DiabetesNCT00251875
Shared Online Health Records for Patient Safety and Care
A study testing online health information journal in people with Diabetes, run by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) at 10 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The study uses a randomized, prospective cohort design to assess the impact of shared online health records on 1) patient safety, 2) health goal adherence and outcomes, 3) documentation of family history, and 4) barriers to the adoption of patient-physician communication technology. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- online health information journal
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 5,400 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2005to Sep 2007
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients, who are enrolled in Patient Gateway, of physicians and practices participating in the study.
Who cannot join
- Any patients who are not enrolled in Patient Gateway or do not belong to a participating practice.
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 1 country.
Alexandra Businger contact
10 sites in 1 country
United States10 sites, 10 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Beacon Hill/Downtown Primary Care
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Richard Winickoff, MD
- Recruiting
Bulfinch Medical Group
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Charles Weiss, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Massachusetts General Hospital Women's Health Associates
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Karen Carlson, MD
- Recruiting
Charlestown Health Center
Charlestown, Massachusetts, 02129
Michael Garrity, MD
- Recruiting
Brigham & Women's Hospital Women's Health Center
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, 02467
Lori Farnan, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Brigham & Women's Physicians Group
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, 02467
Jonathan Appelbaum, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Brigham Primary Physicians at Faulkner
Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, 02130
Michael Healey, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Southern Jamaica Plain Health Center
Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, 02130
Michael Lambert, MD
- Recruiting
Brigham & Women's Hospital at Norwood
Norwood, Massachusetts, 02062
Louise Schneider, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Revere Health Center
Revere, Massachusetts, 02151
Eric Weil, MD
About this study
The study uses a randomized, prospective cohort design to assess the impact of shared online health records on 1) patient safety, 2) health goal adherence and outcomes, 3) documentation of family history, and 4) barriers to the adoption of patient-physician communication technology.
Hypothesis: the respective interventions will result in 1) improved patient safety 2) greater adherence to health care maintenance and chronic disease guidelines 3) more accurate documentation of family history 4) the identification of technology adoption enablers and barriers.
Read the detailed description
During the first phase of the study, primary care practice patients continue to receive "usual care" while their physician's offices are using Patient Gateway, an Internet portal offering secure messaging, common requests, chart information, and health information that has already been developed. Also in this first phase, all patients using Patient Gateway will receive an electronic letter explaining the research study and a link to an electronic consent form. In addition to recruitment of subjects, phase 1 allows for baseline data to be collected.
In the second phase, study clinics will be randomized into one of two intervention "arms". Study subjects whose clinics are randomized into Arm 1 will be invited to review and comment on their medication, allergy, and diabetes information through Patient Gateway; they can then submit this information to their primary care physician for review. Those randomized into Arm 2 will report on their health maintenance status and family history and submit this information to their primary care physician through Patient Gateway prior to a scheduled visit. Chart reviews performed at the end of Phase 1 and Phase 2 will be conducted to identify differences in process measures and outcome measures between intervention and control groups.
In addition, a medication phone survey sub-study will be conducted to evaluate the effect of the new Patient Gateway features on medication management.
- Conditions
- Diabetes
- Being tested
- online health information journal
- Keywords
- patient portals, electronic health records, family history, health maintenance, medications, diabetes
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
online health information journalDevice
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
1. ADEs
2. duration of ameliorable medication side effects
3. health goal adherence rates
4. diabetes outcomes
5. familial risk factor documentation rates
6. user satisfaction surveys
7. user metrics
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2005
- Study completionSep 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5,400 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Investigators
- Blackford Middleton, MD, MPH, MSc, Principal investigator, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Partners HealthCare System, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00251875
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R01HS013326
- Status last verified
- Nov 2005
- First submitted
- 9 Nov 2005
- Last updated
- 11 Nov 2005
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Schnipper JL, Gandhi TK, Wald JS, Grant RW, Poon EG, Volk LA, Businger A, Williams DH, Siteman E, Buckel L, Middleton B. Effects of an online personal health record on medication accuracy and safety: a cluster-randomized trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):728-34. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000723. Epub 2012 May 3.
PubMed 22556186Wright A, Poon EG, Wald J, Schnipper JL, Grant R, Gandhi TK, Volk LA, Bloom A, Williams DH, Gardner K, Epstein M, Nelson L, Businger A, Li Q, Bates DW, Middleton B. Effectiveness of health maintenance reminders provided directly to patients. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 6:1183.
PubMed 18999087Grant RW, Wald JS, Schnipper JL, Gandhi TK, Poon EG, Orav EJ, Williams DH, Volk LA, Middleton B. Practice-linked online personal health records for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 8;168(16):1776-82. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.16.1776.
PubMed 18779465
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Nov 2005. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Shared Online Health Records for Patient Safety and Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00251875
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R01HS013326
- Conditions
- Diabetes
- Keywords
- patient portals, electronic health records, family history, health maintenance, medications, diabetes
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 5,400 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)US federal agency
- Study start
- Jul 2005
- Study completion
- Sep 2007
- First posted
- 11 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study uses a randomized, prospective cohort design to assess the impact of shared online health records on 1) patient safety, 2) health goal adherence and outcomes, 3) documentation of family history, and 4) barriers to the adoption of patient-physician communication technology.
Hypothesis: the respective interventions will result in 1) improved patient safety 2) greater adherence to health care maintenance and chronic disease guidelines 3) more accurate documentation of family history 4) the identification of technology adoption enablers and barriers.
Detailed description
During the first phase of the study, primary care practice patients continue to receive "usual care" while their physician's offices are using Patient Gateway, an Internet portal offering secure messaging, common requests, chart information, and health information that has already been developed. Also in this first phase, all patients using Patient Gateway will receive an electronic letter explaining the research study and a link to an electronic consent form. In addition to recruitment of subjects, phase 1 allows for baseline data to be collected.
In the second phase, study clinics will be randomized into one of two intervention "arms". Study subjects whose clinics are randomized into Arm 1 will be invited to review and comment on their medication, allergy, and diabetes information through Patient Gateway; they can then submit this information to their primary care physician for review. Those randomized into Arm 2 will report on their health maintenance status and family history and submit this information to their primary care physician through Patient Gateway prior to a scheduled visit. Chart reviews performed at the end of Phase 1 and Phase 2 will be conducted to identify differences in process measures and outcome measures between intervention and control groups.
In addition, a medication phone survey sub-study will be conducted to evaluate the effect of the new Patient Gateway features on medication management.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients, who are enrolled in Patient Gateway, of physicians and practices participating in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Any patients who are not enrolled in Patient Gateway or do not belong to a participating practice.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| online health information journal | Device | – |
Primary outcome
1. ADEs
2. duration of ameliorable medication side effects
3. health goal adherence rates
4. diabetes outcomes
5. familial risk factor documentation rates
6. user satisfaction surveys
7. user metrics
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Nov 2005.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22556186Schnipper JL, Gandhi TK, Wald JS, Grant RW, Poon EG, Volk LA, Businger A, Williams DH, Siteman E, Buckel L, Middleton B. Effects of an online personal health record on medication accuracy and safety: a cluster-randomized trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):728-34. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000723. Epub 2012 May 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 18999087Wright A, Poon EG, Wald J, Schnipper JL, Grant R, Gandhi TK, Volk LA, Bloom A, Williams DH, Gardner K, Epstein M, Nelson L, Businger A, Li Q, Bates DW, Middleton B. Effectiveness of health maintenance reminders provided directly to patients. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 6:1183.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 18779465Grant RW, Wald JS, Schnipper JL, Gandhi TK, Poon EG, Orav EJ, Williams DH, Volk LA, Middleton B. Practice-linked online personal health records for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 8;168(16):1776-82. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.16.1776.
Related trials for Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alexandra Businger contact
Blackford Middleton, MD, MPH, MSc principal investigator
Brigham & Women's Hospital, Partners HealthCare System, Inc.
10 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing online health information journal in people with Diabetes, run by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) at 10 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Nov 2005. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Alexandra Businger (abusinger@partners.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
1. ADEs. The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00251875, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Nov 2005.