Heparin-Induced ThrombocytopeniaNCT00283322
Heparin Antibodies in Intensive Care Unit Patients (HAICU)
An observational study of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Intensive care unit patients have multiple risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Venous thromboembolism leads to significant morbidity and can be fatal. Unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin are commonly used to prevent venous thromboembolism. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia
- What is being tested?
- blood samples (2)
- How many people
- 185 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2004to May 2006
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Consecutive consenting patients admitted to neurotrauma, surgical-trauma or medical intensive care unit meeting enrollment criteria.
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients (> 18 years of age) admitted to the
- Neuro-trauma intensive care unit (NTICU)
- Shock-trauma intensive care unit (STICU) or
- Medical intensive care unit (MICU).
- Completed informed consent process.
Who cannot join
- Admitted to ICU for short-term observation or expected hospital length of stay of less than 5 days
- Undergoing or planned plasmaphoresis
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
UT-Houston/Memorial Hermann Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
Florida Hospital Center for Hemostasis & Thrombosis (Laboratory)
Orlando, Florida, 32804
About this study
Intensive care unit patients have multiple risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Venous thromboembolism leads to significant morbidity and can be fatal. Unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin are commonly used to prevent venous thromboembolism. Heparin induced thrombocytopenia, an untoward consequence of exposure to heparin, is an immune disorder that may develop in patients treated with heparin products. Determining the prevalence of heparin induced thrombocytopenia and its relationship to preventive and therapeutic heparin and low molecular weight heparin will help clinicians more appropriately choose methods of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in the critically ill, ICU population.
The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of heparin-induced antibodies on admission to the ICU and the development of new heparin-antibodies during the first week of hospitalization.
Read the detailed description
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is common in the intensive care unit (ICU); VTE leads to significant morbidity and is fatal in 30% of undiagnosed pulmonary emboli and 8% when PE is appropriately treated. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients have multiple risk factors for VTE and tend to be at higher risk than non-ICU patients. Risk factors specific to ICU patients include immobility, central venous catheters, sepsis or infection, need for vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, surgery, trauma, and increasing age. Guidelines exist for the prevention of VTE, and VTE prophylaxis is strongly recommended. Given the high rate of VTE and the attendant morbidity and mortality, most ICU's routinely provide VTE prophylaxis which is individualized according to risk-benefit analysis with respect to thrombosis and bleeding risk. Prophylaxis for patients at risk of bleeding is accomplished by using mechanical compression devices while those without bleeding risk are administered medical prophylaxis which is felt to be more effective.
Recently, it has become apparent that medical prophylaxis is not without risk and that the risk-benefit analysis should also include the risk of developing heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or heparin induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT).
Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are commonly used to prevent VTE in ICU and non-ICU patients. HIT, an untoward consequence of exposure to heparin is an immune disorder that may develop in patients treated with heparin products. HIT is antibody mediated, usually due to IgG antibodies directed against epitopes on the platelet surface comprised of the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex. HIT is generally characterized by a decrease in platelet count to less than 100 X 109/L, or a 50% decrease from baseline, after exposure to heparin. HIT is typically observed after 5 to 10 days of treatment. Alternatively, patients with previous exposure to heparin can develop HIT in two days while heparin naive patients may develop HIT in about 10 days. The platelet count usually returns to normal several days after discontinuing heparin with or without therapy, though the risk for thrombosis persists for up to 3 months due to the persistence of antibodies.
Using an ELISA assay heparin-induced antibody formation is found in up to 50% of patients exposed to UFH. However, the serotonin release assay (SRA) which is believed to be more specific for HIT detects antibody formation in about 20% of patients. Five percent of patients receiving UFH develop thrombocytopenia (HIT) and half of these patients go on to develop heparin induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT) which results in venous and arterial complications which can be life threatening, or result in loss of extremities.
The occurrence of HIT varies widely between clinical populations and is dependent on the type of heparin used, i.e. UFH vs. LMWH. The highest incidence reported to date has been in the cardiac and orthopedic populations and is unknown in the ICU population. Warkentin, et al found in a study of 655 hip surgery patients that 2.7% randomized to UFH developed HIT while none receiving enoxaparin (LMWH) developed HIT. This variability in development of antibodies and the HIT syndrome makes it critically important to understand heparin induced antibody formation as a precursor to HIT and HITT.
Determining the prevalence of HIT and its relationship to preventive and therapeutic UFH and LMWH will help clinicians more appropriately choose methods of VTE prophylaxis and treatment in the critically ill, ICU population.
Objectives To determine the prevalence of heparin-induced antibodies on admission to the ICU and the development of new heparin-antibodies during the first 7 +/- 2 days of hospitalization. Secondary objectives include: determining the incidence of heparin antibody formation in patients treated with UFH, LMWH and mechanical prophylaxis (MPX); and to compare the incidence of heparin antibodies between different ICU populations.
- Conditions
- Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia
- Being tested
- blood samples (2)
- Keywords
- Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia, HIT, HITT, Thrombosis, Thromboembolism
- Medical subject headings
- Thrombosis, Thromboembolism
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
blood samples (2)Other
Two blood samples were obtained from patients and tested for heparin antibodies.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Medical ICU patients | Patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit Receives: Other: blood samples (2) | |
| Surgical ICU patients | Patients admitted to a surgical-trauma intensive care unit Receives: Other: blood samples (2) | |
| Neuro ICU patients | Patients admitted to a neuro-trauma intensive care unit Receives: Other: blood samples (2) |
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2006 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2004
- Study completionMay 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Heparin-Induced ThrombocytopeniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 185 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Investigators
- Robert L Levine, MD, Principal investigator, The University of Texas, Houston
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00283322
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HSC-MS-04-0312
- Other IDs
- HAICU
- Status last verified
- Dec 2007
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2006
- Last updated
- 6 Dec 2007
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Dec 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Heparin Antibodies in Intensive Care Unit Patients (HAICU)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00283322
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HSC-MS-04-0312
- Conditions
- Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia
- Keywords
- Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia, HIT, HITT, Thrombosis, Thromboembolism
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 185 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Study start
- Nov 2004
- Study completion
- May 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Intensive care unit patients have multiple risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Venous thromboembolism leads to significant morbidity and can be fatal. Unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin are commonly used to prevent venous thromboembolism. Heparin induced thrombocytopenia, an untoward consequence of exposure to heparin, is an immune disorder that may develop in patients treated with heparin products. Determining the prevalence of heparin induced thrombocytopenia and its relationship to preventive and therapeutic heparin and low molecular weight heparin will help clinicians more appropriately choose methods of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in the critically ill, ICU population.
The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of heparin-induced antibodies on admission to the ICU and the development of new heparin-antibodies during the first week of hospitalization.
Detailed description
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is common in the intensive care unit (ICU); VTE leads to significant morbidity and is fatal in 30% of undiagnosed pulmonary emboli and 8% when PE is appropriately treated. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients have multiple risk factors for VTE and tend to be at higher risk than non-ICU patients. Risk factors specific to ICU patients include immobility, central venous catheters, sepsis or infection, need for vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, surgery, trauma, and increasing age. Guidelines exist for the prevention of VTE, and VTE prophylaxis is strongly recommended. Given the high rate of VTE and the attendant morbidity and mortality, most ICU's routinely provide VTE prophylaxis which is individualized according to risk-benefit analysis with respect to thrombosis and bleeding risk. Prophylaxis for patients at risk of bleeding is accomplished by using mechanical compression devices while those without bleeding risk are administered medical prophylaxis which is felt to be more effective.
Recently, it has become apparent that medical prophylaxis is not without risk and that the risk-benefit analysis should also include the risk of developing heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or heparin induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT).
Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are commonly used to prevent VTE in ICU and non-ICU patients. HIT, an untoward consequence of exposure to heparin is an immune disorder that may develop in patients treated with heparin products. HIT is antibody mediated, usually due to IgG antibodies directed against epitopes on the platelet surface comprised of the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex. HIT is generally characterized by a decrease in platelet count to less than 100 X 109/L, or a 50% decrease from baseline, after exposure to heparin. HIT is typically observed after 5 to 10 days of treatment. Alternatively, patients with previous exposure to heparin can develop HIT in two days while heparin naive patients may develop HIT in about 10 days. The platelet count usually returns to normal several days after discontinuing heparin with or without therapy, though the risk for thrombosis persists for up to 3 months due to the persistence of antibodies.
Using an ELISA assay heparin-induced antibody formation is found in up to 50% of patients exposed to UFH. However, the serotonin release assay (SRA) which is believed to be more specific for HIT detects antibody formation in about 20% of patients. Five percent of patients receiving UFH develop thrombocytopenia (HIT) and half of these patients go on to develop heparin induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT) which results in venous and arterial complications which can be life threatening, or result in loss of extremities.
The occurrence of HIT varies widely between clinical populations and is dependent on the type of heparin used, i.e. UFH vs. LMWH. The highest incidence reported to date has been in the cardiac and orthopedic populations and is unknown in the ICU population. Warkentin, et al found in a study of 655 hip surgery patients that 2.7% randomized to UFH developed HIT while none receiving enoxaparin (LMWH) developed HIT. This variability in development of antibodies and the HIT syndrome makes it critically important to understand heparin induced antibody formation as a precursor to HIT and HITT.
Determining the prevalence of HIT and its relationship to preventive and therapeutic UFH and LMWH will help clinicians more appropriately choose methods of VTE prophylaxis and treatment in the critically ill, ICU population.
Objectives To determine the prevalence of heparin-induced antibodies on admission to the ICU and the development of new heparin-antibodies during the first 7 +/- 2 days of hospitalization. Secondary objectives include: determining the incidence of heparin antibody formation in patients treated with UFH, LMWH and mechanical prophylaxis (MPX); and to compare the incidence of heparin antibodies between different ICU populations.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Medical ICU patients | – | Other: blood samples (2)Patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit |
| Surgical ICU patients | – | Other: blood samples (2)Patients admitted to a surgical-trauma intensive care unit |
| Neuro ICU patients | – | Other: blood samples (2)Patients admitted to a neuro-trauma intensive care unit |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Consecutive consenting patients admitted to neurotrauma, surgical-trauma or medical intensive care unit meeting enrollment criteria.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adult patients (> 18 years of age) admitted to the
- Completed informed consent process.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Admitted to ICU for short-term observation or expected hospital length of stay of less than 5 days
- Undergoing or planned plasmaphoresis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| blood samples (2)Two blood samples were obtained from patients and tested for heparin antibodies. | Other | Medical ICU patients, Neuro ICU patients, Surgical ICU patients |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Dec 2007.
Related trials for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Cangrelor As Treatment for Cardiac Surgery Associated With Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia
Recruiting
Characterization and Quantification of Platelet/Leukocyte Aggregates in Patients With Suspected Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia
Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia, HIT
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Robert L Levine, MD principal investigator
The University of Texas, Houston
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Dec 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Dec 2007.