Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveNCT00281216
Innate and Adaptive Immunity in Individuals Experiencing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations
An observational study of Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive and Lung Diseases, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a statistical association between the changes from baseline in the levels of two cytokines interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-6 in the sputum of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the severity of acute exacerbations of COPD (AE-COPD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Lung Diseases, Lung Diseases, Obstructive
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2005to Sep 2010
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Recruited from pulmonary and general medicine clinics
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of COPD (following American Thoracic Society guidelines) and/or chronic bronchitis
- Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second of less than 70% predicted value after bronchodilator
- Current or former smokers with more than 20 pack-years
- Daily productive cough for 3 months of the year for 2 consecutive years
- At least one AE-COPD requiring medical attention in each year for the previous 3 years
- Willingness to participate in follow-up studies defined in the protocol
Who cannot join
- Unstable cardiovascular disease
- Other systemic disease in which survival of more than 2 years is unlikely
- Mental incompetence or active psychiatric illness
- Currently taking more than 20 mg/day of Prednisone
- Participation in another experimental protocol within 6 weeks of study entry
- Asthma
Show all 10Show fewer
- Cystic fibrosis
- Clinically significant bronchiectasis
- Lung cancer
- Other inflammatory or fibrotic lung disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Michigan at Ann Arbor
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105
About this study
Official title: Innate and Adaptive Immunity in COPD Exacerbations: Prospective Cohort Study
The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a statistical association between the changes from baseline in the levels of two cytokines interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-6 in the sputum of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the severity of acute exacerbations of COPD (AE-COPD). These sputum cytokine levels are taken as measures of the adaptive immune response (IL-17A) and the innate immune response (IL-6), respectively. Sputum will be collected either spontaneously or will be obtained by induction; cytokine levels will be measured by ELISA. The primary analysis, comparisons of sputum cytokine levels between clinical states, will be done using random effects modeling.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
COPD is one of the most pressing healthcare problems facing our nation. AE-COPD is responsible for the bulk of healthcare costs and much of the morbidity and decline in health status among individuals with this common disease. The lack of accepted animal models of AE-COPD necessitates novel approaches using human samples. Advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis have been slowed, in part, due to controversy as to how exacerbations should be defined. The prevailing paradigm has defined AE-COPD as event-based. Such definitions clearly identify groups of patients with accelerated loss of pulmonary function and increased mortality. However, limited data show that symptom-based definitions of AE-COPD also capture episodes inducing significant morbidity and functional decline, and hence of concern to patients. Fundamental mechanisms are lacking to explain AE-COPD defined by either means.
Controversy also surrounds triggers of AE-COPD. Bacteria and viruses are involved in some episodes, but the relative importance of each is intertwined with disputes over the definition of AE-COPD. Progress at linking specific pathogens to molecular pathogenesis has been slow, both due to their diversity, and to the high rates of bacterial colonization of patients with COPD, even in the stable state. Moreover, in many AE-COPD cases, no pathogen can be identified. Without negating the value of analyzing infections with specific species of pathogens, it appears that progress in molecular pathogenesis could be accelerated by focusing on unifying features of the pulmonary immune response during AE-COPD.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
A prospective patient cohort will be studied extensively physiologically, functionally, and immunologically upon enrollment while in the stable state. As part of the study, participants will be trained in the use of peak flow meters, so that they can record daily first morning peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR). To confirm the range of fluctuations in their basal state, participants will be then be followed at three-month intervals for face-to-face interviews and more limited physiological and functional testing described below. Participants will also be reminded at each scheduled visit to contact the study coordinator when they feel that an AE-COPD may be present. If they do contact the study coordinator, they will be evaluated at one of the study sites within 48 hours.
A diagnosis of AE-COPD will incorporate a modification of the definition used by the COPD Clinical Research Network (CCRN). The diagnosis will be made in one of two ways: severe AE-COPD will be defined as a change in respiratory symptoms above the participant's baseline measurements plus evaluation in the emergency room (ER) or requiring hospitalization; or mild-to-moderate AE-COPD will be defined as a change in respiratory symptoms above the participant's baseline measurements and requiring a change in therapy (addition of either antibiotics, oral steroids, or both), but without evaluation in the ER or hospitalization. In the latter case, therapy could be changed either at the advice of the patient's own caregivers or a study physician based on clinical judgment, or could be self-initiated in the case of participants authorized to do so by their caregiver. A concerted effort will be made to capture these milder AE-COPD during both winter and non-winter seasons.
Upon enrolling participants, the following will be performed: review of medical history; review of demographic and smoking history; physical examination, blood and sputum collection; six-minute walk test; and questionnaires to assess shortness of breath (MMRC and University of California San Diego SOBQ), sputum production (modified Chronic Bronchitis Symptom Questionnaire), health status (SF-36 and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire), and psychological traits (Hospital Anxiety/Depression Score, Illness Perception Questionnaire, Coping Index, and an individualized 30-minute clinical interview via telephone).
Participants will attend study visits every 3 months to review symptoms. During an AE-COPD (episode of acute bronchitis), sputum and blood will be collected, and a five-symptom questionnaire will be filled out.
Subjects are reimbursed $25 per scheduled visit and $50 per unscheduled visit (at the time of perceived exacerbation) to help defray travel expenses.
- Keywords
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPD
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Lung Diseases, Lung Diseases, Obstructive
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
length of hospital stay
Measured: hospital discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jan 2006 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2005
- Primary completionSep 2010
- Study completionSep 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MichiganThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jeffrey L. Curtis, University of Michigan
- Investigators
- Jeffrey L. Curtis, Study chair, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00281216
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1324
- Other IDs
- R01HL082480
- Status last verified
- Jan 2016
- First submitted
- 20 Jan 2006
- Last updated
- 29 Jan 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Freeman CM, Curtis JL, Chensue SW. CC chemokine receptor 5 and CXC chemokine receptor 6 expression by lung CD8+ cells correlates with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity. Am J Pathol. 2007 Sep;171(3):767-76. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.061177. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
PubMed 17640964Curtis JL, Freeman CM, Hogg JC. The immunopathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: insights from recent research. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007 Oct 1;4(7):512-21. doi: 10.1513/pats.200701-002FM.
PubMed 17878463Freeman CM, Martinez FJ, Han MK, Washko GR Jr, McCubbrey AL, Chensue SW, Arenberg DA, Meldrum CA, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Lung CD8+ T cells in COPD have increased expression of bacterial TLRs. Respir Res. 2013 Feb 1;14(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-13.
PubMed 23374856Freeman CM, Han MK, Martinez FJ, Murray S, Liu LX, Chensue SW, Polak TJ, Sonstein J, Todt JC, Ames TM, Arenberg DA, Meldrum CA, Getty C, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Cytotoxic potential of lung CD8(+) T cells increases with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity and with in vitro stimulation by IL-18 or IL-15. J Immunol. 2010 Jun 1;184(11):6504-13. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000006. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
PubMed 20427767Freeman CM, Martinez FJ, Han MK, Ames TM, Chensue SW, Todt JC, Arenberg DA, Meldrum CA, Getty C, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Lung dendritic cell expression of maturation molecules increases with worsening chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Dec 15;180(12):1179-88. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200904-0552OC. Epub 2009 Sep 3.
PubMed 19729666Freeman CM, Martinez CH, Todt JC, Martinez FJ, Han MK, Thompson DL, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are associated with decreased CD4+ & CD8+ T cells and increased growth & differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) in peripheral blood. Respir Res. 2015 Aug 5;16(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12931-015-0251-1.
PubMed 26243260
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jan 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Innate and Adaptive Immunity in COPD Exacerbations: Prospective Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00281216
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1324
- Keywords
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPD
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MichiganUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Study start
- Sep 2005
- Primary completion
- Sep 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jan 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a statistical association between the changes from baseline in the levels of two cytokines interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-6 in the sputum of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the severity of acute exacerbations of COPD (AE-COPD). These sputum cytokine levels are taken as measures of the adaptive immune response (IL-17A) and the innate immune response (IL-6), respectively. Sputum will be collected either spontaneously or will be obtained by induction; cytokine levels will be measured by ELISA. The primary analysis, comparisons of sputum cytokine levels between clinical states, will be done using random effects modeling.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
COPD is one of the most pressing healthcare problems facing our nation. AE-COPD is responsible for the bulk of healthcare costs and much of the morbidity and decline in health status among individuals with this common disease. The lack of accepted animal models of AE-COPD necessitates novel approaches using human samples. Advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis have been slowed, in part, due to controversy as to how exacerbations should be defined. The prevailing paradigm has defined AE-COPD as event-based. Such definitions clearly identify groups of patients with accelerated loss of pulmonary function and increased mortality. However, limited data show that symptom-based definitions of AE-COPD also capture episodes inducing significant morbidity and functional decline, and hence of concern to patients. Fundamental mechanisms are lacking to explain AE-COPD defined by either means.
Controversy also surrounds triggers of AE-COPD. Bacteria and viruses are involved in some episodes, but the relative importance of each is intertwined with disputes over the definition of AE-COPD. Progress at linking specific pathogens to molecular pathogenesis has been slow, both due to their diversity, and to the high rates of bacterial colonization of patients with COPD, even in the stable state. Moreover, in many AE-COPD cases, no pathogen can be identified. Without negating the value of analyzing infections with specific species of pathogens, it appears that progress in molecular pathogenesis could be accelerated by focusing on unifying features of the pulmonary immune response during AE-COPD.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
A prospective patient cohort will be studied extensively physiologically, functionally, and immunologically upon enrollment while in the stable state. As part of the study, participants will be trained in the use of peak flow meters, so that they can record daily first morning peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR). To confirm the range of fluctuations in their basal state, participants will be then be followed at three-month intervals for face-to-face interviews and more limited physiological and functional testing described below. Participants will also be reminded at each scheduled visit to contact the study coordinator when they feel that an AE-COPD may be present. If they do contact the study coordinator, they will be evaluated at one of the study sites within 48 hours.
A diagnosis of AE-COPD will incorporate a modification of the definition used by the COPD Clinical Research Network (CCRN). The diagnosis will be made in one of two ways: severe AE-COPD will be defined as a change in respiratory symptoms above the participant's baseline measurements plus evaluation in the emergency room (ER) or requiring hospitalization; or mild-to-moderate AE-COPD will be defined as a change in respiratory symptoms above the participant's baseline measurements and requiring a change in therapy (addition of either antibiotics, oral steroids, or both), but without evaluation in the ER or hospitalization. In the latter case, therapy could be changed either at the advice of the patient's own caregivers or a study physician based on clinical judgment, or could be self-initiated in the case of participants authorized to do so by their caregiver. A concerted effort will be made to capture these milder AE-COPD during both winter and non-winter seasons.
Upon enrolling participants, the following will be performed: review of medical history; review of demographic and smoking history; physical examination, blood and sputum collection; six-minute walk test; and questionnaires to assess shortness of breath (MMRC and University of California San Diego SOBQ), sputum production (modified Chronic Bronchitis Symptom Questionnaire), health status (SF-36 and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire), and psychological traits (Hospital Anxiety/Depression Score, Illness Perception Questionnaire, Coping Index, and an individualized 30-minute clinical interview via telephone).
Participants will attend study visits every 3 months to review symptoms. During an AE-COPD (episode of acute bronchitis), sputum and blood will be collected, and a five-symptom questionnaire will be filled out.
Subjects are reimbursed $25 per scheduled visit and $50 per unscheduled visit (at the time of perceived exacerbation) to help defray travel expenses.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Recruited from pulmonary and general medicine clinics
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Diagnosis of COPD (following American Thoracic Society guidelines) and/or chronic bronchitis
- Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second of less than 70% predicted value after bronchodilator
- Current or former smokers with more than 20 pack-years
- Daily productive cough for 3 months of the year for 2 consecutive years
- At least one AE-COPD requiring medical attention in each year for the previous 3 years
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Unstable cardiovascular disease
- Other systemic disease in which survival of more than 2 years is unlikely
- Mental incompetence or active psychiatric illness
- Currently taking more than 20 mg/day of Prednisone
- Participation in another experimental protocol within 6 weeks of study entry
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
length of hospital stay
Time frame: hospital discharge
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jan 2016.
- Background: PubMed 17640964Freeman CM, Curtis JL, Chensue SW. CC chemokine receptor 5 and CXC chemokine receptor 6 expression by lung CD8+ cells correlates with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity. Am J Pathol. 2007 Sep;171(3):767-76. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.061177. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
- Background: PubMed 17878463Curtis JL, Freeman CM, Hogg JC. The immunopathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: insights from recent research. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007 Oct 1;4(7):512-21. doi: 10.1513/pats.200701-002FM.
- Results publication: PubMed 23374856Freeman CM, Martinez FJ, Han MK, Washko GR Jr, McCubbrey AL, Chensue SW, Arenberg DA, Meldrum CA, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Lung CD8+ T cells in COPD have increased expression of bacterial TLRs. Respir Res. 2013 Feb 1;14(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-13.
- Results publication: PubMed 20427767Freeman CM, Han MK, Martinez FJ, Murray S, Liu LX, Chensue SW, Polak TJ, Sonstein J, Todt JC, Ames TM, Arenberg DA, Meldrum CA, Getty C, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Cytotoxic potential of lung CD8(+) T cells increases with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity and with in vitro stimulation by IL-18 or IL-15. J Immunol. 2010 Jun 1;184(11):6504-13. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000006. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 19729666Freeman CM, Martinez FJ, Han MK, Ames TM, Chensue SW, Todt JC, Arenberg DA, Meldrum CA, Getty C, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Lung dendritic cell expression of maturation molecules increases with worsening chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Dec 15;180(12):1179-88. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200904-0552OC. Epub 2009 Sep 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 26243260Freeman CM, Martinez CH, Todt JC, Martinez FJ, Han MK, Thompson DL, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are associated with decreased CD4+ & CD8+ T cells and increased growth & differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) in peripheral blood. Respir Res. 2015 Aug 5;16(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12931-015-0251-1.
- Curtis LaboratoryLink provided by the sponsor.
- COPD FoundationLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Brenipatide (LY3537031) in Adult Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
RecruitingPhase 2
Oral Sildenafil for Exercise Capacity, Dyspnea and Cardiopulmonary Function in COPD
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Recruiting
Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of dNerva Lung Denervation System in Patients With COPD
COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Inhaled Treprostinil for Dyspnea and Exercise Intolerance in Mild COPD
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jeffrey L. Curtis study chair
University of Michigan at Ann Arbor
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive and Lung Diseases, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
length of hospital stay (time frame: hospital discharge). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00281216, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2016.