Ulcerative ColitisPhase 3NCT00269438
New Tablet Formulation and Dosing Regimen of Balsalazide Disodium in Mildly to Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis
A Phase 3 study testing 5 ASA, enemas, suppositories, corticosteroids in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Bausch Health Americas, Inc. at 66 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to establish the efficacy and safety of a new tablet formulation and dosing regimen of balsalazide disodium dosed twice daily in achieving clinical improvement in subjects with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis after 8 weeks of therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Ulcerative Colitis
- What is being tested?
- 5 ASA, enemas, suppositories, corticosteroids
- How many people
- 225 participants
- Where
- 66 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2005to Jun 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if all of the following criteria apply:
- An Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved informed consent is signed and dated prior to any study-related activities.
- Subject is a male or, if the subject is female, she is eligible to enter if she is of:
- Non-childbearing potential (i.e. physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who has undergone sterilization [hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation] or is post-menopausal. For purposes of this study, postmenopausal is defined as 1 year without menses);
- OR,
- Childbearing potential, has a negative serum pregnancy test at screen and, if heterosexually active, agrees to one of the following:
Show all 17Show fewer
- Double barrier method of contraception, specifically, use of a condom and spermicide, for 1 week prior to study drug administration, throughout the 8 week Treatment Phase.
- Oral contraceptives administered for at least 2 monthly cycles prior to study drug administration during all 6 months of study drug administration and administered for 1 monthly cycle following completion of the study.
- An intrauterine device (IUD), inserted by a qualified clinician, with published data showing that the lowest expected failure rate is less than or equal to 1% per year (not all IUDs meet this criterion).
- Medroxyprogesterone acetate (DEPO-PROVERA) administered for a minimum of 1 monthly cycle prior to the study drug administration, during all 6 months of study drug administration, and administered for 1 monthly cycle following study completion. Norelgestromin/ ethinyl estradiol transdermal system (Ortho Evra patch) administered for at least 2 monthly cycles prior to study drug administration and administered for 2 monthly cycles following study completion
- Partner has undergone vasectomy and subject is in a monogamous relationship. The investigator is responsible for determining whether the subject is using appropriate birth control for study participation.
- Subject is greater than or equal to 18 years of age.
- Subjects with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis experiencing symptoms of an acute flare within the past 4 weeks.
- Subject has not taken more than 2.4 grams of mesalamine or equivalent for a continuous period of 4 weeks preceding the screening visit
- Subjects must have a baseline Modified Mayo Disease Activity Index (MMDAI) score between 6 and 10, inclusive. Additionally, subjects must score greater than or equal to 2 on Bleeding and greater than or equal to 2 on Endoscopy/Sigmoidoscopy.
- Subject is capable and willing to comply with all study procedures.
- Disease extends at least 20 cm from the rectum on screening sigmoidoscopy.
Who cannot join
- A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply (Note: Development of any of the following exclusion criteria on-study will be considered a basis for subject discontinuation.):
- Subject has a significant medical, including psychiatric, condition which in the opinion of the investigator precludes participation in the study.
- Subject has a history of allergy or intolerance to aspirin, mesalamine, or other salicylates.
- Subject has recently (within the past 30 days) failed therapy with balsalazide disodium
- Subject has received immunosuppressive therapy (e.g. azothioprine, 6 mercaptopurine) within 30 days, or corticosteroids (oral, intravenous [IV] or topical rectal) within 30 days prior to screening.
- Subject has received intra-rectal aminosalicylates within 14 days of screening.
Show all 35Show fewer
- Subject has had any prior bowel surgery, excepting appendectomy.
- Subject has participated in an investigational drug or device study within the 30 days prior to study screening, with the exception of Salix protocols 3003 \& 3004 entitled: "A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial to evaluate the use of mesalamine pellet formulation 1.5G QD to maintain remission from mildly to moderate ulcerative colitis."
- Subject is pregnant or at risk of pregnancy, or is lactating (female subjects only).
- Subject shows evidence of current excessive alcohol consumption or drug dependence.
- Subject has a history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis (B and C).
- Subject has other infectious, ischemic, or immunologic diseases with GI involvement.
- Subject has twice the upper limit of normal (ULN) for any of the following LFTs: alanine aminotransferase (ALT/SGPT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST/SGOT), alkaline phosphatase, or total bilirubin (except isolated elevation of unconjugated bilirubin).
- Subject has uncontrolled, clinically significant renal disease manifested by 1.5 × ULN of serum creatinine or blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels.
- Subject has calculated creatinine clearance level of less than or equal to 60 mL/min.
- Subject has unstable cardiovascular, coagulopathy or pulmonary disease.
- Subject has active malignancy within the last 5 years, except basal cell carcinoma of the skin, or if female, in situ cervical carcinoma that has been surgically excised.
- Subject has any condition or circumstance that would, in the opinion of the investigator, prevent completion of the study or interfere with analysis of study results, including history of noncompliance with treatments or visits.
- Subject has sclerosing cholangitis.
- Subject has positive stool culture for ovum and parasites (O and P) or C. difficile.
- Subject has been treated with infliximab, cyclosporine, natalizumab, or methotrexate for ulcerative colitis within the last 30 days prior to screening.
- Regular use of NSAIDS except cardioprotective ASA (i.e., less than or equal to 162 mg ASA per day).
- Subject has received cell-depleting therapies such as the Adacolumn.
- Subject requires antidiarrheal therapy during screening.
- Subject has clinical or radiographic findings suggestive of serious UC complications such as toxic megacolon or colonic perforation.
- Females of Reproductive Potential:
- If a female subject becomes pregnant while on this study, the study drug will be discontinued immediately and the subject followed until the outcome of the pregnancy is known. If a pregnancy occurs, it will be reported in the same manner as an unexpected AE using the guidelines provided in Section 6.4.1.9.
- Premature Subject Discontinuation:
- A subject may be discontinued from the study for the following medical or administrative reasons:
- Occurrence of an AE, which in the judgment of the investigator suggests an unacceptable risk to the subject (The investigator will follow the subject until satisfactory resolution of the AE or the AE is determined to be stable);
- Development on-study of any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator or the study sponsor, places the subject at an unacceptable medical risk if he/she continues;
- Pregnancy;
- Subject request;
- Institution of additional medical (rescue) therapy for UC. The investigator may discontinue individual subjects from the study at any time. Subjects will be encouraged to complete the study; however they may voluntarily withdraw at any time. The investigator must provide written documentation of the reason for discontinuation on the CRF. Regardless of the reason for withdrawal, all subjects will be asked to undergo an end of therapy evaluation. Every attempt will be made to obtain all the end of study assessments, including all of the subscales of the MMDAI (i.e., bowel frequency, bleeding, physician's assessment, and endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy score).
- Subjects who withdraw or are withdrawn will not be replaced under this protocol.
Trial locations and contacts
66 sites in 1 country.
66 sites in 1 country
United States66 sites
Advanced Clinical Research Institute
Anaheim, California, 92801
Northwest Gastroenterologists S.C.
Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60005
Gary Richter, M.D.
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
Woodholme Gastroenterology Associates, PA
Baltimore, Maryland, 21208
Sinai Medical Office Building
Baltimore, Maryland, 21215
Digestive Health Center of Louisiana
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809
Lovelace Scientific Resources
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
Birmingham Gastroenterology Associates
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209
Connecticut Gastroenterology Institute
Bristol, Connecticut, 06010
Charleston Gastroenterology Specialists, LLC
Charleston, South Carolina, 29414
Gastroenterology Associates of Tidewater
Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320
Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC
Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047
Consultants for Clinical Research, Inc.
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
The Atlanta Center for Gastroenterology
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
Central Jersey Primary Care Inc.
Elizabeth, New Jersey, 07202
Digestive Liver Disease Specialists, Medical Group
Garden Grove, California, 92840
LeBauer Research Associates, PA
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27265
Medical Research Unlimited
Hialeah, Florida, 33013
Bethany Medical Center
High Point, North Carolina, 27262
Mark Lamet, M.D.
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
Southern Clinical Research Consultants
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
Mid Atlantic Medical Research Centers
Hollywood, Maryland, 20636
Clinical Trial Network
Houston, Texas, 77030
NationsMed Clinical Research
Houston, Texas, 77034
Houston Digestive Disease Clinic
Houston, Texas, 77090
Study site
Kansas City, Missouri, 67131
Gastroenterology Associates
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660
Gastrointestinal Associates
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909
Therapeutic Research Institute of Orange County
Laguna Hills, California, 92653
Little Rock Diagnostic Clinic
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Long Beach VA Medical Center
Long Beach, California, 90822
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Gastroenterology Associates of Central Georgia
Macon, Georgia, 31201
Memphis Gastroenterology Group
Memphis, Tennessee, 38210
Center for Digestive & Liver Diseases
Mexico, Missouri, 65265
Facey Medical Group
Mission Hills, California, 91345
Spring Memorial Hospital
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Nashville Medical Research Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205
United Medical Research
New Smyrna Beach, Florida, 32168
Study site
New York, New York, 10128
Venture Research Institute, LLC
North Miami Beach, Florida, 33162
University Digestive Health Center
Oak Forest, Illinois, 60452
Study site
Ocean City, New Jersey, 07712
Community Clinical Trials
Orange, California, 92868
Advanced Gastroenterology Associates
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684
Boice-Willis Clinic
Rocky Mount, North Carolina, 27804
Rider Research Group
San Francisco, California, 94117
John Jolley, M.D.
San Rafael, California, 94901
Lovelace Scientific Resources
Santa Ana, California, 92704
Santa Barbara Clinical Research
Santa Barbara, California, 93108
Lovelace Scientific Resources
Sarasota, Florida, 34233
Advent Clinical Research
Sarasota, Florida, 34239
Seattle Gastroenterology Associates
Seattle, Washington, 98133
Hillcrest Clinical Research LLC
Simpsonville, South Carolina, 29681
Eastern Washington Clinical Research Center
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Spokane Digestive Disease Center Research
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Clinical Research of Tampa Bay, Inc.
Spring Hill, Florida, 34609
St. Louis Center for Clinical Research
St Louis, Missouri, 63128
Stamford Therapeutic Consortium
Stamford, Connecticut, 06905
VA Medical Center
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Tacoma Digestive Disease Research Center
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Digestive Health Center
Topeka, Kansas, 66606
Upstate Gastroenterology Associates, PC
Troy, New York, 12180
Avamar Center for Gastroenterology, Inc.
Warren, Ohio, 44484
Covenent Clinic
Waterloo, Iowa, 50702
Metabolic Research Institute, Inc.
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401
About this study
Official title: Phase 3 Study to Establish the Efficacy and Safety of a New Tablet Formulation and Dosing Regimen of Balsalazide Disodium Dosed Twice Daily in Achieving Clinical Improvement in Subjects With Mildly to Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis After 8 Weeks of Therapy
The purpose of this study is to establish the efficacy and safety of a new tablet formulation and dosing regimen of balsalazide disodium dosed twice daily in achieving clinical improvement in subjects with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis after 8 weeks of therapy.
Read the detailed description
The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of subjects that achieve clinical improvement and improvement in the rectal bleeding subscale of the MMDAI at the end of eight weeks of therapy, where clinical improvement is defined as a greater than or equal to 3 point improvement from baseline in the MMDAI.
The secondary endpoints are as follows:
- The change from baseline over the duration of treatment in total MMDAI score and in the individual MMDAI subscales.
- The change from baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 in total MMDAI score and in each individual MMDAI subscale (endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy at Weeks 2 and 8 only).
- The proportion of subjects with treatment failure, defined as withdrawal due to significant disease progression or lack of significant improvement, as determined by the Investigator.
- The proportion of subjects with mucosal healing at Weeks 2 and 8, where mucosal healing is defined as an endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy score of 0 or 1
- The proportion of subjects achieving complete remission at Week 2 and Week 8, where complete remission is defined as a MMDAI score of less than or equal to 1.
- The proportion of subjects with improvement from baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 in total MMDAI score and in each individual MMDAI subscale (endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy at Weeks 2 and 8 only).
- Change from baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 in diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, and subjective sense of well being, as recorded in the subjects' diaries.
- The proportion of subjects achieving clinical remission at Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8, where clinical remission is defined as a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and a combined score of less than or equal to 2 for bowel frequency and physician assessment using the MMDAI.
- Time to clinical remission, where clinical remission is defined as in secondary endpoint number eight.
Safety endpoints are as follows:
- incidence of treatment-emergent AEs grouped by body system and evaluated by treatment group;
- changes from baseline in clinical laboratory parameters at each treatment visit by treatment group; and
- changes from baseline in vital sign measurements at each treatment visit by treatment group.
- Conditions
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Being tested
- 5 ASA, enemas, suppositories, corticosteroids
- Medical subject headings
- Colitis, Ulcerative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
5 ASA, enemas, suppositories, corticosteroidsDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of subjects that achieve clinical improvement and improvement in the rectal bleeding subscale of the MMDAI at the end of eight weeks of therapy, where clinical improvement is defined as a >3 point improvement from baseline in the MMDAI.
Secondary outcomes (1)
The change from baseline over the duration of treatment in total MMDAI score and in the individual MMDAI subscales.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Dec 2005 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2005
- Primary completionMar 2007
- Study completionJun 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Ulcerative ColitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bausch Health Americas, Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 225 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bausch Health Americas, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00269438
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BZUC3002
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 22 Dec 2005
- Last updated
- 25 Nov 2019
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Nov 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase 3 Study to Establish the Efficacy and Safety of a New Tablet Formulation and Dosing Regimen of Balsalazide Disodium Dosed Twice Daily in Achieving Clinical Improvement in Subjects With Mildly to Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis After 8 Weeks of Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00269438
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BZUC3002
- Conditions
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 225 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Bausch Health Americas, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2005
- Primary completion
- Mar 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Dec 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to establish the efficacy and safety of a new tablet formulation and dosing regimen of balsalazide disodium dosed twice daily in achieving clinical improvement in subjects with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis after 8 weeks of therapy.
Detailed description
The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of subjects that achieve clinical improvement and improvement in the rectal bleeding subscale of the MMDAI at the end of eight weeks of therapy, where clinical improvement is defined as a greater than or equal to 3 point improvement from baseline in the MMDAI.
The secondary endpoints are as follows:
- The change from baseline over the duration of treatment in total MMDAI score and in the individual MMDAI subscales.
- The change from baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 in total MMDAI score and in each individual MMDAI subscale (endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy at Weeks 2 and 8 only).
- The proportion of subjects with treatment failure, defined as withdrawal due to significant disease progression or lack of significant improvement, as determined by the Investigator.
- The proportion of subjects with mucosal healing at Weeks 2 and 8, where mucosal healing is defined as an endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy score of 0 or 1
- The proportion of subjects achieving complete remission at Week 2 and Week 8, where complete remission is defined as a MMDAI score of less than or equal to 1.
- The proportion of subjects with improvement from baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 in total MMDAI score and in each individual MMDAI subscale (endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy at Weeks 2 and 8 only).
- Change from baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 in diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, and subjective sense of well being, as recorded in the subjects' diaries.
- The proportion of subjects achieving clinical remission at Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8, where clinical remission is defined as a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and a combined score of less than or equal to 2 for bowel frequency and physician assessment using the MMDAI.
- Time to clinical remission, where clinical remission is defined as in secondary endpoint number eight.
Safety endpoints are as follows:
- incidence of treatment-emergent AEs grouped by body system and evaluated by treatment group;
- changes from baseline in clinical laboratory parameters at each treatment visit by treatment group; and
- changes from baseline in vital sign measurements at each treatment visit by treatment group.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- A subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if all of the following criteria apply:
- An Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved informed consent is signed and dated prior to any study-related activities.
- Subject is a male or, if the subject is female, she is eligible to enter if she is of:
- Non-childbearing potential (i.e. physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who has undergone sterilization [hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation] or is post-menopausal. For purposes of this study, postmenopausal is defined as 1 year without menses);
- OR,
Key exclusion criteria (35 listed)
- A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply (Note: Development of any of the following exclusion criteria on-study will be considered a basis for subject discontinuation.):
- Subject has a significant medical, including psychiatric, condition which in the opinion of the investigator precludes participation in the study.
- Subject has a history of allergy or intolerance to aspirin, mesalamine, or other salicylates.
- Subject has recently (within the past 30 days) failed therapy with balsalazide disodium
- Subject has received immunosuppressive therapy (e.g. azothioprine, 6 mercaptopurine) within 30 days, or corticosteroids (oral, intravenous [IV] or topical rectal) within 30 days prior to screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 5 ASA, enemas, suppositories, corticosteroids | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Proportion of subjects that achieve clinical improvement and improvement in the rectal bleeding subscale of the MMDAI at the end of eight weeks of therapy, where clinical improvement is defined as a >3 point improvement from baseline in the MMDAI.
1 secondary outcome
The change from baseline over the duration of treatment in total MMDAI score and in the individual MMDAI subscales.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Nov 2019.
Related trials for Ulcerative Colitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Open-label, DDI Study to Investigate the Effects of Duvakitug on the PK of Selected Cytochrome P450 Substrates
Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Immunophenotyping of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Ibd CAncer and seRious Infections in France (I-CARE 2)
IBD, Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Colorectal Dysplasic Lesions and Stratification of Their Evolving Risk in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: a Prospective, Observational and Multicenter Study
Crohn Disease (CD), Colitis Ulcerative
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
MOdel-Informed Precision Dosing of Ustekinumab and VEdolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
66 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing 5 ASA, enemas, suppositories, corticosteroids in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Bausch Health Americas, Inc. at 66 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 35 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 66 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of subjects that achieve clinical improvement and improvement in the rectal bleeding subscale of the MMDAI at the end of eight weeks of therapy, where clinical improvement is defined as a >3 point improvement from baseline in the MMDAI.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Nov 2019.