AzTrials
AzTrials

PertussisNCT00258882

Descriptive, Post-marketing, Passive Surveillance Safety Study of ADACEL™ Vaccine

An observational study of Pertussis, run by Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi Company at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To further characterize the vaccine safety profile and to identify any signals of potentially vaccine-related adverse events (AEs) not detected during pre-licensure studies. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pertussis
What is being tested?
Tetanus Toxoid, acellular pertussis, diphtheria toxoid
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
327,293 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2006to Dec 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Passive surveillance by review of Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program (KPMCP) computerized records and state mortality tapes

Who may be able to join

  • Receipt of ADACEL vaccine during the study period

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Study site

    Aurora, Colorado

  • Study site

    Oakland, California

  • Study site

    Portland, Oregon

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Post-licensure Safety Surveillance Study of Routine Use of Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Adsorbed (Adacel®)

To further characterize the vaccine safety profile and to identify any signals of potentially vaccine-related adverse events (AEs) not detected during pre-licensure studies.

Read the detailed description

Surveillance using a healthcare organization with large comprehensive medical encounter databases will be used in this study to identify any risks or uncommon events associated with use of the recently licensed Adacel vaccine that may occur in routine clinical usage in a large population.

No investigational vaccines will be administered in this study. Participants will be included in the study on the basis of their having received Adacel vaccine as part of routine care.

Conditions
Pertussis
Being tested
Tetanus Toxoid, acellular pertussis, diphtheria toxoid
Keywords
Tetanus Toxoid,, acellular pertussis,, diphtheria toxoid
Medical subject headings
Whooping Cough, Tetanus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tetanus Toxoid, acellular pertussis, diphtheria toxoidBiological

    Also called Adacel®

    0.5 mL, Intramuscular

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Twenty One Pre-specified Outcomes of Interest as Obtained From International Coding of Diseases (ICD-9) Codes Captured After Adacel Vaccination in Clinical Database

    The twenty one pre-specified outcomes of special interest screened for in this study included: Arthritis, Arthralgia, or Arthropathy; Bell's Palsy; Diabetes; Encephalitis; Encephalopathy; Febrile Illness; Guillain-Barré; Hemolytic Anemia; Hypersensitivity; Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP); Lupus; Mixed Connective Tissue Disease; Multiple Sclerosis; Neuralgia; Neuritis; Neuropathy; Rheumatoid Arthritis; Scleroderma; Seizure; Severe Local Reaction; Transverse Myelitis.

    Comparison of events rates was performed using the risk-interval cohort design. In this design, the combined experience of individuals receiving Adacel vaccine served as their own control for evaluation of pre-specified outcomes of interest. Rates of events occurring during Days 0 to X (where X = 7, 14, 30, and 60) following vaccination were compared to rates of events occurring in the same individuals during Days 61 to 120 following vaccination.

    Measured: Days 0 to 60 and Day 61 to 120 following vaccination

  2. Twenty One Pre-specified Outcomes of Interest (ICD-9 Codes) Captured After Adacel Vaccination in Clinic Database

    The twenty one pre-specified outcomes of special interest screened for in this study included: Arthritis, Arthralgia, or Arthropathy; Bell's Palsy; Diabetes; Encephalitis; Encephalopathy; Febrile Illness; Guillain-Barré; Hemolytic Anemia; Hypersensitivity; ITP; Lupus; Mixed Connective Tissue Disease; Multiple Sclerosis; Neuralgia; Neuritis; Neuropathy; Rheumatoid Arthritis; Scleroderma; Seizure; Severe Local Reaction; Transverse Myelitis.

    Comparison of events rates was performed using the historic cohort design in which screening for possible new-onset chronic illnesses during the first 6 months following vaccination was performed. For each age-subgroup event, rates during the 6 months following vaccination among persons receiving Adacel vaccine were compared to event rates during the 6 months following vaccination among persons in the same age subgroup who received Td vaccine, but no live virus vaccine, during the year prior to initiation of this study.

    Measured: Days 0 up to 180 following vaccination

  3. All Diagnoses (Coded as ICD-9 Codes) Occurring During Specific Periods After Vaccination in All Adacel Exposed Individuals in Emergency Department and Hospital Databases.

    Surveillance for acute onset outcomes occurring shortly (days to weeks) after vaccination was performed using the risk-interval cohort design. In this design, the combined experience of individuals receiving Adacel vaccine served as their own control for evaluation of acute events. Rates of events occurring during Days 0 to X (where X = 7, 14, 30, and 60) following vaccination were compared to rates of events occurring in the same individuals during Days 61 to 120 following vaccination

    Measured: Days 0 to 60 and Day 61 to 120 following vaccination

  4. All Diagnoses (Coded as ICD-9 Codes) Occurring During 6 Months After Vaccination in All Adacel Exposed Individuals in Emergency Department and Hospital Databases.

    Comparison of events rates was performed using the historic cohort design in which screening for possible new-onset chronic illnesses during the first 6 months following vaccination was performed. For each age-subgroup event, rates during the 6 months following vaccination among persons receiving Adacel vaccine were compared to event rates during the 6 months following vaccination among persons in the same age subgroup who received Td vaccine, but no live virus vaccine, during the year prior to initiation of this study.

    Measured: Days 0 to 180 following vaccination

  5. Summary of Maternal Outcomes in Pregnant Adacel Recipients and Pregnant Non-Adacel Recipient Controls

    Pregnancies were identified by positive pregnancy tests or prenatal visits within 9 months prior to vaccination with no record of pre-vaccination delivery or abortion, or by prenatal visits, therapeutic abortions, or deliveries within 10 months after vaccination. For all such pregnancies, further review (including chart review, provider and vaccinee interviews, or other appropriate steps) was conducted to identify those for whom it could not be excluded that the individual was pregnant at the time of vaccination or within 28 days thereafter. Such pregnancies were reported by Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center to the Adacel Pregnancy Registry. Maternal and fetal outcomes (up to 1 month of life) were enumerated. For each pregnant Adacel vaccine subjects, 3 age-matched non-Adacel vaccinated controls (± 1 year) that had a first positive pregnancy test during the same month (± 1 month). Rates of events of maternal and fetal outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.

    Measured: Pregnancy to Delivery, up to 9 months

  6. Summary of Fetal Outcomes in Infants Born to Adacel Exposed Pregnant Women and Infants Born to Non-Adacel Exposed Pregnant Controls.

    Pregnancies were identified by positive pregnancy tests or prenatal visits within 9 months prior to vaccination with no record of pre-vaccination delivery or abortion, or by prenatal visits, therapeutic abortions, or deliveries within 10 months after vaccination. For all such pregnancies, further review (including chart review, provider and vaccinee interviews, or other appropriate steps) was conducted to identify those for whom it could not be excluded that the individual was pregnant at the time of vaccination or within 28 days thereafter. Such pregnancies were reported by Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center to the Adacel Pregnancy Registry. Maternal and fetal outcomes (up to 1 month of life) were enumerated. For each pregnant Adacel vaccine subjects, 3 age-matched non-Adacel vaccinated controls (± 1 year) that had a first positive pregnancy test during the same month (± 1 month). Rates of events of maternal and fetal outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.

    Measured: Pregnancy to Delivery, up to 9 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Nov 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2006
  3. Primary completionJul 2011
  4. Study completionDec 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
327,293 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00258882
Sponsor's protocol ID
TD512
Status last verified
Jun 2018
First submitted
24 Nov 2005
Last updated
17 Jul 2018
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Baxter R, Hansen J, Timbol J, Pool V, Greenberg DP, Johnson DR, Decker MD. Post-licensure safety surveillance study of routine use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Nov;12(11):2742-2748. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1201622. Epub 2016 Jul 7.

    PubMed 27388557

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pertussis, run by Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi Company at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Apr 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Twenty One Pre-specified Outcomes of Interest as Obtained From International Coding of Diseases (ICD-9) Codes Captured After Adacel Vaccination in Clinical Database (time frame: Days 0 to 60 and Day 61 to 120 following vaccination). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00258882, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in