Achilles Tendon RuptureNCT00284648
Operative Versus Non-operative Treatment of Achilles Tendon Rupture
A study testing Surgical repair Achilles tendon rupture and Non-surgical repair Achilles tendon rupture in people with Achilles Tendon Rupture, run by Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
This study is intended to determine whether the optimal treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures is surgical repair or functional bracing. Our hypotheses are surgical repair will: 1) Result in a clinically relevant decrease in re-rupture rate and 2) Result in a clinically relevant improvement in disease specific… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Achilles Tendon Rupture
- What is being tested?
- Surgical repair Achilles tendon rupture and Non-surgical repair Achilles tendon rupture
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Dec 2000to Jul 2007
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Complete Achilles Tendon Rupture Less than 7 days from date of injury Age 18-70 years of age Ability to follow rehab protocol
Who cannot join
- Inability to Speak English Significant ipsilateral injury Open injury to Achilles tendon Neurological disease (ie stroke, cerebral palsy) Collagen Disease (ie Ehlers Danlos disease) Pregnancy Fluoroquinolone associated rupture (rupture within 2 weeks of taking medication) Unfit for surgery Diabetes Peripheral Vascular disease Avulsion of Achilles tendon from calcaneus
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario, N6A 3K7
About this study
Official title: Operative Versus Non-operative Treatment of Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Multicentre, Prospective Randomized Study.
This study is intended to determine whether the optimal treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures is surgical repair or functional bracing.
Our hypotheses are surgical repair will: 1) Result in a clinically relevant decrease in re-rupture rate and 2) Result in a clinically relevant improvement in disease specific quality of life and 3) A clinically relevant improvement in functional outcome measures
Read the detailed description
Methodology This study is a multi-centre prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. This study will be conducted at five tertiary care centres by orthopaedic surgeons with an interest in soft tissue trauma. All subjects will be recruited over a one year period. Subjects who meet the following inclusion and exclusion criteria and who consent to involvement in the study will be randomized to either operative or non-operative arms of the study. All patients who enter the study will receive a pre-treatment ultrasound to document that the tear is complete and to document the location of the tear. Prior to obtaining consent for the study the risks and benefits of each treatment option will be clearly explained along with the current state of knowledge concerning treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures. It will be explained to each study participant that involvement in the study is voluntary and that they are free to discontinue their involvement at any point in their treatment .
Inclusion Criteria
- Complete Achilles Tendon Rupture
- Less than 7 days from date of injury
- Age 18-70 years of age
- Ability to follow rehab protocol
Exclusion Criteria
- Inability to Speak English
- Significant ipsilateral injury
- Open injury to Achilles tendon
- Neurological disease (ie stroke, cerebral palsy)
- Collagen Disease (ie Ehlers Danlos disease)
- Pregnancy
- Fluoroquinolone associated rupture (rupture within 2 weeks of taking medication)
- Unfit for surgery
- Diabetes
- Peripheral Vascular disease
- Avulsion of Achilles tendon from calcaneus
Surgical Repair If randomized to the operative group, all patients will be evaluated and informed consent obtained. Surgery will performed as outpatient day surgery. Prophylactic antibiotics will be given one hour prior to the procedure. All patients will receive general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation. The patient will be positioned prone on bolsters on the operative table. A tourniquet will be applied to the thigh of the affected extremity and inflated to 300 mmHg at the start of the case.
The affected limb will be prepared and draped in the standard fashion. A medial to lateral curvilinear incision will be utilzed. The posterior aspect of the tendon and tendon sheath will then be exposed. Evacuation of the overlying clot will then expose the ruptured tendon. Two ethibond sutures will be placed in each end of the torn tendon (total of four sutures). Two ethibond sutures will be placed in a modified Bunnel stitch fashion entering at the tear site, first going proximally towards normal tendon and then distally towards the calcaneus. With the foot in neutral alignment the sutures will be tied proximally and distally in normal tendon away from the tear site. A 2-0 vicryl suture will then be place at the site of the repair in a running fashion to augment the repair. The wound will be irrigated and the tendon sheath will be closed with a running 2-0 running vicryl stitch. The skin will be closed with interrupted 3-0 nylon suture and a sterile dressing and tubigrip applied.
In the recovery room the patient will be fitted with a plaster backslab in gravity plantar flexion (approx. 20 degrees).
Postoperative Protocol Patients will be instructed to be non-weight bearing on their injured side with crutch assistance until seen in the outpatient clinic in 7-10 days. Patients will then be fitted for and Air Cast Boot splint. Patients will then be instructed to be weight bearing as tolerated on their injured side with crutch assistance for a period of six weeks.
Patients will be allowed active plantar flexion and dorsiflexion up to neutral with physiotherapy supervision. The Air Cast Boot will be removed for therapy but should be worn otherwise for protection. At six weeks patients will have their splints removed and be allowed to weight bear as tolerated. At the six week interval patients will also begin to perform dorsiflexion stretching exercises and will begin graduated resistance exercises. Follow up appointments will be 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years following surgery.
Functional Bracing Treatment If randomized to the functional bracing group, subjects will have an Air Cast Boot splint applied with a 2cm felt heel lift. Ath two weeks the heel lift will be removed. As with the operative group patients will be weight bearing as tolerated on their injured side with crutch assistance for six weeks. Similarly, subjects will be allowed to remove the Air Cast Boot and perform active plantar flexion and dorsiflexion up to neutral with physiotherapy supervision. At six weeks the patients will have their Cast Boots removed and dorsiflexion stretching exercises will be begun. A gentle resistance program will also begin at six weeks along with dorsiflexion stretching exercises. Follow up appointments will be 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years following the initial injury.
Re-rupture Rate and Complications The primary outcome measure will be re-rupture rate. This will be determined at follow-up intervals of: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
Re-rupture rates between the operative and non-operative groups will be calculated and statistically analysed using a student's t test. P values of less than 0.05 will be considered significant. Any clinical suspicion of a re-rupture will require an ultrasound for confirmation. Re-ruptures will be treated surgically. At the above listed follow-up intervals other complications will also be recorded including:
Minor complications
- superficial infection
- wound hematoma
- delayed wound healing
- scar adhesion
- sensory disturbances
- suture granuloma
Major Complications
- re-rupture
- equinus postioning of foot
- extreme lengthening of tendon
- deep infection
- chronic fistula
- necrosis of skin
- deep vein thrombosis
- embolism
- death
Range of Motion, Strength and Calf Circumference Range of motion and calf circumference will be documented at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Active range of motion only will be recorded to avoid healing setbacks. Calf circumference will be recorded and compared to the unaffected extremity.
Strength Testing Strength testing will be performed on all study participants. This will be done at follow-up visits at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. These measurements will include peak torque and total work. A cybex dynamometer will be used to test isokinetic concentric plantar and dorsiflexion strength at 30, 90 and 240 degrees per second. All values will be compared to the opposite unaffected side. Scores will then be transformed into a percentage of the unaffected side and points awarded appropriately as per the outcome measure designed by Leppilahti et al.
Disease Specific Quality of Life In the debate surrounding the most effective management of Achilles tendon ruptures, surgeons have argued about which individual factor signifies success. Many authors have suggested that re-rupture rate should be considered the measure of successful treatment, while others suggest minor complications or return to sport may also warrant consideration.
This study will utilize a previously published outcome scoring system that attempts to evaluate important factors in the recovery from this injury. This measurement tool published by Leppilahti et al utilizes a combination of factors including pain, stiffness and footwear restrictions as well as objective strength values, to arrive at an overall score. Statistical analysis using a students t test will be applied to the outcome score means of the operative and non-operative groups. P values of less than 0.05 will be considered significant. The application of this scoring system to a prospective randomized trial comparing operative and non-operative treatment of this condition will hopefully shed some much needed light on this therapeutic dilemma.
- Conditions
- Achilles Tendon Rupture
- Being tested
- Surgical repair Achilles tendon rupture, Non-surgical repair Achilles tendon rupture
- Keywords
- Achilles tendon, Rupture, Non-operative, Operative
- Medical subject headings
- Rupture
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Surgical repair Achilles tendon ruptureProcedure or surgery
Non-surgical repair Achilles tendon ruptureProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Re-rupture rate
Secondary outcomes (5)
Minor complications
Major Complications
Range of Motion, Strength and Calf Circumference
Strength Testing
Disease Specific Quality of Life
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Feb 2006 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2000
- Primary completionJul 2007
- Study completionJul 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Achilles Tendon RuptureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Enrolment
- 150 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sharon Griffin, Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic
- Investigators
- Kevin Willits, MD, Principal investigator, The University of Western Ontario
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00284648
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 99-36
- Status last verified
- Nov 2015
- First submitted
- 31 Jan 2006
- Last updated
- 30 Nov 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Willits K, Amendola A, Bryant D, Mohtadi NG, Giffin JR, Fowler P, Kean CO, Kirkley A. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a multicenter randomized trial using accelerated functional rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Dec 1;92(17):2767-75. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01401. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
PubMed 21037028
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Nov 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Operative Versus Non-operative Treatment of Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Multicentre, Prospective Randomized Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00284648
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 99-36
- Conditions
- Achilles Tendon Rupture
- Keywords
- Achilles tendon, Rupture, Non-operative, Operative
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 150 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
- Study start
- Dec 2000
- Primary completion
- Jul 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Feb 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is intended to determine whether the optimal treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures is surgical repair or functional bracing.
Our hypotheses are surgical repair will: 1) Result in a clinically relevant decrease in re-rupture rate and 2) Result in a clinically relevant improvement in disease specific quality of life and 3) A clinically relevant improvement in functional outcome measures
Detailed description
Methodology This study is a multi-centre prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. This study will be conducted at five tertiary care centres by orthopaedic surgeons with an interest in soft tissue trauma. All subjects will be recruited over a one year period. Subjects who meet the following inclusion and exclusion criteria and who consent to involvement in the study will be randomized to either operative or non-operative arms of the study. All patients who enter the study will receive a pre-treatment ultrasound to document that the tear is complete and to document the location of the tear. Prior to obtaining consent for the study the risks and benefits of each treatment option will be clearly explained along with the current state of knowledge concerning treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures. It will be explained to each study participant that involvement in the study is voluntary and that they are free to discontinue their involvement at any point in their treatment .
Inclusion Criteria
- Complete Achilles Tendon Rupture
- Less than 7 days from date of injury
- Age 18-70 years of age
- Ability to follow rehab protocol
Exclusion Criteria
- Inability to Speak English
- Significant ipsilateral injury
- Open injury to Achilles tendon
- Neurological disease (ie stroke, cerebral palsy)
- Collagen Disease (ie Ehlers Danlos disease)
- Pregnancy
- Fluoroquinolone associated rupture (rupture within 2 weeks of taking medication)
- Unfit for surgery
- Diabetes
- Peripheral Vascular disease
- Avulsion of Achilles tendon from calcaneus
Surgical Repair If randomized to the operative group, all patients will be evaluated and informed consent obtained. Surgery will performed as outpatient day surgery. Prophylactic antibiotics will be given one hour prior to the procedure. All patients will receive general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation. The patient will be positioned prone on bolsters on the operative table. A tourniquet will be applied to the thigh of the affected extremity and inflated to 300 mmHg at the start of the case.
The affected limb will be prepared and draped in the standard fashion. A medial to lateral curvilinear incision will be utilzed. The posterior aspect of the tendon and tendon sheath will then be exposed. Evacuation of the overlying clot will then expose the ruptured tendon. Two ethibond sutures will be placed in each end of the torn tendon (total of four sutures). Two ethibond sutures will be placed in a modified Bunnel stitch fashion entering at the tear site, first going proximally towards normal tendon and then distally towards the calcaneus. With the foot in neutral alignment the sutures will be tied proximally and distally in normal tendon away from the tear site. A 2-0 vicryl suture will then be place at the site of the repair in a running fashion to augment the repair. The wound will be irrigated and the tendon sheath will be closed with a running 2-0 running vicryl stitch. The skin will be closed with interrupted 3-0 nylon suture and a sterile dressing and tubigrip applied.
In the recovery room the patient will be fitted with a plaster backslab in gravity plantar flexion (approx. 20 degrees).
Postoperative Protocol Patients will be instructed to be non-weight bearing on their injured side with crutch assistance until seen in the outpatient clinic in 7-10 days. Patients will then be fitted for and Air Cast Boot splint. Patients will then be instructed to be weight bearing as tolerated on their injured side with crutch assistance for a period of six weeks.
Patients will be allowed active plantar flexion and dorsiflexion up to neutral with physiotherapy supervision. The Air Cast Boot will be removed for therapy but should be worn otherwise for protection. At six weeks patients will have their splints removed and be allowed to weight bear as tolerated. At the six week interval patients will also begin to perform dorsiflexion stretching exercises and will begin graduated resistance exercises. Follow up appointments will be 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years following surgery.
Functional Bracing Treatment If randomized to the functional bracing group, subjects will have an Air Cast Boot splint applied with a 2cm felt heel lift. Ath two weeks the heel lift will be removed. As with the operative group patients will be weight bearing as tolerated on their injured side with crutch assistance for six weeks. Similarly, subjects will be allowed to remove the Air Cast Boot and perform active plantar flexion and dorsiflexion up to neutral with physiotherapy supervision. At six weeks the patients will have their Cast Boots removed and dorsiflexion stretching exercises will be begun. A gentle resistance program will also begin at six weeks along with dorsiflexion stretching exercises. Follow up appointments will be 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years following the initial injury.
Re-rupture Rate and Complications The primary outcome measure will be re-rupture rate. This will be determined at follow-up intervals of: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
Re-rupture rates between the operative and non-operative groups will be calculated and statistically analysed using a student's t test. P values of less than 0.05 will be considered significant. Any clinical suspicion of a re-rupture will require an ultrasound for confirmation. Re-ruptures will be treated surgically. At the above listed follow-up intervals other complications will also be recorded including:
Minor complications
- superficial infection
- wound hematoma
- delayed wound healing
- scar adhesion
- sensory disturbances
- suture granuloma
Major Complications
- re-rupture
- equinus postioning of foot
- extreme lengthening of tendon
- deep infection
- chronic fistula
- necrosis of skin
- deep vein thrombosis
- embolism
- death
Range of Motion, Strength and Calf Circumference Range of motion and calf circumference will be documented at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Active range of motion only will be recorded to avoid healing setbacks. Calf circumference will be recorded and compared to the unaffected extremity.
Strength Testing Strength testing will be performed on all study participants. This will be done at follow-up visits at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. These measurements will include peak torque and total work. A cybex dynamometer will be used to test isokinetic concentric plantar and dorsiflexion strength at 30, 90 and 240 degrees per second. All values will be compared to the opposite unaffected side. Scores will then be transformed into a percentage of the unaffected side and points awarded appropriately as per the outcome measure designed by Leppilahti et al.
Disease Specific Quality of Life In the debate surrounding the most effective management of Achilles tendon ruptures, surgeons have argued about which individual factor signifies success. Many authors have suggested that re-rupture rate should be considered the measure of successful treatment, while others suggest minor complications or return to sport may also warrant consideration.
This study will utilize a previously published outcome scoring system that attempts to evaluate important factors in the recovery from this injury. This measurement tool published by Leppilahti et al utilizes a combination of factors including pain, stiffness and footwear restrictions as well as objective strength values, to arrive at an overall score. Statistical analysis using a students t test will be applied to the outcome score means of the operative and non-operative groups. P values of less than 0.05 will be considered significant. The application of this scoring system to a prospective randomized trial comparing operative and non-operative treatment of this condition will hopefully shed some much needed light on this therapeutic dilemma.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Complete Achilles Tendon Rupture Less than 7 days from date of injury Age 18-70 years of age Ability to follow rehab protocol
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Inability to Speak English Significant ipsilateral injury Open injury to Achilles tendon Neurological disease (ie stroke, cerebral palsy) Collagen Disease (ie Ehlers Danlos disease) Pregnancy Fluoroquinolone associated rupture (rupture within 2 weeks of taking medication) Unfit for surgery Diabetes Peripheral Vascular disease Avulsion of Achilles tendon from calcaneus
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Surgical repair Achilles tendon rupture | Procedure or surgery | – |
| Non-surgical repair Achilles tendon rupture | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Re-rupture rate
5 secondary outcomes
Minor complications
Major Complications
Range of Motion, Strength and Calf Circumference
Strength Testing
Disease Specific Quality of Life
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Nov 2015.
- Background: PubMed 21037028Willits K, Amendola A, Bryant D, Mohtadi NG, Giffin JR, Fowler P, Kean CO, Kirkley A. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a multicenter randomized trial using accelerated functional rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Dec 1;92(17):2767-75. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01401. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
Related trials for Achilles Tendon Rupture
Not yet recruiting
Early Functional Outcomes After Open Versus Percutaneous Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures
Patients With an Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture, Time From Achilles Tendon Rupture to Surgery of Less Than 2 Weeks
Recruiting
Blood Flow Restriction Exercise in Patients With an Achilles Tendon Rupture
Achilles Tendon Rupture
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Achilles Non-SNIS REGENETEN
Complete Mid-portion Achilles Rupture
RecruitingObservational study
Achilles Tendon Rupture Patient Outcomes at 12 Months
Achilles Tendon Rupture
Recruiting
Effect of BFR Rehab After Achilles Tendon Rupture
Achilles Tendon Rupture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kevin Willits, MD principal investigator
The University of Western Ontario
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Surgical repair Achilles tendon rupture and Non-surgical repair Achilles tendon rupture in people with Achilles Tendon Rupture, run by Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Re-rupture rate. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00284648, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Nov 2015.