AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Myocardial InfarctionPhase 2NCT00260416

Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Symptom Duration Above 12 Hours

A Phase 2 study testing Primary angioplasty with stent and abciximab in people with Acute Myocardial Infarction, run by Aarhus University Hospital Skejby at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Acute balloon angioplasty is beneficial in patients with acute myocardial infarction. However, presently this treatment is not offered to patients with symptom duration above 12 hours. Hypothesis: Acute balloon angioplasty for myocardial infarction is beneficial despite symptom duration above 12 hours. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Myocardial Infarction
What is being tested?
Primary angioplasty with stent and abciximab
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
May 2005to Dec 2007
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation;
  • Symptom duration 12 hours to 72 hours.

Who cannot join

  • Age below 18 years;
  • Bleeding disorders or anaemia or low levels of thrombocytes;
  • Thrombolysis used during the present admission;
  • Expected survival less than 1 year due to other diseases;
  • Previous acute myocardial infarction or coronary by-pass surgery;
  • Major operation within last 30 days;
  • Heamorrhaghic stroke within last 3 months.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Departments of Cardiology and Nuclear Medicine at Skejby Hospital

    Aarhus, DK-8200 N

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Background: Acute balloon angioplasty is beneficial in patients with acute myocardial infarction. However, presently this treatment is not offered to patients with symptom duration above 12 hours.

Hypothesis: Acute balloon angioplasty for myocardial infarction is beneficial despite symptom duration above 12 hours.

Methods: In 60 patients with myocardial infarction and symptom duration above 12 hours, the proportion of non-perfused myocardium before acute angioplasty and 1 month after angioplasty is compared to evaluate if myocardial tissue can be saved by acute angioplasty despite long symptom duration.

Read the detailed description

Methods: On arrival at our angioplasty laboratory, patients are informed about the study. If they accept to participate, we infuse 600 MBq of Sestamibi i.v. This binds in a first passage fashion without later redistribution to perfused myocardium. Non-perfused myocardium does not bind sestamibi. Primary angioplasty with stent and abciximab is then performed followed by myocardial scintigraphy to illustrate the non-perfused myocardial area that was at risk of infarction before the coronary artery was opened. Echocardiography is also performed. At 1 month, myocardial scintigraphy is repeated to evaluate infarct size. The difference between the myocardial area at risk of infarction before angioplasty and the myocardial infarct size 1 month later is defined as "salvage". Scintigraphy is repeated at 6 month and echocardiography is also repeated at 1 month and 6 months. The primary endpoint is "salvage". Accordingly, the aim is to demonstrate that salvage can be achieved with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction despite symptom duration above 12 hours. Clinical endpoints are death and reinfarction. The results are compared with results in 200 patients with symptom duration below 12 hours. These patients are treated and examined according to the exact same protocol. By this comparison, it can be evaluated whether it is relevant that the current guidelines recommend acute balloon angioplasty only to patients with less than 12 hours of symptom duration.

Being tested
Primary angioplasty with stent and abciximab
Keywords
Acute myocardial infarction, Symptom duration, Primary angioplasty, Infarct size, Myocardial scintigraphy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Primary angioplasty with stent and abciximabProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Myocardial salvage as evaluated by repeat myocardial scintigraphy(= area at risk of infarction before primary angioplasty - infarct size at 1 month).

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Infarct size by myocardial scintigraphy at 1 month and 6 months after primary angioplasty.

  2. Death at 1 month and 6 months.

  3. Reinfarction at 1 month and 6 months.

  4. Ejection fraction at 1 day, 1 month and 6 months.

  5. Left ventricular end diastolic volume at 1 day, 1 month and 6 months.

  6. Brain Natriuretic Peptide levels at 1 day, 1 month and 6 months.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Dec 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2005
  3. Primary completionDec 2007
  4. Study completionDec 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00260416
Sponsor's protocol ID
STEMI-12
Status last verified
May 2008
First submitted
30 Nov 2005
Last updated
22 May 2008
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Primary angioplasty with stent and abciximab in people with Acute Myocardial Infarction, run by Aarhus University Hospital Skejby at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Myocardial salvage as evaluated by repeat myocardial scintigraphy(= area at risk of infarction before primary angioplasty - infarct size at 1 month).. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2008; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in