Extrahepatic Bile Duct CancerPhase 3ABC-02NCT00262769
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma or Other Biliary Tract Tumors
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin and gemcitabine hydrochloride in people with Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer and Gallbladder Cancer, run by University College, London at 25 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine and cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer, Gallbladder Cancer
- What is being tested?
- cisplatin and gemcitabine hydrochloride
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 324 participants
- Where
- 25 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- May 2005to Aug 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed biliary tract, gallbladder, or ampullary carcinoma
- Intra- or extra-hepatic disease allowed
- Unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease
- No brain metastases
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Performance status
- ECOG 0-2
Life expectancy
- At least 3 months
Hematopoietic
- Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm^3
- Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm^3
- Hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL (transfusion allowed)
- WBC ≥ 3,000/mm^3
Hepatic
- AST and ALT ≤ 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN) (5 times ULN if liver metastases are present)
- Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times ULN
- Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 3 times ULN (5 times ULN if liver metastases are present)
- Adequate biliary drainage
- No unresolved biliary tract obstruction
Renal
- Creatinine < 1.5 times ULN
- Urea < 1.5 times ULN
- Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥ 45 mL/min
- If GFR < 60 mL/min, isotope EDTA confirmation of adequate renal function is required
Other
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 3 months after study participation
- No active, uncontrolled infection
- No other severe or uncontrolled systemic disease
- No other malignancy within the past 5 years except nonmetastatic basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix treated by cone-biopsy or resection
- No psychiatric disorder that would preclude giving informed consent
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Chemotherapy
- At least 6 months since prior adjuvant chemotherapy
- No prior gemcitabine hydrochloride
- No prior cisplatin
- No prior systemic chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease except low-dose radiosensitizing chemotherapy in conjunction with radiotherapy
Radiotherapy
- Prior radiotherapy for localized disease allowed provided there is clear evidence of disease progression afterwards
Surgery
- Prior curative surgery allowed provided there is evidence of nonresectable disease relapse requiring systemic chemotherapy
Other
- Recovered from all prior therapies
- Prior photodynamic therapy (PDT) allowed provided it was given for localized disease only (with no evidence of metastatic disease) and resulted in subsequent disease progression after completion of therapy OR to relieve biliary obstruction in the presence of metastatic disease
- PDT must have been completed ≥ 4 weeks ago
- At least 4 weeks since prior investigational agents
- No other concurrent, curative anticancer therapy
Trial locations and contacts
25 sites in 1 country.
25 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom25 sites
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Aberdeen, Scotland, AB25 2ZN
Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Foundation Trust
Basingstoke, England, RG24 9NA
Belfast City Hospital Trust Incorporating Belvoir Park Hospital
Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7AB
Queen Elizabeth Hospital at University Hospital of Birmingham NHS Trust
Birmingham, England, B15 2TH
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, England, CB2 2QQ
Velindre Cancer Center at Velindre Hospital
Cardiff, Wales, CF14 2TL
Cumberland Infirmary
Carlisle, England, CA2 7HY
Gloucestershire Oncology Centre at Cheltenham General Hospital
Cheltenham, England, GL53 7AN
Derbyshire Royal Infirmary
Derby, England, DE1 2QY
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Essex, England, CM20 1QX
Gloucestershire Royal Hospital
Gloucester, England, GL1 3NN
Princess Royal Hospital at Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust
Hull, England, HU8 9HE
Leeds Cancer Centre at St. James's University Hospital
Leeds, England, LS9 7TF
Helen Rollason Cancer Care Centre at North Middlesex Hospital
London, England, N18 1QX
Royal Marsden - London
London, England, SW3 6JJ
Hammersmith Hospital
London, England, W12 OHS
UCL Cancer Institute
London, England, WC1E 6DD
University College of London Hospitals
London, England, WIT 3AA
Maidstone Hospital
Maidstone, England, ME16 9QQ
Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology
Merseyside, England, CH63 4JY
Mount Vernon Cancer Centre at Mount Vernon Hospital
Northwood, England, HA6 2RN
Nottingham City Hospital
Nottingham, England, NG5 1PB
Portsmouth Oncology Centre at Saint Mary's Hospital
Portsmouth Hants, England, PO3 6AD
Glan Clwyd Hospital
Rhyl, Denbighshire, Wales, LL 18 5UJ
Cancer Research Centre at Weston Park Hospital
Sheffield, England, S10 2SJ
About this study
Official title: Gemcitabine, Alone or in Combination With Cisplatin, in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinomas and Other Biliary Tract Tumors: A Multicentre, Randomized Phase III Study
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine and cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether gemcitabine is more effective with or without cisplatin in treating cholangiocarcinoma or biliary tract tumors.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying gemcitabine and cisplatin to see how well they work compared to gemcitabine alone in treating patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma or other biliary tract tumors.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the overall survival of patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma or other biliary tract tumors treated with gemcitabine hydrochloride with vs without cisplatin.
Secondary
- Compare the progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the toxic effects of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, primary site of disease (gallbladder vs bile ducts vs ampulla), prior therapy (photodynamic therapy [PDT] vs non-PDT therapy vs none), ECOG performance status (0 vs 1 vs 2), and disease status (locally advanced vs metastatic). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes and cisplatin IV over 1½ hours on days 1 and 8. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and after finishing treatment.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for at least 3 years.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 400 patients will be accrued for this study.
- Conditions
- Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer, Gallbladder Cancer
- Being tested
- cisplatin, gemcitabine hydrochloride
- Keywords
- cholangiocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile duct, recurrent extrahepatic bile duct cancer, unresectable extrahepatic bile duct cancer, cholangiocarcinoma of the gallbladder, recurrent gallbladder cancer, unresectable gallbladder cancer, metastatic extrahepatic bile duct cancer, metastatic gallbladder cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Bile Duct Neoplasms, Gallbladder Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cisplatinDrug
Also called CDDP, cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II), cisplatinum
25 mg/m2 in 1000 mls 0.9% saline given over 1 hour followed by 500 mls 0.9% saline over 90 mins
Also called Gemzar
1000mg/m2 in 250-500mls 0.9% saline over 30 mins by intravenous infusions on day 1, 8 and 15 (Arm A only) of each 28 (Arm A) or 21 (Arm B) day cycle.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A - Gemcitabine | Experimental | Gemcitabine alone Receives: Drug: gemcitabine hydrochloride |
| B - Gemcitabine and Cisplatin | Experimental | Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Receives: Drug: cisplatin; Drug: gemcitabine hydrochloride |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival
From date of randomisation till date of death or last date of follow-up (up to 5 years)
Measured: From date of randomisation till date of death or last date of follow-up (up to 5 years)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Progression-free survival
From date of randomisation till date of death or last date of follow-up (up to 5 years)
Measured: From date of randomisation till date of death or last date of follow-up (up to 5 years)
Quality of life
Quality of life as measured by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 Items periodically
Measured: Before and 12 weeks after completion of treatment
Toxicity
Toxicity as measured by NCI CTC periodically. The proportion of patients who experience a toxicity of grade 3 or 4 will be compared between the two arms of the trial.
Measured: During treatment and follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Dec 2005 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2005
- Primary completionAug 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Extrahepatic Bile Duct CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University College, LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 324 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University College, London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- John A. Bridgewater, Study chair, University College London (UCL) Cancer Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00262769
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000455013
- Other IDs
- CRUK-ABC-02, EU-205103, ISRCTN82956140, EUDRACT-2004-004882-14, CTA-21266/0005/001
- Acronym
- ABC-02
- Status last verified
- Jul 2012
- First submitted
- 6 Dec 2005
- Last updated
- 17 Jul 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Madhusudan S, Iveson T, Hughes S, Pereira SP, Roughton M, Bridgewater J; ABC-02 Trial Investigators. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1273-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721.
PubMed 20375404Lamarca A, Ross P, Wasan HS, Hubner RA, McNamara MG, Lopes A, Palmer DH, Valle JW, Bridgewater J. Advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer: Post-hoc analysis of the ABC-01, -02 and -03 clinical trials. JHEP Rep. 2026 Jul;8(7):101833. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101833. Epub 2026 Mar 24.
PubMed 41887529
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jul 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Gemcitabine, Alone or in Combination With Cisplatin, in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinomas and Other Biliary Tract Tumors: A Multicentre, Randomized Phase III Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00262769
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ABC-02 / CDR0000455013
- Conditions
- Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer, Gallbladder Cancer
- Keywords
- cholangiocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile duct, recurrent extrahepatic bile duct cancer, unresectable extrahepatic bile duct cancer, cholangiocarcinoma of the gallbladder, recurrent gallbladder cancer, unresectable gallbladder cancer, metastatic extrahepatic bile duct cancer, metastatic gallbladder cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 324 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University College, LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Study start
- May 2005
- Primary completion
- Aug 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Dec 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine and cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether gemcitabine is more effective with or without cisplatin in treating cholangiocarcinoma or biliary tract tumors.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying gemcitabine and cisplatin to see how well they work compared to gemcitabine alone in treating patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma or other biliary tract tumors.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the overall survival of patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma or other biliary tract tumors treated with gemcitabine hydrochloride with vs without cisplatin.
Secondary
- Compare the progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the toxic effects of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, primary site of disease (gallbladder vs bile ducts vs ampulla), prior therapy (photodynamic therapy [PDT] vs non-PDT therapy vs none), ECOG performance status (0 vs 1 vs 2), and disease status (locally advanced vs metastatic). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes and cisplatin IV over 1½ hours on days 1 and 8. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and after finishing treatment.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for at least 3 years.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 400 patients will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A - Gemcitabine | Experimental | Drug: gemcitabine hydrochlorideGemcitabine alone |
| B - Gemcitabine and Cisplatin | Experimental | Drug: cisplatin, Drug: gemcitabine hydrochlorideGemcitabine and Cisplatin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cisplatinAlso: CDDP, cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II), cisplatinum25 mg/m2 in 1000 mls 0.9% saline given over 1 hour followed by 500 mls 0.9% saline over 90 mins | Drug | B - Gemcitabine and Cisplatin |
| gemcitabine hydrochlorideAlso: Gemzar1000mg/m2 in 250-500mls 0.9% saline over 30 mins by intravenous infusions on day 1, 8 and 15 (Arm A only) of each 28 (Arm A) or 21 (Arm B) day cycle. | Drug | A - Gemcitabine, B - Gemcitabine and Cisplatin |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival
Time frame: From date of randomisation till date of death or last date of follow-up (up to 5 years)
From date of randomisation till date of death or last date of follow-up (up to 5 years)
3 secondary outcomes
Progression-free survival
Time frame: From date of randomisation till date of death or last date of follow-up (up to 5 years)
Quality of life
Time frame: Before and 12 weeks after completion of treatment
Toxicity
Time frame: During treatment and follow-up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jul 2012.
- Results publication: PubMed 20375404Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Madhusudan S, Iveson T, Hughes S, Pereira SP, Roughton M, Bridgewater J; ABC-02 Trial Investigators. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1273-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41887529Lamarca A, Ross P, Wasan HS, Hubner RA, McNamara MG, Lopes A, Palmer DH, Valle JW, Bridgewater J. Advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer: Post-hoc analysis of the ABC-01, -02 and -03 clinical trials. JHEP Rep. 2026 Jul;8(7):101833. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101833. Epub 2026 Mar 24.
Related trials for Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer
Recruiting
Photodynamic Therapy Combined With a Self-expandable Radioactive Particle-loaded Biliary Stent for Unresectable Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of CDX-1140, a CD40 Agonist, in Combination With Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and Keytruda in Subjects With Biliary Tract Carcinoma (BTC)
Biliary Cancer, Bile Duct Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Obtaining Solid Tumor Tissue From People Having Biopsy or Surgery for Certain Types of Cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms, Gastric Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Zanidatamab With Standard-of-care Therapy Against Standard-of-care Therapy for Advanced HER2-positive Biliary Tract Cancer
Biliary Tract Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing the Combination of Pevonedistat With Chemotherapy for Bile Duct Cancer of the Liver
Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma, Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John A. Bridgewater study chair
University College London (UCL) Cancer Institute
25 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin and gemcitabine hydrochloride in people with Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer and Gallbladder Cancer, run by University College, London at 25 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 25 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (time frame: From date of randomisation till date of death or last date of follow-up (up to 5 years)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00262769, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2012.