AzTrials
AzTrials

HypertensionPhase 4PRISMANCT00274612

Prospective Randomised Investigation of the Safety and Efficacy of Micardis® vs Ramipril Using ABPM

A Phase 4 study testing Telmisartan and Ramipril in people with Hypertension, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 62 sites in 8 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) is at least as effective and possibly superior to ramipril 5mg and 10mg in lowering mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval in… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hypertension
What is being tested?
Telmisartan and Ramipril
How many people
801 participants
Where
62 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
Oct 2002to Nov 2003
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Mild-to-moderate hypertension defined as a mean seated diastolic blood pressure of greater than or equal to 95 mmHg and less than or equal to 109 mmHg, measured by manual cuff sphygmomanometer at Visit 2.
  • 24-hour mean DBP of greater than or equal to 85 mmHg at Visit 3 as measured by ABPM.
  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Ability to stop any current antihypertensive therapy without risk to the patient (investigator's discretion).
  • Ability to provide written informed consent in accordance with GCP and local legislation.

Who cannot join

  • Pre-menopausal women (last menstruation approximately less than or equal to 1 year prior to signing informed consent) who:
  • Are not surgically sterile
  • Are nursing,
  • Are of child-bearing potential and are NOT practicing acceptable methods of birth control, or do NOT plan to continue practicing an acceptable method throughout the study. Acceptable methods of birth control include intra uterine device, oral, implantable or injectable contraceptives.
  • Night shift workers who routinely sleep during the daytime and whose work hours include midnight to 4:00 A.M.
  • Mean sitting SBP greater than or equal to180 mmHg or mean sitting DBP greater than or equal to 110 mmHg during any visit of the placebo run-in period.
Show all 31Show fewer
  • Known or suspected secondary hypertension (i.e., pheochromocytoma).
  • Hepatic and/or renal dysfunction as defined by the following laboratory parameters:
  • SGPT (ALT) or SGOT (AST) > 2 times the upper limit of normal range.
  • Serum creatinine > 2.3mg/dL (or > 203 micromol/l).
  • Bilateral renal artery stenosis, renal artery stenosis in a solitary kidney, post-renal transplant patients or patients with only one kidney.
  • Clinically relevant sodium depletion, hypokalaemia or hyperkalaemia.
  • Uncorrected volume depletion.
  • Primary aldosteronism.
  • Hereditary fructose intolerance.
  • Biliary obstructive disorders.
  • Congestive heart failure (NYHA functional class CHF III-IV).
  • Unstable angina within the past three months prior to start of run in period.
  • Stroke within the past six months prior to start of run in period.
  • Myocardial infarction or cardiac surgery within the past three months prior to start of run in period.
  • PTCA (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) within the past three months prior to start of run in period.
  • Sustained ventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or other clinically relevant cardiac arrhythmias as determined by the investigator.
  • Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, aortic stenosis, haemodynamically relevant stenosis of the aortic or mitral valve.
  • Patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus whose diabetes has not been stable and controlled for at least the past three months as defined by an HbA1C greater than or equal to 10%.
  • Patients who have previously experienced symptoms characteristic of angioedema during treatment with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists.
  • History of drug or alcohol dependency within 6 months prior to start of run in period.
  • Concomitant administration of any medications known to affect blood pressure, except medication allowed by the protocol.
  • Any investigational therapy within one month of start of run in period.
  • Known hypersensitivity to any component of the formulations.
  • Any clinical condition which, in the opinion of the investigator would not allow safe completion of the protocol and safe administration of trial medication.
  • Inability to comply with the protocol.

Trial locations and contacts

62 sites in 8 countries.

62 sites in 8 countries

United Kingdom19 sites
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Ashford, TW15 3EA

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Atherstone, CV9 1EU

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bath, BA2 3HAT

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bedworth, CV6 4DD

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Coventry, CV7 8LA

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Doncaster, DN1 2EG

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Fowey, PL23 1DT

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Frome, BA11 2QE

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Glasgow, G69 7AD

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Ilford, IG3 8BG

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Lesley, KY6 3LG

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Lostwithiel, PL22 0EF

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Royal Leamington Spa, CV32 4RA

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Ryde, PO33 2PT

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Trowbridge, BA14 7EG

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Wells Next to the Sea, NR23 1JP

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Whitstable, CT5 1BZ

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Whitstable, CT5 3QU

  • York District Hospital

    York, YO31 8HE

Other trials in United Kingdom

Germany9 sites
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Gaggenau, 76571

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Haag, 83527

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Linkenheim-Hochstetten, 76351

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Mühldorf, 84453

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Plattling, 94447

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Unterschneidheim, 73485

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Villingen-Schwenningen, 78054

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Vilsbiburg, 84137

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Westerkappeln, 49492

Other trials in Germany

France7 sites
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Angers, 49000

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Angers, 49100

  • Hôpital Saint André

    Bordeaux, 33075

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Laval, 53000

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Mayenne, 53100

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Saint Laurent Du Medoc, 33112

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Saumur, 49400

Other trials in France

Spain7 sites
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Barcelona, 08003

  • Hospital de Galdakao

    Galdakao / Vizcaya, 48680

  • Pabellon de Consultas

    Madrid, 28007

  • Edificio de Consultas Externas

    Oviedo, 33006

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Salamanca, 37007

  • Pabellon B / 1 piso

    Santa Coloma de Gramanet, 08923

  • Centro de Diagnostico y Tratamiento

    Seville, 41013

Other trials in Spain

Austria6 sites
  • Rehabilitationszentrum für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen

    Bad Tatzmannsdorf, 7431

  • A.ö. Landeskrankenhaus Bruck a. d. Mur

    Bruck A. D. Mur, 8600

  • Landeskrankenhaus Graz West

    Graz, 8020

  • Medizinische Universitätsklinik Graz

    Graz, 8036

  • Univ.-Klinik für Innere Medizin III

    Vienna, 1090

  • Landeskrankenhaus Villach

    Villach, 9500

Other trials in Austria

Switzerland6 sites
  • Universitätsspital Basel

    Basel, 4031

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Basel, 4055

  • Schweizerisches Herz- und Gefässzentrum

    Bern, 3010

  • Cardiocentro Ticino

    Lugano, 6900

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Münsterlingen, 8596

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Muralto, 6600

Other trials in Switzerland

Netherlands4 sites
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bennebroek, 2121 BB

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Heerlen, 6415 HT

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Nijverdal, 7441 BN

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Rotterdam, 3082 DC

Other trials in Netherlands

South Africa4 sites
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bellville, 7531

  • Health Emporium

    Midrand, 1685

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Vanderbijlpark, 1911

  • 1 Military Hospital

    Vootrekkehoogte, 0143

Other trials in South Africa

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Randomised Open- Label Blinded-Endpoint (PROBE) Trial Comparing Telmisartan (MICARDIS®) (40-80-80mg QD) and Ramipril (2.5-5--10mg QD) in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Hypertension Using Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring. PRISMA = Prospective Randomised Investigation of the Safety and Efficacy of Micardis® vs Ramipril Using ABPM

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) is at least as effective and possibly superior to ramipril 5mg and 10mg in lowering mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval in mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients at the end of an 8 and 14-week treatment period, respectively.

Read the detailed description

Secondary objectives will compare telmisartan (80 mg) (MICARDIS® and ramipril (5 mg and 10 mg) on: 1) the reduction in the last 6-hour ABPM mean pulse pressure (PP) relative to dosing, 2) the reductions in the 24-hour ABPM mean DBP, SBP and PP relative to dosing, 3) reductions in ABPM mean DBP, SBP and PP during other periods of the 24-hour dosing interval (i.e., morning, daytime, and nighttime) relative to clock time, 4) change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure load during the 24-hour dosing interval, 5) reductions in the mean seated trough DBP and SBP measured using a manual in-clinic cuff sphygmomanometer, 6) responder rates as determined by both ABPM and manual in-clinic cuff measurements and 7) Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL).

Study Hypothesis:

It is hypothesised that the rise of blood pressure (BP) during the last hours of the sleeping period is a cause of the high incidence of cardiovascular events in the morning. The purpose of the present study is to demonstrate that telmisartan (MICARDIS®) is not inferior to ramipril in lowering blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Blood pressure will be assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) as this will allow comparison of the full 24-hour effects of both treatments without artefacts (e.g., white-coat hypertension) introduced by measurement of blood pressure in the clinic. This will measure diastolic blood pressures over the entire 24-hour dosing interval, with primary attention focused on the last six hours of the dosing interval.

NULL AND ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESES In order to test the multiple hypotheses (e.g., non-inferiority and superiority of telmisartan compared to ramipril), multiple dosages (i.e., telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) versus ramipril 5mg and ramipril 10mg after 8 and 14 weeks of treatment, respectively), and the two endpoints (i.e., reduction in DBP and SBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval) as measured by ABPM, a completely hierarchical, closed testing procedure will be used.

Hierarchical Closed Testing Procedure:

  1. Non-inferiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5 mg at the end of the 8 week treatment period in the reduction of DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24 hour dosing interval; if significant then,
  2. Superiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5 mg at the end of the 8-week treatment period in the reduction of DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval; if significant then,
  3. Superiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5 mg at the end of the 8-week treatment period in the reduction of SBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval; if significant then,
  4. Non-inferiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10 mg at the end of an 14 week treatment period in the reduction of DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval; if significant then,
  5. Superiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10 mg at the end of an 14-week treatment period in the reduction of DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval; and if significant then,
  6. Superiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10mg at the end of an 14-week treatment period in the reduction of SBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval.

A difference of 2 mmHg was determined to be the maximum difference between the mean reductions in DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for the two treatments which would be considered to have no clinical importance (i.e., the limit for non inferiority). Thus non-inferiority of telmisartan compared to ramipril will be tested using the following set of hypotheses:

Null Hypothesis:

The overall mean reduction from baseline in ABPM mean DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) is inferior to that for ramipril by at least 2 mmHg.

Alternative Hypothesis: The overall mean reduction from baseline in ABPM mean DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) is less than 2 mmHg smaller than that for ramipril.

These hypotheses can be stated as:

H0: dT - dR less than or equal to -2 mmHg versus HA: dT - dR > -2 mmHg where dT and dR represent the overall mean reduction from baseline in ABPM mean DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan and ramipril, respectively, adjusted for any other factors included in the statistical model.

If the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference between the least square means of both treatments (telmisartan - ramipril) lies above -2 mmHg, then it will be concluded that telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) is at least as effective as ramipril (5mg after 8 weeks of treatment or 10mg after 14 weeks of treatment, depending upon the comparison) in reducing DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval.

Superiority of telmisartan (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril will be tested using the following set of hypotheses:

Null Hypothesis:

The overall mean reduction from baseline in the ABPM mean during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) is less than or equal to that for ramipril.

Alternative Hypothesis: The overall mean reduction from baseline in the ABPM mean during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) is greater than that for ramipril.

These hypotheses can be stated as:

H0: dT - dR less than or equal to 0 mmHg versus HA: dT - dR > 0 mmHg where dT and dR represent the overall mean reduction from baseline in ABPM mean DBP during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval for telmisartan and ramipril, respectively, adjusted for any other factors included in the statistical model.

If the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference between the least square means of both treatments (telmisartan (MICARDIS®) - ramipril) is greater than zero, then it will be concluded that telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) is statistically superior to ramipril (5mg after 8 weeks of treatment or 10mg after 14 weeks of treatment, depending upon the comparison) in reducing blood pressure (DBP or SBP, depending upon the comparison) during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval.

Comparison(s):

Reductions in blood pressure during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval as measured by ABPM in patients treated with telmisartan (MICARDIS®) compared to patients treated with ramipril. The primary analysis will consist of a closed testing procedure first testing for non-inferiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10mg after fourteen weeks of treatment in the reduction in diastolic blood pressure (DBP); if significant, testing for superiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10 mg in the reduction in DBP; if significant, testing for superiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 10 mg in the reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP); if significant, testing for non-inferiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5 mg after eight weeks of treatment in the reduction in DBP; if significant, testing for superiority of telmisartan 80 mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5 mg in the reduction in DBP; and if significant, testing for superiority of telmisartan 80mg (MICARDIS®) compared to ramipril 5mg in the reduction in SBP.

Conditions
Hypertension
Being tested
Telmisartan, Ramipril
Medical subject headings
Hypertension

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TelmisartanDrug

  • RamiprilDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in the last 6-hour mean (relative to dose time) diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP and SBP) as measured by ABPM

    Measured: after 8 and 14 weeks

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Changes in the last 6-hour ABPM mean (relative to dosing time) for pulse pressure (PP)

    Measured: after 8 and 14 weeks

  2. Changes in the 24-hour ABPM mean (relative to dosing time) for DBP, SBP and PP

    Measured: after 8 and 14 weeks

  3. Changes in the ABPM mean (relative to clock-time) for DBP, SBP and PP during the morning, daytime and night-time periods of the 24-hour dosing interval.

    Measured: after 8 and 14 weeks

  4. Changes in SBP and DBP load during the 24-hour dosing interval

    Measured: after 8 and 14 weeks

  5. Changes in mean seated trough DBP and SBP as measured by manual in-clinic cuff sphygmomanometer

    Measured: after 8 and 14 weeks

  6. Responder rates based on both the 24-hour ABPM mean (relative to dose time) BPs and manual in-clinic trough cuff measurements

    Measured: after 8 and 14 weeks

  7. Changes from baseline in patient Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as measured by Psychological General Wellbeing Index (PGWB).

    Measured: week 8 and 14

  8. Manually triggered BP measurements before going to bed and upon arising in the morning

    Measured: after 8 and 14 weeks

  9. Incidence of adverse events

    Measured: up to 14 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jan 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2002
  3. Primary completionNov 2003
  4. Study completionNov 2003

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
801 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00274612
Sponsor's protocol ID
502.391
Acronym
PRISMA
Status last verified
Oct 2013
First submitted
10 Jan 2006
Last updated
1 Nov 2013
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Telmisartan and Ramipril in people with Hypertension, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 62 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 31 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 62 sites in United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain, Austria and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in the last 6-hour mean (relative to dose time) diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP and SBP) as measured by ABPM (time frame: after 8 and 14 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in