High-Risk Surgical PatientsPhase 2NCT00254150
A Therapy to Reduce Morbidity and Hospital Length of Stay of High-Risk Surgical Patients
A Phase 2 study testing Increase oxygen extraction rate in people with High-Risk Surgical Patients, run by Università Politecnica delle Marche at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Postoperative organ failures commonly occur after major abdominal surgery and substantially increase the utilization of resources and the costs of care, and are favored by tissue hypoxia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- High-Risk Surgical Patients
- What is being tested?
- Increase oxygen extraction rate
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 130 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- May 1995to Dec 1996
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- high risk surgical patients requiring major abdomina surgery
Who cannot join
- age below 16 years, preexistent neurologic, or malignant haematologic diseases
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
Azienda Ospedaliera Umberto I - U.O. Anestesia e Rianimazione Clinica
Ancona, Ancona, 60020
About this study
Official title: Goal-Directed Intraoperative Therapy Reduces Morbidity and Length of Hospital Stay in High Risk Surgical Patients
Postoperative organ failures commonly occur after major abdominal surgery and substantially increase the utilization of resources and the costs of care, and are favored by tissue hypoxia. A therapeutic strategy designed to detect and reverse tissue hypoxia, as diagnosed by an increase of oxygen extraction over a pre-defined threshold could decrease the incidence of organ failures.
Read the detailed description
The development of postoperative organ failures severely affects the prognosis of surgical patients, and substantially increases the utilization of resources and the costs of care. The presence of tissue hypoxia is particularly common and likely results from an impairment of the adaptive mechanisms of myocardial function, leading to an inappropriately low cardiac output and from the effects of inflammatory mediators. Importantly, tissue hypoxia can be detected early. Indeed, hypoxic tissues will compensate the hypoperfusion by increasing oxygen extraction (O2ER) over a threshold value, a change that will also be reflected by a decreased venous oxygen saturation, and if uncompensated by lactic acidosis. Hence, the use of oxygen extraction calculated from arterial and central venous oxygen saturation as a therapeutic goal is appropriate to monitor goal-directed hemodynamic strategies, as it reflects the balance between oxygen delivery and consumption. In place of O2ER or its surrogate, mixed venous oxygen saturation, the use of oxygen-derived values measured in central blood drawn from the routinely placed central line, in place of pulmonary artery catheter, may represent a valuable alternative. Indeed, recent evidence suggests that a multifaceted goal-directed strategy, including fluid challenge, blood transfusion and inotropes titrated to keep central venous oxygen saturation higher than a predetermined threshold of 70% was associated with decreased mortality and rate of organ failures when applied from the early phase of septic shock or severe sepsis. The aim of the present multicentre prospective randomized study was to compare the outcomes of patients randomized to a conventional management or to a therapeutic strategy guided by O2ER estimate (O2ERe) calculated from the arterial oxygen saturation and the central venous saturation ScvO2. Specifically, we hypothesized that the use of a goal-directed protocol aimed at maintaining the O2ERe below a previously defined "critical" (able to discriminate survivors from non-survivors) value of 26.7% during surgical interventions in high-risk patients will reduce the rate of postoperative organ failures, hospital length of stay and mortality, as compared with the standard management based on the monitoring of mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure and urine output.
High Risk surgical patients scheduled for elective abdominal extensive surgery were eligible. After enrollment, the patients were randomized to one of the two groups of treatment (A or B) by a phone system on a 24-hour-a-day, 7-day-a-week basis. Randomization was based on a permuted-block algorithm, allowing stratification for each center. The exclusion criteria from the study were : age below 16 years, preexistent neurologic, or malignant haematologic diseases.
In preparation for surgery, the patients were equipped with central and peripheral venous and arterial catheters. Standard monitoring included continuous recording of electrocardiography; body temperature, heart rate, pulse oxymetry and arterial blood pressure. Central venous pressure, ScvO2 , arterial blood gases, lactate concentration, body temperature, and urine output were recorded hourly. Hemoglobin concentration was measured when deemed necessary by the anesthesiologist. For the purpose of the study, blood gases measured on arterial and central venous samples, arterial lactate and O2ERe (SaO2-ScvO2/SaO2 [SaO2 : arterial oxygen saturation, ScvO2 : central venous saturation]) were recorded after induction of anesthesia (T0), hourly after cutaneous incision (T1a-f), throughout surgery, during the first 6 hours of the postoperative period (T2a-f) and on postoperative day 1.
In both groups, the patients were managed to achieve predefined standard goals, i.e. a meen arterial pressure (MAP) >80 mmHg and an urine output > 0.5ml/kg/h. The patients of the "protocol group" (Group A) were managed to keep O2ER below 26.7%, following algorithms detailed in figure 1. In brief, a fluid challenge (colloids 250-1000 ml infused over 30 min to restore central venous pressure to at least 10 mmHg), dobutamine (incremental doses of 3 µg/kg/min up to 15 µg/kg/min) and/or packed red cells (in cases of hemoglobin below 10 g/dl or intraoperative hemorrhage > 1000 ml) could be administered. There was no specific requirement regarding the type of anesthesia in any of the groups.
- Conditions
- High-Risk Surgical Patients
- Being tested
- Increase oxygen extraction rate
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Increase oxygen extraction rateProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
reduction of patients with postoperative organ failure
Secondary outcomes (1)
reduction of length of hospital stay
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Study startMay 1995
- Study completionDec 1996
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for High-Risk Surgical PatientsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 130 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Università Politecnica delle Marche
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Paolo Pietropaoli, MD, Study director, Università La Sapienza, Roma - Istituto di Anestesia e Rianimazione
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00254150
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- O2ER GDT
- Status last verified
- Apr 1995
- First submitted
- 14 Nov 2005
- Last updated
- 15 Nov 2005
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Donati A, Loggi S, Preiser JC, Orsetti G, Munch C, Gabbanelli V, Pelaia P, Pietropaoli P. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy reduces morbidity and length of hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients. Chest. 2007 Dec;132(6):1817-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0621. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
PubMed 17925428
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Nov 2005. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Goal-Directed Intraoperative Therapy Reduces Morbidity and Length of Hospital Stay in High Risk Surgical Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00254150
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- O2ER GDT
- Conditions
- High-Risk Surgical Patients
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 130 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Università Politecnica delle MarcheUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 1995
- Study completion
- Dec 1996
- First posted
- 15 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Postoperative organ failures commonly occur after major abdominal surgery and substantially increase the utilization of resources and the costs of care, and are favored by tissue hypoxia. A therapeutic strategy designed to detect and reverse tissue hypoxia, as diagnosed by an increase of oxygen extraction over a pre-defined threshold could decrease the incidence of organ failures.
Detailed description
The development of postoperative organ failures severely affects the prognosis of surgical patients, and substantially increases the utilization of resources and the costs of care. The presence of tissue hypoxia is particularly common and likely results from an impairment of the adaptive mechanisms of myocardial function, leading to an inappropriately low cardiac output and from the effects of inflammatory mediators. Importantly, tissue hypoxia can be detected early. Indeed, hypoxic tissues will compensate the hypoperfusion by increasing oxygen extraction (O2ER) over a threshold value, a change that will also be reflected by a decreased venous oxygen saturation, and if uncompensated by lactic acidosis. Hence, the use of oxygen extraction calculated from arterial and central venous oxygen saturation as a therapeutic goal is appropriate to monitor goal-directed hemodynamic strategies, as it reflects the balance between oxygen delivery and consumption. In place of O2ER or its surrogate, mixed venous oxygen saturation, the use of oxygen-derived values measured in central blood drawn from the routinely placed central line, in place of pulmonary artery catheter, may represent a valuable alternative. Indeed, recent evidence suggests that a multifaceted goal-directed strategy, including fluid challenge, blood transfusion and inotropes titrated to keep central venous oxygen saturation higher than a predetermined threshold of 70% was associated with decreased mortality and rate of organ failures when applied from the early phase of septic shock or severe sepsis. The aim of the present multicentre prospective randomized study was to compare the outcomes of patients randomized to a conventional management or to a therapeutic strategy guided by O2ER estimate (O2ERe) calculated from the arterial oxygen saturation and the central venous saturation ScvO2. Specifically, we hypothesized that the use of a goal-directed protocol aimed at maintaining the O2ERe below a previously defined "critical" (able to discriminate survivors from non-survivors) value of 26.7% during surgical interventions in high-risk patients will reduce the rate of postoperative organ failures, hospital length of stay and mortality, as compared with the standard management based on the monitoring of mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure and urine output.
High Risk surgical patients scheduled for elective abdominal extensive surgery were eligible. After enrollment, the patients were randomized to one of the two groups of treatment (A or B) by a phone system on a 24-hour-a-day, 7-day-a-week basis. Randomization was based on a permuted-block algorithm, allowing stratification for each center. The exclusion criteria from the study were : age below 16 years, preexistent neurologic, or malignant haematologic diseases.
In preparation for surgery, the patients were equipped with central and peripheral venous and arterial catheters. Standard monitoring included continuous recording of electrocardiography; body temperature, heart rate, pulse oxymetry and arterial blood pressure. Central venous pressure, ScvO2 , arterial blood gases, lactate concentration, body temperature, and urine output were recorded hourly. Hemoglobin concentration was measured when deemed necessary by the anesthesiologist. For the purpose of the study, blood gases measured on arterial and central venous samples, arterial lactate and O2ERe (SaO2-ScvO2/SaO2 [SaO2 : arterial oxygen saturation, ScvO2 : central venous saturation]) were recorded after induction of anesthesia (T0), hourly after cutaneous incision (T1a-f), throughout surgery, during the first 6 hours of the postoperative period (T2a-f) and on postoperative day 1.
In both groups, the patients were managed to achieve predefined standard goals, i.e. a meen arterial pressure (MAP) >80 mmHg and an urine output > 0.5ml/kg/h. The patients of the "protocol group" (Group A) were managed to keep O2ER below 26.7%, following algorithms detailed in figure 1. In brief, a fluid challenge (colloids 250-1000 ml infused over 30 min to restore central venous pressure to at least 10 mmHg), dobutamine (incremental doses of 3 µg/kg/min up to 15 µg/kg/min) and/or packed red cells (in cases of hemoglobin below 10 g/dl or intraoperative hemorrhage > 1000 ml) could be administered. There was no specific requirement regarding the type of anesthesia in any of the groups.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- high risk surgical patients requiring major abdomina surgery
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- age below 16 years, preexistent neurologic, or malignant haematologic diseases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Increase oxygen extraction rate | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
reduction of patients with postoperative organ failure
1 secondary outcome
reduction of length of hospital stay
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Nov 2005.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 17925428Donati A, Loggi S, Preiser JC, Orsetti G, Munch C, Gabbanelli V, Pelaia P, Pietropaoli P. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy reduces morbidity and length of hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients. Chest. 2007 Dec;132(6):1817-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0621. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
Related trials for High-Risk Surgical Patients
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Pucotenlimab, Lenvatinib, and SBRT Before Surgery for Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn How Well a Combination of Darolutamide and Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) Works as a Treatment Before Surgery for Men Who Have High-risk Localized Prostate Cancer.
High-risk Localized Prostate Cancer
Not yet recruiting
High-Flow Nasal Oxygen-Assisted Deep Extubation Versus Awake Extubation in Morbidly Obese Patients
Deep Tracheal Extubation
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Addition of MEDI4736 (Durvalumab) to Chemotherapy Before Surgery for Patients With High-Grade Upper Urinary Tract Cancer
Renal Pelvis and Ureter Urothelial Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
High-precision Radiosurgery Followed by Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach in Patients With High-prominence Uveal Melanoma: Modern Radiation Techniques and Outcomes
Uveal Melanoma, High-risk Uveal Melanoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Paolo Pietropaoli, MD study director
Università La Sapienza, Roma - Istituto di Anestesia e Rianimazione
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Increase oxygen extraction rate in people with High-Risk Surgical Patients, run by Università Politecnica delle Marche at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2005. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
reduction of patients with postoperative organ failure. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00254150, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2005.