HypertensionPhase 4PRISMANCT00274612
Prospective Randomised Investigation of the Safety and Efficacy of Micardis® vs Ramipril Using ABPM
A Phase 4 study testing Telmisartan and Ramipril in people with Hypertension, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 62 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) is at least as effective and possibly superior to ramipril 5mg and 10mg in lowering mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension
- What is being tested?
- Telmisartan and Ramipril
- How many people
- 801 participants
- Where
- 62 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2002to Nov 2003
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Mild-to-moderate hypertension defined as a mean seated diastolic blood pressure of greater than or equal to 95 mmHg and less than or equal to 109 mmHg, measured by manual cuff sphygmomanometer at Visit 2.
- 24-hour mean DBP of greater than or equal to 85 mmHg at Visit 3 as measured by ABPM.
- Age 18 years or older.
- Ability to stop any current antihypertensive therapy without risk to the patient (investigator's discretion).
- Ability to provide written informed consent in accordance with GCP and local legislation.
Who cannot join
- Pre-menopausal women (last menstruation approximately less than or equal to 1 year prior to signing informed consent) who:
- Are not surgically sterile
- Are nursing,
- Are of child-bearing potential and are NOT practicing acceptable methods of birth control, or do NOT plan to continue practicing an acceptable method throughout the study. Acceptable methods of birth control include intra uterine device, oral, implantable or injectable contraceptives.
- Night shift workers who routinely sleep during the daytime and whose work hours include midnight to 4:00 A.M.
- Mean sitting SBP greater than or equal to180 mmHg or mean sitting DBP greater than or equal to 110 mmHg during any visit of the placebo run-in period.
Show all 31Show fewer
- Known or suspected secondary hypertension (i.e., pheochromocytoma).
- Hepatic and/or renal dysfunction as defined by the following laboratory parameters:
- SGPT (ALT) or SGOT (AST) > 2 times the upper limit of normal range.
- Serum creatinine > 2.3mg/dL (or > 203 micromol/l).
- Bilateral renal artery stenosis, renal artery stenosis in a solitary kidney, post-renal transplant patients or patients with only one kidney.
- Clinically relevant sodium depletion, hypokalaemia or hyperkalaemia.
- Uncorrected volume depletion.
- Primary aldosteronism.
- Hereditary fructose intolerance.
- Biliary obstructive disorders.
- Congestive heart failure (NYHA functional class CHF III-IV).
- Unstable angina within the past three months prior to start of run in period.
- Stroke within the past six months prior to start of run in period.
- Myocardial infarction or cardiac surgery within the past three months prior to start of run in period.
- PTCA (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) within the past three months prior to start of run in period.
- Sustained ventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or other clinically relevant cardiac arrhythmias as determined by the investigator.
- Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, aortic stenosis, haemodynamically relevant stenosis of the aortic or mitral valve.
- Patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus whose diabetes has not been stable and controlled for at least the past three months as defined by an HbA1C greater than or equal to 10%.
- Patients who have previously experienced symptoms characteristic of angioedema during treatment with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists.
- History of drug or alcohol dependency within 6 months prior to start of run in period.
- Concomitant administration of any medications known to affect blood pressure, except medication allowed by the protocol.
- Any investigational therapy within one month of start of run in period.
- Known hypersensitivity to any component of the formulations.
- Any clinical condition which, in the opinion of the investigator would not allow safe completion of the protocol and safe administration of trial medication.
- Inability to comply with the protocol.
Trial locations and contacts
62 sites in 8 countries.
62 sites in 8 countries
United Kingdom19 sites
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ashford, TW15 3EA
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Atherstone, CV9 1EU
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bath, BA2 3HAT
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bedworth, CV6 4DD
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Coventry, CV7 8LA
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Doncaster, DN1 2EG
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Fowey, PL23 1DT
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Frome, BA11 2QE
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Glasgow, G69 7AD
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ilford, IG3 8BG
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lesley, KY6 3LG
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lostwithiel, PL22 0EF
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Royal Leamington Spa, CV32 4RA
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ryde, PO33 2PT
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Trowbridge, BA14 7EG
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wells Next to the Sea, NR23 1JP
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Whitstable, CT5 1BZ
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Whitstable, CT5 3QU
York District Hospital
York, YO31 8HE
Germany9 sites
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Gaggenau, 76571
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Haag, 83527
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Linkenheim-Hochstetten, 76351
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mühldorf, 84453
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Plattling, 94447
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Unterschneidheim, 73485
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Villingen-Schwenningen, 78054
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Vilsbiburg, 84137
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Westerkappeln, 49492
France7 sites
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Angers, 49000
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Angers, 49100
Hôpital Saint André
Bordeaux, 33075
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Laval, 53000
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mayenne, 53100
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Saint Laurent Du Medoc, 33112
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Saumur, 49400
Spain7 sites
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08003
Hospital de Galdakao
Galdakao / Vizcaya, 48680
Pabellon de Consultas
Madrid, 28007
Edificio de Consultas Externas
Oviedo, 33006
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Salamanca, 37007
Pabellon B / 1 piso
Santa Coloma de Gramanet, 08923
Centro de Diagnostico y Tratamiento
Seville, 41013
Austria6 sites
Rehabilitationszentrum für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen
Bad Tatzmannsdorf, 7431
A.ö. Landeskrankenhaus Bruck a. d. Mur
Bruck A. D. Mur, 8600
Landeskrankenhaus Graz West
Graz, 8020
Medizinische Universitätsklinik Graz
Graz, 8036
Univ.-Klinik für Innere Medizin III
Vienna, 1090
Landeskrankenhaus Villach
Villach, 9500
Switzerland6 sites
Universitätsspital Basel
Basel, 4031
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Basel, 4055
Schweizerisches Herz- und Gefässzentrum
Bern, 3010
Cardiocentro Ticino
Lugano, 6900
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Münsterlingen, 8596
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Muralto, 6600
Netherlands4 sites
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bennebroek, 2121 BB
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Heerlen, 6415 HT
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Nijverdal, 7441 BN
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rotterdam, 3082 DC
South Africa4 sites
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bellville, 7531
Health Emporium
Midrand, 1685
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Vanderbijlpark, 1911
1 Military Hospital
Vootrekkehoogte, 0143
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Randomised Open- Label Blinded-Endpoint (PROBE) Trial Comparing Telmisartan (MICARDIS®) (40-80-80mg QD) and Ramipril (2.5-5--10mg QD) in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Hypertension Using Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring. PRISMA = Prospective Randomised Investigation of the Safety and Efficacy of Micardis® vs Ramipril Using ABPM
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) is at least as effective and possibly superior to ramipril 5mg and 10mg in lowering mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval in mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients at the end of an 8 and 14-week treatment period, respectively.
Read the detailed description
Secondary objectives will compare telmisartan (80 mg) (MICARDIS® and ramipril (5 mg and 10 mg) on: 1) the reduction in the last 6-hour ABPM mean pulse pressure (PP) relative to dosing, 2) the reductions in the 24-hour ABPM mean DBP, SBP and PP relative to dosing, 3) reductions in ABPM mean DBP, SBP and PP during other periods of the 24-hour dosing interval (i.e., morning, daytime, and nighttime) relative to clock time, 4) change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure load during the 24-hour dosing interval, 5) reductions in the mean seated trough DBP and SBP measured using a manual in-clinic cuff sphygmomanometer, 6) responder rates as determined by both ABPM and manual in-clinic cuff measurements and 7) Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL).
Study Hypothesis:
It is hypothesised that the rise of blood pressure (BP) during the last hours of the sleeping period is a cause of the high incidence of cardiovascular events in the morning. The purpose of the present study is to demonstrate that telmisartan (MICARDIS®) is not inferior to ramipril in lowering blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Blood pressure will be assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) as this will allow comparison of the full 24-hour effects of both treatments without artefacts (e.g., white-coat hypertension) introduced by measurement of blood pressure in the clinic. This will measure diastolic blood pressures over the entire 24-hour dosing interval, with primary attention focused on the last six hours of the dosing interval.
NULL AND ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESES In order to test the multiple hypotheses (e.g., non-inferiority and superiority of telmisartan compared to ramipril), multiple dosages (i.e., telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) versus ramipril 5mg and ramipril 10mg after 8 and 14 weeks of treatment, respectively), and the two endpoints (i.e., reduction in DBP and SBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval) as measured by ABPM, a completely hierarchical, closed testing procedure will be used.
Hierarchical Closed Testing Procedure:
- Non-inferiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5 mg at the end of the 8 week treatment period in the reduction of DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval; if significant then,
- Superiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5 mg at the end of the 8-week treatment period in the reduction of DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval; if significant then,
- Superiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5 mg at the end of the 8-week treatment period in the reduction of SBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval; if significant then,
- Non-inferiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10 mg at the end of an 14 week treatment period in the reduction of DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval; if significant then,
- Superiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10 mg at the end of an 14-week treatment period in the reduction of DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval; and if significant then,
- Superiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10mg at the end of an 14-week treatment period in the reduction of SBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval.
A difference of 2 mmHg was determined to be the maximum difference between the mean reductions in DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for the two treatments which would be considered to have no clinical importance (i.e., the limit for non inferiority). Thus non-inferiority of telmisartan compared to ramipril will be tested using the following set of hypotheses:
Null Hypothesis:
The overall mean reduction from baseline in ABPM mean DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) is inferior to that for ramipril by at least 2 mmHg.
Alternative Hypothesis: The overall mean reduction from baseline in ABPM mean DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) is less than 2 mmHg smaller than that for ramipril.
These hypotheses can be stated as:
H0: dT - dR less than or equal to -2 mmHg versus HA: dT - dR > -2 mmHg where dT and dR represent the overall mean reduction from baseline in ABPM mean DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan and ramipril, respectively, adjusted for any other factors included in the statistical model.
If the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference between the least square means of both treatments (telmisartan - ramipril) lies above -2 mmHg, then it will be concluded that telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) is at least as effective as ramipril (5mg after 8 weeks of treatment or 10mg after 14 weeks of treatment, depending upon the comparison) in reducing DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval.
Superiority of telmisartan (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril will be tested using the following set of hypotheses:
Null Hypothesis:
The overall mean reduction from baseline in the ABPM mean during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) is less than or equal to that for ramipril.
Alternative Hypothesis: The overall mean reduction from baseline in the ABPM mean during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) is greater than that for ramipril.
These hypotheses can be stated as:
H0: dT - dR less than or equal to 0 mmHg versus HA: dT - dR > 0 mmHg where dT and dR represent the overall mean reduction from baseline in ABPM mean DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan and ramipril, respectively, adjusted for any other factors included in the statistical model.
If the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference between the least square means of both treatments (telmisartan (MICARDIS®) - ramipril) is greater than zero, then it will be concluded that telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) is statistically superior to ramipril (5mg after 8 weeks of treatment or 10mg after 14 weeks of treatment, depending upon the comparison) in reducing blood pressure (DBP or SBP, depending upon the comparison) during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval.
Comparison(s):
Reductions in blood pressure during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval as measured by ABPM in patients treated with telmisartan (MICARDIS®) compared to patients treated with ramipril. The primary analysis will consist of a closed testing procedure first testing for non-inferiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10mg after fourteen weeks of treatment in the reduction in diastolic blood pressure (DBP); if significant, testing for superiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10 mg in the reduction in DBP; if significant, testing for superiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10 mg in the reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP); if significant, testing for non-inferiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5 mg after eight weeks of treatment in the reduction in DBP; if significant, testing for superiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5 mg in the reduction in DBP; and if significant, testing for superiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5mg in the reduction in SBP.
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Being tested
- Telmisartan, Ramipril
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TelmisartanDrug
RamiprilDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in the last 6-hour mean (relative to dose time) diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP and SBP) as measured by ABPM
Measured: after 8 and 14 weeks
Secondary outcomes (9)
Changes in the last 6-hour ABPM mean (relative to dosing time) for pulse pressure (PP)
Measured: after 8 and 14 weeks
Changes in the 24-hour ABPM mean (relative to dosing time) for DBP, SBP and PP
Measured: after 8 and 14 weeks
Changes in the ABPM mean (relative to clock-time) for DBP, SBP and PP during the morning, daytime and night-time periods of the 24-hour dosing interval.
Measured: after 8 and 14 weeks
Changes in SBP and DBP load during the 24-hour dosing interval
Measured: after 8 and 14 weeks
Changes in mean seated trough DBP and SBP as measured by manual in-clinic cuff sphygmomanometer
Measured: after 8 and 14 weeks
Responder rates based on both the 24-hour ABPM mean (relative to dose time) BPs and manual in-clinic trough cuff measurements
Measured: after 8 and 14 weeks
Changes from baseline in patient Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as measured by Psychological General Wellbeing Index (PGWB).
Measured: week 8 and 14
Manually triggered BP measurements before going to bed and upon arising in the morning
Measured: after 8 and 14 weeks
Incidence of adverse events
Measured: up to 14 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jan 2006 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2002
- Primary completionNov 2003
- Study completionNov 2003
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boehringer IngelheimThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 801 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Boehringer Ingelheim Study Coordinator, Study chair, Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd./Bracknell
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00274612
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 502.391
- Acronym
- PRISMA
- Status last verified
- Oct 2013
- First submitted
- 10 Jan 2006
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2013
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Nov 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Randomised Open- Label Blinded-Endpoint (PROBE) Trial Comparing Telmisartan (MICARDIS®) (40-80-80mg QD) and Ramipril (2.5-5--10mg QD) in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Hypertension Using Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring. PRISMA = Prospective Randomised Investigation of the Safety and Efficacy of Micardis® vs Ramipril Using ABPM
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00274612
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRISMA / 502.391
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 801 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer IngelheimIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2002
- Primary completion
- Nov 2003 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2003
- First posted
- 11 Jan 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) is at least as effective and possibly superior to ramipril 5mg and 10mg in lowering mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval in mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients at the end of an 8 and 14-week treatment period, respectively.
Detailed description
Secondary objectives will compare telmisartan (80 mg) (MICARDIS® and ramipril (5 mg and 10 mg) on: 1) the reduction in the last 6-hour ABPM mean pulse pressure (PP) relative to dosing, 2) the reductions in the 24-hour ABPM mean DBP, SBP and PP relative to dosing, 3) reductions in ABPM mean DBP, SBP and PP during other periods of the 24-hour dosing interval (i.e., morning, daytime, and nighttime) relative to clock time, 4) change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure load during the 24-hour dosing interval, 5) reductions in the mean seated trough DBP and SBP measured using a manual in-clinic cuff sphygmomanometer, 6) responder rates as determined by both ABPM and manual in-clinic cuff measurements and 7) Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL).
Study Hypothesis:
It is hypothesised that the rise of blood pressure (BP) during the last hours of the sleeping period is a cause of the high incidence of cardiovascular events in the morning. The purpose of the present study is to demonstrate that telmisartan (MICARDIS®) is not inferior to ramipril in lowering blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Blood pressure will be assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) as this will allow comparison of the full 24-hour effects of both treatments without artefacts (e.g., white-coat hypertension) introduced by measurement of blood pressure in the clinic. This will measure diastolic blood pressures over the entire 24-hour dosing interval, with primary attention focused on the last six hours of the dosing interval.
NULL AND ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESES In order to test the multiple hypotheses (e.g., non-inferiority and superiority of telmisartan compared to ramipril), multiple dosages (i.e., telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) versus ramipril 5mg and ramipril 10mg after 8 and 14 weeks of treatment, respectively), and the two endpoints (i.e., reduction in DBP and SBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval) as measured by ABPM, a completely hierarchical, closed testing procedure will be used.
Hierarchical Closed Testing Procedure:
- Non-inferiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5 mg at the end of the 8 week treatment period in the reduction of DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval; if significant then,
- Superiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5 mg at the end of the 8-week treatment period in the reduction of DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval; if significant then,
- Superiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5 mg at the end of the 8-week treatment period in the reduction of SBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval; if significant then,
- Non-inferiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10 mg at the end of an 14 week treatment period in the reduction of DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval; if significant then,
- Superiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10 mg at the end of an 14-week treatment period in the reduction of DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval; and if significant then,
- Superiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10mg at the end of an 14-week treatment period in the reduction of SBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval.
A difference of 2 mmHg was determined to be the maximum difference between the mean reductions in DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for the two treatments which would be considered to have no clinical importance (i.e., the limit for non inferiority). Thus non-inferiority of telmisartan compared to ramipril will be tested using the following set of hypotheses:
Null Hypothesis:
The overall mean reduction from baseline in ABPM mean DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) is inferior to that for ramipril by at least 2 mmHg.
Alternative Hypothesis: The overall mean reduction from baseline in ABPM mean DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) is less than 2 mmHg smaller than that for ramipril.
These hypotheses can be stated as:
H0: dT - dR less than or equal to -2 mmHg versus HA: dT - dR > -2 mmHg where dT and dR represent the overall mean reduction from baseline in ABPM mean DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan and ramipril, respectively, adjusted for any other factors included in the statistical model.
If the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference between the least square means of both treatments (telmisartan - ramipril) lies above -2 mmHg, then it will be concluded that telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) is at least as effective as ramipril (5mg after 8 weeks of treatment or 10mg after 14 weeks of treatment, depending upon the comparison) in reducing DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval.
Superiority of telmisartan (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril will be tested using the following set of hypotheses:
Null Hypothesis:
The overall mean reduction from baseline in the ABPM mean during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) is less than or equal to that for ramipril.
Alternative Hypothesis: The overall mean reduction from baseline in the ABPM mean during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) is greater than that for ramipril.
These hypotheses can be stated as:
H0: dT - dR less than or equal to 0 mmHg versus HA: dT - dR > 0 mmHg where dT and dR represent the overall mean reduction from baseline in ABPM mean DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan and ramipril, respectively, adjusted for any other factors included in the statistical model.
If the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference between the least square means of both treatments (telmisartan (MICARDIS®) - ramipril) is greater than zero, then it will be concluded that telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) is statistically superior to ramipril (5mg after 8 weeks of treatment or 10mg after 14 weeks of treatment, depending upon the comparison) in reducing blood pressure (DBP or SBP, depending upon the comparison) during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval.
Comparison(s):
Reductions in blood pressure during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval as measured by ABPM in patients treated with telmisartan (MICARDIS®) compared to patients treated with ramipril. The primary analysis will consist of a closed testing procedure first testing for non-inferiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10mg after fourteen weeks of treatment in the reduction in diastolic blood pressure (DBP); if significant, testing for superiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10 mg in the reduction in DBP; if significant, testing for superiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10 mg in the reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP); if significant, testing for non-inferiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5 mg after eight weeks of treatment in the reduction in DBP; if significant, testing for superiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5 mg in the reduction in DBP; and if significant, testing for superiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5mg in the reduction in SBP.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Mild-to-moderate hypertension defined as a mean seated diastolic blood pressure of greater than or equal to 95 mmHg and less than or equal to 109 mmHg, measured by manual cuff sphygmomanometer at Visit 2.
- 24-hour mean DBP of greater than or equal to 85 mmHg at Visit 3 as measured by ABPM.
- Age 18 years or older.
- Ability to stop any current antihypertensive therapy without risk to the patient (investigator's discretion).
- Ability to provide written informed consent in accordance with GCP and local legislation.
Key exclusion criteria (31 listed)
- Pre-menopausal women (last menstruation approximately less than or equal to 1 year prior to signing informed consent) who:
- Night shift workers who routinely sleep during the daytime and whose work hours include midnight to 4:00 A.M.
- Mean sitting SBP greater than or equal to180 mmHg or mean sitting DBP greater than or equal to 110 mmHg during any visit of the placebo run-in period.
- Known or suspected secondary hypertension (i.e., pheochromocytoma).
- Hepatic and/or renal dysfunction as defined by the following laboratory parameters:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Telmisartan | Drug | – |
| Ramipril | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Changes in the last 6-hour mean (relative to dose time) diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP and SBP) as measured by ABPM
Time frame: after 8 and 14 weeks
9 secondary outcomes
Changes in the last 6-hour ABPM mean (relative to dosing time) for pulse pressure (PP)
Time frame: after 8 and 14 weeks
Changes in the 24-hour ABPM mean (relative to dosing time) for DBP, SBP and PP
Time frame: after 8 and 14 weeks
Changes in the ABPM mean (relative to clock-time) for DBP, SBP and PP during the morning, daytime and night-time periods of the 24-hour dosing interval.
Time frame: after 8 and 14 weeks
Changes in SBP and DBP load during the 24-hour dosing interval
Time frame: after 8 and 14 weeks
Changes in mean seated trough DBP and SBP as measured by manual in-clinic cuff sphygmomanometer
Time frame: after 8 and 14 weeks
Responder rates based on both the 24-hour ABPM mean (relative to dose time) BPs and manual in-clinic trough cuff measurements
Time frame: after 8 and 14 weeks
Changes from baseline in patient Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as measured by Psychological General Wellbeing Index (PGWB).
Time frame: week 8 and 14
Manually triggered BP measurements before going to bed and upon arising in the morning
Time frame: after 8 and 14 weeks
Incidence of adverse events
Time frame: up to 14 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Nov 2013.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Hypertension
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Enrolling by invitation
Testing Implementation Strategies to Support Clinic Fidelity to an Outpatient Hypertension Bundle
Pregnancy Related, Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Boehringer Ingelheim Study Coordinator study chair
Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd./Bracknell
62 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Telmisartan and Ramipril in people with Hypertension, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 62 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 31 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 62 sites in United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain, Austria and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in the last 6-hour mean (relative to dose time) diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP and SBP) as measured by ABPM (time frame: after 8 and 14 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2013.