Coronary Artery DiseaseNCT00256581
Imaging Studies With GE C-Hawk Gamma Camera Compared to Routine Clinical Exam
An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease and Chest Pain, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Comparison study of myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging with current clinical use camera and new camera. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Pain
- What is being tested?
- Additional rest and stress image sets on new camera
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2005to Jun 2007
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adults undergoing SPECT Myocardial perfusion imaging
Who may be able to join
- Referral for cardiac stress testing with SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging
Who cannot join
- refusal to provide written informed consent or lack capacity to provide informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Comparison study of myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging with current clinical use camera and new camera.
Read the detailed description
Comparison study of myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging with current clinical use camera and new camera.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Pain
- Being tested
- Additional rest and stress image sets on new camera
- Keywords
- myocardial perfusion, Imaging
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Additional rest and stress image sets on new cameraProcedure or surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2005
- Primary completionJun 2007
- Study completionJun 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, Madison
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- General Electric
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Charles Hellman, MD, Principal investigator, University of Wisconsin, Madison
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00256581
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2005-0273
- Status last verified
- Aug 2012
- First submitted
- 16 Nov 2005
- Last updated
- 29 Aug 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Aug 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Imaging Studies With GE C-Hawk Gamma Camera Compared to Routine Clinical Exam
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00256581
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2005-0273
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Pain
- Keywords
- myocardial perfusion, Imaging
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, MadisonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- General Electric
- Study start
- Nov 2005
- Primary completion
- Jun 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Comparison study of myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging with current clinical use camera and new camera.
Detailed description
Comparison study of myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging with current clinical use camera and new camera.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adults undergoing SPECT Myocardial perfusion imaging
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Referral for cardiac stress testing with SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- refusal to provide written informed consent or lack capacity to provide informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Additional rest and stress image sets on new camera | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Aug 2012.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Recruiting
Reducing Slow/No-Reflow With Prophylactic High-Dose Intracoronary Adenosine Protocol in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction The REFLOW AMI Trial
ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
Active, not recruiting
Insulin Resistance and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Myocardial Ischemia and Non-obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction, Coronary Microvascular Disease
Not yet recruiting
TRADENT Scoring Balloon Versus Non-scoring Balloon for Lesion Preparation in DCB-Based Coronary Intervention
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prognostic Value of Functional-Nutritional Status in Older Adults With Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)
RecruitingPhase 4
Early Initiation of Tafolecimab for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromeundergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Chinese Population
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Non ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Charles Hellman, MD principal investigator
University of Wisconsin, Madison
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease and Chest Pain, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Aug 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Aug 2012.