Atrial FibrillationPhase 4NCT00247780
Cavotricuspid Isthmusblock and Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
A Phase 4 study testing Pulmonary vein isolation and cavotricuspid ishtmusblock in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in the left atrium using radiofrequency energy is a new and promising non-medical treatment in patients with symptomatic AF with reported success rates of 65 % to 90 % depending on AF classification and ablation procedure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- Pulmonary vein isolation and cavotricuspid ishtmusblock
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 149 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Nov 2004to Oct 2007
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Documented symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation where medical treatment has proven inefficient or related to sideeffects.
Who cannot join
- Prior cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (for atrial flutter) Significant valvular heart disease Congestive heart failure (NYHA class 3-4) Contraindications to antithrombic treatment with Warfarin
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
Department of Cardiology, Skejby University Hospital
Aarhus, Aarhus, 8200
About this study
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in the left atrium using radiofrequency energy is a new and promising non-medical treatment in patients with symptomatic AF with reported success rates of 65 % to 90 % depending on AF classification and ablation procedure. However, the risk of recurrence has led to suggestions of how to improve the clinical outcome by tailoring a more efficient ablation procedure. A prospective, randomised study with 150 patients with symptomatic AF referred for PVI has been initiated and patients are allocated to PVI alone (75 patients) or PVI with additional ablation in the right atrium (75 patients). Patients undergo extensive monitoring of the heart rhythm during follow-up to document symptomatic or asymptomatic AF or atrial flutter. The presence of asymptomatic AF after PVI could potentially affect the management of the anticoagulation therapy in these patients. The structural and functional changes in the atria after PVI is characterized by new imaging techniques (Tissue Doppler Imaging(TDI))of the atria and cardiac neurohormones. TDI may be an effective tool for characterising changes in the left atrial function after PVI. Neurohormones may provide new information regarding the changes in left atrial function and clinical outcome after PVI in patients with AF.
We hypothesize that:
- Among patients with predominant atrial fibrillation, PVI with additional ablation in the right atrium is associated with better outcome, i.e. freedom of symptomatic AF/atrial flutter overall.
- Asymptomatic AF and atrial flutter occur frequently after PVI.
- Left atrial volume and systolic function correlates to AF recurrence after PVI.
- Neurohormones levels correlates to AF recurrence after PVI.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Medical treatment is often inefficient or associated with side effects. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in the left atrium using radiofrequency energy is a new and promising non-medical treatment in patients with symptomatic AF with reported success rates of 65 % to 90 % depending on AF classification and ablation procedure (1).
Circumferential PVI appears to be the superior ablation technique in patients with AF (2). However, the risk of recurrence has led to suggestions of how to improve the clinical outcome by tailoring a more efficient ablation procedure. Patients with AF often have coexisting atrial flutter (3), but it is uncertain if patients referred for PVI can benefit from additional cavotricuspid isthmusblock (CTI) which is the traditional ablation treatment of atrial flutter. A recent study indicates that PVI reduces both AF and atrial flutter by eliminating sharing triggers in the pulmonary veins (4). Other investigators showed that patients with AF and atrial flutter prior or during PVI had high risk of recurrent atrial flutter during follow-up, and that successful PVI did not reduce the risk of recurrent atrial flutter (3). The current approach in our lab is to perform additional CTI in cases of documented atrial flutter, but CTI may potentially improve the overall outcome (freedom of symptomatic arrhythmia) in patients without documented atrial flutter, especially since most symptomatic periods are undocumented.
A prospective, randomised study with 150 patients with symptomatic AF referred for PVI has been initiated and patients are allocated to PVI alone (75 patients) or PVI with additional CTI (75 patients). Patients undergo extensive Holter monitoring during follow-up to document symptomatic or asymptomatic AF or atrial flutter. Patients with AF have a high incidence of asymptomatic AF which correlates to an increased risk of tromboembolic complications (5). The presence of aymptomatic AF after PVI could potentially affect the management of the anticoagulation therapy in these patients.
The structural and functional changes in the atria after PVI have been described in few studies. To our knowledge, Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) and neurohormones (NT-pro-BNP and ANP) have not previously been used in characterising the left atrial function after PVI. New echocardiographic modalities such as TDI have been introduced in the characterisation of the left ventricle systolic function in ischemic heart disease and congestive heart failure. TDI has been used for characterising the global and segmental atrial systolic function in healthy individuals (6), and TDI may be an effective tool for characterising changes in the left atrial function after PVI.
Neurohormones are produced in the left ventricle/atrium, and patients with AF have elevated levels due to atrial stretch. Cardioversion from AF to sinus rhythm is associated with normalisation of the BNP/ANP levels (7), and BNP is an independent risk factor of developing AF in patients with mild congestive heart failure (8). Neurohormones may therefore provide new information regarding the changes in left atrial function and clinical outcome after PVI in patients with AF.
PURPOSE:
- To investigate the effect of additional cavotricuspid isthmusblock in patients with AF referred for circumferential pulmonary vein isolation.
- To investigate the incidence of asymptomatic AF and atrial flutter after ablation by extensive Holter monitoring.
- To characterise left atrial volume and function before and after PVI by echocardiographic assessment (TDI) and measurements of neurohormones (NT-pro-BNP and ANP).
HYPOTHESIS:
- Among patients with predominant AF, PVI with additional cavotricuspidal isthmusblock is associated with better outcome, i.e. freedom of symptomatic AF/atrial flutter overall.
- Asymptomatic AF and atrial flutter occur frequently after PVI.
- Left atrial volume and systolic function correlates to AF recurrence after PVI.
- ANP/NT-pro-BNP levels correlates to AF recurrence after PVI.
DESIGN AND MATERIALS:
A prospective, randomised study with 150 patients referred to PVI due to symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF. Patients are randomised to circumferential PVI with (75 patients) or without (75 patients) cavotricuspid isthmusblock in the right atrium. Follow up period of 12 months.
Eighty of the included patients (40 with paroxysmal and 40 with persistent AF) undergo TDI-echocardiography and neurohormonal measurements.
METHOD:
Admission:
- History, physical examination, medication.
- Echocardiographic characterisation of left atrial function and volume and left ventricle systolic and diastolic function (TDI in 80 patients).
- NT-pro-BNP/ANP measurements (in 80 patients).
- Questionnaire (SF-36).
- Circumferential PVI. Patients are randomised to PVI with or without cavotricuspid isthmusblock.
Ablation:
One quadripolar 5-F catheter (St. Jude Medical) is placed in the right ventricular apex and a decapolar catheter (Biosense Webster) in the coronary sinus. Transseptal access to the left atrium is achieved by the use of a SL1 sheath (St. Jude Medical). Three-dimensional maps of the left atrium are constructed with a quadripolar D-curve mapping catheter (3.5-mm Navistar, Biosense Webster) with the use of a non-fluoroscopic navigation system (CARTO, Biosense-Webster). Patients are heparinized using an initial dose of 100 IE/kg with an additional 1000 IE/hour. Radiofrequency energy is delivered via the 4-mm mapping catheter. Ablation lines are deployed circumferentially around the pulmonary veins (PV) approximately 0.5 cm from the ostia. After ablation, remapping is performed during sinus rhythm or pacing from the coronary sinus. In case of AF during ablation, patients are cardioverted to sinus rhythm before remapping. The criteria of successful ablation is the elimination of potentials > 0.1 mV within the lesions determined by voltage maps.
Ultimately, the cavotricuspid ishtmusblock is performed with the ablation catheter. The position of the catheter is established using fluoroscopy or CARTO-mapping. Ishtmusblock is verified by double potentials during coronary sinus (CS) pacing, an activation detour by pacing either side of the line, and differential pacing techniques.
Follow-up:
- 24 hours heart rhythm monitoring.
- Clinical control after 3,6 and 12 months
- 1 week Holter monitoring after 3, 6 and 12 months
- NT-pro-BNP/ANP measurements after 3 and 12 months
- Echocardiography after 3 and 12 months 2D Echocardiography M-mode of the left ventricle and atrium in parasternal view Left atrium enddiastolic and endsystolic volume using Simpson biplane in apical 4 and 2-chamber view Left ventricle enddiastolic and endsystolic volume using Simpson biplane in apical 4 and 2-chamber view Color M-mode Transmitral flow (Pulsed Wave Doppler) E- og A-peak velocity, E/A ratio og E-decelerationtime Atrial emptying fraction = A velocity time integral (VTI)/total velocity time integral (VTI)
Tissue Doppler echocardiography (TDI) Segmental atrial velocity and amplitude of right and left atrium Framerate over 100 fps
Five points in the apical 4-chamber projection:
- 2 in the right atrium (lateral annular and superior)
- 3 in the left atrium (septal annular, superior and lateral annular) Three points in the apical 2 chamber view in the left atrium (posterior annular, superior and annular anterior)
STATISTICS:
The sample size is calculated on the basis of the following assumptions:
A type 1 error and type 2 error of 5 % and 20 %, respectively, are accepted. The statistical power is 80%. Thirty-five percent of patients with AF had coexisting atrial flutter in a population who were referred to PVI (3). Patients undergoing CTI due to atrial flutter have 10 % risk of recurrence. During follow-up, 90 % versus 70 % (without CTI) of the patients are expected to be free of symptoms related to atrial flutter. Based on these parameters, the sample size is 72 patients included in each group. Overall, 150 patients are included due to expected loss of patients during follow-up.
In 2003, ninety-five patients were treated with PVI in Skejby Hospital which has increased to 150 patients in 2004. The production is expected to increase further during the following years.
PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The PhD protocol has been approved by The Faculty of Health Science at the University of Aarhus and the Local Committee of Ethics in Aarhus. The study was initiated in December 2004 and at he moment 8 patients have been included. The Institute of Clinical Experimental Research at the University Hospital of Aarhus has donated 6 months salary to Dr. Jacob Pontoppidan.
The inclusion period is 12 months. Patients are followed 12 months. Finally, 12 months are expected for dataprocessing and publications. At least 3 publications in international peer-reviewed journals are expected.
The measurements of neurohormones are performed by the Department of Clinical Biochemistry and the biochemical laboratory at the Department of Nephrology, Skejby Hospital. The echocardiographic analyses including TDI are performed by Dr. Pontoppidan, who is experienced in this technique. The electrophysiologists in the Department of Cardiology, Skejby University Hospital of Aarhus, perform the ablation procedures as described above.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Being tested
- Pulmonary vein isolation and cavotricuspid ishtmusblock
- Keywords
- Atrial fibrillation, Pulmonary vein isolation, Tissue Doppler echocardiography
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pulmonary vein isolation and cavotricuspid ishtmusblockProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Symptomatic AF or atrial flutter documented by ECG or Holter monitoring from the 3rd month* after the ablation (Definition: AF > 1 minute, atrial flutter > 1 minute of typical isthmusdependent flutter).
Secondary outcomes (6)
Asymptomatic AF or atrial flutter documented by ECG or Holter
Macro-reentrant left atrial flutter
Left atrial dimension
Segmental tissue velocities ad amplitude in the left and right atria
Plasma ANP/NT-pro-BNP
Quality of life-score
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2004
- Primary completionOct 2007
- Study completionOct 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AarhusThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 149 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Aarhus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Danish Heart Foundation, H. Lundbeck A/S
- Investigators
- Peter Steen Hansen, MD, DMSc, Principal investigatorJens Cosedis Nielsen, MD, PhD, Principal investigatorSteen Hvitfeldt Poulsen, MD, DMSc, Principal investigator, Unaffilliated
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00247780
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- JAP-PV-01
- Status last verified
- Feb 2008
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 2005
- Last updated
- 18 Feb 2008
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Feb 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cavotricuspid Isthmusblock and Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00247780
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- JAP-PV-01
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Keywords
- Atrial fibrillation, Pulmonary vein isolation, Tissue Doppler echocardiography
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 149 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AarhusUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Danish Heart Foundation, H. Lundbeck A/S
- Study start
- Nov 2004
- Primary completion
- Oct 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in the left atrium using radiofrequency energy is a new and promising non-medical treatment in patients with symptomatic AF with reported success rates of 65 % to 90 % depending on AF classification and ablation procedure. However, the risk of recurrence has led to suggestions of how to improve the clinical outcome by tailoring a more efficient ablation procedure. A prospective, randomised study with 150 patients with symptomatic AF referred for PVI has been initiated and patients are allocated to PVI alone (75 patients) or PVI with additional ablation in the right atrium (75 patients). Patients undergo extensive monitoring of the heart rhythm during follow-up to document symptomatic or asymptomatic AF or atrial flutter. The presence of asymptomatic AF after PVI could potentially affect the management of the anticoagulation therapy in these patients. The structural and functional changes in the atria after PVI is characterized by new imaging techniques (Tissue Doppler Imaging(TDI))of the atria and cardiac neurohormones. TDI may be an effective tool for characterising changes in the left atrial function after PVI. Neurohormones may provide new information regarding the changes in left atrial function and clinical outcome after PVI in patients with AF.
We hypothesize that:
- Among patients with predominant atrial fibrillation, PVI with additional ablation in the right atrium is associated with better outcome, i.e. freedom of symptomatic AF/atrial flutter overall.
- Asymptomatic AF and atrial flutter occur frequently after PVI.
- Left atrial volume and systolic function correlates to AF recurrence after PVI.
- Neurohormones levels correlates to AF recurrence after PVI.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Medical treatment is often inefficient or associated with side effects. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in the left atrium using radiofrequency energy is a new and promising non-medical treatment in patients with symptomatic AF with reported success rates of 65 % to 90 % depending on AF classification and ablation procedure (1).
Circumferential PVI appears to be the superior ablation technique in patients with AF (2). However, the risk of recurrence has led to suggestions of how to improve the clinical outcome by tailoring a more efficient ablation procedure. Patients with AF often have coexisting atrial flutter (3), but it is uncertain if patients referred for PVI can benefit from additional cavotricuspid isthmusblock (CTI) which is the traditional ablation treatment of atrial flutter. A recent study indicates that PVI reduces both AF and atrial flutter by eliminating sharing triggers in the pulmonary veins (4). Other investigators showed that patients with AF and atrial flutter prior or during PVI had high risk of recurrent atrial flutter during follow-up, and that successful PVI did not reduce the risk of recurrent atrial flutter (3). The current approach in our lab is to perform additional CTI in cases of documented atrial flutter, but CTI may potentially improve the overall outcome (freedom of symptomatic arrhythmia) in patients without documented atrial flutter, especially since most symptomatic periods are undocumented.
A prospective, randomised study with 150 patients with symptomatic AF referred for PVI has been initiated and patients are allocated to PVI alone (75 patients) or PVI with additional CTI (75 patients). Patients undergo extensive Holter monitoring during follow-up to document symptomatic or asymptomatic AF or atrial flutter. Patients with AF have a high incidence of asymptomatic AF which correlates to an increased risk of tromboembolic complications (5). The presence of aymptomatic AF after PVI could potentially affect the management of the anticoagulation therapy in these patients.
The structural and functional changes in the atria after PVI have been described in few studies. To our knowledge, Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) and neurohormones (NT-pro-BNP and ANP) have not previously been used in characterising the left atrial function after PVI. New echocardiographic modalities such as TDI have been introduced in the characterisation of the left ventricle systolic function in ischemic heart disease and congestive heart failure. TDI has been used for characterising the global and segmental atrial systolic function in healthy individuals (6), and TDI may be an effective tool for characterising changes in the left atrial function after PVI.
Neurohormones are produced in the left ventricle/atrium, and patients with AF have elevated levels due to atrial stretch. Cardioversion from AF to sinus rhythm is associated with normalisation of the BNP/ANP levels (7), and BNP is an independent risk factor of developing AF in patients with mild congestive heart failure (8). Neurohormones may therefore provide new information regarding the changes in left atrial function and clinical outcome after PVI in patients with AF.
PURPOSE:
- To investigate the effect of additional cavotricuspid isthmusblock in patients with AF referred for circumferential pulmonary vein isolation.
- To investigate the incidence of asymptomatic AF and atrial flutter after ablation by extensive Holter monitoring.
- To characterise left atrial volume and function before and after PVI by echocardiographic assessment (TDI) and measurements of neurohormones (NT-pro-BNP and ANP).
HYPOTHESIS:
- Among patients with predominant AF, PVI with additional cavotricuspidal isthmusblock is associated with better outcome, i.e. freedom of symptomatic AF/atrial flutter overall.
- Asymptomatic AF and atrial flutter occur frequently after PVI.
- Left atrial volume and systolic function correlates to AF recurrence after PVI.
- ANP/NT-pro-BNP levels correlates to AF recurrence after PVI.
DESIGN AND MATERIALS:
A prospective, randomised study with 150 patients referred to PVI due to symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF. Patients are randomised to circumferential PVI with (75 patients) or without (75 patients) cavotricuspid isthmusblock in the right atrium. Follow up period of 12 months.
Eighty of the included patients (40 with paroxysmal and 40 with persistent AF) undergo TDI-echocardiography and neurohormonal measurements.
METHOD:
Admission:
- History, physical examination, medication.
- Echocardiographic characterisation of left atrial function and volume and left ventricle systolic and diastolic function (TDI in 80 patients).
- NT-pro-BNP/ANP measurements (in 80 patients).
- Questionnaire (SF-36).
- Circumferential PVI. Patients are randomised to PVI with or without cavotricuspid isthmusblock.
Ablation:
One quadripolar 5-F catheter (St. Jude Medical) is placed in the right ventricular apex and a decapolar catheter (Biosense Webster) in the coronary sinus. Transseptal access to the left atrium is achieved by the use of a SL1 sheath (St. Jude Medical). Three-dimensional maps of the left atrium are constructed with a quadripolar D-curve mapping catheter (3.5-mm Navistar, Biosense Webster) with the use of a non-fluoroscopic navigation system (CARTO, Biosense-Webster). Patients are heparinized using an initial dose of 100 IE/kg with an additional 1000 IE/hour. Radiofrequency energy is delivered via the 4-mm mapping catheter. Ablation lines are deployed circumferentially around the pulmonary veins (PV) approximately 0.5 cm from the ostia. After ablation, remapping is performed during sinus rhythm or pacing from the coronary sinus. In case of AF during ablation, patients are cardioverted to sinus rhythm before remapping. The criteria of successful ablation is the elimination of potentials > 0.1 mV within the lesions determined by voltage maps.
Ultimately, the cavotricuspid ishtmusblock is performed with the ablation catheter. The position of the catheter is established using fluoroscopy or CARTO-mapping. Ishtmusblock is verified by double potentials during coronary sinus (CS) pacing, an activation detour by pacing either side of the line, and differential pacing techniques.
Follow-up:
- 24 hours heart rhythm monitoring.
- Clinical control after 3,6 and 12 months
- 1 week Holter monitoring after 3, 6 and 12 months
- NT-pro-BNP/ANP measurements after 3 and 12 months
- Echocardiography after 3 and 12 months 2D Echocardiography M-mode of the left ventricle and atrium in parasternal view Left atrium enddiastolic and endsystolic volume using Simpson biplane in apical 4 and 2-chamber view Left ventricle enddiastolic and endsystolic volume using Simpson biplane in apical 4 and 2-chamber view Color M-mode Transmitral flow (Pulsed Wave Doppler) E- og A-peak velocity, E/A ratio og E-decelerationtime Atrial emptying fraction = A velocity time integral (VTI)/total velocity time integral (VTI)
Tissue Doppler echocardiography (TDI) Segmental atrial velocity and amplitude of right and left atrium Framerate over 100 fps
Five points in the apical 4-chamber projection:
- 2 in the right atrium (lateral annular and superior)
- 3 in the left atrium (septal annular, superior and lateral annular) Three points in the apical 2 chamber view in the left atrium (posterior annular, superior and annular anterior)
STATISTICS:
The sample size is calculated on the basis of the following assumptions:
A type 1 error and type 2 error of 5 % and 20 %, respectively, are accepted. The statistical power is 80%. Thirty-five percent of patients with AF had coexisting atrial flutter in a population who were referred to PVI (3). Patients undergoing CTI due to atrial flutter have 10 % risk of recurrence. During follow-up, 90 % versus 70 % (without CTI) of the patients are expected to be free of symptoms related to atrial flutter. Based on these parameters, the sample size is 72 patients included in each group. Overall, 150 patients are included due to expected loss of patients during follow-up.
In 2003, ninety-five patients were treated with PVI in Skejby Hospital which has increased to 150 patients in 2004. The production is expected to increase further during the following years.
PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The PhD protocol has been approved by The Faculty of Health Science at the University of Aarhus and the Local Committee of Ethics in Aarhus. The study was initiated in December 2004 and at he moment 8 patients have been included. The Institute of Clinical Experimental Research at the University Hospital of Aarhus has donated 6 months salary to Dr. Jacob Pontoppidan.
The inclusion period is 12 months. Patients are followed 12 months. Finally, 12 months are expected for dataprocessing and publications. At least 3 publications in international peer-reviewed journals are expected.
The measurements of neurohormones are performed by the Department of Clinical Biochemistry and the biochemical laboratory at the Department of Nephrology, Skejby Hospital. The echocardiographic analyses including TDI are performed by Dr. Pontoppidan, who is experienced in this technique. The electrophysiologists in the Department of Cardiology, Skejby University Hospital of Aarhus, perform the ablation procedures as described above.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Documented symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation where medical treatment has proven inefficient or related to sideeffects.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Prior cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (for atrial flutter) Significant valvular heart disease Congestive heart failure (NYHA class 3-4) Contraindications to antithrombic treatment with Warfarin
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary vein isolation and cavotricuspid ishtmusblock | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Symptomatic AF or atrial flutter documented by ECG or Holter monitoring from the 3rd month* after the ablation (Definition: AF > 1 minute, atrial flutter > 1 minute of typical isthmusdependent flutter).
6 secondary outcomes
Asymptomatic AF or atrial flutter documented by ECG or Holter
Macro-reentrant left atrial flutter
Left atrial dimension
Segmental tissue velocities ad amplitude in the left and right atria
Plasma ANP/NT-pro-BNP
Quality of life-score
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Feb 2008.
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
Horizon 360 Protocol for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With the Sphere-360™ Catheter and Affera™ Mapping and Ablation System (Horizon 360)
Paroxysmal AF
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Pulsed Field Ablation-Asia
Concomitant Procedures, Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
CONVERGE Post-Approval Study (PAS)
Chronic Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
Early Closure of Left Atrial Appendage for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke Despite Anticoagulation Therapy
Ischemic Stroke, Atrial Fibrillation
RecruitingPhase 2
Safety in Adult Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Treated With Anticoagulation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Peter Steen Hansen, MD, DMSc principal investigator
Jens Cosedis Nielsen, MD, PhD principal investigator
Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen, MD, DMSc principal investigator
Unaffilliated
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Pulmonary vein isolation and cavotricuspid ishtmusblock in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Symptomatic AF or atrial flutter documented by ECG or Holter monitoring from the 3rd month* after the ablation (Definition: AF > 1 minute, atrial flutter > 1 minute of typical isthmusdependent flutter).. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2008.