Ulcerative ColitisPhase 2/3NCT00261118
Rituximab in Active Ulcerative Colitis
A Phase 2/3 study testing Rituximab in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Royal Liverpool University Hospital at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
There is broad support for the hypothesis that Ulcerative colitis is an auto-immune disease. Rituximab is an antibody protein that removes a subgroup of white blood cells (B lymphocytes) from the circulation. These cells have the capacity to generate the auto-antibodies that typify auto-immune disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ulcerative Colitis
- What is being tested?
- Rituximab
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Apr 2004to Oct 2009
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients over age of 18 years who are capable of providing written informed consent.
- Confirmed diagnosis of ulcerative colitis by conventional clinical, endoscopic and histological criteria.
- Failure of response to at least two weeks of oral prednisolone 40mg/day.
- Active colitis as assessed by a Mayo score [21] of 6-12 inclusive (see Appendix 1)
Who cannot join
- Patients under 18 or unable to give informed consent.
- Patients in their first attack of ulcerative colitis.
- Patients with severe ulcerative colitis as defined by presence of any of: temperature >37.5oC, pulse rate >100, focal severe or rebound abdominal tenderness, haemoglobin < 10.0g/dl, serum albumin <3.5 g/dl, transverse colon diameter greater than 5.0cms on plain abdominal X ray.
- Patients who are pregnant, post partum (<3months) or breast feeding
- Patients who are at risk of pregnancy and not using a reliable form of contraception (oral contraceptive and barrier or barrier plus spermicide).
- Patients with a stoma
Show all 13Show fewer
- Positive stool culture for pathogens or test for C difficile at screening within 7 days prior to trial entry
- Patients for whom a baseline Mayo score can not be reliably calculated: frequent use of laxatives (for proximal constipation) or antimotility agents (for control of diarrhoea)
- Any change to maintenance medication for ulcerative colitis: azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine within previous 3 months or 5-aminosalicylates within previous one month
- Any change to rectal therapy for colitis within the previous two weeks.
- Participation in other trials in the last 3 months.
- Serious intercurrent infection or other clinically important active disease (including renal and hepatic disease)
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Royal Liverpool University Hospital
Liverpool, Merseyside, L7 8XP
About this study
Official title: Phase 3: Randomised Controlled Trial of Rituximab in Active Ulcerative Colitis
There is broad support for the hypothesis that Ulcerative colitis is an auto-immune disease. Rituximab is an antibody protein that removes a subgroup of white blood cells (B lymphocytes) from the circulation. These cells have the capacity to generate the auto-antibodies that typify auto-immune disease. Although Rituximab has been mainly used for treating B lymphocyte malignancies (lymphoma) it has also been used with promising results in Rheumatoid arthritis and has an excellent safety record. This is a small placebo-controlled trial to assess its efficacy and safety in patients with steroid-resistant active ulcerative colitis.
Read the detailed description
WHAT IS THE PROBLEM TO BE ADDRESSED ?
Lack of effective cure for Ulcerative colitis.
WHAT IS THE HYPOTHESIS TO BE TESTED?
That rituximab may be effective in active ulcerative colitis.
WHY IS A TRIAL NEEDED NOW?
Rituximab has been used to treat more than 300,000 patients with B lymphocyte malignancies and has been shown to have an excellent safety record [6-8]. Published pilot studies have shown excellent results with rituximab in patients with autoimmune diseases such as immune-mediated thrombocytopaenia, Wegeners granulomatosis, cold agglutinin disease, myasthenia gravis, rheumatoid arthritis and SLE [11-17]. Together with increasing evidence to support a pathogenic role for the pANCA associated with ulcerative colitis, a study of rituximab in ulcerative colitis is timely. Moreover the only significant advance in the treatment of ulcerative colitis in recent years has been the introduction of cyclosporin which probably halves the colectomy rate [18,19] but at the risk of considerable side effects and with a drug-related mortality that has been estimated at 2%.
HAS A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW BEEN CARRIED OUT AND WHAT WERE THE FINDINGS?
A Medline search for " rituximab and ulcerative colitis" yielded no responses. There has been a recent report of its use in a single patient with ileocolonic Crohn's disease who also had immune-mediated thrombocytopaenia [20]. The thrombocytopaenia improved but the Crohn's disease did not. It can be argued though that there is little or no evidence for autoimmunity in Crohn's disease which seems in many cases to be due to a defect in phagocyte function, eg in association with the recently described NOD2/CARD15 genetic alteration.
2.5 HOW WILL THE RESULTS OF THIS TRIAL BE USED? This trial will establish whether rituximab is effective in achieving remission in patients with ulcerative colitis who are failing to respond to conventional therapy with corticosteroids. Because there is no background evidence of its efficacy the initial study will be a small two centre study with placebo blinding. If the result of this study is promising, these would be used as pilot data for power calculations for a larger multicentre study.
3.1 WHAT IS THE PROPOSED TRIAL DESIGN? A "placebo-blinded" study with 16 patients receiving rituximab and 6 patients receiving placebo (0.9% saline).
3.2 WHAT ARE THE PLANNED TRIAL INTERVENTIONS? Patients will receive either (i) rituximab 1g in 500 mls of 0.9% saline infused into a peripheral vein over four hours (see appended infusion chart), or (ii) 500 mls of 0.9% saline infused into a peripheral vein over two hours as placebo. This regimen will be repeated once at 2 weeks. This protocol is based on the dosing regimen that proved most efficacious for rheumatoid arthritis. All patients will also receive paracetamol 1g orally and chlorpheniramine (Piriton) 10mg intravenously immediately prior to each Rituximab/placebo infusion.
All patients will continue to receive oral prednisolone 40mg/day for 2 weeks then 30mg for two weeks, then 20mgs/day for two weeks, then reduce by 5mg/day every 7 days until off prednisolone.
3.3 WHAT IS THE PROPOSED DURATION OF THE TREATMENT PERIOD? Two treatments, two weeks apart.
3.4 WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA? see earlier
3.5 WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED OUTCOME MEASURES? see earlier 3.6 WILL HEALTH SERVICE RESEARCH ISSUES BE ADDRESSED? Not Applicable 3.7 WHAT IS THE PROPOSED FREQUENCY/DURATION OF FOLLOW UP? Patients will be reviewed after one, two and four, eight, twelve and twenty four weeks. Patients will be monitored thereafter in routine gastroenterology clinic follow up.
3.8 HOW WILL THE OUTCOME MEASURES BE MEASURED AT FOLLOW-UP? Patients will complete a daily diary with details of bowel frequency, presence of blood in the stool, any change in medical therapy and any new or worsening symptoms The IBD quality of life questionnaire will be completed at baseline and at weeks 4 and 12.
Patients will also have a diary card to record the details of any other symptoms noted during the trial to assess adverse effects of the trial treatment.
3.9 WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED PRACTICAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR ALLOCATING PATIENTS TO TRIAL GROUPS? Randomization will be allocated in blocks of five by the pharmacy department of the hospital.
3.10 WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED METHODS FOR PROTECTING AGAINST OTHER SOURCES OF BIAS? Controls (known only to the Pharmacy Department) will receive a placebo saline infusion.
3.11 WHAT IS THE PROPOSED SAMPLE SIZE? A "placebo-blinded" study with 16 patients receiving rituximab and 8 patients receiving placebo (0.9% saline). This will provide 80% power for excluding an 80% remission rate with active treatment compared with an assumed 25% placebo response.
3.12 WHAT IS THE PLANNED RECRUITMENT RATE? 1-2 patients per month 3.13 ARE THERE LIKELY TO BE ANY PROBLEMS WITH COMPLIANCE? No.
3.14 WHAT IS THE LIKELY RATE OF LOSS TO FOLLOW UP? 100% follow up should be achievable. 3.15 HOW MANY CENTRES WILL BE INVOLVED? Two 3.16 WHAT IS THE PROPOSED TYPE OF ANALYSIS? Formal hypothesis testing of the primary outcome will be compared by chi-square test.
Wilcoxon signed rank test will be used for comparisons against baseline for changes in secondary quantitative endpoints.
3.17 WHAT IS THE PROPOSED FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS? Once only on completion. 3.18 ARE THERE ANY PLANNED SUBGROUP ANALYSES? Subgroup analysis may be performed according to pANCA status.
3.19 WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED RESEARCH COST OF THE TRIAL? Cost of therapy plus £800 pharmacy fee plus £2200 towards ethics submission/ research nurse time/ cost of pANCA assays to be provided as an unrestricted educational grant from Roche UK.
3.20 IS THERE AN NHS SERVICE SUPPORT COST OF THIS TRIAL, AND IF SO WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED COST? The only NHS cost would be modest, involving only the routine testing of full blood count and SMAC which is current practice in the monitoring of patients with relapses of inflammatory bowel disease.
- Conditions
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Being tested
- Rituximab
- Keywords
- colitis, rituximab
- Medical subject headings
- Colitis, Ulcerative, Colitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RituximabDrug
Also called MabThera (Roche)
Rituximab 1g in 500 mls Normal Saline Placebo 500 mls Normal Saline
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 (i) | Active comparator | Rituximab 1g in 500 mls of 0.9% normal saline infused into a peripheral vein Receives: Drug: Rituximab |
| 2 (ii) | Placebo comparator | 500 mls of 0.9% NORMAL SALINE INFUSED INTO A PERIPHERAL VEIN Receives: Drug: Rituximab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Remission defined as a decrease in Mayo score to ≤ 2 points at week 4
Measured: week 4
Secondary outcomes (6)
Clinical response defined as a decrease in Mayo score by ≥ 3 points at weeks 4, 8 (partial Mayo score) and 12.
Measured: Week 4, 8 & 12
Remission at weeks 8 and 12.
Measured: week 8 &12
Endoscopic mucosal healing at week 4 and 12
Measured: Week 4 & 12
Improvement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease specific Quality of Life Index at weeks 4 and 12
Measured: weeks 4 &12
Histological improvement of disease activity at 4 and 12 weeks compared with baseline.
Measured: week 4 & 12 weeks
Treatment tolerability as defined by adverse events.
Measured: all visits
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Dec 2005 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2004
- Primary completionAug 2009
- Study completionOct 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (23)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ulcerative ColitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Royal Liverpool University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Hoffmann-La Roche, University of Liverpool
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jonathan Michael Rhodes, Royal Liverpool University Hospital
- Investigators
- Jonathan M Rhodes, MD, Principal investigator, University of Liverpool
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00261118
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RLBUHT R&D 2709
- Other IDs
- DDX exemption from MRHA ref:-, MF 8000/12794
- Status last verified
- Nov 2014
- First submitted
- 29 Nov 2005
- Last updated
- 6 Nov 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Quinton JF, Sendid B, Reumaux D, Duthilleul P, Cortot A, Grandbastien B, Charrier G, Targan SR, Colombel JF, Poulain D. Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannan antibodies combined with antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies in inflammatory bowel disease: prevalence and diagnostic role. Gut. 1998 Jun;42(6):788-91. doi: 10.1136/gut.42.6.788.
PubMed 9691915Xiao H, Heeringa P, Hu P, Liu Z, Zhao M, Aratani Y, Maeda N, Falk RJ, Jennette JC. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies specific for myeloperoxidase cause glomerulonephritis and vasculitis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2002 Oct;110(7):955-63. doi: 10.1172/JCI15918.
PubMed 12370273Inoue N, Watanabe M, Sato T, Okazawa A, Yamazaki M, Kanai T, Ogata H, Iwao Y, Ishii H, Hibi T. Restricted V(H) gene usage in lamina propria B cells producing anticolon antibody from patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2001 Jul;121(1):15-23. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.25477.
PubMed 11438490Hibi T, Ohara M, Kobayashi K, Brown WR, Toda K, Takaishi H, Hosoda Y, Hayashi A, Iwao Y, Watanabe M, et al. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunoprecipitation studies on anti-goblet cell antibody using a mucin producing cell line in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 1994 Feb;35(2):224-30. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.2.224.
PubMed 8307474Monteleone I, Vavassori P, Biancone L, Monteleone G, Pallone F. Immunoregulation in the gut: success and failures in human disease. Gut. 2002 May;50 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):III60-4. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.suppl_3.iii60.
PubMed 11953335Maloney DG, Liles TM, Czerwinski DK, Waldichuk C, Rosenberg J, Grillo-Lopez A, Levy R. Phase I clinical trial using escalating single-dose infusion of chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (IDEC-C2B8) in patients with recurrent B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 1994 Oct 15;84(8):2457-66.
PubMed 7522629McLaughlin P, Grillo-Lopez AJ, Link BK, Levy R, Czuczman MS, Williams ME, Heyman MR, Bence-Bruckler I, White CA, Cabanillas F, Jain V, Ho AD, Lister J, Wey K, Shen D, Dallaire BK. Rituximab chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy for relapsed indolent lymphoma: half of patients respond to a four-dose treatment program. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Aug;16(8):2825-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.8.2825.
PubMed 9704735Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, Herbrecht R, Tilly H, Bouabdallah R, Morel P, Van Den Neste E, Salles G, Gaulard P, Reyes F, Lederlin P, Gisselbrecht C. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 24;346(4):235-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011795.
PubMed 11807147Leandro MJ, Edwards JC, Cambridge G. Clinical outcome in 22 patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with B lymphocyte depletion. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Oct;61(10):883-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.10.883.
PubMed 12228157De Vita S, Zaja F, Sacco S, De Candia A, Fanin R, Ferraccioli G. Efficacy of selective B cell blockade in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: evidence for a pathogenetic role of B cells. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Aug;46(8):2029-33. doi: 10.1002/art.10467.
PubMed 12209504Arzoo K, Sadeghi S, Liebman HA. Treatment of refractory antibody mediated autoimmune disorders with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab). Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Oct;61(10):922-4. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.10.922.
PubMed 12228164Looney RJ. Treating human autoimmune disease by depleting B cells. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Oct;61(10):863-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.10.863. No abstract available.
PubMed 12228152Stasi R, Pagano A, Stipa E, Amadori S. Rituximab chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody treatment for adults with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood. 2001 Aug 15;98(4):952-7. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.4.952.
PubMed 11493438Specks U, Fervenza FC, McDonald TJ, Hogan MC. Response of Wegener's granulomatosis to anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody therapy. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Dec;44(12):2836-40. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200112)44:123.0.co;2-w.
PubMed 11762944Patel DD. B cell-ablative therapy for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Aug;46(8):1984-5. doi: 10.1002/art.10476. No abstract available.
PubMed 12209499
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Nov 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase 3: Randomised Controlled Trial of Rituximab in Active Ulcerative Colitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00261118
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RLBUHT R&D 2709
- Conditions
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Keywords
- colitis, rituximab
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Royal Liverpool University HospitalOther government
- Collaborators
- Hoffmann-La Roche, University of Liverpool
- Study start
- Apr 2004
- Primary completion
- Aug 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Dec 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There is broad support for the hypothesis that Ulcerative colitis is an auto-immune disease. Rituximab is an antibody protein that removes a subgroup of white blood cells (B lymphocytes) from the circulation. These cells have the capacity to generate the auto-antibodies that typify auto-immune disease. Although Rituximab has been mainly used for treating B lymphocyte malignancies (lymphoma) it has also been used with promising results in Rheumatoid arthritis and has an excellent safety record. This is a small placebo-controlled trial to assess its efficacy and safety in patients with steroid-resistant active ulcerative colitis.
Detailed description
WHAT IS THE PROBLEM TO BE ADDRESSED ?
Lack of effective cure for Ulcerative colitis.
WHAT IS THE HYPOTHESIS TO BE TESTED?
That rituximab may be effective in active ulcerative colitis.
WHY IS A TRIAL NEEDED NOW?
Rituximab has been used to treat more than 300,000 patients with B lymphocyte malignancies and has been shown to have an excellent safety record [6-8]. Published pilot studies have shown excellent results with rituximab in patients with autoimmune diseases such as immune-mediated thrombocytopaenia, Wegeners granulomatosis, cold agglutinin disease, myasthenia gravis, rheumatoid arthritis and SLE [11-17]. Together with increasing evidence to support a pathogenic role for the pANCA associated with ulcerative colitis, a study of rituximab in ulcerative colitis is timely. Moreover the only significant advance in the treatment of ulcerative colitis in recent years has been the introduction of cyclosporin which probably halves the colectomy rate [18,19] but at the risk of considerable side effects and with a drug-related mortality that has been estimated at 2%.
HAS A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW BEEN CARRIED OUT AND WHAT WERE THE FINDINGS?
A Medline search for " rituximab and ulcerative colitis" yielded no responses. There has been a recent report of its use in a single patient with ileocolonic Crohn's disease who also had immune-mediated thrombocytopaenia [20]. The thrombocytopaenia improved but the Crohn's disease did not. It can be argued though that there is little or no evidence for autoimmunity in Crohn's disease which seems in many cases to be due to a defect in phagocyte function, eg in association with the recently described NOD2/CARD15 genetic alteration.
2.5 HOW WILL THE RESULTS OF THIS TRIAL BE USED? This trial will establish whether rituximab is effective in achieving remission in patients with ulcerative colitis who are failing to respond to conventional therapy with corticosteroids. Because there is no background evidence of its efficacy the initial study will be a small two centre study with placebo blinding. If the result of this study is promising, these would be used as pilot data for power calculations for a larger multicentre study.
3.1 WHAT IS THE PROPOSED TRIAL DESIGN? A "placebo-blinded" study with 16 patients receiving rituximab and 6 patients receiving placebo (0.9% saline).
3.2 WHAT ARE THE PLANNED TRIAL INTERVENTIONS? Patients will receive either (i) rituximab 1g in 500 mls of 0.9% saline infused into a peripheral vein over four hours (see appended infusion chart), or (ii) 500 mls of 0.9% saline infused into a peripheral vein over two hours as placebo. This regimen will be repeated once at 2 weeks. This protocol is based on the dosing regimen that proved most efficacious for rheumatoid arthritis. All patients will also receive paracetamol 1g orally and chlorpheniramine (Piriton) 10mg intravenously immediately prior to each Rituximab/placebo infusion.
All patients will continue to receive oral prednisolone 40mg/day for 2 weeks then 30mg for two weeks, then 20mgs/day for two weeks, then reduce by 5mg/day every 7 days until off prednisolone.
3.3 WHAT IS THE PROPOSED DURATION OF THE TREATMENT PERIOD? Two treatments, two weeks apart.
3.4 WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA? see earlier
3.5 WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED OUTCOME MEASURES? see earlier 3.6 WILL HEALTH SERVICE RESEARCH ISSUES BE ADDRESSED? Not Applicable 3.7 WHAT IS THE PROPOSED FREQUENCY/DURATION OF FOLLOW UP? Patients will be reviewed after one, two and four, eight, twelve and twenty four weeks. Patients will be monitored thereafter in routine gastroenterology clinic follow up.
3.8 HOW WILL THE OUTCOME MEASURES BE MEASURED AT FOLLOW-UP? Patients will complete a daily diary with details of bowel frequency, presence of blood in the stool, any change in medical therapy and any new or worsening symptoms The IBD quality of life questionnaire will be completed at baseline and at weeks 4 and 12.
Patients will also have a diary card to record the details of any other symptoms noted during the trial to assess adverse effects of the trial treatment.
3.9 WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED PRACTICAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR ALLOCATING PATIENTS TO TRIAL GROUPS? Randomization will be allocated in blocks of five by the pharmacy department of the hospital.
3.10 WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED METHODS FOR PROTECTING AGAINST OTHER SOURCES OF BIAS? Controls (known only to the Pharmacy Department) will receive a placebo saline infusion.
3.11 WHAT IS THE PROPOSED SAMPLE SIZE? A "placebo-blinded" study with 16 patients receiving rituximab and 8 patients receiving placebo (0.9% saline). This will provide 80% power for excluding an 80% remission rate with active treatment compared with an assumed 25% placebo response.
3.12 WHAT IS THE PLANNED RECRUITMENT RATE? 1-2 patients per month 3.13 ARE THERE LIKELY TO BE ANY PROBLEMS WITH COMPLIANCE? No.
3.14 WHAT IS THE LIKELY RATE OF LOSS TO FOLLOW UP? 100% follow up should be achievable. 3.15 HOW MANY CENTRES WILL BE INVOLVED? Two 3.16 WHAT IS THE PROPOSED TYPE OF ANALYSIS? Formal hypothesis testing of the primary outcome will be compared by chi-square test.
Wilcoxon signed rank test will be used for comparisons against baseline for changes in secondary quantitative endpoints.
3.17 WHAT IS THE PROPOSED FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS? Once only on completion. 3.18 ARE THERE ANY PLANNED SUBGROUP ANALYSES? Subgroup analysis may be performed according to pANCA status.
3.19 WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED RESEARCH COST OF THE TRIAL? Cost of therapy plus £800 pharmacy fee plus £2200 towards ethics submission/ research nurse time/ cost of pANCA assays to be provided as an unrestricted educational grant from Roche UK.
3.20 IS THERE AN NHS SERVICE SUPPORT COST OF THIS TRIAL, AND IF SO WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED COST? The only NHS cost would be modest, involving only the routine testing of full blood count and SMAC which is current practice in the monitoring of patients with relapses of inflammatory bowel disease.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 (i) | Active comparator | Drug: RituximabRituximab 1g in 500 mls of 0.9% normal saline infused into a peripheral vein |
| 2 (ii) | Placebo comparator | Drug: Rituximab500 mls of 0.9% NORMAL SALINE INFUSED INTO A PERIPHERAL VEIN |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients over age of 18 years who are capable of providing written informed consent.
- Confirmed diagnosis of ulcerative colitis by conventional clinical, endoscopic and histological criteria.
- Failure of response to at least two weeks of oral prednisolone 40mg/day.
- Active colitis as assessed by a Mayo score [21] of 6-12 inclusive (see Appendix 1)
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Patients under 18 or unable to give informed consent.
- Patients in their first attack of ulcerative colitis.
- Patients with severe ulcerative colitis as defined by presence of any of: temperature >37.5oC, pulse rate >100, focal severe or rebound abdominal tenderness, haemoglobin < 10.0g/dl, serum albumin <3.5 g/dl, transverse colon diameter greater than 5.0cms on plain abdominal X ray.
- Patients who are pregnant, post partum (<3months) or breast feeding
- Patients who are at risk of pregnancy and not using a reliable form of contraception (oral contraceptive and barrier or barrier plus spermicide).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RituximabAlso: MabThera (Roche)Rituximab 1g in 500 mls Normal Saline Placebo 500 mls Normal Saline | Drug | 1 (i), 2 (ii) |
Primary outcome
Remission defined as a decrease in Mayo score to ≤ 2 points at week 4
Time frame: week 4
6 secondary outcomes
Clinical response defined as a decrease in Mayo score by ≥ 3 points at weeks 4, 8 (partial Mayo score) and 12.
Time frame: Week 4, 8 & 12
Remission at weeks 8 and 12.
Time frame: week 8 &12
Endoscopic mucosal healing at week 4 and 12
Time frame: Week 4 & 12
Improvement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease specific Quality of Life Index at weeks 4 and 12
Time frame: weeks 4 &12
Histological improvement of disease activity at 4 and 12 weeks compared with baseline.
Time frame: week 4 & 12 weeks
Treatment tolerability as defined by adverse events.
Time frame: all visits
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Nov 2014.
- Background: PubMed 9691915Quinton JF, Sendid B, Reumaux D, Duthilleul P, Cortot A, Grandbastien B, Charrier G, Targan SR, Colombel JF, Poulain D. Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannan antibodies combined with antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies in inflammatory bowel disease: prevalence and diagnostic role. Gut. 1998 Jun;42(6):788-91. doi: 10.1136/gut.42.6.788.
- Background: PubMed 12370273Xiao H, Heeringa P, Hu P, Liu Z, Zhao M, Aratani Y, Maeda N, Falk RJ, Jennette JC. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies specific for myeloperoxidase cause glomerulonephritis and vasculitis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2002 Oct;110(7):955-63. doi: 10.1172/JCI15918.
- Background: PubMed 11438490Inoue N, Watanabe M, Sato T, Okazawa A, Yamazaki M, Kanai T, Ogata H, Iwao Y, Ishii H, Hibi T. Restricted V(H) gene usage in lamina propria B cells producing anticolon antibody from patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2001 Jul;121(1):15-23. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.25477.
- Background: PubMed 8307474Hibi T, Ohara M, Kobayashi K, Brown WR, Toda K, Takaishi H, Hosoda Y, Hayashi A, Iwao Y, Watanabe M, et al. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunoprecipitation studies on anti-goblet cell antibody using a mucin producing cell line in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 1994 Feb;35(2):224-30. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.2.224.
- Background: PubMed 11953335Monteleone I, Vavassori P, Biancone L, Monteleone G, Pallone F. Immunoregulation in the gut: success and failures in human disease. Gut. 2002 May;50 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):III60-4. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.suppl_3.iii60.
- Background: PubMed 7522629Maloney DG, Liles TM, Czerwinski DK, Waldichuk C, Rosenberg J, Grillo-Lopez A, Levy R. Phase I clinical trial using escalating single-dose infusion of chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (IDEC-C2B8) in patients with recurrent B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 1994 Oct 15;84(8):2457-66.
- Background: PubMed 9704735McLaughlin P, Grillo-Lopez AJ, Link BK, Levy R, Czuczman MS, Williams ME, Heyman MR, Bence-Bruckler I, White CA, Cabanillas F, Jain V, Ho AD, Lister J, Wey K, Shen D, Dallaire BK. Rituximab chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy for relapsed indolent lymphoma: half of patients respond to a four-dose treatment program. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Aug;16(8):2825-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.8.2825.
- Background: PubMed 11807147Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, Herbrecht R, Tilly H, Bouabdallah R, Morel P, Van Den Neste E, Salles G, Gaulard P, Reyes F, Lederlin P, Gisselbrecht C. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 24;346(4):235-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011795.
- Background: PubMed 12228157Leandro MJ, Edwards JC, Cambridge G. Clinical outcome in 22 patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with B lymphocyte depletion. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Oct;61(10):883-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.10.883.
- Background: PubMed 12209504De Vita S, Zaja F, Sacco S, De Candia A, Fanin R, Ferraccioli G. Efficacy of selective B cell blockade in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: evidence for a pathogenetic role of B cells. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Aug;46(8):2029-33. doi: 10.1002/art.10467.
- Background: PubMed 12228164Arzoo K, Sadeghi S, Liebman HA. Treatment of refractory antibody mediated autoimmune disorders with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab). Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Oct;61(10):922-4. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.10.922.
- Background: PubMed 12228152Looney RJ. Treating human autoimmune disease by depleting B cells. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Oct;61(10):863-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.10.863. No abstract available.
Related trials for Ulcerative Colitis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Multicenter, Prospective, Long-term, Observational Registry of Pediatric Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Crohn's Disease, Ulcerative Colitis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
An Observational Prospective Long-term Exposure Registry of Adult Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety of Ustekinumab Versus Other Biologics in Patients With Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis
Crohn Disease, Colitis, Ulcerative
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Long-term Extension Study of Ustekinumab in Pediatric Participants
Crohn Disease, Colitis, Ulcerative
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Guselkumab in Pediatric Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
Colitis, Ulcerative
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jonathan M Rhodes, MD principal investigator
University of Liverpool
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Rituximab in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Royal Liverpool University Hospital at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Remission defined as a decrease in Mayo score to ≤ 2 points at week 4 (time frame: week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00261118, which also lists 23 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2014; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 4 Nov 2026.