AzTrials
AzTrials

Retinitis Pigmentosa(A16)NCT00279500

Feasibility Study of a Chronic Retinal Stimulator in Retinitis Pigmentosa

A study testing Argus 16 Retinal Stimulation System in people with Retinitis Pigmentosa, run by Second Sight Medical Products at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the retinal stimulation system by evaluating the data after chronic implantation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Retinitis Pigmentosa
What is being tested?
Argus 16 Retinal Stimulation System
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
6 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
27 Feb 2002to 31 Dec 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Confirmed history of retinal degenerative disease in the worse seeing eye with remaining vision no better than light perception. The fellow eye can have any visual acuity but must have better vision than the eye that will have the surgery.
  • History of former useful form vision in worse-seeing eye
  • Acceptable ability to describe visual percepts
  • Age eighteen (18) or older

Who cannot join

  • History of glaucoma
  • Optic neuropathy or other confirmed damage to optic nerve or visual cortical damage
  • Presence of communicable disease/infection
  • Pregnancy
  • History of claustrophobia
  • Inconsistent flash detection thresholds
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Any other diseases that can effect the function of the retina
  • Subjects with a Beck Depression Inventory Interpretation score of >30 and subsequent diagnosis of depression by a psychiatrist.
  • Corneal degeneration

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Doheny Eye Institute

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Chronic Retinal Electrodes to Provide Electrical Stimulation of the Retina to Elicit Visual Percepts in Blind Subjects

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the retinal stimulation system by evaluating the data after chronic implantation.

Read the detailed description

The chronic retinal stimulation system is an implantable electronic device designed to provide electrical stimulation of the retina in order to elicit visual percepts in blind subjects.

This chronic feasibility study will evaluate the ability of subjects to resolve multiple percepts and patterns under various stimulus conditions and optimize the effectiveness of electrical stimulus parameters with an initial chronic design.

Being tested
Argus 16 Retinal Stimulation System
Medical subject headings
Retinitis Pigmentosa

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Argus 16 Retinal Stimulation SystemDevice

    The chronic retinal stimulation system is an implantable electronic device designed to provide electrical stimulation of the retina in order to elicit visual percepts in blind subjects.

Study groups in NCT00279500
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
single arm studyExperimentalArgus 16 Retinal Stimulation System-single arm study.
Receives: Device: Argus 16 Retinal Stimulation System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Adverse Events From 2 Weeks Post-op Until the End of the Study

    All adverse events are collected as a result of chronic electrical stimulation and/or surgical complications.

    Measured: From 2 weeks post-op until end of device usage, up to 10 years.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Jan 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study start27 Feb 2002
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2014
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Subjects with a confirmed history of advanced retinal degenerative disease and meeting the inclusion criteria listed will be considered as eligible participants in the study. Subjects who have a condition listed in the exclusion criteria will not be allowed to participate in the study. Eligible subjects with the above diagnoses will be recruited from the Doheny Eye Institute at the University of Southern California. Additionally, new subjects encountered in the clinic who fulfill the inclusion criteria will also be eligible to participate. Upon meeting the entry criteria, all subjects must sign an Informed Consent prior to enrollment in the study. Since the subjects are blind, an individual not associated with this study must read the informed consent to the subject. This person must sign the consent form as a witness to the informed consent process.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
6 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00279500
Sponsor's protocol ID
CP0002
Acronym
(A16)
Status last verified
Apr 2018
First submitted
17 Jan 2006
Last updated
12 Apr 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Yue L, Wuyyuru V, Gonzalez-Calle A, Dorn JD, Humayun MS. Retina-electrode interface properties and vision restoration by two generations of retinal prostheses in one patient-one in each eye. J Neural Eng. 2020 Apr 9;17(2):026020. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab7c8f.

    PubMed 32131056
  • Nanduri D, Fine I, Horsager A, Boynton GM, Humayun MS, Greenberg RJ, Weiland JD. Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jan 20;53(1):205-14. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8401.

    PubMed 22110084
  • Eng JG, Agrawal RN, Tozer KR, Ross-Cisneros FN, Dagnelie G, Greenberg RJ, Chader GJ, Weiland JD, Rao NA, Sadun AA, Humayun MS. Morphometric analysis of optic nerves and retina from an end-stage retinitis pigmentosa patient with an implanted active epiretinal array. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 28;52(7):4610-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4936.

    PubMed 21296811
  • Horsager A, Boynton GM, Greenberg RJ, Fine I. Temporal interactions during paired-electrode stimulation in two retinal prosthesis subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Feb 1;52(1):549-57. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5282. Print 2011 Jan.

    PubMed 20720224
  • Greenwald SH, Horsager A, Humayun MS, Greenberg RJ, McMahon MJ, Fine I. Brightness as a function of current amplitude in human retinal electrical stimulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Nov;50(11):5017-25. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2897. Epub 2009 Jul 15.

    PubMed 19608533
  • Caspi A, Dorn JD, McClure KH, Humayun MS, Greenberg RJ, McMahon MJ. Feasibility study of a retinal prosthesis: spatial vision with a 16-electrode implant. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Apr;127(4):398-401. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.20.

    PubMed 19365014
  • Horsager A, Greenwald SH, Weiland JD, Humayun MS, Greenberg RJ, McMahon MJ, Boynton GM, Fine I. Predicting visual sensitivity in retinal prosthesis patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Apr;50(4):1483-91. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2595. Epub 2008 Dec 20.

    PubMed 19098313
  • de Balthasar C, Patel S, Roy A, Freda R, Greenwald S, Horsager A, Mahadevappa M, Yanai D, McMahon MJ, Humayun MS, Greenberg RJ, Weiland JD, Fine I. Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in epiretinal prostheses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jun;49(6):2303-14. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0696.

    PubMed 18515576

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Argus 16 Retinal Stimulation System in people with Retinitis Pigmentosa, run by Second Sight Medical Products at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 May 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Adverse Events From 2 Weeks Post-op Until the End of the Study (time frame: From 2 weeks post-op until end of device usage, up to 10 years.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00279500, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in