Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungPhase 2SUN1058NCT00265317
A Study In Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Testing If Erlotinib Plus SU011248 (Sunitinib) Is Better Than Erlotinib Alone
A Phase 2 study testing erlotinib and sunitinib in people with Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, run by Pfizer at 32 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
This study will test whether treatment with erlotinib plus SU011248 is better than erlotinib alone in patients with advanced/metastatic lung cancer who have received previous treatment with a platinum-based regimen Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- What is being tested?
- erlotinib and sunitinib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 162 participants
- Where
- 32 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2006to Jan 2012
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
- Prior treatment with no more than 2 chemotherapy regimens including a platinum-based regimen
Who cannot join
- Prior treatment with any receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors or other angiogenic inhibitors
- History of or known brain metastases
Trial locations and contacts
32 sites in 8 countries.
32 sites in 8 countries
United States18 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Antioch, California, 94531
Pfizer Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Pfizer Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Pfizer Investigational Site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7600
Pfizer Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Pfizer Investigational Site
City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63376
Pfizer Investigational Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Pfizer Investigational Site
Clinton, North Carolina, 28328
Pfizer Investigational Site
Creve Coeur, Missouri, 63141
Pfizer Investigational Site
Goldsboro, North Carolina, 27534
Pfizer Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
Pfizer Investigational Site
Mobile, Alabama, 36604
Pfizer Investigational Site
Palm Springs, California, 92262-4885
Pfizer Investigational Site
Pleasant Hill, California, 94523
Pfizer Investigational Site
San Leandro, California, 94578
Pfizer Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110-1094
Pfizer Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Pfizer Investigational Site
Wilson, North Carolina, 27893
Romania3 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bucharest, Sector 2, 022328
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bucharest, 30171
Pfizer Investigational Site
Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, 400015
Canada2 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Pfizer Investigational Site
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2
Hungary2 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Budapest, 1525
Pfizer Investigational Site
Törökbálint, 2045
Italy2 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Genova, 16132
Pfizer Investigational Site
Monteforte Irpino, AV, 83024
Netherlands2 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Amsterdam, 1066 CX
Pfizer Investigational Site
Groningen, 9713 GZ
Poland2 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bydgoszcz, 85-796
Pfizer Investigational Site
Gdansk, 80-952
About this study
Official title: Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2 Study Of Erlotinib With Or Without SU011248 In The Treatment Of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
This study will test whether treatment with erlotinib plus SU011248 is better than erlotinib alone in patients with advanced/metastatic lung cancer who have received previous treatment with a platinum-based regimen
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Keywords
- Non-small cell lung cancer, sunitinib, erlotinib, Phase 2
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
erlotinibDrug
erlotinib 150 mg daily by tablets in a continuous regimen, until progression or unacceptable toxicity
sunitinibDrug
Also called Sutent
Sunitinib 37.5 mg daily by oral capsule in a continuous regimen plus erlotinib 150 mg daily by tablets in a continuous regimen, until progression or unacceptable toxicity
erlotinibDrug
erlotinib 150 mg daily by tablets in a continuous regimen, until progression or unacceptable toxicity
placeboDrug
Placebo daily by oral capsule in a continuous regimen plus erlotinib 150 mg daily by tablets in a continuous regimen, until progression or unacceptable toxicity
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: erlotinib; Drug: sunitinib |
| B | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: erlotinib; Drug: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS=time from randomization date to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD; defined as greater than or equal to [≥]20% increase in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of longest dimensions recorded since first dose or appearance of ≥1 new lesions) or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first based on third party independent imaging review laboratory assessment. PFS calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02. Used 7.02 days as it equals 365 days per year divided by 52 weeks per year.
Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Secondary outcomes (62)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
Objective Response Rate (ORR)=participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST,Version 1.0) based on third party independent imaging review laboratory assessment. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. A PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.
Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)
TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization to first documentation of PD based on third party independent imaging review laboratory assessment. TTP was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Duration of Response (DR)
DR was defined as time from first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed to the first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DR was calculated as (first date of PD or death minus first date of CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 7.02.
Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (date of death minus date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4. For participants still alive at the time of analysis, OS time was censored on last date that participants were known to be alive.
Measured: From randomization until death (up to Month 17)
Percentage of Participants Surviving at 1 Year
Percentage of participants alive at 1 year after date of first administration of study medication.
Measured: From randomization until death (up until Month 17)
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours [AUC(0-24)] of Erlotinib
AUC0-24=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours (0-24) of erlotinib
Measured: Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
AUC(0-24) of Sunitinib
AUC0-24=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours (0-24) of sunitinib
Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
AUC(0-24) of SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib)
AUC0-24=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours (0-24) of SU-012662 (metabolite of sunitinib)
Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
AUC(0-24) of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)
AUC0-24=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours (0-24) of total drug (sunitinib + SU-012662)
Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Erlotinib
Measured: Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
Cmax of Sunitinib
Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose
Cmax of SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib)
Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose
Cmax of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)
Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUC0-inf) for Erlotinib
AUC (0-inf) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf) for erlotinib. It is obtained from AUC from time zero (pre-dose) to last quantifiable concentration(AUC[0-t]) plus AUC from time last quantifiable concentration extrapolated infinite time (AUC[t-inf])
Measured: Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose; predose on Days 22 and 23 (Cycle 1)
AUC(0-inf) for Sunitinib
AUC (0 - inf) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf) for sunitinib. It is obtained from AUC(0-t) plus AUC(t-inf)
Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose; predose on Days 15, 16, and 17 (Cycle 1)
AUC(0-inf) for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib)
AUC(0-inf) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf) for SU-012662 (metabolite of sunitinib). It is obtained from AUC(0-t) plus AUC(t-inf)
Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose; predose on Days 15, 16, and 17 (Cycle 1)
AUC(0-inf) for Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)
AUC(0-inf) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf) for total drug (sunitinib + SU-012662). It is obtained from AUC(0-t) plus AUC(t-inf)
Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose; predose on Days 15, 16, and 17 (Cycle 1)
Plasma Decay Half-life (t1/2) of Erlotinib
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
Measured: Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
Plasma Decay Half-life (t1/2) of Sunitinib
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose
Erlotinib Clearance at Steady State After Oral Administration (CL/F)
Measured: Day 15 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
Sunitinib Clearance at Steady State After Oral Administration (CL/F)
Measured: Day 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Erlotinib
Measured: Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
Tmax for Sunitinib
Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose
Tmax for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib)
Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose
Tmax for Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)
Measured: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose
Dose-Corrected Observed Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) for Erlotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 3-13 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
Ctrough = plasma concentration of erlotinib prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original and Amended Lead-In (Arms A and B) Cohorts predose on Day 1 (Cycles 3-13) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.
Measured: predose Day 1 (Cycles 3-13); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)
Dose-Corrected Ctrough for Erlotinib on Day 15 Cycle 1 (Original), Day 1 of Cycle 3 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
Ctrough = plasma concentration of erlotinib prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original Cohort predose on Day 15 (Cycle 1, Time Zero) and Day 1 (Cycle 3), in the Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B) predose on Day 1 (Cycle 3) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.
Measured: predose Day 15 (Cycle1); predose Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)
Dose-Corrected Ctrough for Sunitinib on Day 1 of Cycles 3-13 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
Ctrough = plasma concentration of sunitinib prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original and Amended Lead-In (Arms A and B) Cohorts predose on Day 1 (Cycles 3-13) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.
Measured: predose Day 1 (Cycles 3-13); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)
Dose-Corrected Ctrough for Sunitinib on Day 15 Cycle 1 (Original), Day 1 of Cycle 3 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
Ctrough = plasma concentration of sunitinib prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original Cohort predose on Day 15 (Cycle 1, Time Zero) and Day 1 (Cycle 3), in the Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B) predose on Day 1 (Cycle 3) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.
Measured: predose Day 15 (Cycle 1) and Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)
Dose-Corrected Ctrough for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib) on Day 1 of Cycles 3-13 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
Ctrough = plasma concentration of SU-012662 prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original and Amended Lead-In (Arms A and B) Cohorts predose on Day 1 (Cycles 3-13) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.
Measured: predose Day 1 (Cycles 3-13); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)
Dose-Corrected Ctrough for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib) on Day 15 Cycle 1 (Original), Day 1 of Cycle 3 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
Ctrough = plasma concentration of SU-012662 prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original Cohort predose on Day 15 (Cycle 1, Time Zero) and Day 1 (Cycle 3), in the Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B) predose on Day 1 (Cycle 3) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.
Measured: predose Day 15 (Cycle 1) and Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)
Percentage of Participants With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Using 0 Percent [%] Cutoff
Percentage of participants with EGFR expression by IHC using a 0% cutoff; Reported as positive, negative, or unmeasured (where positive was greater than 0% of cells demonstrating membranous staining for EGFR). Correlative analysis of EGFR expression was conducted using tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.
Measured: Baseline
PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Expression (Using 0% Cutoff)
PFS defined as time in weeks from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in the following subgroups: positive, negative, or unmeasured EGFR expression. EGFR expression was analyzed using a 0% cutoff where positive was greater than 0% of cells demonstrating membranous staining for EGFR. PFS calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Percentage of Participants With EGFR Expression by IHC (Using 10% Cutoff)
Percentage of participants with EGFR Expression by IHC using a 10% cutoff; Reported as positive (positive values were defined as being greater than 10% of cells demonstrating membranous staining for EGFR), negative, or unmeasured. Correlative analysis of EGFR expression was conducted using tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.
Measured: Baseline
PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Expression (Using 10% Cutoff)
PFS defined as time in weeks from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in the following subgroups: positive, negative, or unmeasured EGFR expression. EGFR expression was analyzed using a 10% cutoff where positive was greater than 10% of cells demonstrating membranous staining for EGFR. PFS calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Percentage of Participants With EGFR Gene Copy Number Increase
The number of copies corresponding to exon 19 of the EGFR gene was determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The percentage of participants with EGFR Gene Copy Number Increase (defined as greater than 4 copies) was determined using deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable. Reported as yes, no or unmeasured.
Measured: Baseline
PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Gene Copy Number Increase
PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by EGFR gene copy number increase (reported as yes, no, or unmeasured). The number of copies corresponding to exon 19 of the EGFR gene was determined and an increase was defined as greater than 4 copies. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1)/7.02.
Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Percentage of Participants With EGFR Gene Amplification
The percentage of participants with EGFR gene amplification (defined as greater than 15) was determined and reported as yes, no, or unmeasured. Correlative analysis of EGFR gene amplification was conducted using tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.
Measured: Baseline
PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Gene Amplification
PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by EGFR gene amplification (defined as greater than 15) and reported as no or unmeasured. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Percentage of Participants With EGFR Gene Mutation
Mutations in exons 18 through 21 of the EGFR gene were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography using DNA from tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable. The percentage of participants with EGFR mutations categorized as mutated, wild type or indeterminate was reported.
Measured: Baseline
PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Gene Mutation
PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or to death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by EGFR gene mutation (reported as mutated, wild type, or indeterminate). PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Percentage of Participants With KRAS (V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog) Gene Mutations
Mutations in exons 2-3 of the KRAS gene (including codons 12, 13, and 61) were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography using DNA from tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable. The percentage of participants with KRAS mutations categorized as mutated, wild type or indeterminate was reported.
Measured: Baseline
PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by KRAS Gene Mutation
PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by KRAS gene mutation (reported as mutated, wild type, or indeterminate). PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Percentage of Participants With Germline Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 (VEGFR2) Polymorphisms
Blood samples were collected at baseline for multiplex reverse transcription (RT) analysis of genes expressing proteins that are targets of sunitinib or involved in angiogenesis or tumor growth to determine expression levels. Percentage of participants with germline VEGFR2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was reported for the following genotype frequencies: homozygous C alleles (C/C), T alleles (T/T), G alleles (G/G), or A alleles (A/A), and the following heterozygous genotypes C/T, G/T, T/A, and G/A.
Measured: Baseline
PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by Germline VEGFR2 Polymorphisms
PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by VEGFR2 polymorphisms. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Overall Survival (OS) in Subgroups That Were Defined by Germline VEGFR2 Polymorphisms
OS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, in subgroups that were defined by VEGFR2 polymorphisms. OS was calculated as (date of death minus date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4.
Measured: From randomization until death (up to Month 17)
Percentage of Participants With Germline Platelet-derived Growth Factor Receptor Beta (PDGFRB) Polymorphisms
Blood samples were collected at baseline for multiplex RT analysis of genes expressing proteins that are targets of sunitinib or involved in angiogenesis or tumor growth to determine expression levels. Percentage of participants with germline PDGFRB SNPs was reported for the following genotype frequencies: homozygous C alleles (C/C), T alleles (T/T), G alleles (G/G), or A alleles (A/A), and the following heterozygous genotypes C/T, A/T, A/G, T/C, T/G, G/C, C/A and G/A.
Measured: Baseline
PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by Germline PDGFRB Polymorphisms
PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by PDGFRB polymorphisms. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
OS in Subgroups That Were Defined by Germline PDGFRB Polymorphisms
OS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, in subgroups that were defined by PDGFRB polymorphisms. OS was calculated as (date of death minus date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4.
Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Percentage of Participants by Tumor VEGFR Mutation
Percentage of participants with VEGFR mutations in DNA from tumor samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.
Measured: Baseline
Correlation of Polymorphisms in Stem Cell Factor Receptor (c-Kit), FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Receptor (FLT-3), and c-FMS With Blood Counts
A blood sample (6 mL) was collected before on-study treatment and was used to isolate DNA. These samples were not anonymized. Correlation was investigated by the percentage of participants with anemia (based on hemoglobin count), neutropenia (based on neutrophil count) and thrombocytopenia (based on platelet count) endpoints and genetic variation as measured by c-KIT, FLT-3, and c-FMS was to be analyzed.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1, Cycle 1)
Percentage of Participants by Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Expression Profile
Includes colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R), PDGFRalpha, PDGFRbeta, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF C (VEGF-C), VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR1), VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2), VEGF receptor 3 (VEGFR3), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), FLT-3, KIT (stem cell factor receptor), and RET (rearranged during transfection). Correlative analysis was conducted using tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.
Measured: Baseline
PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by RNA Expression Profile
PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by RNA Gene expression (CSF-1R, PDGFRalpha, PDGFRbeta, VEGF, VEGF-C, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, VEGFR3, FGF, FLT-3, KIT, and RET). PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
Measured: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) Score
EORTC QLQ-C30: self-administered questionnaire assessing global health status/quality of life (QoL), functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales/items (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, and diarrhea), and financial difficulties. Recall period: past week; response range: not at all (1) to very much (4); global/QoL range: very poor (1) to excellent (7). Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
Measured: Baseline (Cycle [C] 1, Day [D] 1) to Cycle 18, Day 1
EORTC-QLQ-C30 Lung Cancer Module (LC13) Score
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 LC13 is a self-administered questionnaire assessing specific lung cancer disease related symptoms (dyspnea, coughing, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, pain in the chest, arm/shoulder or other parts of the body). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all (1) to very much (4). Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1 [Day 1]) to Cycle 18 (Day 1)
Number of Participants With Blood Pressure (BP) Greater Than 150/100 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
Systolic/diastolic BP measured in triplicate (separated by approximately 2 minutes [min]) using validated electronic device (same device for all measurements), recorded to nearest mmHg. Dominant arm used (same one each time) with appropriate cuff size encircling at least 80% of arm. BP measured after 5 min rest and before invasive procedures, while seated in a chair with back supported, arms bared, supported at heart level. No smoking or caffeine use allowed during 30 min before measurement. Number of participants with systolic BP >150 mmHg/diastolic BP >100 mmHg at any timepoint postbaseline.
Measured: Randomization up until Month 17
Number of Participants With BP Greater Than 200/110 mmHg
Systolic/diastolic BP measured in triplicate (separated by approximately 2 minutes [min]) using validated electronic device (same device for all measurements), recorded to nearest mmHg. Dominant arm used (same one each time) with appropriate cuff size encircling at least 80% of arm. BP measured after 5 min rest and before invasive procedures, while seated in a chair with back supported, arms bared, supported at heart level. No smoking or caffeine use allowed during 30 min before measurement. Number of participants with systolic BP >150 mmHg/diastolic BP >100 mmHg at any timepoint postbaseline.
Measured: Randomization up until Month 17
Number of Participants on Anti-hypertensive Medications
Number of participants with BP greater than 150/100 mmHg or 200/110 mmHg who were treated with anti-hypertensive medications.
Measured: Randomization to Day 28 of Cycle 18
Plasma Concentration of VEGF-C at Baseline
Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)
Plasma Concentration of Soluble VEGFR-2 at Baseline
Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)
Plasma Concentration of Soluble VEGFR-3 at Baseline
Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)
Plasma Concentration of Soluble KIT (sKIT) at Baseline
Measured: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Dec 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2006
- Primary completionJan 2010
- Study completionJan 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 162 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00265317
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A6181058
- Acronym
- SUN1058
- Status last verified
- Jan 2013
- First submitted
- 12 Dec 2005
- Last updated
- 6 Feb 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Groen HJ, Socinski MA, Grossi F, Juhasz E, Gridelli C, Baas P, Butts CA, Chmielowska E, Usari T, Selaru P, Harmon C, Williams JA, Gao F, Tye L, Chao RC, Blumenschein GR Jr. A randomized, double-blind, phase II study of erlotinib with or without sunitinib for the second-line treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2382-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt212. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
PubMed 23788751
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Feb 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2 Study Of Erlotinib With Or Without SU011248 In The Treatment Of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00265317
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SUN1058 / A6181058
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Keywords
- Non-small cell lung cancer, sunitinib, erlotinib, Phase 2
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 162 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2006
- Primary completion
- Jan 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Dec 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Jun 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will test whether treatment with erlotinib plus SU011248 is better than erlotinib alone in patients with advanced/metastatic lung cancer who have received previous treatment with a platinum-based regimen
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Drug: erlotinib, Drug: sunitinib |
| B | Active comparator | Drug: erlotinib, Drug: placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
- Prior treatment with no more than 2 chemotherapy regimens including a platinum-based regimen
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Prior treatment with any receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors or other angiogenic inhibitors
- History of or known brain metastases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| erlotiniberlotinib 150 mg daily by tablets in a continuous regimen, until progression or unacceptable toxicity | Drug | A |
| sunitinibAlso: SutentSunitinib 37.5 mg daily by oral capsule in a continuous regimen plus erlotinib 150 mg daily by tablets in a continuous regimen, until progression or unacceptable toxicity | Drug | A |
| erlotiniberlotinib 150 mg daily by tablets in a continuous regimen, until progression or unacceptable toxicity | Drug | B |
| placeboPlacebo daily by oral capsule in a continuous regimen plus erlotinib 150 mg daily by tablets in a continuous regimen, until progression or unacceptable toxicity | Drug | B |
Primary outcome
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
PFS=time from randomization date to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD; defined as greater than or equal to [≥]20% increase in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of longest dimensions recorded since first dose or appearance of ≥1 new lesions) or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first based on third party independent imaging review laboratory assessment. PFS calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02. Used 7.02 days as it equals 365 days per year divided by 52 weeks per year.
62 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
Time frame: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)
Time frame: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Duration of Response (DR)
Time frame: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From randomization until death (up to Month 17)
Percentage of Participants Surviving at 1 Year
Time frame: From randomization until death (up until Month 17)
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours [AUC(0-24)] of Erlotinib
Time frame: Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
AUC(0-24) of Sunitinib
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
AUC(0-24) of SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib)
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
AUC(0-24) of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Erlotinib
Time frame: Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
Cmax of Sunitinib
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose
Cmax of SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib)
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose
Cmax of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUC0-inf) for Erlotinib
Time frame: Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose; predose on Days 22 and 23 (Cycle 1)
AUC(0-inf) for Sunitinib
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose; predose on Days 15, 16, and 17 (Cycle 1)
AUC(0-inf) for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib)
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose; predose on Days 15, 16, and 17 (Cycle 1)
AUC(0-inf) for Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose; predose on Days 15, 16, and 17 (Cycle 1)
Plasma Decay Half-life (t1/2) of Erlotinib
Time frame: Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
Plasma Decay Half-life (t1/2) of Sunitinib
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose
Erlotinib Clearance at Steady State After Oral Administration (CL/F)
Time frame: Day 15 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
Sunitinib Clearance at Steady State After Oral Administration (CL/F)
Time frame: Day 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Erlotinib
Time frame: Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose
Tmax for Sunitinib
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose
Tmax for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib)
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose
Tmax for Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose
Dose-Corrected Observed Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) for Erlotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 3-13 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
Time frame: predose Day 1 (Cycles 3-13); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)
Dose-Corrected Ctrough for Erlotinib on Day 15 Cycle 1 (Original), Day 1 of Cycle 3 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
Time frame: predose Day 15 (Cycle1); predose Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)
Dose-Corrected Ctrough for Sunitinib on Day 1 of Cycles 3-13 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
Time frame: predose Day 1 (Cycles 3-13); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)
Dose-Corrected Ctrough for Sunitinib on Day 15 Cycle 1 (Original), Day 1 of Cycle 3 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
Time frame: predose Day 15 (Cycle 1) and Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)
Dose-Corrected Ctrough for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib) on Day 1 of Cycles 3-13 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
Time frame: predose Day 1 (Cycles 3-13); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)
Dose-Corrected Ctrough for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib) on Day 15 Cycle 1 (Original), Day 1 of Cycle 3 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
Time frame: predose Day 15 (Cycle 1) and Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)
Percentage of Participants With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Using 0 Percent [%] Cutoff
Time frame: Baseline
PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Expression (Using 0% Cutoff)
Time frame: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Percentage of Participants With EGFR Expression by IHC (Using 10% Cutoff)
Time frame: Baseline
PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Expression (Using 10% Cutoff)
Time frame: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Percentage of Participants With EGFR Gene Copy Number Increase
Time frame: Baseline
PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Gene Copy Number Increase
Time frame: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Percentage of Participants With EGFR Gene Amplification
Time frame: Baseline
PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Gene Amplification
Time frame: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)
Percentage of Participants With EGFR Gene Mutation
Time frame: Baseline
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Feb 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23788751Groen HJ, Socinski MA, Grossi F, Juhasz E, Gridelli C, Baas P, Butts CA, Chmielowska E, Usari T, Selaru P, Harmon C, Williams JA, Gao F, Tye L, Chao RC, Blumenschein GR Jr. A randomized, double-blind, phase II study of erlotinib with or without sunitinib for the second-line treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2382-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt212. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
32 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing erlotinib and sunitinib in people with Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, run by Pfizer at 32 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 32 sites in United States, Romania, Canada, Hungary, Italy and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jun 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (time frame: From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00265317, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2013.