Congenital DisordersNCT00277953
MRI Review of Tracheal Dimensions
An observational study of Congenital Disorders, run by Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
To date, there have been no published reports of normal variations in tracheal dimensions for pediatric patients undergoing MRIs. While there are reports of normals in CT studies, the reported dimensions were for average areas and lengths over the entire length of the trachea and not for normal variation in the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 21 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Congenital Disorders
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Start not givento not given
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 21 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- 25 consecutive patients referred for possible vascular rings 50 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac MRIs for other indications adequate axial double-inversion recovery images of sufficient quality to permit accurate measurement of variations in tracheal dimension.
Who cannot join
- Those who do not meet inclusion criteria
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
About this study
Official title: A Review of Tracheal Dimensions in the Pediatric Population Using MRI
To date, there have been no published reports of normal variations in tracheal dimensions for pediatric patients undergoing MRIs. While there are reports of normals in CT studies, the reported dimensions were for average areas and lengths over the entire length of the trachea and not for normal variation in the dimensions at various sites in the trachea. Moreover, CT measurements are likely not entirely applicable to MRI measurements. Since cardiac MRI has become the procedure of choice to document the presence of vascular rings as well as the significance of any ring that is found, there is a need for normal values to be generated. This would in turn permit physicians to determine in cases of documented vascular rings the severity of the tracheal stenosis/deformity if found.
Read the detailed description
To date, there have been no published reports of normal variations in tracheal dimensions for pediatric patients undergoing MRIs. While there are reports of normals in CT studies, the reported dimensions were for average areas and lengths over the entire length of the trachea and not for normal variation in the dimensions at various sites in the trachea. Moreover, CT measurements are likely not entirely applicable to MRI measurements. Since cardiac MRI has become the procedure of choice to document the presence of vascular rings as well as the significance of any ring that is found, there is a need for normal values to be generated. This would in turn permit physicians to determine in cases of documented vascular rings the severity of the tracheal stenosis/deformity if found.
Hypothesis: Patients referred for cardiac MRIs to evaluate vascular rings will have significantly smaller tracheal dimensions (area, longest width, shortest width) based on a percentage of their maximal tracheal dimension in comparison with patients referred for cardiac MRIs for other indications.
I would propose to retrospectively review cardiac MRIs for tracheal dimensions in 25 consecutive patients referred for possible vascular rings and for 50 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac MRIs for other indications. As part of this study I would also propose to review the clinical findings that prompted the cardiac MRI to be ordered (i.e. respiratory symptoms, abnormal echocardiogram, abnormal CXR or barium swallow).
- Conditions
- Congenital Disorders
- Keywords
- Pediatric, Cardiac, Tracheal Dimensions, MRI
- Medical subject headings
- Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jan 2006 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Congenital DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Defined population
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 75 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Denver Sallee III, MD, Principal investigator, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Sibley Heart Center Cardiology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00277953
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 04-047
- Status last verified
- May 2007
- First submitted
- 13 Jan 2006
- Last updated
- 4 May 2007
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 May 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Review of Tracheal Dimensions in the Pediatric Population Using MRI
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00277953
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 04-047
- Conditions
- Congenital Disorders
- Keywords
- Pediatric, Cardiac, Tracheal Dimensions, MRI
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 75 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Healthcare of AtlantaUniversity, hospital or other
- First posted
- 18 Jan 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To date, there have been no published reports of normal variations in tracheal dimensions for pediatric patients undergoing MRIs. While there are reports of normals in CT studies, the reported dimensions were for average areas and lengths over the entire length of the trachea and not for normal variation in the dimensions at various sites in the trachea. Moreover, CT measurements are likely not entirely applicable to MRI measurements. Since cardiac MRI has become the procedure of choice to document the presence of vascular rings as well as the significance of any ring that is found, there is a need for normal values to be generated. This would in turn permit physicians to determine in cases of documented vascular rings the severity of the tracheal stenosis/deformity if found.
Detailed description
To date, there have been no published reports of normal variations in tracheal dimensions for pediatric patients undergoing MRIs. While there are reports of normals in CT studies, the reported dimensions were for average areas and lengths over the entire length of the trachea and not for normal variation in the dimensions at various sites in the trachea. Moreover, CT measurements are likely not entirely applicable to MRI measurements. Since cardiac MRI has become the procedure of choice to document the presence of vascular rings as well as the significance of any ring that is found, there is a need for normal values to be generated. This would in turn permit physicians to determine in cases of documented vascular rings the severity of the tracheal stenosis/deformity if found.
Hypothesis: Patients referred for cardiac MRIs to evaluate vascular rings will have significantly smaller tracheal dimensions (area, longest width, shortest width) based on a percentage of their maximal tracheal dimension in comparison with patients referred for cardiac MRIs for other indications.
I would propose to retrospectively review cardiac MRIs for tracheal dimensions in 25 consecutive patients referred for possible vascular rings and for 50 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac MRIs for other indications. As part of this study I would also propose to review the clinical findings that prompted the cardiac MRI to be ordered (i.e. respiratory symptoms, abnormal echocardiogram, abnormal CXR or barium swallow).
Study design
- Observational model
- Defined population
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 21 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 25 consecutive patients referred for possible vascular rings 50 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac MRIs for other indications adequate axial double-inversion recovery images of sufficient quality to permit accurate measurement of variations in tracheal dimension.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Those who do not meet inclusion criteria
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 May 2007.
Related trials for Congenital Disorders
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingObservational study
A Study in Children and, Adults With Congenital Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (cTTP) Treated With Adzynma
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
RecruitingPhase 1
Serial Amnioinfusions as Regenerative Therapy for Pulmonary Hypoplasia
Renal Failure Congenital, Congenital Renal Anomaly Nos
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Denver Sallee III, MD principal investigator
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Sibley Heart Center Cardiology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Congenital Disorders, run by Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2007.