AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary StenosisNCT00266175

Pulmonary Arteriopathy-Diagnostics and Therapy

An observational study of Pulmonary Stenosis, run by Competence Network for Congenital Heart Defects at 5 sites in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Postoperative stenoses of the pulmonary artery vascular system seldom occur alone; they are frequently found in connection with congenital heart defects or malformation syndromes. The resulting increase of afterload represents a serious pressure load for the right ventricle. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Stenosis
How many people
53 participants
Where
5 sitesGermany
Study dates
May 2005to Jul 2008
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with native or postoperative peripheral pulmonary stenoses (PPS; any stenoses that are located distally to the RVOT). Definition of PPS: 40% lumen constriction, or 30% constriction if volume stress is also present. Informed consent of the patient or his/her legal representative is given after instruction. -

Who cannot join

  • Patients unable to undergo MRI or spiroergometry for physical or psychological reasons.
  • Pregnant or nursing patients. Patients affected by other clinically relevant diseases (malignant tumours, infectious diseases, metabolic disorders etc.). Patients with known intolerance of contrast media. Patients with syndromal diseases such as Alagille's syndrome, rubella embryopathy or elfin face syndrome. -

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

Germany5 sites
  • Herz-und Diabeteszentrum NRW

    Bad Oeynhausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, D-32545

  • Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin

    Berlin, State of Berlin, D-13353

  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

    Hanover, Lower Saxony, D-30625

  • Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes

    Homburg, Saarland, D-66421

  • Deutsches Kinderherzzentrum

    Sankt Augustin, North Rhine-Westphalia, D-53757

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Pulmonary Arteriopathy; Evaluation of Invasive Treatments of Peripheral Pulmonary Stenosis in Terms of Right Ventricular Function and Patient Exercise Tolerance

Postoperative stenoses of the pulmonary artery vascular system seldom occur alone; they are frequently found in connection with congenital heart defects or malformation syndromes. The resulting increase of afterload represents a serious pressure load for the right ventricle. Depending on the number and severity of the stenoses, gradual functional right ventricular failure is to be expected. Due to limited clinical experience, there has not yet been a consensus concerning the indications for the different therapeutic strategies (balloon dilatation, stent implantation, surgical dilatation techniques). Up to now, only few investigators in few centres use stents as therapy. Therefore, systematic multicenter investigations assessing larger groups of patients undergoing this procedure are not yet available. The same applies to other novel dilatation techniques, such as the use of the "cutting balloon" as therapy for rigid valve stenoses.

By comparing and analysing different invasive forms of treatment (balloon dilatation, stent implantation and surgery), we expect to achieve an optimisation of therapy.

In the study, the outcomes of different strategies as practiced now in German cardiological centers will be compared and the main factors influencing the results will be determined. On the basis of a standardized investigation before and one year after the intervention, these comparisons with respect to the reduction of stenosis and corresponding changes of right ventricular functional and anatomical changes are carried out correcting for known confounders. The assessment of the different included invasive and non-invasive diagnostical procedures with respect to their ability to detect pathological findings and their changes as result of the treatment is an important secondary target of the study.

Read the detailed description

For patients with untreated peripheral pulmonary stenoses, the course of disease is characterised by a chronic pressure load of the right ventricle. In the medium to long term this can lead to right heart failure and cardiac arrhythmia unresponsive to therapy. The probability of these events as well as the time of their occurrence depends on the severity of the stenoses, the duration of stress and a possible additional volume load. Within the scope of the prospective study introduced here, we intend to characterise the stenoses with respect to degree and type and to document the treatment success in terms of decrease of afterload of the right ventricle. In this context, imaging and catheter-based methods as well as respective functional analyses are to be used to provide evidence of a reduction or neutralisation of the pulmonary artery stenoses.

Accordingly, the following questions, or corresponding objectives, can be identified as the base for the conduct of this clinical trial:

  • Morphological and functional categorisation of the angiostenoses and standardisation of the diagnostic procedures. For this purpose, the quantitative criteria for both the morphological degree of stenosis (lumen constriction) and the functional degree of stenosis (pressure gradient) are established by means of cardiac catheterisation and angiography. Non-invasive imaging methods, which have as yet been restricted primarily to echocardiography, are complemented by the method of spin angiography. Compared to conventional angiography, this has the advantage of being less invasive and not involving radiation exposure.
  • On the strength of past experience, the implantation of stents can be viewed as a very promising approach to a treatment with lasting effectiveness of pulmonary artery stenoses. The stents have the advantage of high radial forces that can be offset against the elastic recoil of the vessels occurring after sole dilatation. Furthermore, constrictions that are caused by either kinking of vessels or their compression by neighbouring structures can be dilated sufficiently by the use of stents.
  • With respect to the interconnectedness of all the projects of the Competence Network for Congenital Heart Defects, one essential aspect is the standardisation of diagnostic methods of evaluating right ventricular function. The data obtained during the study are to provide the basis for the development of diagnostic guidelines.
  • Concerning evaluation, particular attention is paid to the patients' self-assessment with respect to their exercise tolerance. In this context, it is a matter of interest to what degree the patients' subjective maximum stress and therefore their quality of life correlate with the objective measurement parameters. The anticipated results are of direct clinical significance for the patients, as they aim at medium to long-term relief of the right ventricle, which may effect a decrease in morbidity and therefore an improvement of the quality of life. This is of particular importance with regard to the fact that there will be a continuously increasing number of patients with congenital heart defects reaching adulthood.
Keywords
Pulmonary heart disease, Pulmonary hypertension, Stent implantation, Balloon dilatation, Surgery
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Valve Stenosis, Pulmonary Heart Disease, Hypertension, Pulmonary

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary outcome measure:

  2. To assess the efficacy of the administered therapy, both the ectasia of the stenosed vessels in

  3. relation to the target diameter and the reduction of the pressure gradient in the stenosed vessel

  4. are indicated in percent. An evaluation of the therapeutic success takes place after twelve months.

  5. Definition of the primary target of therapy:

  6. Morphometric:

  7. • Expansion of the peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis to at least 80% of the vascular

  8. lumen.

  9. Manometric:

  10. • Gradient reduction over the stenosis of at least 50%.

  11. • Reduction in right ventricular systolic pressure, indicated by a reduced ratio of systolic

  12. pressure of LV to RV. In this context, there is no definition in terms of a primary target,

  13. as right ventricular pressure reduction depends on a variety of parameters (such as

  14. number of stenoses of the entire peripheral pulmonary vasculature, potential

  15. additional volume load and right ventricular overall function).

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Secondary outcome measures:

  2. The improvement of the right ventricular systolic and diastolic function as well as reduction of

  3. ventricle size and of tricuspid valve incompetence are quantified by means of echocardiography,

  4. angiography and, where required, nuclear magnetic resonance tomography.

  5. An improvement in capability/quality of life is assessed by means of bicycle ergometer

  6. examinations as well as the SF-36 (New England Hospital Inc.) and KINDL questionnaires

  7. (Ravens-Sieberer & Bullinger) for adults and children respectively.

  8. In assessing the organ-related outcome measures, the different diagnostic imaging methods are

  9. compared with each other.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2005
  3. Study completionJul 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
53 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00266175
Sponsor's protocol ID
MP 1
Other IDs
01G10210
Status last verified
Oct 2008
First submitted
15 Dec 2005
Last updated
15 Oct 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pulmonary Stenosis, run by Competence Network for Congenital Heart Defects at 5 sites in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Primary outcome measure:. The study lists 15 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2008.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in