AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney TransplantationPhase 2NCT00263328

Extension Study Of Stage 1 Subjects Of Study A3921009 For The Prevention Of Acute Rejection In Kidney Transplant Patient

A Phase 2 study testing Tacrolimus and CP-690,550 in people with Kidney Transplantation, run by Pfizer at 27 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A new immunosuppressive drug, based on the inhibition of an important enzyme in the immune system called JAK3, is being developed by Pfizer to prevent transplant rejection. In study A3921009, kidney transplant patients were given a JAK inhibitor or tacrolimus for 6 months posttransplant. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Transplantation
What is being tested?
Tacrolimus and CP-690,550
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
46 participants
Where
27 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Dec 2005to Jun 2014
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Enrollment in Stage 1 of Study A3921009 and have completed 6-months of treatment with trial medications (CP-690,550 or tacrolimus)
  • Recipient of a first-time kidney transplant

Who cannot join

  • Subject with any untreated condition that may affect drug absorption (eg, gastrectomy or clinically significant diabetic gastroenteropathy).
  • Subjects who are on the waiting list for a second kidney transplant or any non-renal organ transplants.

Trial locations and contacts

27 sites in 1 country.

27 sites in 1 country

United States27 sites
  • University of Colorado Health Sciences Center Renal Clinical Trials Office

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • University of Colorado Health Sciences Center

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Northwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Organ Transplantation

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Dallas Transplant Institute

    Dallas, Texas, 75204

  • Annette C & Harold C Simmons Transplant Institute

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

  • Baylor University Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

  • Baylor All Saints Medical Center

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76104

  • Multi Organ Transplant Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90057

  • St. Vincent Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90057

  • Transplant Research Institute

    Los Angeles, California, 90057

  • Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

  • Medical College of Wisconsin

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

  • Jack J Dreyfus Clinic

    New York, New York, 10021

  • Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute

    New York, New York, 10029

  • New York Presbyterian Hospital / Weill Cornell Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10065

  • Stanford School of Medicine

    Palo Alto, California, 94304

  • Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital

    Portland, Oregon, 97210

  • Legacy Transplant Services

    Portland, Oregon, 97210

  • Northwest Renal Clinic

    Portland, Oregon, 97210

  • Balboa Institute of Transplantation

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • California Institute of Renal Research

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • Sharp Memorial Hospital

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • California Pacific Medical Center

    San Francisco, California, 94115

  • University of California, San Francisco, Kidney Transplant Unit

    San Francisco, California, 94143

  • Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Stanford University Medical Center

    Stanford, California, 94305

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Phase 2, Open-label, Controlled, Extension Study For Stage 1 Subjects Of Study A3921009 To Evaluate The Long-term Safety And Efficacy Of Cp-690,550 Versus Tacrolimus, When Co-administered With Mycophenolate Mofetil In Renal Allograft Recipients

A new immunosuppressive drug, based on the inhibition of an important enzyme in the immune system called JAK3, is being developed by Pfizer to prevent transplant rejection. In study A3921009, kidney transplant patients were given a JAK inhibitor or tacrolimus for 6 months posttransplant. Patients who completed study A3921009 were offered the opportunity to participate in study A3921021 which will extend the evaluation of safety and efficacy of CP-690,550 versus tacrolimus through 8 years posttransplant. In treatment group 1 (control arm), subjects will continue to receive tacrolimus. In treatment groups 2 and 3, subjects will continue to receive CP-690,550. Per Amendment 4, the tacrolimus comparator arm will be discontinued.

Being tested
Tacrolimus, CP-690,550
Keywords
immunosuppression, JAK3 inhibitor, kidney transplant, tofacitinib, Xeljanz, CP-690, 550, tacromilus, mycophenolate mofetil

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TacrolimusDrug

    Standard of care

  • CP-690,550Drug

    CP-690,550 5 mg BID

  • CP-690,550Drug

    CP-690,550 10 mg BID

Study groups in NCT00263328
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treatment group 1Active comparatorStandard of care
Receives: Drug: Tacrolimus
Treatment group 2ExperimentalTreatment group 2 also receives mycophenolate mofetil
Receives: Drug: CP-690,550
Treatment group 3ExperimentalTreatment group 3 does not receive mycophenolate mofetil
Receives: Drug: CP-690,550

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation

    GFR: an index of kidney function. GFR described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was calculated using MDRD equation. GFR by MDRD equation = 170 * (serum creatinine [in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)])^(-0.999) * (age in years)^(-0.176) * (0.762 if female) * (1.18 if black) * (blood urea nitrogen [BUN] concentration [mg/dL])^(-0.170) * (serum albumin concentration [in grams per dL (g/dL)])^(0.318). A normal GFR is >90 milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meters (mL/min/1.73 m^2), although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m^2 indicated kidney failure.

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  2. Serum Creatinine Levels

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  3. Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Infections by Visit

    Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with clinically significant infections by time to first clinically significant infection within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier.

    Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

  4. Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus, Definition 1 (NODM-1) by Visit

    Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to NODM-1 within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. NODM-1 was defined as an event experienced by participants who were non-diabetic prior to transplantation and required treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti-diabetic agents, and/or insulin for greater than or equal to (≥)30 days.

    Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

  5. Percentage of Participants With Hypercholesterolemia

    Hypercholesterolemia was defined as cholesterol levels >240 mg/dL or 6.2 mmol/L.

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  6. Percentage of Participants With Hypertriglyceridemia by Visit

    Hypertriglyceridemia was defined as triglyceride levels of >200 mg/dL or 2.3 mmol/L.

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  7. Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With First Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) by Visit

    Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with first BPAR by time to first BPAR within 96 months post-transplant. BPAR was defined as acute/active cellular rejection (Category 4 of the Banff Classification), based on the assessment of the renal allograft biopsy by a central, blinded pathologist. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier.

    Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

  8. Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure by Visit

    Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with treatment failure by time to treatment failure within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. Treatment failure was defined as the first occurrence of BPAR, death, graft loss or premature discontinuation of trial medication for any reason.

    Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

Secondary outcomes (44)
  1. Calculated GFR Using the Nankivell Equation (mL/Min)

    GFR: an index of kidney function. GFR described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was measured directly or estimated using established formulas. GFR was estimated by creatinine clearance (CLcr; in mL/min]) using Nankivell equation. CLcr by Nankivell equation= (6.7 per serum creatinine [in millimoles per liter (mmol/L)]) plus (0.25*body weight [in kilograms (kg)]) minus (0.5*serum urea [mmol/dL, where 1 mg/dL BUN=0.36 mmol/L urea]) minus (100 per height [in meters] square) plus (35 for male/25 for female). A normal GFR is >90 mL/min, although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min indicated kidney failure.

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  2. Calculated GFR Using Cockcroft-Gault Equation (mL/Min)

    GFR: an index of kidney function. GFR described the flow rate of filtered fluid through the kidney. GFR was calculated using Cockcroft-Gault equation. GFR by Cockcroft-Gault equation= body weight (kg)*(140 minus age in years) divided by (72*serum creatinine [mg/dL]). For females value obtained was multiplied by 0.85. A normal GFR is >90 mL/min, although children and older people usually have a lower GFR. Lower values indicated poor kidney function. A GFR <15 mL/min indicated kidney failure.

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  3. Reciprocal of Serum Creatinine

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  4. Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With NODM, Definition 2 (NODM-2) by Visit

    Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with NODM-2 by time to NODM-2 within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. NODM-2 was defined as an event experienced by a transplanted subject who meets any of the following criteria: (a) NODM-1; or (b) Symptoms of diabetes plus 2 casual serum glucose levels ≥200 mg/dL separated by at least approximately 24 hours. Casual was defined as any time of day without regard to time since last meal; or (c) Fasting serum glucose ≥126 mg/dL on 2 different occasions separated by at least approximately 24 hours. Fasting was defined as no caloric intake for at least 8 hours; or (d) 2-hour serum glucose ≥200 mg/dL during an OGTT (Oral Glucose Tolerance Test).

    Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

  5. Total Cholesterol Levels by Visit

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  6. Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Levels by Visit

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  7. High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Levels by Visit

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  8. Ratio of Total Serum Cholesterol Level to HDL Level by Visit

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  9. Percentage of Participants With Ratio of Total Serum Cholesterol to Serum HDL Cholesterol <5 by Visit

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  10. Ratio of Serum LDL Level to HDL Level by Visit

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  11. Percentage of Participants With Ratio of Serum LDL Cholesterol to Serum HDL Cholesterol <3.5 by Visit

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  12. Serum Triglyceride Levels by Visit

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  13. Percentage of Participants Requiring Lipid-Lowering Agents by Visit

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

  14. Percentage of Participants Requiring Anti-Hypertensive Medication by Visit

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

  15. Percentage of Participants Requiring Diabetes Agents (Oral Hypoglycemic Agents, Anti-Diabetic Agents, or Insulin) by Visit

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

  16. Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) Deooxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Levels Determined Using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) by Visit

    Calculated as number of copies per 500 mg DNA.

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

  17. Percentage of Participants With EBV DNA Determined Using PCR by Specific Cutoff Categories (in Number of Copies/PCR) and Visit

    EBV DNA PCR categories included 0, 1-50, 51-100, 101-1000, and >1000 copies/PCR.

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96 and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  18. BK Virus (BKV) DNA Levels Determined Using PCR by Visit

    Calculated as number of copies per PCR. Per protocol, BKV DNA PCR was performed on tofacitinib-treated participants only.

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  19. Percentage of Participants With BKV DNA Determined Using PCR by Specific Cutoff Categories (in Number of Copies/PCR) and Visit

    Cutoff categories for BKV DNA were 0-199 and ≥200 copies/PCR. Per protocol, BKV DNA PCR was performed on tofacitinib-treated participants only.

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  20. Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Disease by Visit

    Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with CMV disease within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. CMV disease was an adverse event associated with the preferred term 'CMV infection'.

    Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

  21. Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With First Biopsy-Proven Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (BPCAN) by Visit

    Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with first BPCAN by time to first BPCAN within 96 months post-transplant. BPCAN was defined as chronic allograft nephropathy (Category 5 of the Banff Classification), based on the assessment of the renal allograft biopsy by a central, blinded pathologist. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. Includes BPCAN diagnosed on biopsies done for cause and ready by the central pathologist.

    Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

  22. Cumulative Percentage of Participants With a First Antibody-Mediated Rejection or First BPAR

    Antibody-mediated rejection is defined as Category 2 and BPAR is defined as Category 4 of the Banff Classification, based on the assessment of the renal allograft biopsy by a central, blinded pathologist. Acute humoral rejection was categorized as Grades I, II, III and acute/active cellular rejection was categorized as Grades IA, IB, IIA, IIB, and III. Only participants with first BPAR were included.

    Measured: Months 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  23. Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Ordered Categorical Severity of First BPCAN

    Ordered categorical severity of first BPCAN was classified according to the Banff Classification. Grade I: mild, grade II: moderate and grade III: severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy/loss. (Racusen et al: The Banff classification, 1999).

    Measured: Months 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96

  24. Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Efficacy Failure by Visit

    Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with efficacy failure by time to first efficacy failure within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. Efficacy failure was defined as first occurrence of BPAR, death, or graft loss.

    Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

  25. Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Graft Survival by Visit

    Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with graft survival by time to graft loss within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. Graft loss was defined as graft nephrectomy, retransplantation, return to dialysis for ≥6 consecutive weeks, or death.

    Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

  26. Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants Surviving by Visit

    Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants surviving by time to event (death) within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier.

    Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

  27. Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Percentage of Participants With Rejection by Visit

    Kaplan-Meier analysis of percentage of participants with rejection by time to rejection within 96 months post-transplant. Time was defined from the date of first dose of study drug in Study A3921009 to the date of first occurrence of the event, censored at the day of the last visit or Day 2980 (the maximum scheduled day for follow-up 98 month), whichever comes earlier. Rejection was defined as first occurrence of BPAR, antibody-mediated rejection or suspicious for acute rejection. This included biopsies read by the central pathologist.

    Measured: Day 1 and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96

  28. Absolute Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 8+, CD19+, CD4+, and CD56+ Flouresence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) Counts (Cells/uL) by Visit

    Measured: Months 12 and 24

  29. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Levels by Visit

    Measured: Months 12, 24, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, and 96 and Follow-up (Month 98)

  30. Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA)-%B by Visit

    HOMA-%B = (20 times [*] fasting serum insulin) divided by (/) (fasting serum glucose minus [-] 3.5). HOMA-%B was only performed in participants who were non-diabetic prior to kidney transplantation and who did not require treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti-diabetic agents, and/or insulin prior to the time of measurements.

    Measured: Months 12 and 24

  31. Ratio of Fasting Serum Proinsulin (Pmol/L) to Insulin (Pmol/L) by Visit

    Measured only in participants who were non-diabetic prior to kidney transplantation and who did not require treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti-diabetic agents, and/or insulin prior to the time of measurement.

    Measured: Months 12 and 24

  32. Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Serum Glucose (mg*h/dL) Measured During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) by Visit

    Only performed in participants who were non-diabetic prior to kidney transplantation and who did not require treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti-diabetic agents, and/or insulin.

    Measured: Months 12 and 24

  33. AUC of Serum Insulin (microU*h/mL) Measured During OGTT by Visit

    The OGTT was performed only in participants who were non-diabetic prior to kidney transplantation and who did not require treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti-diabetic agents, and/or insulin.

    Measured: Months 12 and 24

  34. HOMA Insulin Resistance (IR) by Visit

    HOMA-IR=fasting serum insulin*fasting serum glucose/22.5. Measurement only performed in participants who were non-diabetic prior to kidney transplantation and who do not require treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents, anti diabetic agents, and/or insulin prior to the time of measurement.

    Measured: Months 12 and 24

  35. Fasting Serum Glucose Levels (mg/dL) by Visit

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)

  36. Tofacitinib Concentrations in Plasma (ng/mL) by Visit

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-up (Month 98)

  37. Trough Levels of Tacrolimus (ng/mL) by Visit

    Measured: Months 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, and 72 and Follow-up (Month 98)

  38. Short-Form 36 Version 2 (SF-36 v2) Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores by Visit and Scale

    The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS). Total of 11 variables were analyzed (8 subscales, 2 composite subscales and Question 2 "how would you rate your health in general now?" (range 1= better, 5= worst). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).

    Measured: Months 12, 18, and 24

  39. Change From Baseline in SF-36 v2 MCS and PCS Scores by Visit and Scale

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as PCS and MCS. Total of 11 variables were analyzed (8 subscales, 2 composite subscales and Question 2 "how would you rate your health in general now?" (range 1= better, 5= worst). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Negative change from baseline represented improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 12, 18, and 24

  40. SF-36 v2 Subscale Scores by Visit

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as PCS and MCS. Total of 11 variables were analyzed (8 subscales, 2 composite subscales and Question 2 "how would you rate your health in general now?" (range 1= better, 5= worst). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).

    Measured: Months 12, 18, and 24

  41. Change From Baseline in SF-36 v2 Subscale Scores by Visit

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as PCS and MCS. Total of 11 variables were analyzed (8 subscales, 2 composite subscales and Question 2 "how would you rate your health in general now?" (range 1= better, 5= worst). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Negative change from baseline represented improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 12, 18, and 24

  42. End Stage Renal Disease Symptom Checklist (ESRD-SCL) Transplanation Module Scores by Visit and Scale

    ESRD-SCL: 43-item, disease-specific, self-administered questionnaire. Participants' rated question "At the moment, how much do you suffer?" for each item on 5-point scale, ranged from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Consisted of 6 subscales: cardiac and renal dysfunction (Range, 0-28), increased growth of gum and hair (Range, 0-20), limited cognitive capacity (Range, 0-32), limited physical capacity (Range, 0-40), side effects (SEs) of corticosteroids (Range, 0-20), transplantation associated psychological distress (TAPD; Range, 0-32); higher scores=greater dysfunction for each subscale. Total score: 0-172, higher scores=greater dysfunction.

    Measured: Months 12, 18, and 24

  43. Change From Baseline in ESRD-SCL Transplantation Module Scores by Visit and Scale

    ESRD-SCL: 43-item, disease-specific, self-administered questionnaire. Participants' rated question "At the moment, how much do you suffer?" for each item on 5-point scale, ranged from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Consisted of 6 subscales: cardiac and renal dysfunction (Range, 0-28), increased growth of gum and hair (Range, 0-20), limited cognitive capacity (Range, 0-32), limited physical capacity (Range, 0-40), SEs of corticosteroids (Range, 0-20),TAPD (Range, 0-32); higher scores=greater dysfunction for each subscale. Total score: 0-172, higher scores=greater dysfunction.

    Measured: Baseline, Months 12, 18, and 24

  44. Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU) Questionnaire

    HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any number of events including visits to doctor or other healthcare professionals (HCP), non-medical practitioner, hospital ER treatment, hospitalizations, number of surgeries, diagnostic tests, and devices/aids used were reported.

    Measured: Months 12, 18, and 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Dec 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2005
  3. Primary completionJan 2014
  4. Study completionJun 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
46 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00263328
Sponsor's protocol ID
A3921021
Status last verified
Jun 2015
First submitted
6 Dec 2005
Last updated
13 Jul 2015
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Busque S, Leventhal J, Brennan DC, Steinberg S, Klintmalm G, Shah T, Mulgaonkar S, Bromberg JS, Vincenti F, Hariharan S, Slakey D, Peddi VR, Fisher RA, Lawendy N, Wang C, Chan G. Calcineurin-inhibitor-free immunosuppression based on the JAK inhibitor CP-690,550: a pilot study in de novo kidney allograft recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009 Aug;9(8):1936-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02720.x.

    PubMed 19660021

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Tacrolimus and CP-690,550 in people with Kidney Transplantation, run by Pfizer at 27 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 27 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jul 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation (time frame: Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, and Follow-Up (Month 98)). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00263328, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in