Kidney TransplantationPhase 2NCT00263328
Extension Study Of Stage 1 Subjects Of Study A3921009 For The Prevention Of Acute Rejection In Kidney Transplant Patient
A Phase 2 study testing Tacrolimus and CP-690,550 in people with Kidney Transplantation, run by Pfizer at 27 sites in United States.
Trial summary
A new immunosuppressive drug, based on the inhibition of an important enzyme in the immune system called JAK3, is being developed by Pfizer to prevent transplant rejection. In study A3921009, kidney transplant patients were given a JAK inhibitor or tacrolimus for 6 months posttransplant. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Kidney Transplantation
- What is being tested?
- Tacrolimus and CP-690,550
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 46 participants
- Where
- 27 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2005to Jun 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Enrollment in Stage 1 of Study A3921009 and have completed 6-months of treatment with trial medications (CP-690,550 or tacrolimus)
- Recipient of a first-time kidney transplant
Who cannot join
- Subject with any untreated condition that may affect drug absorption (eg, gastrectomy or clinically significant diabetic gastroenteropathy).
- Subjects who are on the waiting list for a second kidney transplant or any non-renal organ transplants.
Trial locations and contacts
27 sites in 1 country.
27 sites in 1 country
United States27 sites
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center Renal Clinical Trials Office
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Northwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Organ Transplantation
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Dallas Transplant Institute
Dallas, Texas, 75204
Annette C & Harold C Simmons Transplant Institute
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Baylor All Saints Medical Center
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Multi Organ Transplant Center
Los Angeles, California, 90057
St. Vincent Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90057
Transplant Research Institute
Los Angeles, California, 90057
Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Jack J Dreyfus Clinic
New York, New York, 10021
Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute
New York, New York, 10029
New York Presbyterian Hospital / Weill Cornell Medical Center
New York, New York, 10065
Stanford School of Medicine
Palo Alto, California, 94304
Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital
Portland, Oregon, 97210
Legacy Transplant Services
Portland, Oregon, 97210
Northwest Renal Clinic
Portland, Oregon, 97210
Balboa Institute of Transplantation
San Diego, California, 92123
California Institute of Renal Research
San Diego, California, 92123
Sharp Memorial Hospital
San Diego, California, 92123
California Pacific Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94115
University of California, San Francisco, Kidney Transplant Unit
San Francisco, California, 94143
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, California, 94305
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Phase 2, Open-label, Controlled, Extension Study For Stage 1 Subjects Of Study A3921009 To Evaluate The Long-term Safety And Efficacy Of Cp-690,550 Versus Tacrolimus, When Co-administered With Mycophenolate Mofetil In Renal Allograft Recipients
A new immunosuppressive drug, based on the inhibition of an important enzyme in the immune system called JAK3, is being developed by Pfizer to prevent transplant rejection. In study A3921009, kidney transplant patients were given a JAK inhibitor or tacrolimus for 6 months posttransplant. Patients who completed study A3921009 were offered the opportunity to participate in study A3921021 which will extend the evaluation of safety and efficacy of CP-690,550 versus tacrolimus through 8 years posttransplant. In treatment group 1 (control arm), subjects will continue to receive tacrolimus. In treatment groups 2 and 3, subjects will continue to receive CP-690,550. Per Amendment 4, the tacrolimus comparator arm will be discontinued.
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplantation
- Being tested
- Tacrolimus, CP-690,550
- Keywords
- immunosuppression, JAK3 inhibitor, kidney transplant, tofacitinib, Xeljanz, CP-690, 550, tacromilus, mycophenolate mofetil
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TacrolimusDrug
Standard of care
CP-690,550Drug
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
CP-690,550Drug
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment group 1 | Active comparator | Standard of care Receives: Drug: Tacrolimus |
| Treatment group 2 | Experimental | Treatment group 2 also receives mycophenolate mofetil Receives: Drug: CP-690,550 |
| Treatment group 3 | Experimental | Treatment group 3 does not receive mycophenolate mofetil Receives: Drug: CP-690,550 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation
GFR: an index of kidney function. GFR described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was calculated using MDRD equation. GFR by MDRD equation = 170 * (serum creatinine [in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)])^(-0.999) * (age in years)^(-0.176) * (0.762 if female) * (1.18 if black) * (blood urea nitrogen [BUN] concentration [mg/dL])^(-0.170) * (serum albumin concentration [in grams per dL (g/dL)])^(0.318). A normal GFR is >90 milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meters (mL/min/1.73 m^2), although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m^2 indicated kidney failure.
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Serum Creatinine Levels
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Infections by Visit
Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with clinically significant infections by time to first clinically significant infection within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier.
Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus, Definition 1 (NODM-1) by Visit
Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to NODM-1 within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. NODM-1 was defined as an event experienced by participants who were non-diabetic prior to transplantation and required treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti-diabetic agents, and/or insulin for greater than or equal to (≥)30 days.
Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Percentage of Participants With Hypercholesterolemia
Hypercholesterolemia was defined as cholesterol levels >240 mg/dL or 6.2 mmol/L.
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Percentage of Participants With Hypertriglyceridemia by Visit
Hypertriglyceridemia was defined as triglyceride levels of >200 mg/dL or 2.3 mmol/L.
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With First Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) by Visit
Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with first BPAR by time to first BPAR within 96 months post-transplant. BPAR was defined as acute/active cellular rejection (Category 4 of the Banff Classification), based on the assessment of the renal allograft biopsy by a central, blinded pathologist. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier.
Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure by Visit
Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with treatment failure by time to treatment failure within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. Treatment failure was defined as the first occurrence of BPAR, death, graft loss or premature discontinuation of trial medication for any reason.
Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Secondary outcomes (44)
Calculated GFR Using the Nankivell Equation (mL/Min)
GFR: an index of kidney function. GFR described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was measured directly or estimated using established formulas. GFR was estimated by creatinine clearance (CLcr; in mL/min]) using Nankivell equation. CLcr by Nankivell equation= (6.7 per serum creatinine [in millimoles per liter (mmol/L)]) plus (0.25*body weight [in kilograms (kg)]) minus (0.5*serum urea [mmol/dL, where 1 mg/dL BUN=0.36 mmol/L urea]) minus (100 per height [in meters] square) plus (35 for male/25 for female). A normal GFR is >90 mL/min, although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min indicated kidney failure.
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Calculated GFR Using Cockcroft-Gault Equation (mL/Min)
GFR: an index of kidney function. GFR described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was calculated using Cockcroft-Gault equation. GFR by Cockcroft-Gault equation= body weight (kg)*(140 minus age in years) divided by (72*serum creatinine [mg/dL]). For females value obtained was multiplied by 0.85. A normal GFR is >90 mL/min, although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min indicated kidney failure.
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Reciprocal of Serum Creatinine
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With NODM, Definition 2 (NODM-2) by Visit
Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with NODM-2 by time to NODM-2 within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. NODM-2 was defined as an event experienced by a transplanted subject who meets any of the following criteria: (a) NODM-1; or (b) Symptoms of diabetes plus 2 casual serum glucose levels ≥200 mg/dL separated by at least approximately 24 hours. Casual was defined as any time of day without regard to time since last meal; or (c) Fasting serum glucose ≥126 mg/dL on 2 different occasions separated by at least approximately 24 hours. Fasting was defined as no caloric intake for at least 8 hours; or (d) 2-hour serum glucose ≥200 mg/dL during an OGTT (Oral Glucose Tolerance Test).
Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Total Cholesterol Levels by Visit
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Levels by Visit
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Levels by Visit
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Ratio of Total Serum Cholesterol Level to HDL Level by Visit
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Percentage of Participants With Ratio of Total Serum Cholesterol to Serum HDL Cholesterol <5 by Visit
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Ratio of Serum LDL Level to HDL Level by Visit
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Percentage of Participants With Ratio of Serum LDL Cholesterol to Serum HDL Cholesterol <3.5 by Visit
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Serum Triglyceride Levels by Visit
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Percentage of Participants Requiring Lipid-Lowering Agents by Visit
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Percentage of Participants Requiring Anti-Hypertensive Medication by Visit
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Percentage of Participants Requiring Diabetes Agents (Oral Hypoglycemic Agents, Anti-Diabetic Agents, or Insulin) by Visit
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) Deooxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Levels Determined Using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) by Visit
Calculated as number of copies per 500 mg DNA.
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Percentage of Participants With EBV DNA Determined Using PCR by Specific Cutoff Categories (in Number of Copies/PCR) and Visit
EBV DNA PCR categories included 0, 1-50, 51-100, 101-1000, and >1000 copies/PCR.
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96 and Follow-Up (Month 98)
BK Virus (BKV) DNA Levels Determined Using PCR by Visit
Calculated as number of copies per PCR. Per protocol, BKV DNA PCR was performed on tofacitinib-treated participants only.
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Percentage of Participants With BKV DNA Determined Using PCR by Specific Cutoff Categories (in Number of Copies/PCR) and Visit
Cutoff categories for BKV DNA were 0-199 and ≥200 copies/PCR. Per protocol, BKV DNA PCR was performed on tofacitinib-treated participants only.
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Disease by Visit
Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with CMV disease within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. CMV disease was an adverse event associated with the preferred term 'CMV infection'.
Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With First Biopsy-Proven Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (BPCAN) by Visit
Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with first BPCAN by time to first BPCAN within 96 months post-transplant. BPCAN was defined as chronic allograft nephropathy (Category 5 of the Banff Classification), based on the assessment of the renal allograft biopsy by a central, blinded pathologist. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. Includes BPCAN diagnosed on biopsies done for cause and ready by the central pathologist.
Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Cumulative Percentage of Participants With a First Antibody-Mediated Rejection or First BPAR
Antibody-mediated rejection is defined as Category 2 and BPAR is defined as Category 4 of the Banff Classification, based on the assessment of the renal allograft biopsy by a central, blinded pathologist. Acute humoral rejection was categorized as Grades I, II, III and acute/active cellular rejection was categorized as Grades IA, IB, IIA, IIB, and III. Only participants with first BPAR were included.
Measured: Months 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Ordered Categorical Severity of First BPCAN
Ordered categorical severity of first BPCAN was classified according to the Banff Classification. Grade I: mild, grade II: moderate and grade III: severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy/loss. (Racusen et al: The Banff classification, 1999).
Measured: Months 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure by Visit
Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with efficacy failure by time to first efficacy failure within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. Efficacy failure was defined as first occurrence of BPAR, death, or graft loss.
Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Graft Survival by Visit
Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with graft survival by time to graft loss within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. Graft loss was defined as graft nephrectomy, retransplantation, return to dialysis for ≥6 consecutive weeks, or death.
Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants Surviving by Visit
Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants surviving by time to event (death) within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier.
Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Rejection by Visit
Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with rejection by time to rejection within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. Rejection was defined as first occurrence of BPAR, antibody-mediated rejection or suspicious for acute rejection. This included biopsies read by the central pathologist.
Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Absolute Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 8+, CD19+, CD4+, and CD56+ Flouresence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) Counts (Cells/uL) by Visit
Measured: Months 12 and 24
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Levels by Visit
Measured: Months 12, 24, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96 and Follow-up (Month 98)
Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA)-%B by Visit
HOMA-%B = (20 times [*] fasting serum insulin) divided by (/) (fasting serum glucose minus [-] 3.5). HOMA-%B was only performed in participants who were non-diabetic prior to kidney transplantation and who did not require treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti-diabetic agents, and/or insulin prior to the time of measurements.
Measured: Months 12 and 24
Ratio of Fasting Serum Proinsulin (Pmol/L) to Insulin (Pmol/L) by Visit
Measured only in participants who were non-diabetic prior to kidney transplantation and who did not require treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti-diabetic agents, and/or insulin prior to the time of measurement.
Measured: Months 12 and 24
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Serum Glucose (mg*h/dL) Measured During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) by Visit
Only performed in participants who were non-diabetic prior to kidney transplantation and who did not require treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti-diabetic agents, and/or insulin.
Measured: Months 12 and 24
AUC of Serum Insulin (microU*h/mL) Measured During OGTT by Visit
The OGTT was performed only in participants who were non-diabetic prior to kidney transplantation and who did not require treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti-diabetic agents, and/or insulin.
Measured: Months 12 and 24
HOMA Insulin Resistance (IR) by Visit
HOMA-IR=fasting serum insulin*fasting serum glucose/22.5. Measurement only performed in participants who were non-diabetic prior to kidney transplantation and who do not require treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti diabetic agents, and/or insulin prior to the time of measurement.
Measured: Months 12 and 24
Fasting Serum Glucose Levels (mg/dL) by Visit
Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Tofacitinib Concentrations in Plasma (ng/mL) by Visit
Measured: Months 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-up (Month 98)
Trough Levels of Tacrolimus (ng/mL) by Visit
Measured: Months 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, and 72 and Follow-up (Month 98)
Short-Form 36 Version 2 (SF-36 v2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores by Visit and Scale
The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS). Total of 11 variables were analyzed (8 subscales, 2 composite subscales and Question 2 "how would you rate your health in general now?" (range 1= better, 5= worst). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Measured: Months 12, 18, and 24
Change From Baseline in SF-36 v2 MCS and PCS Scores by Visit and Scale
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as PCS and MCS. Total of 11 variables were analyzed (8 subscales, 2 composite subscales and Question 2 "how would you rate your health in general now?" (range 1= better, 5= worst). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Negative change from baseline represented improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Months 12, 18, and 24
SF-36 v2 Subscale Scores by Visit
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as PCS and MCS. Total of 11 variables were analyzed (8 subscales, 2 composite subscales and Question 2 "how would you rate your health in general now?" (range 1= better, 5= worst). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Measured: Months 12, 18, and 24
Change From Baseline in SF-36 v2 Subscale Scores by Visit
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as PCS and MCS. Total of 11 variables were analyzed (8 subscales, 2 composite subscales and Question 2 "how would you rate your health in general now?" (range 1= better, 5= worst). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Negative change from baseline represented improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Months 12, 18, and 24
End Stage Renal Disease Symptom Checklist (ESRD-SCL) Transplanation Module Scores by Visit and Scale
ESRD-SCL: 43-item, disease-specific, self-administered questionnaire. Participants' rated question "At the moment, how much do you suffer?" for each item on 5-point scale, ranged from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Consisted of 6 subscales: cardiac and renal dysfunction (Range, 0-28), increased growth of gum and hair (Range, 0-20), limited cognitive capacity (Range, 0-32), limited physical capacity (Range, 0-40), side effects (SEs) of corticosteroids (Range, 0-20), transplantation associated psychological distress (TAPD; Range, 0-32); higher scores=greater dysfunction for each subscale. Total score: 0-172, higher scores=greater dysfunction.
Measured: Months 12, 18, and 24
Change From Baseline in ESRD-SCL Transplantation Module Scores by Visit and Scale
ESRD-SCL: 43-item, disease-specific, self-administered questionnaire. Participants' rated question "At the moment, how much do you suffer?" for each item on 5-point scale, ranged from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Consisted of 6 subscales: cardiac and renal dysfunction (Range, 0-28), increased growth of gum and hair (Range, 0-20), limited cognitive capacity (Range, 0-32), limited physical capacity (Range, 0-40), SEs of corticosteroids (Range, 0-20),TAPD (Range, 0-32); higher scores=greater dysfunction for each subscale. Total score: 0-172, higher scores=greater dysfunction.
Measured: Baseline, Months 12, 18, and 24
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU) Questionnaire
HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any number of events including visits to doctor or other healthcare professionals (HCP), non-medical practitioner, hospital ER treatment, hospitalizations, number of surgeries, diagnostic tests, and devices/aids used were reported.
Measured: Months 12, 18, and 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Dec 2005 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2005
- Primary completionJan 2014
- Study completionJun 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Kidney TransplantationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00263328
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A3921021
- Status last verified
- Jun 2015
- First submitted
- 6 Dec 2005
- Last updated
- 13 Jul 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Busque S, Leventhal J, Brennan DC, Steinberg S, Klintmalm G, Shah T, Mulgaonkar S, Bromberg JS, Vincenti F, Hariharan S, Slakey D, Peddi VR, Fisher RA, Lawendy N, Wang C, Chan G. Calcineurin-inhibitor-free immunosuppression based on the JAK inhibitor CP-690,550: a pilot study in de novo kidney allograft recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009 Aug;9(8):1936-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02720.x.
PubMed 19660021
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jul 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Phase 2, Open-label, Controlled, Extension Study For Stage 1 Subjects Of Study A3921009 To Evaluate The Long-term Safety And Efficacy Of Cp-690,550 Versus Tacrolimus, When Co-administered With Mycophenolate Mofetil In Renal Allograft Recipients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00263328
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A3921021
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplantation
- Keywords
- immunosuppression, JAK3 inhibitor, kidney transplant, tofacitinib, Xeljanz, CP-690, 550, tacromilus
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2005
- Primary completion
- Jan 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Dec 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Jul 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A new immunosuppressive drug, based on the inhibition of an important enzyme in the immune system called JAK3, is being developed by Pfizer to prevent transplant rejection. In study A3921009, kidney transplant patients were given a JAK inhibitor or tacrolimus for 6 months posttransplant. Patients who completed study A3921009 were offered the opportunity to participate in study A3921021 which will extend the evaluation of safety and efficacy of CP-690,550 versus tacrolimus through 8 years posttransplant. In treatment group 1 (control arm), subjects will continue to receive tacrolimus. In treatment groups 2 and 3, subjects will continue to receive CP-690,550. Per Amendment 4, the tacrolimus comparator arm will be discontinued.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment group 1 | Active comparator | Drug: TacrolimusStandard of care |
| Treatment group 2 | Experimental | Drug: CP-690,550Treatment group 2 also receives mycophenolate mofetil |
| Treatment group 3 | Experimental | Drug: CP-690,550Treatment group 3 does not receive mycophenolate mofetil |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Enrollment in Stage 1 of Study A3921009 and have completed 6-months of treatment with trial medications (CP-690,550 or tacrolimus)
- Recipient of a first-time kidney transplant
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Subject with any untreated condition that may affect drug absorption (eg, gastrectomy or clinically significant diabetic gastroenteropathy).
- Subjects who are on the waiting list for a second kidney transplant or any non-renal organ transplants.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TacrolimusStandard of care | Drug | Treatment group 1 |
| CP-690,550CP-690,550 5 mg BID | Drug | Treatment group 2 |
| CP-690,550CP-690,550 10 mg BID | Drug | Treatment group 3 |
Primary outcome
Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
GFR: an index of kidney function. GFR described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was calculated using MDRD equation. GFR by MDRD equation = 170 * (serum creatinine [in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)])^(-0.999) * (age in years)^(-0.176) * (0.762 if female) * (1.18 if black) * (blood urea nitrogen [BUN] concentration [mg/dL])^(-0.170) * (serum albumin concentration [in grams per dL (g/dL)])^(0.318). A normal GFR is >90 milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meters (mL/min/1.73 m^2), although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m^2 indicated kidney failure.
Serum Creatinine Levels
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Infections by Visit
Time frame: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with clinically significant infections by time to first clinically significant infection within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier.
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus, Definition 1 (NODM-1) by Visit
Time frame: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to NODM-1 within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. NODM-1 was defined as an event experienced by participants who were non-diabetic prior to transplantation and required treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti-diabetic agents, and/or insulin for greater than or equal to (≥)30 days.
Percentage of Participants With Hypercholesterolemia
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Hypercholesterolemia was defined as cholesterol levels >240 mg/dL or 6.2 mmol/L.
Percentage of Participants With Hypertriglyceridemia by Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Hypertriglyceridemia was defined as triglyceride levels of >200 mg/dL or 2.3 mmol/L.
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With First Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) by Visit
Time frame: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with first BPAR by time to first BPAR within 96 months post-transplant. BPAR was defined as acute/active cellular rejection (Category 4 of the Banff Classification), based on the assessment of the renal allograft biopsy by a central, blinded pathologist. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier.
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure by Visit
Time frame: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with treatment failure by time to treatment failure within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. Treatment failure was defined as the first occurrence of BPAR, death, graft loss or premature discontinuation of trial medication for any reason.
44 secondary outcomes
Calculated GFR Using the Nankivell Equation (mL/Min)
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Calculated GFR Using Cockcroft-Gault Equation (mL/Min)
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Reciprocal of Serum Creatinine
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With NODM, Definition 2 (NODM-2) by Visit
Time frame: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Total Cholesterol Levels by Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Levels by Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Levels by Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Ratio of Total Serum Cholesterol Level to HDL Level by Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Percentage of Participants With Ratio of Total Serum Cholesterol to Serum HDL Cholesterol <5 by Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Ratio of Serum LDL Level to HDL Level by Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Percentage of Participants With Ratio of Serum LDL Cholesterol to Serum HDL Cholesterol <3.5 by Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Serum Triglyceride Levels by Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Percentage of Participants Requiring Lipid-Lowering Agents by Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Percentage of Participants Requiring Anti-Hypertensive Medication by Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Percentage of Participants Requiring Diabetes Agents (Oral Hypoglycemic Agents, Anti-Diabetic Agents, or Insulin) by Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) Deooxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Levels Determined Using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) by Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Percentage of Participants With EBV DNA Determined Using PCR by Specific Cutoff Categories (in Number of Copies/PCR) and Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96 and Follow-Up (Month 98)
BK Virus (BKV) DNA Levels Determined Using PCR by Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Percentage of Participants With BKV DNA Determined Using PCR by Specific Cutoff Categories (in Number of Copies/PCR) and Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Disease by Visit
Time frame: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With First Biopsy-Proven Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (BPCAN) by Visit
Time frame: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Cumulative Percentage of Participants With a First Antibody-Mediated Rejection or First BPAR
Time frame: Months 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Ordered Categorical Severity of First BPCAN
Time frame: Months 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure by Visit
Time frame: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Graft Survival by Visit
Time frame: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants Surviving by Visit
Time frame: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Rejection by Visit
Time frame: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96
Absolute Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 8+, CD19+, CD4+, and CD56+ Flouresence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) Counts (Cells/uL) by Visit
Time frame: Months 12 and 24
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Levels by Visit
Time frame: Months 12, 24, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96 and Follow-up (Month 98)
Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA)-%B by Visit
Time frame: Months 12 and 24
Ratio of Fasting Serum Proinsulin (Pmol/L) to Insulin (Pmol/L) by Visit
Time frame: Months 12 and 24
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Serum Glucose (mg*h/dL) Measured During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) by Visit
Time frame: Months 12 and 24
AUC of Serum Insulin (microU*h/mL) Measured During OGTT by Visit
Time frame: Months 12 and 24
HOMA Insulin Resistance (IR) by Visit
Time frame: Months 12 and 24
Fasting Serum Glucose Levels (mg/dL) by Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)
Tofacitinib Concentrations in Plasma (ng/mL) by Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-up (Month 98)
Trough Levels of Tacrolimus (ng/mL) by Visit
Time frame: Months 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, and 72 and Follow-up (Month 98)
Short-Form 36 Version 2 (SF-36 v2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores by Visit and Scale
Time frame: Months 12, 18, and 24
Change From Baseline in SF-36 v2 MCS and PCS Scores by Visit and Scale
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12, 18, and 24
SF-36 v2 Subscale Scores by Visit
Time frame: Months 12, 18, and 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jul 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19660021Busque S, Leventhal J, Brennan DC, Steinberg S, Klintmalm G, Shah T, Mulgaonkar S, Bromberg JS, Vincenti F, Hariharan S, Slakey D, Peddi VR, Fisher RA, Lawendy N, Wang C, Chan G. Calcineurin-inhibitor-free immunosuppression based on the JAK inhibitor CP-690,550: a pilot study in de novo kidney allograft recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009 Aug;9(8):1936-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02720.x.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Kidney Transplantation
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) After a Kidney Transplant
Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR)
Not yet recruiting
Hypothermic Kidney Machine Perfusion With Omnisol
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplant
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Biomarker-Guided Mycophenolate Mofetil Elimination in Low-Risk Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients
Kidney Transplant Recipient
Recruiting
Non-Invasive Monitoring of Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients and Immunosuppression Personalization: an Open-labeled Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
Pediatric Kidney Disease, Transplant;Failure,Kidney
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
27 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Tacrolimus and CP-690,550 in people with Kidney Transplantation, run by Pfizer at 27 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 27 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jul 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation (time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00263328, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2015.