AzTrials
AzTrials

Shock, SepticPhase 2/3NCT00269685

Comparison of Vasopressin and Other Pressors in Septic Shock

A Phase 2/3 study testing vasopressin in people with Shock, Septic, run by Université de Sherbrooke.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the classical tactics in the treatment of septic shock (dopamine, noradrenalin and dobutamine) to the use of vasopressin as first choice pressor. Vasopressin seems to be an interesting alternative in the treatment of septic shock. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Shock, Septic
What is being tested?
vasopressin
How many people
20 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 2000to not given
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Legally major patient presenting a septic shock.
  • The time window between beginning of symptoms and onset of treatment is established at 12 hours.
  • The patient must be intubated and mechanically ventilated.
  • Patient presenting a mean arterial blood pressure of less than 60 mm Hg after adequate fluid resuscitation (at least 1 L of colloid or crystalloid) and 10 ug/Kg/min of dopamine.
  • Patient presenting a cardiac index of at least 3 L/min/m2

Who cannot join

  • Shock other than septic
  • cardiac hypokinesia
  • a pre-existing organic renal failure that needs hemodyalisis
  • oesophagal or gastric phatology that would lead to a naso-gastric tube contraindication

About this study

Official title: Comparative Prospective Study of Vasopressin and Catecholamine in Septic Shock

The purpose of this study is to compare the classical tactics in the treatment of septic shock (dopamine, noradrenalin and dobutamine) to the use of vasopressin as first choice pressor.

Vasopressin seems to be an interesting alternative in the treatment of septic shock. To this date, available studies have showed that it could correct hyperkinetic syndrome and vasoplegia in septic shocks without noticeable side effect. It as been demonstrated that vasopressin improves renal function, as no effect on digestive organs and as no metabolic effect.

Conditions
Shock, Septic
Being tested
vasopressin
Keywords
Septic shock, catecholamine, vasopressin, tonometria, lactate
Medical subject headings
Shock, Septic, Diabetes Insipidus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • vasopressinDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To compare the efficiency of vasopressine to the standard and usual treatment of septic shock on the reverse of the hemodynamic criterion of septic shock

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. To compare these two categories of treatment on:

  2. tonometric parameters

  3. renal function

  4. in term of tolerance: metabolic effects (increase in lactate and glycaemia), cardiac effects (tachycardia being defined as a heart rate increase of 15%), increase of cardiac enzymes (troponine, CK, CK-MB), and cutanuous vasoconstriction.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Dec 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2000

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00269685
Sponsor's protocol ID
00-33-R2
Status last verified
Aug 2005
First submitted
22 Dec 2005
Last updated
29 May 2006
Results posted
No

Publications

  • American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun;20(6):864-74.

    PubMed 1597042
  • Landry DW, Levin HR, Gallant EM, Ashton RC Jr, Seo S, D'Alessandro D, Oz MC, Oliver JA. Vasopressin deficiency contributes to the vasodilation of septic shock. Circulation. 1997 Mar 4;95(5):1122-5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.5.1122.

    PubMed 9054839
  • Luk J, Ajaelo I, Wong V, Wong J, Chang D, Chou L, Reid IA. Role of V1 receptors in the action of vasopressin on the baroreflex control of heart rate. Am J Physiol. 1993 Sep;265(3 Pt 2):R524-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1993.265.3.R524.

    PubMed 8214142
  • Malay MB, Ashton RC Jr, Landry DW, Townsend RN. Low-dose vasopressin in the treatment of vasodilatory septic shock. J Trauma. 1999 Oct;47(4):699-703; discussion 703-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199910000-00014.

    PubMed 10528604
  • Reid IA. Role of vasopressin deficiency in the vasodilation of septic shock. Circulation. 1997 Mar 4;95(5):1108-10. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.5.1108. No abstract available.

    PubMed 9054835
  • Rozenfeld V, Cheng JW. The role of vasopressin in the treatment of vasodilation in shock states. Ann Pharmacother. 2000 Feb;34(2):250-4. doi: 10.1345/aph.19066.

    PubMed 10676834

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing vasopressin in people with Shock, Septic, run by Université de Sherbrooke.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To compare the efficiency of vasopressine to the standard and usual treatment of septic shock on the reverse of the hemodynamic criterion of septic shock. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00269685, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2006.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in