AzTrials
AzTrials

AsthmaNCT00279136

Towards Restoring the Physiological Inhibition of Airway Narrowing in Asthma

An observational study of Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Asthma and COPD are characterized by airway narrowing. The most potent, physiological mechanism leading to bronchodilation is taking a deep inspiration. This protects healthy subjects against bronchoconstrictive stimuli, and reverses pre-existing bronchoconstriction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
Sep 2004to Mar 2006
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Asthma according to GINA criteria (www.ginasthma.org)
  • COPD according to GOLD criteria (www.goldcopd.org)

Who cannot join

  • nonsmoking
  • inhaled or oral steroid therapy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Peter J. Sterk, MD, PhD contact

+31 71 526 3578

p.j.sterk@lumc.nl

Annelies M. Slats, MD contact

+31 71 526 3734

a.m.slatts@lumc.nl

Netherlands1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Leiden University Medical Center

    Leiden, NL-2300 RC

    Peter J. Sterk, MD, PhD, +31 71 526 3578, p.j.sterk@lumc.nl

    Annelies M. Slats, MD, +31 71 526 3734, a.m.slats@lumc.nl

    Recruiting

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Asthma and COPD are characterized by airway narrowing. The most potent, physiological mechanism leading to bronchodilation is taking a deep inspiration. This protects healthy subjects against bronchoconstrictive stimuli, and reverses pre-existing bronchoconstriction. However, the deep breath-induced bronchoprotection and -bronchodilation is impaired in asthma. We questioned whether this is specific for asthma (in comparison to COPD), and whether this is associated with bronchial inflammation and -remodelling. The study is a two-groups comparison, of physiological and pathological disease markers, obtained by methacholine challenges, monitoring airways resistance, and by taking bronchial biopsies.

Read the detailed description

Rationale. Asthma is associated with variable airways obstruction and airways inflammation. It is generally assumed that inflammatory mechanisms are promoting airway narrowing, by stimulating airway smooth muscle and by geometrical changes of the airway wall. Healthy subjects are very effectively protected against stimuli of airway narrowing, by mechanisms that are apparently failing in asthma. The most potent inhibitor of airway narrowing in healthy subjects is taking a deep inspiration. This prevents and reverses bronchoconstriction (DI-induced bronchoprotection and -bronchodilation, respectively), which is less effective or absent in asthma. The DI-induced inhibition of airway narrowing in normal subjects is presumably due to relaxation of smooth muscle after mechanical stretch or to the release of relaxant mediators (such as endogenous NO). Such mechanisms might have become impaired in asthma, secondary to e.g. mechanical uncoupling of smooth muscle from the surrounding parenchyma (e.g. by congestion or edema), by altered structure and function of airway smooth muscle, and/or by reduced inhibitory mediator release.

It can be postulated that the impaired response to deep inspiration is a central pathophysiological feature of asthma at all ages. Therefore, we believe that it is imperative to address this, by identifying and restoring these inhibitory pathways in patients with asthma.

Hypotheses.

We hypothesize that DI-induced bronchoprotection and -broncho¬dilation:

  1. are associated with cellular and morphological features of airways inflammation,
  2. can be restored by deep insufflation rather than deep inspiration, and by pharmacological interventions aimed to reduce microvascular congestion or to increase endogenous nitric oxide synthesis..

Design and methods. To examine to what extent DI-responses differ between asthma and COPD in adulthood, and whether this is associated with features of airways inflammation and changes in smooth muscle function. 12 Adult patients with asthma and 12 with COPD will undergo single-dose methacholine challenge, with prohibition of DI's or 5 DI's prior to challenge in a cross-over design, measuring airways resistance. On a separate day bronchial biopsies will obtained with immunohistochemistry for inflammatory cell markers, vascularity, microvascular leakage, myosin light chain kinase, NO-synthases, and arginase.

Keywords
Bronchial hyperresponsiveness,, lung function,, airway inflammation,, deep inspiration,, bronchial biopsies, airway smooth muscle
Medical subject headings
Asthma, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Bronchial Hyperreactivity

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Jan 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2004
  3. Study completionMar 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Defined population
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
36 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00279136
Sponsor's protocol ID
AF 3.2.02.34, DIACON
Other IDs
Grant AF 3.2.02.34
Status last verified
Sep 2005
First submitted
17 Jan 2006
Last updated
19 Jan 2006
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Slats AM, Janssen K, van Schadewijk A, van der Plas DT, Schot R, van den Aardweg JG, de Jongste JC, Hiemstra PS, Mauad T, Rabe KF, Sterk PJ. Bronchial inflammation and airway responses to deep inspiration in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Jul 15;176(2):121-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200612-1814OC. Epub 2007 Mar 22.

    PubMed 17379851

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jan 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Peter J. Sterk, MD, PhD (+31 71 526 3578, p.j.sterk@lumc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00279136, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jan 2006.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in