Acute Myocardial InfarctionPhase 4TRIANANCT00257309
Thrombolysis Versus Primary Angioplasty for AMI in Elderly Patients
A Phase 4 study testing Tenecteplase + UFH (+ clopidogrel, since 01/97) and Primary angioplasty in people with Acute Myocardial Infarction, run by Spanish Society of Cardiology at 23 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
General objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of primary angioplasty(PA) with that of thrombolytic therapy (TT) for the treatment of AMI in patients >=75 years old with ST-segment elevation or LBBB AMI <6 hours of evolution without contraindications for TT. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 75 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myocardial Infarction
- What is being tested?
- Tenecteplase + UFH (+ clopidogrel, since 01/97) and Primary angioplasty
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 266 participants
- Where
- 23 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- Apr 2005to Dec 2008
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 75 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects of 75 or more years of age
- Diagnosis of AMI: chest pain or any symptom of myocardial ischemia of, at least, 20 minutes of duration, not responding to nitrate therapy, an evolution period of less than 6 hours after symptom onset until randomization process, and, at least, one of the following alterations:
- ST-elevation >=2 mm in 2 or more precordial leads
- ST-elevation >=1 mm in 2 or more anterior leads
- Complete de novo (or probably de novo) left bundle branch block (LBBB)
- Subject should be able to give informed consent prior to randomization process and should agree to fulfill all procedures described in the protocol, including follow-up after hospital discharge. A written consent signed by a close relative with witness is also acceptable.
Who cannot join
- Documented contraindication to the use of fibrinolytics. 1.1. Internal active bleeding or known history of hemorrhagic diathesis 1.2. History of previous CVA of any kind or at any time 1.3. Intracranial tumor, arteriovenous malformation, aneurysm or cerebral aneurysm repair 1.4. Major surgery, parenchymal biopsy, ocular surgery or severe traumatism in the 6 weeks prior to randomization 1.5. Unexplained puncture in a non-compressible vascular location in the last 24 hours prior to randomization 1.6. Confirmed arterial hypertension with a reliable measurement of systolic AP >180 mmHg or diastolic AP >110 mmHg 1.7. Known thrombocytopenia < 100.000 platelets/mL 1.8. Prolonged (>20 minutes) or traumatic cardiopulmonar resuscitation (CPR) in the 2 weeks prior to randomization 1.9. History or signs suggesting aortic dissection
- Cardiogenic shock
- Estimated door-to-needle time >120 minutes
- Administration of fibrinolysis in the 14 days prior to randomization
- Administration of any glycoprotein IIa/IIIb inhibitor in the 24 hours prior to randomization
- Administration of any Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) in the 8 hours prior to randomization
Show all 13Show fewer
- Actual oral anticoagulant treatment
- Suspected AMI secondary to occlusion of one lesion treated previously with a percutaneous coronary intervention (within the previous 30 days for angioplasty or conventional stent and within the previous 12 months for coated stents)
- Dementia or acute confusional state at the time of randomization
- Subject incapacity or unwillingness to give informed consent -at least, verbally
- Known renal failure (basal creatinine> 2,5 mg/dl)
- Reduced life expectancy (<12 months) due to advanced or terminal concomitant condition
- Subject participation in another clinical trial (assessing a drug or a device) in the 30 days prior to randomization
Trial locations and contacts
23 sites in 1 country.
23 sites in 1 country
Spain23 sites
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario "Juan Canalejo"
A Coruña, La Coruña, 15006
Hospital de Cruces
Barakaldo, Vizcaya, 48903
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, Barcelona, 08025
Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona
Barcelona, Barcelona, 08036
Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
Granada, Granada, 18012
Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez
Huelva, Huelva, 21005
Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Complejo Hospitalario de León
León, León, 24010
Hospital General Universitario "Gregorio Maranon"
Madrid, Madrid, 28007
Hospital Clínico "San Carlos"
Madrid, Madrid, 28040
Hospital 12 de Octubre
Madrid, Madrid, 28041
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, Madrid, 28046
Hospital Universitario "Virgen de la Victoria"
Málaga, Málaga, 29010
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, 33006
Hospital Universitario Son Dureta
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07003
Hospital de Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, 38320
Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
Santander, Cantabria, 39008
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago
Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, 15706
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
Seville, Sevilla, 41009
Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo Hospital Virgen de la Salud
Toledo, Toledo, 45004
Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, Valencia, 46014
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
Valladolid, Valladolid, 47005
About this study
Official title: TRIANA: A Randomized Trial to Compare the Efficay and Safety of Thrombolysis With Primary Angioplasty as Initial Reperfusion Therapy in Older Patients (>= 75 Years Old) With Acute Myocardial Infarction
General objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of primary angioplasty(PA) with that of thrombolytic therapy (TT) for the treatment of AMI in patients >=75 years old with ST-segment elevation or LBBB AMI <6 hours of evolution without contraindications for TT.
Hypothesis: The therapeutical strategy based on PA is superior to that based initially on TT in patients >=75 years old with AMI.
Read more
Participating Centers: 27 Spanish hospitals performing >50 PA/year. Primary Endpoint (PE): Incidence of the aggregate of death of any cause, reinfarction or disabling stroke at 30 days. There are also 7 secondary endpoints (SE).
Procedure: Diagnosis of inclusion/exclusion criteria --> Centralized randomization --> Treatment allocation to 1) TT with weight adjusted TNK + unfractionated heparin or 2) PA within 120 minutes. Estimated Sample size and recruitment time: 570 patients in 19 months. Follow-up: Blinded evaluation of events (PROBE regulations) specified in PE and SE at 30 days and 12 months. Quality control: 100% variable and follow-up review by external CRO. Safety Committee and Event Adjudication Committee formed by experts not participating in the study.
Read the detailed description
Hypothesis of the study. In patients of 75 or more years of age with AMI and ST-elevation or LBBB, the treatment strategy based on primary angioplasty is superior to the treatment strategy based on initial fibrinolytic therapy for reducing the incidence of death, re-infarction and disabling CVA at 30 days. This benefit is maintained at 12 months.
Objectives General objective of the study. To compare the efficacy and safety of primary angioplasty and fibrinolytic treatment in >=75 year-old patients with AMI eligible for fibrinolytic therapy in Spanish medical centers with an active program of primary angioplasty.
Primary end point: Incidence of the combined end point of all-cause death, re-infartion or disabling stroke at 30 days
Secondary end points:
- All-cause death at 30 days
- Incidence of the combined end point of all-cause death, disabling CVA or de novo heart failure at 30 days
- Incidence of recurrent ischemia requiring emergency catheterization in the first 30 days
- Cause of death at 30 days classified in three groups:
- Shock or heart (pump) failure
- Mechanical complications (ruptures) or electromechanical dissociation
- Other causes (including bleeding)
- Incidence of major bleeding during hospital admission
- All-cause mortality at 12 months
- Period of time elapsed until presentation of any of the composite of all-cause death, reinfarction or disabling CVA at 12 months
- Period of time elapsed until the presentation of any composite of all-cause death, reinfarction, disabling CVA or non-elective hospital readmission for cardiac causes (unstable angina, heart failure, non-elective coronary revascularization at 12 months.
TYPE AND DESIGN OF THE CLINICAL TRIAL Clinical trial status Phase IV trial Description of randomization process The treatment strategy will be determined by a centralized randomization process, using a telephone system. Eligible patients will be randomized to one of two (2) treatment arms: fibrinolytic treatment or primary angioplasty.
Control and design This is a randomized multicenter, open blind clinical trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of primary angioplasty vs. thrombolytic treatment in >=75 year-old patients with AMI and ST-elevation or de novo LBBB, eligible for thrombolysis, admitted at Spanish medical centers that have an active primary angioplasty program, within the first 6 hours after symptom onset.
Masking techniques Being an open trial there are not masking techniques, nor will there be an emergency opening procedure of emergency codes.
Pre-inclusion / clearance period Not applicable
SUBJECT SELECTION Inclusion / exclusion criteria Subjects must be >=75 years of age with AMI and ST-elevation or de novo LBBB, eligible for thrombolytic therapy, admitted in any Spanish medical center in which there is an active primary angioplasty program within the first 6 hours after symptom onset.
Each patient must fulfill all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria.
Inclusion criteria:
- Subjects of 75 or more years of age
- Diagnosis of AMI: chest pain or any symptom of myocardial ischemia of, at least, 20 minutes of duration, not responding to nitrate therapy, an evolution period of less than 6 hours after symptom onset until randomization process, and, at least, one of the following alterations:
- ST-elevation >=2 mm in 2 or more precordial leads
- ST-elevation >=1 mm in 2 or more anterior leads
- Complete de novo (or probably de novo) left bundle branch block (LBBB)
- Subject should be able to give informed consent prior to randomization process and should agree to fulfill all procedures described in the protocol, including follow-up after hospital discharge. A written consent signed by a close relative with witness is also acceptable.
Exclusion criteria:
- Documented contraindication to the use of fibrinolytics. 1.1. Internal active bleeding or known history of hemorrhagic diathesis 1.2. History of previous CVA of any kind or at any time 1.3. Intracranial tumor, arteriovenous malformation, aneurysm or cerebral aneurysm repair 1.4. Major surgery, parenchymal biopsy, ocular surgery or severe traumatism in the 6 weeks prior to randomization 1.5. Unexplained puncture in a non-compressible vascular location in the last 24 hours prior to randomization 1.6. Confirmed arterial hypertension with a reliable measurement of systolic AP >180 mmHg or diastolic AP >110 mmHg 1.7. Known thrombocytopenia < 100.000 platelets/mL 1.8. Prolonged (>20 minutes) or traumatic cardiopulmonar resuscitation (CPR) in the 2 weeks prior to randomization 1.9. History or signs suggesting aortic dissection
- Cardiogenic shock
- Estimated door-to-needle time >120 minutes
- Administration of fibrinolysis in the 14 days prior to randomization
- Administration of any glycoprotein IIa/IIIb inhibitor in the 24 hours prior to randomization
- Administration of any Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) in the 8 hours prior to randomization
- Actual oral anticoagulant treatment
- Suspected AMI secondary to occlusion of one lesion treated previously with a percutaneous coronary intervention (within the previous 30 days for angioplasty or conventional stent and within the previous 12 months for coated stents)
- Dementia or acute confusional state at the time of randomization
- Subject incapacity or unwillingness to give informed consent -at least, verbally
- Known renal failure (basal creatinine> 2,5 mg/dl)
- Reduced life expectancy (<12 months) due to advanced or terminal concomitant condition
- Subject participation in another clinical trial (assessing a drug or a device) in the 30 days prior to randomization
Diagnostic criteria for the pathologies of the study
Patients with a diagnosis of AMI presenting with:
- Chest pain or any symptom of myocardial ischemia of, at least, 20 minutes of duration, not responding to nitrate therapy and an evolution period of less than 6 hours after symptom onset until randomization process, with, at least, one of the following alterations:
- ST-elevation >=2 mm in 2 or more precordial leads
- ST-elevation >=1 mm in 2 or more anterior leads
- Complete de novo (or probably de novo) left bundle branch block (LBBB)
Estimate of sample size For the following conditions: α = 0.05 (2 tailed), power: 80% (β = 0.20) and assuming a composite event incidence rate (death, reinfarction and disabling CVA) based on previous registries (21.7% in the fibrinolysis group and 12.8% in the PA group), a sample size of 282 patients per group is needed to demonstrate that difference (8.9% in absolute terms and 40% in relative terms). Assuming a loss to follow-up rate of 1%, the total number is 570 patients
Estimated loss of patients prior to randomization During a period of 3 months all patients meeting inclusion criteria who, for any reason, are not enrolled in the study will be included in a registry with an abbreviated CRF recording inclusion/exclusion criteria, the reason for non-enrollment and follow-up at 30 days and 12 months.
- Conditions
- Acute Myocardial Infarction
- Being tested
- Tenecteplase + UFH (+ clopidogrel, since 01/97), Primary angioplasty
- Keywords
- Acute myocardial infarction, Elderly, Thrombolysis, Primary angioplasty, Randomized trial, Efficacy, Safety
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tenecteplase + UFH (+ clopidogrel, since 01/97)Drug
Primary angioplastyProcedure or surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Thrombolysis | Active comparator | Weight adjusted tenecteplase bolus + Unfrationated heparin Receives: Drug: Tenecteplase + UFH (+ clopidogrel, since 01/97) |
| Primary angioplasty | Active comparator | Primary angioplasty Receives: Procedure: Primary angioplasty |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of Death or Reinfarction or Disabling Stroke
Incidence of all-cause death or myocardial reinfarction or disabling stroke
Measured: 30 days
Death/Reinfarction/Disabling Stroke at 30 Days
Incidence of Death or Reinfarction or Disabling Stroke at 30 days
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2005
- Primary completionFeb 2008
- Study completionDec 2008
Why it stopped: Slow recruitment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Myocardial InfarctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 266 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Spanish Society of Cardiology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria, Sanofi, Cordis US Corp., Medtronic, Guidant Corporation, Boston Scientific Corporation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Héctor Bueno, Spanish Society of Cardiology
- Investigators
- Hector Bueno, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Spanish Society of Cardiology (WG on Ischemic Heart Disease and CCUs)Rosa Ana Hernández-Antolín, MD, Principal investigator, Spanish Society of Cardiology (WG on Interventional Cardiology)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00257309
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EUDRACT 2004-001943-31
- Other IDs
- FIS PI042122
- Acronym
- TRIANA
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 18 Nov 2005
- Last updated
- 19 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Bardaji A, Bueno H, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Cequier A, Auge JM, Heras M. [Type of treatment and short-term outcome in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals with a primary coronary angioplasty facility. The TRIANA (TRatamiento del Infarto Agudo de miocardio eN Ancianos) Registry]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2005 Apr;58(4):351-8. Spanish.
PubMed 15847731Cequier A, Bueno H, Auge JM, Bardaji A, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Heras M. [Characteristics and mortality following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction in Spain. Results from the TRIANA 1 (TRatamiento del Infarto Agudo de miocardio eN Ancianos) Registry]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2005 Apr;58(4):341-50. Spanish.
PubMed 15847730Bueno H, Betriu A, Heras M, Alonso JJ, Cequier A, Garcia EJ, Lopez-Sendon JL, Macaya C, Hernandez-Antolin R; TRIANA Investigators. Primary angioplasty vs. fibrinolysis in very old patients with acute myocardial infarction: TRIANA (TRatamiento del Infarto Agudo de miocardio eN Ancianos) randomized trial and pooled analysis with previous studies. Eur Heart J. 2011 Jan;32(1):51-60. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq375. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
PubMed 20971744
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- TRIANA: A Randomized Trial to Compare the Efficay and Safety of Thrombolysis With Primary Angioplasty as Initial Reperfusion Therapy in Older Patients (>= 75 Years Old) With Acute Myocardial Infarction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00257309
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TRIANA / EUDRACT 2004-001943-31
- Conditions
- Acute Myocardial Infarction
- Keywords
- Acute myocardial infarction, Elderly, Thrombolysis, Primary angioplasty, Randomized trial, Efficacy, Safety
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Slow recruitment
- Enrolment
- 266 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Spanish Society of CardiologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria, Sanofi, Cordis US Corp., Medtronic, Guidant Corporation, Boston Scientific Corporation
- Study start
- Apr 2005
- Primary completion
- Feb 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Nov 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Jan 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
General objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of primary angioplasty(PA) with that of thrombolytic therapy (TT) for the treatment of AMI in patients >=75 years old with ST-segment elevation or LBBB AMI <6 hours of evolution without contraindications for TT.
Hypothesis: The therapeutical strategy based on PA is superior to that based initially on TT in patients >=75 years old with AMI.
Participating Centers: 27 Spanish hospitals performing >50 PA/year. Primary Endpoint (PE): Incidence of the aggregate of death of any cause, reinfarction or disabling stroke at 30 days. There are also 7 secondary endpoints (SE).
Procedure: Diagnosis of inclusion/exclusion criteria --> Centralized randomization --> Treatment allocation to 1) TT with weight adjusted TNK + unfractionated heparin or 2) PA within 120 minutes. Estimated Sample size and recruitment time: 570 patients in 19 months. Follow-up: Blinded evaluation of events (PROBE regulations) specified in PE and SE at 30 days and 12 months. Quality control: 100% variable and follow-up review by external CRO. Safety Committee and Event Adjudication Committee formed by experts not participating in the study.
Detailed description
Hypothesis of the study. In patients of 75 or more years of age with AMI and ST-elevation or LBBB, the treatment strategy based on primary angioplasty is superior to the treatment strategy based on initial fibrinolytic therapy for reducing the incidence of death, re-infarction and disabling CVA at 30 days. This benefit is maintained at 12 months.
Objectives General objective of the study. To compare the efficacy and safety of primary angioplasty and fibrinolytic treatment in >=75 year-old patients with AMI eligible for fibrinolytic therapy in Spanish medical centers with an active program of primary angioplasty.
Primary end point: Incidence of the combined end point of all-cause death, re-infartion or disabling stroke at 30 days
Secondary end points:
- All-cause death at 30 days
- Incidence of the combined end point of all-cause death, disabling CVA or de novo heart failure at 30 days
- Incidence of recurrent ischemia requiring emergency catheterization in the first 30 days
- Cause of death at 30 days classified in three groups:
- Shock or heart (pump) failure
- Mechanical complications (ruptures) or electromechanical dissociation
- Other causes (including bleeding)
- Incidence of major bleeding during hospital admission
- All-cause mortality at 12 months
- Period of time elapsed until presentation of any of the composite of all-cause death, reinfarction or disabling CVA at 12 months
- Period of time elapsed until the presentation of any composite of all-cause death, reinfarction, disabling CVA or non-elective hospital readmission for cardiac causes (unstable angina, heart failure, non-elective coronary revascularization at 12 months.
TYPE AND DESIGN OF THE CLINICAL TRIAL Clinical trial status Phase IV trial Description of randomization process The treatment strategy will be determined by a centralized randomization process, using a telephone system. Eligible patients will be randomized to one of two (2) treatment arms: fibrinolytic treatment or primary angioplasty.
Control and design This is a randomized multicenter, open blind clinical trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of primary angioplasty vs. thrombolytic treatment in >=75 year-old patients with AMI and ST-elevation or de novo LBBB, eligible for thrombolysis, admitted at Spanish medical centers that have an active primary angioplasty program, within the first 6 hours after symptom onset.
Masking techniques Being an open trial there are not masking techniques, nor will there be an emergency opening procedure of emergency codes.
Pre-inclusion / clearance period Not applicable
SUBJECT SELECTION Inclusion / exclusion criteria Subjects must be >=75 years of age with AMI and ST-elevation or de novo LBBB, eligible for thrombolytic therapy, admitted in any Spanish medical center in which there is an active primary angioplasty program within the first 6 hours after symptom onset.
Each patient must fulfill all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria.
Inclusion criteria:
- Subjects of 75 or more years of age
- Diagnosis of AMI: chest pain or any symptom of myocardial ischemia of, at least, 20 minutes of duration, not responding to nitrate therapy, an evolution period of less than 6 hours after symptom onset until randomization process, and, at least, one of the following alterations:
- ST-elevation >=2 mm in 2 or more precordial leads
- ST-elevation >=1 mm in 2 or more anterior leads
- Complete de novo (or probably de novo) left bundle branch block (LBBB)
- Subject should be able to give informed consent prior to randomization process and should agree to fulfill all procedures described in the protocol, including follow-up after hospital discharge. A written consent signed by a close relative with witness is also acceptable.
Exclusion criteria:
- Documented contraindication to the use of fibrinolytics. 1.1. Internal active bleeding or known history of hemorrhagic diathesis 1.2. History of previous CVA of any kind or at any time 1.3. Intracranial tumor, arteriovenous malformation, aneurysm or cerebral aneurysm repair 1.4. Major surgery, parenchymal biopsy, ocular surgery or severe traumatism in the 6 weeks prior to randomization 1.5. Unexplained puncture in a non-compressible vascular location in the last 24 hours prior to randomization 1.6. Confirmed arterial hypertension with a reliable measurement of systolic AP >180 mmHg or diastolic AP >110 mmHg 1.7. Known thrombocytopenia < 100.000 platelets/mL 1.8. Prolonged (>20 minutes) or traumatic cardiopulmonar resuscitation (CPR) in the 2 weeks prior to randomization 1.9. History or signs suggesting aortic dissection
- Cardiogenic shock
- Estimated door-to-needle time >120 minutes
- Administration of fibrinolysis in the 14 days prior to randomization
- Administration of any glycoprotein IIa/IIIb inhibitor in the 24 hours prior to randomization
- Administration of any Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) in the 8 hours prior to randomization
- Actual oral anticoagulant treatment
- Suspected AMI secondary to occlusion of one lesion treated previously with a percutaneous coronary intervention (within the previous 30 days for angioplasty or conventional stent and within the previous 12 months for coated stents)
- Dementia or acute confusional state at the time of randomization
- Subject incapacity or unwillingness to give informed consent -at least, verbally
- Known renal failure (basal creatinine> 2,5 mg/dl)
- Reduced life expectancy (<12 months) due to advanced or terminal concomitant condition
- Subject participation in another clinical trial (assessing a drug or a device) in the 30 days prior to randomization
Diagnostic criteria for the pathologies of the study
Patients with a diagnosis of AMI presenting with:
- Chest pain or any symptom of myocardial ischemia of, at least, 20 minutes of duration, not responding to nitrate therapy and an evolution period of less than 6 hours after symptom onset until randomization process, with, at least, one of the following alterations:
- ST-elevation >=2 mm in 2 or more precordial leads
- ST-elevation >=1 mm in 2 or more anterior leads
- Complete de novo (or probably de novo) left bundle branch block (LBBB)
Estimate of sample size For the following conditions: α = 0.05 (2 tailed), power: 80% (β = 0.20) and assuming a composite event incidence rate (death, reinfarction and disabling CVA) based on previous registries (21.7% in the fibrinolysis group and 12.8% in the PA group), a sample size of 282 patients per group is needed to demonstrate that difference (8.9% in absolute terms and 40% in relative terms). Assuming a loss to follow-up rate of 1%, the total number is 570 patients
Estimated loss of patients prior to randomization During a period of 3 months all patients meeting inclusion criteria who, for any reason, are not enrolled in the study will be included in a registry with an abbreviated CRF recording inclusion/exclusion criteria, the reason for non-enrollment and follow-up at 30 days and 12 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Thrombolysis | Active comparator | Drug: Tenecteplase + UFH (+ clopidogrel, since 01/97)Weight adjusted tenecteplase bolus + Unfrationated heparin |
| Primary angioplasty | Active comparator | Procedure: Primary angioplastyPrimary angioplasty |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 75 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Subjects of 75 or more years of age
- Diagnosis of AMI: chest pain or any symptom of myocardial ischemia of, at least, 20 minutes of duration, not responding to nitrate therapy, an evolution period of less than 6 hours after symptom onset until randomization process, and, at least, one of the following alterations:
- Subject should be able to give informed consent prior to randomization process and should agree to fulfill all procedures described in the protocol, including follow-up after hospital discharge. A written consent signed by a close relative with witness is also acceptable.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Documented contraindication to the use of fibrinolytics. 1.1. Internal active bleeding or known history of hemorrhagic diathesis 1.2. History of previous CVA of any kind or at any time 1.3. Intracranial tumor, arteriovenous malformation, aneurysm or cerebral aneurysm repair 1.4. Major surgery, parenchymal biopsy, ocular surgery or severe traumatism in the 6 weeks prior to randomization 1.5. Unexplained puncture in a non-compressible vascular location in the last 24 hours prior to randomization 1.6. Confirmed arterial hypertension with a reliable measurement of systolic AP >180 mmHg or diastolic AP >110 mmHg 1.7. Known thrombocytopenia < 100.000 platelets/mL 1.8. Prolonged (>20 minutes) or traumatic cardiopulmonar resuscitation (CPR) in the 2 weeks prior to randomization 1.9. History or signs suggesting aortic dissection
- Cardiogenic shock
- Estimated door-to-needle time >120 minutes
- Administration of fibrinolysis in the 14 days prior to randomization
- Administration of any glycoprotein IIa/IIIb inhibitor in the 24 hours prior to randomization
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tenecteplase + UFH (+ clopidogrel, since 01/97) | Drug | Thrombolysis |
| Primary angioplasty | Procedure or surgery | Primary angioplasty |
Primary outcome
Incidence of Death or Reinfarction or Disabling Stroke
Time frame: 30 days
Incidence of all-cause death or myocardial reinfarction or disabling stroke
Death/Reinfarction/Disabling Stroke at 30 Days
Time frame: 30 days
Incidence of Death or Reinfarction or Disabling Stroke at 30 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jan 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 15847731Bardaji A, Bueno H, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Cequier A, Auge JM, Heras M. [Type of treatment and short-term outcome in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals with a primary coronary angioplasty facility. The TRIANA (TRatamiento del Infarto Agudo de miocardio eN Ancianos) Registry]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2005 Apr;58(4):351-8. Spanish.
- Background: PubMed 15847730Cequier A, Bueno H, Auge JM, Bardaji A, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Heras M. [Characteristics and mortality following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction in Spain. Results from the TRIANA 1 (TRatamiento del Infarto Agudo de miocardio eN Ancianos) Registry]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2005 Apr;58(4):341-50. Spanish.
- Results publication: PubMed 20971744Bueno H, Betriu A, Heras M, Alonso JJ, Cequier A, Garcia EJ, Lopez-Sendon JL, Macaya C, Hernandez-Antolin R; TRIANA Investigators. Primary angioplasty vs. fibrinolysis in very old patients with acute myocardial infarction: TRIANA (TRatamiento del Infarto Agudo de miocardio eN Ancianos) randomized trial and pooled analysis with previous studies. Eur Heart J. 2011 Jan;32(1):51-60. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq375. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
Related trials for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Elicit Drugs in Myocardial Infarction
Young Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Recruiting
CT Stress Myocardial Perfusion, Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiography in Patients With Stable Chest Pain Syndromes
Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
Early Single Antiplatelet Therapy After IVUS-Guided PCI in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes, STEMI
Recruiting
Heart@Home Safety and Efficacy of Hospital-at-Home Care Versus Standard Hospitalization in Cardiac Patients
Myocardial Infarction, Myocarditis Acute
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Selatogrel Outcome Study in Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction
Acute Myocardial Infarction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hector Bueno, MD, PhD principal investigator
Spanish Society of Cardiology (WG on Ischemic Heart Disease and CCUs)
Rosa Ana Hernández-Antolín, MD principal investigator
Spanish Society of Cardiology (WG on Interventional Cardiology)
23 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Tenecteplase + UFH (+ clopidogrel, since 01/97) and Primary angioplasty in people with Acute Myocardial Infarction, run by Spanish Society of Cardiology at 23 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 23 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Jan 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of Death or Reinfarction or Disabling Stroke (time frame: 30 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00257309, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jan 2017.