AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney TransplantationPhase 4NCT00239083

Efficacy and Safety of Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS) in Renal Transplant Patients

A Phase 4 study testing Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS) in people with Kidney Transplantation, run by Novartis at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of MYFORMS is to assess efficacy and safety on clinical outcomes of EC-MPS in combination with Cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME) in kidney transplant recipients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Transplantation
What is being tested?
Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
Jan 2005to Aug 2006
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

De Novo-Inclusion criteria

  1. Males and females aged 6 years or over.
  2. Recipients of cadaveric, living unrelated or living related kidney transplant, treated with CsA-Me, with or without corticosteroids, as primary immunosuppression.

Maintenance-Inclusion criteria

  1. Males and females aged 6 years or over.
  2. Recipients of first or secondary cadaveric, living related or unrelated donor kidney transplant.
  3. Patients currently receiving CsA-ME with or without Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine, with or without corticosteroids as part of their immunosuppressive regimen for at least 3 months prior to Screening.
  4. Patients in a stable condition in terms of graft function (serum creatinine not above 2.3 mg/dL (=204 µmol/L) at screening and at baseline, or not increased by more than 20% at baseline compared to values obtained at screening), no change of immune suppressive regimen due to graft malfunction, and any known clinically significant physical and/or laboratory changes for at least 2 months prior to enrollment.

De Novo and Maintenance-Exclusion Criteria

  1. Multi-organ recipients (e.g. kidney and pancreas) or previous transplant with any organ other than kidney.
  2. Patients with any known hypersensitivity to MPA, EC-MPS or other components of the formulation (e.g. lactose).
  3. Patients with thrombocytopenia (< 75,000/mm3), with an absolute neutrophil count of < 1,500/mm3, and/or leukocytopenia (< 2,500/mm3), and/or hemoglobin < 6 g/dL at Screening or Baseline.
  4. Patients with a history of malignancy within the last five years, except excised squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Novartis

    Basel

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Phase IV Study of Efficacy and Safety of Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS) in Combination With Cyclosporine Microemulsion (CsA-ME) in Kidney Transplant Patients

The aim of MYFORMS is to assess efficacy and safety on clinical outcomes of EC-MPS in combination with Cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME) in kidney transplant recipients.

Being tested
Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS)
Keywords
MYFORMS, Kidney Transplantation, Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS), Cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME)

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS)Drug

Study groups in NCT00239083
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EC-MPSExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. patient and graft survival

  2. acute rejection incidence

  3. graft function

  4. safety

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. influence of demographic characteristics, transplant-related variables, medical conditions and post-transplantation complications on the main clinical outcomes, according to the immunosuppressive regimen used.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Oct 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2005
  3. Primary completionAug 2006
  4. Study completionAug 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00239083
Sponsor's protocol ID
CERL080ATR01
Status last verified
Feb 2017
First submitted
12 Oct 2005
Last updated
23 Feb 2017
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Nart A, Sipahi S, Aykas A, Uslu A, Hoscoskun C, Toz H. Efficacy and safety of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in de novo and maintenance renal transplant patients. Transplant Proc. 2008 Jan-Feb;40(1):189-92. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.11.066.

    PubMed 18261583

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS) in people with Kidney Transplantation, run by Novartis at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

patient and graft survival. The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00239083, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in