AzTrials
AzTrials

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungPhase 2SUN1058NCT00265317

A Study In Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Testing If Erlotinib Plus SU011248 (Sunitinib) Is Better Than Erlotinib Alone

A Phase 2 study testing erlotinib and sunitinib in people with Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, run by Pfizer at 32 sites in 8 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will test whether treatment with erlotinib plus SU011248 is better than erlotinib alone in patients with advanced/metastatic lung cancer who have received previous treatment with a platinum-based regimen Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What is being tested?
erlotinib and sunitinib
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
162 participants
Where
32 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
Jun 2006to Jan 2012
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
  • Prior treatment with no more than 2 chemotherapy regimens including a platinum-based regimen

Who cannot join

  • Prior treatment with any receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors or other angiogenic inhibitors
  • History of or known brain metastases

Trial locations and contacts

32 sites in 8 countries.

32 sites in 8 countries

United States18 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Antioch, California, 94531

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7600

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63376

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Clinton, North Carolina, 28328

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Creve Coeur, Missouri, 63141

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Goldsboro, North Carolina, 27534

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Mobile, Alabama, 36604

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Palm Springs, California, 92262-4885

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Pleasant Hill, California, 94523

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    San Leandro, California, 94578

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110-1094

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Wilson, North Carolina, 27893

Other trials in United States

Romania3 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Bucharest, Sector 2, 022328

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Bucharest, 30171

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, 400015

Other trials in Romania

Canada2 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2

Other trials in Canada

Hungary2 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Budapest, 1525

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Törökbálint, 2045

Other trials in Hungary

Italy2 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Genova, 16132

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Monteforte Irpino, AV, 83024

Other trials in Italy

Netherlands2 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Amsterdam, 1066 CX

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Groningen, 9713 GZ

Other trials in Netherlands

Poland2 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Bydgoszcz, 85-796

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Gdansk, 80-952

Other trials in Poland

Spain1 site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Santander, Cantabria, 39008

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2 Study Of Erlotinib With Or Without SU011248 In The Treatment Of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This study will test whether treatment with erlotinib plus SU011248 is better than erlotinib alone in patients with advanced/metastatic lung cancer who have received previous treatment with a platinum-based regimen

Being tested
erlotinib, sunitinib, placebo
Keywords
Non-small cell lung cancer, sunitinib, erlotinib, Phase 2
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • erlotinibDrug

    erlotinib 150 mg daily by tablets in a continuous regimen, until progression or unacceptable toxicity

  • sunitinibDrug

    Also called Sutent

    Sunitinib 37.5 mg daily by oral capsule in a continuous regimen plus erlotinib 150 mg daily by tablets in a continuous regimen, until progression or unacceptable toxicity

  • erlotinibDrug

    erlotinib 150 mg daily by tablets in a continuous regimen, until progression or unacceptable toxicity

  • placeboDrug

    Placebo daily by oral capsule in a continuous regimen plus erlotinib 150 mg daily by tablets in a continuous regimen, until progression or unacceptable toxicity

Study groups in NCT00265317
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: erlotinib; Drug: sunitinib
BActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: erlotinib; Drug: placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS=time from randomization date to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD; defined as greater than or equal to [≥]20% increase in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of longest dimensions recorded since first dose or appearance of ≥1 new lesions) or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first based on third party independent imaging review laboratory assessment. PFS calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02. Used 7.02 days as it equals 365 days per year divided by 52 weeks per year.

    Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

Secondary outcomes (62)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

    Objective Response Rate (ORR)=participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST,Version 1.0) based on third party independent imaging review laboratory assessment. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. A PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.

    Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

  2. Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)

    TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization to first documentation of PD based on third party independent imaging review laboratory assessment. TTP was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

  3. Duration of Response (DR)

    DR was defined as time from first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed to the first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DR was calculated as (first date of PD or death minus first date of CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

  4. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (date of death minus date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4. For participants still alive at the time of analysis, OS time was censored on last date that participants were known to be alive.

    Measured: From randomization until death (up to Month 17)

  5. Percentage of Participants Surviving at 1 Year

    Percentage of participants alive at 1 year after date of first administration of study medication.

    Measured: From randomization until death (up until Month 17)

  6. Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours [AUC(0-24)] of Erlotinib

    AUC0-24=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours (0-24) of erlotinib

    Measured: Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

  7. AUC(0-24) of Sunitinib

    AUC0-24=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours (0-24) of sunitinib

    Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

  8. AUC(0-24) of SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib)

    AUC0-24=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours (0-24) of SU-012662 (metabolite of sunitinib)

    Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

  9. AUC(0-24) of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)

    AUC0-24=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours (0-24) of total drug (sunitinib + SU-012662)

    Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

  10. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Erlotinib

    Measured: Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

  11. Cmax of Sunitinib

    Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose

  12. Cmax of SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib)

    Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose

  13. Cmax of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)

    Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose

  14. Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUC0-inf) for Erlotinib

    AUC (0-inf) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf) for erlotinib. It is obtained from AUC from time zero (pre-dose) to last quantifiable concentration(AUC[0-t]) plus AUC from time last quantifiable concentration extrapolated infinite time (AUC[t-inf])

    Measured: Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose; predose on Days 22 and 23 (Cycle 1)

  15. AUC(0-inf) for Sunitinib

    AUC (0 - inf) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf) for sunitinib. It is obtained from AUC(0-t) plus AUC(t-inf)

    Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose; predose on Days 15, 16, and 17 (Cycle 1)

  16. AUC(0-inf) for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib)

    AUC(0-inf) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf) for SU-012662 (metabolite of sunitinib). It is obtained from AUC(0-t) plus AUC(t-inf)

    Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose; predose on Days 15, 16, and 17 (Cycle 1)

  17. AUC(0-inf) for Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)

    AUC(0-inf) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf) for total drug (sunitinib + SU-012662). It is obtained from AUC(0-t) plus AUC(t-inf)

    Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose; predose on Days 15, 16, and 17 (Cycle 1)

  18. Plasma Decay Half-life (t1/2) of Erlotinib

    Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.

    Measured: Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

  19. Plasma Decay Half-life (t1/2) of Sunitinib

    Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.

    Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose

  20. Erlotinib Clearance at Steady State After Oral Administration (CL/F)

    Measured: Day 15 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

  21. Sunitinib Clearance at Steady State After Oral Administration (CL/F)

    Measured: Day 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose

  22. Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Erlotinib

    Measured: Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

  23. Tmax for Sunitinib

    Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose

  24. Tmax for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib)

    Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose

  25. Tmax for Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)

    Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose

  26. Dose-Corrected Observed Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) for Erlotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 3-13 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)

    Ctrough = plasma concentration of erlotinib prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original and Amended Lead-In (Arms A and B) Cohorts predose on Day 1 (Cycles 3-13) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.

    Measured: predose Day 1 (Cycles 3-13); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)

  27. Dose-Corrected Ctrough for Erlotinib on Day 15 Cycle 1 (Original), Day 1 of Cycle 3 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)

    Ctrough = plasma concentration of erlotinib prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original Cohort predose on Day 15 (Cycle 1, Time Zero) and Day 1 (Cycle 3), in the Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B) predose on Day 1 (Cycle 3) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.

    Measured: predose Day 15 (Cycle1); predose Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)

  28. Dose-Corrected Ctrough for Sunitinib on Day 1 of Cycles 3-13 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)

    Ctrough = plasma concentration of sunitinib prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original and Amended Lead-In (Arms A and B) Cohorts predose on Day 1 (Cycles 3-13) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.

    Measured: predose Day 1 (Cycles 3-13); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)

  29. Dose-Corrected Ctrough for Sunitinib on Day 15 Cycle 1 (Original), Day 1 of Cycle 3 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)

    Ctrough = plasma concentration of sunitinib prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original Cohort predose on Day 15 (Cycle 1, Time Zero) and Day 1 (Cycle 3), in the Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B) predose on Day 1 (Cycle 3) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.

    Measured: predose Day 15 (Cycle 1) and Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)

  30. Dose-Corrected Ctrough for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib) on Day 1 of Cycles 3-13 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)

    Ctrough = plasma concentration of SU-012662 prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original and Amended Lead-In (Arms A and B) Cohorts predose on Day 1 (Cycles 3-13) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.

    Measured: predose Day 1 (Cycles 3-13); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)

  31. Dose-Corrected Ctrough for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib) on Day 15 Cycle 1 (Original), Day 1 of Cycle 3 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)

    Ctrough = plasma concentration of SU-012662 prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original Cohort predose on Day 15 (Cycle 1, Time Zero) and Day 1 (Cycle 3), in the Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B) predose on Day 1 (Cycle 3) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.

    Measured: predose Day 15 (Cycle 1) and Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)

  32. Percentage of Participants With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Using 0 Percent [%] Cutoff

    Percentage of participants with EGFR expression by IHC using a 0% cutoff; Reported as positive, negative, or unmeasured (where positive was greater than 0% of cells demonstrating membranous staining for EGFR). Correlative analysis of EGFR expression was conducted using tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.

    Measured: Baseline

  33. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Expression (Using 0% Cutoff)

    PFS defined as time in weeks from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in the following subgroups: positive, negative, or unmeasured EGFR expression. EGFR expression was analyzed using a 0% cutoff where positive was greater than 0% of cells demonstrating membranous staining for EGFR. PFS calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

  34. Percentage of Participants With EGFR Expression by IHC (Using 10% Cutoff)

    Percentage of participants with EGFR Expression by IHC using a 10% cutoff; Reported as positive (positive values were defined as being greater than 10% of cells demonstrating membranous staining for EGFR), negative, or unmeasured. Correlative analysis of EGFR expression was conducted using tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.

    Measured: Baseline

  35. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Expression (Using 10% Cutoff)

    PFS defined as time in weeks from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in the following subgroups: positive, negative, or unmeasured EGFR expression. EGFR expression was analyzed using a 10% cutoff where positive was greater than 10% of cells demonstrating membranous staining for EGFR. PFS calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

  36. Percentage of Participants With EGFR Gene Copy Number Increase

    The number of copies corresponding to exon 19 of the EGFR gene was determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The percentage of participants with EGFR Gene Copy Number Increase (defined as greater than 4 copies) was determined using deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable. Reported as yes, no or unmeasured.

    Measured: Baseline

  37. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Gene Copy Number Increase

    PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by EGFR gene copy number increase (reported as yes, no, or unmeasured). The number of copies corresponding to exon 19 of the EGFR gene was determined and an increase was defined as greater than 4 copies. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1)/7.02.

    Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

  38. Percentage of Participants With EGFR Gene Amplification

    The percentage of participants with EGFR gene amplification (defined as greater than 15) was determined and reported as yes, no, or unmeasured. Correlative analysis of EGFR gene amplification was conducted using tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.

    Measured: Baseline

  39. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Gene Amplification

    PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by EGFR gene amplification (defined as greater than 15) and reported as no or unmeasured. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

  40. Percentage of Participants With EGFR Gene Mutation

    Mutations in exons 18 through 21 of the EGFR gene were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography using DNA from tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable. The percentage of participants with EGFR mutations categorized as mutated, wild type or indeterminate was reported.

    Measured: Baseline

  41. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Gene Mutation

    PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or to death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by EGFR gene mutation (reported as mutated, wild type, or indeterminate). PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

  42. Percentage of Participants With KRAS (V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog) Gene Mutations

    Mutations in exons 2-3 of the KRAS gene (including codons 12, 13, and 61) were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography using DNA from tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable. The percentage of participants with KRAS mutations categorized as mutated, wild type or indeterminate was reported.

    Measured: Baseline

  43. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by KRAS Gene Mutation

    PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by KRAS gene mutation (reported as mutated, wild type, or indeterminate). PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

  44. Percentage of Participants With Germline Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 (VEGFR2) Polymorphisms

    Blood samples were collected at baseline for multiplex reverse transcription (RT) analysis of genes expressing proteins that are targets of sunitinib or involved in angiogenesis or tumor growth to determine expression levels. Percentage of participants with germline VEGFR2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was reported for the following genotype frequencies: homozygous C alleles (C/C), T alleles (T/T), G alleles (G/G), or A alleles (A/A), and the following heterozygous genotypes C/T, G/T, T/A, and G/A.

    Measured: Baseline

  45. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by Germline VEGFR2 Polymorphisms

    PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by VEGFR2 polymorphisms. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

  46. Overall Survival (OS) in Subgroups That Were Defined by Germline VEGFR2 Polymorphisms

    OS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, in subgroups that were defined by VEGFR2 polymorphisms. OS was calculated as (date of death minus date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4.

    Measured: From randomization until death (up to Month 17)

  47. Percentage of Participants With Germline Platelet-derived Growth Factor Receptor Beta (PDGFRB) Polymorphisms

    Blood samples were collected at baseline for multiplex RT analysis of genes expressing proteins that are targets of sunitinib or involved in angiogenesis or tumor growth to determine expression levels. Percentage of participants with germline PDGFRB SNPs was reported for the following genotype frequencies: homozygous C alleles (C/C), T alleles (T/T), G alleles (G/G), or A alleles (A/A), and the following heterozygous genotypes C/T, A/T, A/G, T/C, T/G, G/C, C/A and G/A.

    Measured: Baseline

  48. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by Germline PDGFRB Polymorphisms

    PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by PDGFRB polymorphisms. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

  49. OS in Subgroups That Were Defined by Germline PDGFRB Polymorphisms

    OS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, in subgroups that were defined by PDGFRB polymorphisms. OS was calculated as (date of death minus date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4.

    Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

  50. Percentage of Participants by Tumor VEGFR Mutation

    Percentage of participants with VEGFR mutations in DNA from tumor samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.

    Measured: Baseline

  51. Correlation of Polymorphisms in Stem Cell Factor Receptor (c-Kit), FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Receptor (FLT-3), and c-FMS With Blood Counts

    A blood sample (6 mL) was collected before on-study treatment and was used to isolate DNA. These samples were not anonymized. Correlation was investigated by the percentage of participants with anemia (based on hemoglobin count), neutropenia (based on neutrophil count) and thrombocytopenia (based on platelet count) endpoints and genetic variation as measured by c-KIT, FLT-3, and c-FMS was to be analyzed.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1, Cycle 1)

  52. Percentage of Participants by Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Expression Profile

    Includes colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R), PDGFRalpha, PDGFRbeta, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF C (VEGF-C), VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR1), VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2), VEGF receptor 3 (VEGFR3), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), FLT-3, KIT (stem cell factor receptor), and RET (rearranged during transfection). Correlative analysis was conducted using tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.

    Measured: Baseline

  53. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by RNA Expression Profile

    PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by RNA Gene expression (CSF-1R, PDGFRalpha, PDGFRbeta, VEGF, VEGF-C, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, VEGFR3, FGF, FLT-3, KIT, and RET). PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

  54. Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) Score

    EORTC QLQ-C30: self-administered questionnaire assessing global health status/quality of life (QoL), functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales/items (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, and diarrhea), and financial difficulties. Recall period: past week; response range: not at all (1) to very much (4); global/QoL range: very poor (1) to excellent (7). Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline (Cycle [C] 1, Day [D] 1) to Cycle 18, Day 1

  55. EORTC-QLQ-C30 Lung Cancer Module (LC13) Score

    The EORTC-QLQ-C30 LC13 is a self-administered questionnaire assessing specific lung cancer disease related symptoms (dyspnea, coughing, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, pain in the chest, arm/shoulder or other parts of the body). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all (1) to very much (4). Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1 [Day 1]) to Cycle 18 (Day 1)

  56. Number of Participants With Blood Pressure (BP) Greater Than 150/100 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)

    Systolic/diastolic BP measured in triplicate (separated by approximately 2 minutes [min]) using validated electronic device (same device for all measurements), recorded to nearest mmHg. Dominant arm used (same one each time) with appropriate cuff size encircling at least 80% of arm. BP measured after 5 min rest and before invasive procedures, while seated in a chair with back supported, arms bared, supported at heart level. No smoking or caffeine use allowed during 30 min before measurement. Number of participants with systolic BP >150 mmHg/diastolic BP >100 mmHg at any timepoint postbaseline.

    Measured: Randomization up until Month 17

  57. Number of Participants With BP Greater Than 200/110 mmHg

    Systolic/diastolic BP measured in triplicate (separated by approximately 2 minutes [min]) using validated electronic device (same device for all measurements), recorded to nearest mmHg. Dominant arm used (same one each time) with appropriate cuff size encircling at least 80% of arm. BP measured after 5 min rest and before invasive procedures, while seated in a chair with back supported, arms bared, supported at heart level. No smoking or caffeine use allowed during 30 min before measurement. Number of participants with systolic BP >150 mmHg/diastolic BP >100 mmHg at any timepoint postbaseline.

    Measured: Randomization up until Month 17

  58. Number of Participants on Anti-hypertensive Medications

    Number of participants with BP greater than 150/100 mmHg or 200/110 mmHg who were treated with anti-hypertensive medications.

    Measured: Randomization to Day 28 of Cycle 18

  59. Plasma Concentration of VEGF-C at Baseline

    Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)

  60. Plasma Concentration of Soluble VEGFR-2 at Baseline

    Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)

  61. Plasma Concentration of Soluble VEGFR-3 at Baseline

    Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)

  62. Plasma Concentration of Soluble KIT (sKIT) at Baseline

    Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Dec 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2006
  3. Primary completionJan 2010
  4. Study completionJan 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
162 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00265317
Sponsor's protocol ID
A6181058
Acronym
SUN1058
Status last verified
Jan 2013
First submitted
12 Dec 2005
Last updated
6 Feb 2013
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Groen HJ, Socinski MA, Grossi F, Juhasz E, Gridelli C, Baas P, Butts CA, Chmielowska E, Usari T, Selaru P, Harmon C, Williams JA, Gao F, Tye L, Chao RC, Blumenschein GR Jr. A randomized, double-blind, phase II study of erlotinib with or without sunitinib for the second-line treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2382-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt212. Epub 2013 Jun 20.

    PubMed 23788751

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing erlotinib and sunitinib in people with Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, run by Pfizer at 32 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 32 sites in United States, Romania, Canada, Hungary, Italy and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jun 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (time frame: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00265317, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in