AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatic DiseasePhase 1/2NCT00244153

Intraarticular Opioids Vs Glucocorticosteroids in Gonarthritis

A Phase 1/2 study testing intraarticular morphine and intraarticular dexamethasone in people with Rheumatic Disease, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 1 site in Germany.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Intraarticular application of opioids versus glucocorticosteroids versus placebo in knee arthritis study goals: assessment of effectiveness and tolerability of locally applied morphine, dexamethasone or placebo in knee arthritis Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatic Disease
What is being tested?
intraarticular morphine and intraarticular dexamethasone
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Jun 2004to Aug 2007
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Arthritis according to the American Rheumatism Association or osteoarthritis of the knee
  • age older than 18 years
  • active gonarthritis in the setting of a rheumatic inflammatory disease such as rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathies, undifferentiated oligoarthritis or monarthritis since at least 4 weeks with proof of joint or ostearthritis of the knee effusion in ultrasound
  • visual analogue scale (pain) >30 mm
  • weight between 50 and 90 kg
  • signed informed consent
  • negative urine pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential

Who cannot join

  • pregnancy / lactation
  • severe infection, suspicion for opportunistic infection within the last 2 months (herpes zoster, cytomegaly-, pneumocystis carinii-infection), HIV- infection
  • malignant disease
  • severe cardiac, renal, hematologic, pulmonary, neurologic, gastrointestinal (amongst others gastric or duodenal ulcer) or hepatic (viral hepatitis, toxic liver disease etc) disease, uncontrolled high blood pressure, recurrent thrombosis/ embolism
  • psychiatric disease
  • significant bone marrow dysfunction with impaired hematopoiesis
Show all 11Show fewer
  • one of the following laboratory findings: thrombocytopenia < 100 /nl, Quick < 50%
  • significant pathological findings in physical examination, especially findings indicating an infectious cause for arthritis (septic arthritis) or Lyme arthritis
  • participation in clinical trials within the last 30 days
  • intake of illegal drugs (such as cocaine, heroin...), substance abuse (alcohol, excessive intake of analgetic drugs, benzodiazepines)
  • intake of anticoagulating drugs

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Immanuel Krankenhaus

    Berlin, 14109

    Andreas Krause, Prof., 0049038050 ext. 5293, a.krause@immanuel.de

    Petra Mertens, MD, 0049038050 ext. 5293, p.mertens@immanuel.de

    Recruiting

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Intraarticular Application of Opioids Versus Glucocorticosteroids Versus Placebo in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Intraarticular application of opioids versus glucocorticosteroids versus placebo in knee arthritis

study goals: assessment of effectiveness and tolerability of locally applied morphine, dexamethasone or placebo in knee arthritis

Read the detailed description

Study background

Patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, undifferentiated oligoarthritis, monarthritis) suffer from recurrent pain, functional impairment and impaired capacity. Consequences of such hard to treat diseases are occupational incapacity and early retirement. The treatment options we have today such as nonsteroidal antirheumatic drugs (NSAIDs such as diclofenac), glucocorticosteroids (e.g. dexamethasone) and disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (such as methotrexate) partly are effective but also have serious side effects and complications (e.g. gastric and duodenal ulcers, nephrotoxicity, degeneration of cartilage, cushing´s syndrome…).

A new therapeutic approach without such complications is represented by the intraarticular (i.a.) application of low-concentrated, systemically inactive dosages of an opioid (e.g. morphine). This treatment showed a significant reduction of pain in patients with chronic arthritis in controlled clinical trials without systemic or local side effects [1, 2]. This effect is based on an activation of peripheral opioid receptors, which could be identified on peripheral nerve endings of sensoric neurons [3-5]. The activation of these opioid receptors leads to a decrease of neuronal excitability and the transmission of noziceptive impulses as well as to a reduced release of proinflammatory neurotransmitters (e.g. substance p) [6]. Several studies showed that locally applied opioids act analgetic, that such analgetic effects mainly occur in inflamed tissue, that the analgetic effects increase with the degree of inflammation and that peripherally acting opioids act analgetic [6-9]. In human beings the analgetic effect of peripherally applied opioid agonists has almost only been shown in patients with acute post-surgical pain [4, 10-15]. In a first case report [16] we found indices for the analgetic effect of i.a. given morphine in patients with chronic arthritic pain. In patients with osteoarthritis a double blind cross-over study it was shown that 1mg morphine leads to a long-lasting analgetic effect up to 9 days [1]. In a second controlled trial we compared patients with chronic joint inflammation in different diseases in regards of the analgetic effect of i.a. morphine (3 mg) versus placebo versus a standard therapy with i.a. dexamethasone (4 mg) [2]. Dexamethasone as well as morphine lead to a significant pain reduction under rest and under strain compared to placebo. This analgetic effect lasted up to 6 days after injection. Moreover we found first indications for an anti-inflammatory effect as the number of inflammatory cells in the synovial fluid was reduced after the i.a. morphine application [2].

In addition to the question whether morphine can stimulate local peripheral opioid receptors, it should be investigated, whether intraarticular morphine has an anti-inflammatory local effect in arthritis of the knee in the setting of inflammatory rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathies, undifferentiated oligoarthritis or monarthritis (17, 19, 31). This question should be answered through investigation of cellular infiltration and cytokine expression in the synovial membrane and synovial fluid.

Next to the exogenous application of opioids also endogenous opioid peptides play an important role in inflammatory processes. Experimental and clinical investigations show an expression of opioid peptides in immune cells, which invade into inflamed tissue [3, 4, 6, 20, 21]. Under certain circumstances these opioid peptides are locally released and unfold a strong analgetic effect through the activation of opioid receptors on peripheral sensoric nerve endings [22-24]. Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) can release - similar as in the hypophysis- opioid peptides from immune cells [25-28]. CRF receptors are located in regionally invaded immune cells, and the number is up regulated among inflammatory cells. [29]. Experimental investigations from our or other groups showed a significant analgetic effect of local CRF which was given into the inflamed tissue [24, 26, 30].

In this study we want to test the hypothesis, that i.a. applied CRF leads to a reduction of pain intensity and pain duration in patients with inflammatory knee trauma. Initially this effect is to be tested in acute and then - if successful- in chronic knee pain.

Background for dosage

The intraarticular application of morphine 3mg and dexamethasone 4 mg respectively has turned out from previous studies (2, 15) in patients with inflammatory knee joints of different causes, without evidence of relevant systemic side effects.

Background for patient selection:

Several patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathies, undifferentiated oligoarthritis or monarthritis suffer from symptomatic knee arthritis despite intake of disease modifying drugs (DMARDs) or systemic low dose glucocorticosteroids. To achieve a adequate comparability of the different drugs a patient number of 20 for each group seems to be sufficient. Patients are supposed to have arthritis of the knee and a sufficient pain intensity according to the visual analogue scale for pain > 30 mm. Patients will be seen in the rheumatology department of the Klinikum Benjamin-Franklin, Berlin, Germany as well as in the Immanuel-Krankenhaus, Berlin, Germany examined. Arthroscopies will only take place in the rheumatology department of the Klinikum Benjamin-Franklin, Berlin, Germany.

References:

  1. Likar R, Schäfer M, Paulak F, et al. Intraarticular morphine analgesia in chronic pain patients with osteoarthritis. Anesth Analg 1997;84:1313-7.
  2. Stein A, Yassouridis A, Szopko C, Helmke K, Stein C. Intraarticular morphine versus dexamethasone in chronic arthritis. Pain 1999;83:525-32.
  3. Stein C. The control of pain in peripheral tissue by opioids. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1685-90.
  4. Stein C, Pflüger M, Yassouridis A, et al. No tolerance to peripheral morphine analgesia in presence of opioid expression in inflamed synovia. J Clin Invest 1996;98:793-9.
  5. Mousa SA, Zhang Q, Sitte N, Ji R, Stein C. beta-Endorphin-containing memory-cells and mu-opioid receptors undergo transport to peripheral inflamed tissue. J Neuroimmunol 2001;115:71-8.
  6. Stein C, Machelska H, Schäfer M. Peripheral analgesic and antiinflammatory effects of opioids. Z Rheumatol 2001;60:416-24.
  7. Binder W, Walker JS. Effect of the peripherally selective kappa-opioid agonist, asimadoline, on adjuvant arthritis. Br J Pharmacol 1998;124:647-54.
  8. Wilson JL, Walker JS, Antoon JS, Perry MA. Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression in adjuvant arthritis in rats: inhibition by kappa-opioid agonist but not by NSAID. J Rheumatol 1998;25:499-505.
  9. Binder W, Machelska H, Mousa S, et al. Analgesic and antiinflammatory effects of two novel kappa opioid peptides. Anesthesiology 2001;94:1034-44.
  10. Stein C, Comisel K, Haimerl E, et al. Analgesic effect of intraarticular morphine after arthroscopic knee surgery. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1123-6.
  11. Khoury GF, Chen ACN, Garland DE, Stein C. Intraarticular morphine, bupivacaine and morphine/bupivacaine for pain control after knee videoarthroscopy. Anesthesiology 1992;77:263-6.
  12. Likar R, Kapral S, Steinkellner H, Stein C, Schäfer M. Dose-dependency of intra-articular morphine analgesia. Br J Anaesth 1999;83:241-4.
  13. Schäfer M. Peripheral opioid analgesia: from experimental to clinical studies. Curr Opin Anaesth 1999;12:603-7.
  14. Gupta A, Bodin L, Holmstrom B, Berggren L. A systematic review of the peripheral analgesic effects of intraarticular morphine. Anesth Analg 2001;93:761-70.
  15. Kalso E, Smith L, McQuay HJ, Moore A. No pain, no gain: clinical excellence and scientific rigour - lessons learned from IA morphine. Pain 2002;98: 269-275.
  16. Khoury GF, Garland DE, Stein C. Intraarticular opioid-local anesthetic combinations for chronic joint pain. Middle East J Anesth 1994;12:579-85.
  17. Simon AK, Seipelt E, Sieper J. Divergent T-cell cytokine patterns in inflammatory arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994;91:8562-6.
  18. Yin Z, Siegert S, Neure L, et al. The elevated ratio of interferon gamma-/interleukin-4-positive T cells found in synovial fluid and synovial membrane of rheumatoid arthritis patients can be changed by interleukin-4 but not by interleukin-10 or transforming growth factor beta. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999;38:1058-67.
  19. Rudwaleit M, Yin Z, Siegert S, et al. Response to methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis is associated with a decrease of T cell derived tumour necrosis factor alpha, increase of interleukin 10, and predicted by the initial concentration of interleukin 4. Ann Rheum Dis 2000;59:311-4.
  20. Machelska H, Cabot PJ, Mousa SA, Zhang Q, Stein C. Pain control in inflammation governed by selectins. Nature Med 1998;4:1425-8.
  21. Rittner HL, Brack A, Machelska H, et al. Opioid peptide-expressing leukocytes: identification, recruitment, and simultaneously increasing inhibition of inflammatory pain. Anesthesiology 2001;95:500-8.
  22. Stein C, Hassan AHS, Przewlocki R, Gramsch C, Peter K, Herz A. Opioids from immunocytes interact with receptors on sensory nerves to inhibit nociception in inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:5935-9.
  23. Stein C, Hassan AHS, Lehrberger K, Giefing J, Yassouridis A. Local analgesic effect of endogenous opioid peptides. Lancet 1993;342:321-4.
  24. Schäfer M, Carter L, Stein C. Interleukin-1 and corticotropin-releasing-factor inhibit pain by releasing opioids from immune cells in inflamed tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:4219-23.
  25. Schäfer M, Mousa SA, Zhang Q, Carter L, Stein C. Expression of corticotropin-releasing factor in inflamed tissue is required for intrinsic peripheral opioid analgesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:6096-100.
  26. Lariviere WR, Melzack R. The role of corticotropin-releasing factor in pain and analgesia. Pain 2000;84:1-12.
  27. Cabot PJ, Carter L, Gaiddon C, et al. Immune cell-derived -endorphin: production, release and control of inflammatory pain in rats. J Clin Invest 1997;100:142-8.
  28. Cabot PJ, Carter L, Schäfer M, Stein C. Methionine-enkephalin- and Dynorphin A-release from immune cells and control of inflammatory pain. Pain 2001;93:207-12.
  29. Mousa SA, Schäfer M, Mitchell WM, Hassan AHS, Stein C. Local upregulation of corticotropin- releasing hormone and interleukin-1 receptors in rats with painful hindlimb inflammation. Eur J Pharmacol 1996;311:221-31.
  30. Schäfer M, Mousa SA, Stein C. Corticotropin-releasing factor in antinociception and inflammation. Eur J Pharmacol 1997;323:1-10.
  31. Leirisalo-Repo M. Prognosis, course of disease, and treatment of the spondyloarthropathies. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1998 Nov;24(4):737-51
Being tested
intraarticular morphine, intraarticular dexamethasone
Keywords
intraarticular morphine, steroids, arthroscopy
Medical subject headings
Rheumatic Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • intraarticular morphineDrug

  • intraarticular dexamethasoneDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. primary endpoints: improvement on the visual analogue scale (VAS) of minimally 20mm on a scale from 0- 100mm

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. secondary end points: improvement of the numeric rating scale, quality of sleep, global daily activity, WOMAC, improvement of joint mobility according to the Lysholm and Gillquist scores and improvement of pain on a four digit scale.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Oct 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2004
  3. Study completionAug 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
120 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00244153
Sponsor's protocol ID
Mor01
Status last verified
Feb 2004
First submitted
25 Oct 2005
Last updated
11 Sep 2006
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing intraarticular morphine and intraarticular dexamethasone in people with Rheumatic Disease, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Joachim Sieper, Prof. (0049 30 8445 ext. 4414, joachim.sieper@charite.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

primary endpoints: improvement on the visual analogue scale (VAS) of minimally 20mm on a scale from 0- 100mm. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2006.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in