Inguinal HerniaNCT00263250
Watchful Waiting Versus Open Tension-free Repair of Inguinal Hernia in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Men
A study testing watchful waiting or tension-free hernia repair in people with Inguinal Hernia, run by Creighton University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a multicenter clinical trial to compare pain, physical function, and other outcomes in men with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias randomly assigned to watchful waiting without an operation, or a standard hernia repair with mesh. We studied the safety of delaying operation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Inguinal Hernia
- What is being tested?
- watchful waiting or tension-free hernia repair
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 724 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 1999to Feb 2005
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Inclusion Criteria: men 18 years of age and older with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias who give informed consent to be randomized.
-
Exclusion Criteria:Presence of pain limiting usual activities, difficulty in reducing hernia within last 6 weeks, undetectable hernias, local or systemic infection, ASA physical status >3, or participation in another clinical trial.
-
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
American College of Surgeons
Chicago, Illinois, 60610
About this study
This is a multicenter clinical trial to compare pain, physical function, and other outcomes in men with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias randomly assigned to watchful waiting without an operation, or a standard hernia repair with mesh. We studied the safety of delaying operation.
Read the detailed description
CONTEXT Many men with an inguinal hernia have minimal symptoms. Whether deferring operation is safe and a good option for some patients has not been assessed.
OBJECTIVE To compare pain and the Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36 at two years in men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias randomized to watchful waiting (WW) or a standard tension-free hernia repair (TFR).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS. Between January, 1999 and December, 2004 we conducted a multicenter trial of 720 men (364 WW, 356 TFR) who were followed for 2-4.5 years. Men were excluded with hernia pain interfering with activities; undetectable hernias; infection; American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status >3; recent difficulty in reducing the hernia.
INTERVENTIONS Men assigned to WW were followed at 6 months and annually and watched for hernia symptoms. Men assigned to operation received TFR, and were followed at 3 and 6 months, and annually.
- Conditions
- Inguinal Hernia
- Being tested
- watchful waiting or tension-free hernia repair
- Keywords
- inguinal hernia, asymptomatic, watchful waiting, tension-free hernia repair
- Medical subject headings
- Hernia, Inguinal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
watchful waiting or tension-free hernia repairProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain limiting usual activities at two years.
Physical function (PCS) at two years.
Secondary outcomes (3)
Complications
patient-reported outcomes of pain, functional status, activity levels, and satisfaction with care.
Cost effectiveness.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Dec 2005 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 1999
- Primary completionDec 2004
- Study completionFeb 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Inguinal HerniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 724 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Creighton University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Olga Jonasson, M.D., Study director, American College of Surgeons
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00263250
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R01HS009860
- Status last verified
- Jun 2013
- First submitted
- 6 Dec 2005
- Last updated
- 1 Jul 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gibbs JO, Dunlop DD, Reda DJ, McCarthy M Jr, Neumayer LA, Barkun JS, Hoehn JL, Murphy JT, Sarosi GA Jr, Syme WC, Thompson JS, Wang J, Jonasson O. Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006 Jan 18;295(3):285-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.3.285.
PubMed 16418463Schroeder AD, Tubre DJ, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr. Watchful Waiting for Inguinal Hernia. Adv Surg. 2019 Sep;53:293-303. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 May 15. No abstract available.
PubMed 31327453Ramanan B, Maloley BJ, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr. Inguinal hernia: follow or repair? Adv Surg. 2014;48:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2014.05.017.
PubMed 25293603Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Ramanan B, Arya S, Turner SA, Li X, Gibbs JO, Reda DJ; Investigators of the Original Trial. Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial of a nonoperative strategy (watchful waiting) for men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias. Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):508-15. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a19725.
PubMed 24022443Sarosi GA, Wei Y, Gibbs JO, Reda DJ, McCarthy M, Fitzgibbons RJ, Barkun JS. A clinician's guide to patient selection for watchful waiting management of inguinal hernia. Ann Surg. 2011 Mar;253(3):605-10. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820b04e9.
PubMed 21239979
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jul 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Watchful Waiting Versus Open Tension-free Repair of Inguinal Hernia in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Men
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00263250
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R01HS009860
- Conditions
- Inguinal Hernia
- Keywords
- inguinal hernia, asymptomatic, watchful waiting, tension-free hernia repair
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 724 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Creighton UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 1999
- Primary completion
- Dec 2004 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2005 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Dec 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a multicenter clinical trial to compare pain, physical function, and other outcomes in men with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias randomly assigned to watchful waiting without an operation, or a standard hernia repair with mesh. We studied the safety of delaying operation.
Detailed description
CONTEXT Many men with an inguinal hernia have minimal symptoms. Whether deferring operation is safe and a good option for some patients has not been assessed.
OBJECTIVE To compare pain and the Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36 at two years in men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias randomized to watchful waiting (WW) or a standard tension-free hernia repair (TFR).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS. Between January, 1999 and December, 2004 we conducted a multicenter trial of 720 men (364 WW, 356 TFR) who were followed for 2-4.5 years. Men were excluded with hernia pain interfering with activities; undetectable hernias; infection; American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status >3; recent difficulty in reducing the hernia.
INTERVENTIONS Men assigned to WW were followed at 6 months and annually and watched for hernia symptoms. Men assigned to operation received TFR, and were followed at 3 and 6 months, and annually.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| watchful waiting or tension-free hernia repair | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Pain limiting usual activities at two years.
Physical function (PCS) at two years.
3 secondary outcomes
Complications
patient-reported outcomes of pain, functional status, activity levels, and satisfaction with care.
Cost effectiveness.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jul 2013.
- Results publication: PubMed 16418463Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gibbs JO, Dunlop DD, Reda DJ, McCarthy M Jr, Neumayer LA, Barkun JS, Hoehn JL, Murphy JT, Sarosi GA Jr, Syme WC, Thompson JS, Wang J, Jonasson O. Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006 Jan 18;295(3):285-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.3.285.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31327453Schroeder AD, Tubre DJ, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr. Watchful Waiting for Inguinal Hernia. Adv Surg. 2019 Sep;53:293-303. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 May 15. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25293603Ramanan B, Maloley BJ, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr. Inguinal hernia: follow or repair? Adv Surg. 2014;48:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2014.05.017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24022443Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Ramanan B, Arya S, Turner SA, Li X, Gibbs JO, Reda DJ; Investigators of the Original Trial. Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial of a nonoperative strategy (watchful waiting) for men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias. Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):508-15. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a19725.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21239979Sarosi GA, Wei Y, Gibbs JO, Reda DJ, McCarthy M, Fitzgibbons RJ, Barkun JS. A clinician's guide to patient selection for watchful waiting management of inguinal hernia. Ann Surg. 2011 Mar;253(3):605-10. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820b04e9.
- American College of SurgeonsLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Inguinal Hernia
Recruiting
Permanent Versus Slowly Dissolving Stitches for Non-Mesh (Shouldice) Groin Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia
Recruiting
Watchful Waiting Versus Immediate Repair for Occult Contralateral Inguinal Hernias.
Inguinal Hernia Bilateral, Inguinal Hernia Unilateral
Recruiting
Primary Sac Abandonment and Distal Sac Fixation vs Complete Sac Dissection for Inguinoscrotal Hernias
Seroma, Inguinal Hernias
Recruiting
Comparing Two Laparoscopic Techniques for Hernia Repair in Children
Inguinal Hernia
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar ESP Block Versus TAP Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Children Undergoing Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Olga Jonasson, M.D. study director
American College of Surgeons
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing watchful waiting or tension-free hernia repair in people with Inguinal Hernia, run by Creighton University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain limiting usual activities at two years.. The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00263250, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2013.