AzTrials
AzTrials

TrachomaPhase 4NCT00286026

Azithromycin in Control of Trachoma II

A Phase 4 study testing Azithromycin in people with Trachoma, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Trachoma is the world's leading cause of preventable blindness. This disease, caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, is endemic in many parts of the developing world. In 1990s we evaluated the use of community-wide treatment with oral azithromycin in a project called Azithromycin in Control of Trachoma (ACT). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Trachoma
What is being tested?
Azithromycin
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2005to Aug 2009
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Person resides within a selected rural village in a trachoma-endemic area of Egypt.

Who cannot join

  • Person does not reside in one of the three rural villages being studied.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of California, San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94143

Other trials in United States

About this study

Trachoma is the world's leading cause of preventable blindness. This disease, caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, is endemic in many parts of the developing world. In 1990s we evaluated the use of community-wide treatment with oral azithromycin in a project called Azithromycin in Control of Trachoma (ACT). This approach resulted in clinical improvement and dramatic reduction in prevalence of chlamydial infection through a 1-year follow-up. We enrolled the ACT villages, as well as an additional village that had not had any prior treatments, in our ACT II (2005) study and performed clinical surveys to assess trachoma activity testing conjunctival swabs for the presence of C. trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). Thus, we hoped to determine the long-term (10 year) effects of azithromycin treatment.

We have completed the census and clinical survey of the initial three villages. Mass treatment with azithromycin would not be justified with such low rates (1.8 - 4%) of ocular chlamydial infection. We have treated only those living in households with one or more cases of chlamydial infection and we will not follow up on these individually treated families.

In order to achieve the goals of our study, we now propose to identify other more remote villages with trachoma infection rates of 20% or more to evaluate the effect of community-wide treatment with single dose of oral azithromycin. If one or more of these villages (dependent upon population) has trachoma rates of 20% or more they will be invited to participate in the azithromycin treatment. In one set of subjects (1 or 2 villages, dependent upon population and infection rate) we will perform treatment, and follow them up at 2-, 12-, and 24-months post-treatment to ascertain infection rates. In a second set of subjects (1 or 2 villages, dependent upon population and infection rate) we will perform treatment, then perform re-treatment at 30-days post initial treatment, and follow them up at 2-, 12-, and 24-months post-treatment to ascertain infection rates. This should help us determine the need for/and the best time for re-treatment to eliminate blinding trachoma, as some recent studies suggest there is a 2-4% failure rate in the initial treatment. In sum, this study should provide a rational approach to use of community-wide azithromycin treatment to eliminate blinding trachoma as a public health problem

Read the detailed description

This is operational research aimed at better defining the use of oral azithromycin as part of the SAFE strategy to eliminate blinding trachoma.

  1. Before the examinations, we will do a census and a sketch map of houses in each village. Particular emphasis will be placed on identifying all the children between 1 and 6 years of age. These children are the chief reservoir of infection, and would have been too young (or unborn) at the ACT study treatment, so it is of particular interest to determine their disease and infection status.
  2. Egyptian ophthalmologists will examine the eyelids, conjunctiva and cornea using magnifying loupes and a hand held light, with grading following the ACT protocol which contains categories referable to the W.H.O. detailed grading scheme. The clinical findings will be recorded on a standardized form.
  3. Egyptian health aides will photograph the inside of the right upper eyelid of all subjects. The photographs of the subjects at the initial visit and all subsequent examinations will be examined to confirm the consistency of clinical findings over the period of the study.
  4. To test for chlamydial infection, a single fiber-tipped swab will be stroked gently over the conjunctiva of the right eye by an Egyptian ophthalmologist. These swabs will be placed in special tubes and tested for Chlamydia trachomatis by a nucleic acid amplification assay. [APTIMA® Gen-Probe Inc. (San Diego, CA.)] The APTIMA® assay detects DNA via r-RNA by a process called transcription mediated amplification. Laboratory testing will be performed at the Chlamydia Research Laboratory at University of California, San Francisco.
  5. After the results are obtained from the nucleic acid amplification testing performed at the laboratory in San Francisco, treatment for trachoma will be done with a single-dose of oral azithromycin (20 mg/kg body weight in children, 1.0 gm adults). The azithromycin will be donated by Pfizer International. Young children will be weighed to determine the dose of azithromycin and the doses administered by a health aide under direct supervision of an Egyptian physician (Dr. Mahfouz). One set of subjects (1 or 2 villages depending upon population size, in order to generate meaningful numbers) will receive an initial treatment of 1.0 gm azithromycin; while the second set of subjects will receive an initial treatment of 1.0 gm azithromycin, followed by a second dose of 1.0 gm azithromycin at 30 days post treatment.
  6. If the prevalence of clinical trachoma is over 20% in children 10 and under, everyone in the village will be treated with oral azithromycin. After initial azithromycin treatment, follow-up examinations and specimen collection will be done 2, 12, and 24 months post-treatment for trachoma and chlamydial infection.
  7. If the prevalence is 10% to 20%, all children 10 and under, and the families of those children with active trachoma, will be treated. After initial azithromycin treatment, follow-up examinations and specimen collection will be done 2, 12, and 24 months post-treatment for trachoma and chlamydial infection.
  8. If the prevalence is less than 10%, only children with active disease and their families will receive treatment. There will be no follow-up examinations. Adults and older children will be told that azithromycin can cause nausea, vomiting, or loose stools or vomiting in some children and adults, and can occur in up to 5% (1 person in 20) of those treated. It should be noted that in our previous ACT study, more than 8,000 people received azithromycin with no complaints beyond minor gastro-intestinal upset.
  9. All positive specimens will have the major outer membrane gene amplified and sequenced. The genovars will be mapped for location within villages and families and then their distribution will be followed over time, after treatment to provide a better understanding of the epidemiology of the infection. Results of the study will be used as data input for the generation of mathematical models to predict whether community-wide retreatment (or alternate strategies) will be needed, and the optimal timing for such retreatment.
Conditions
Trachoma
Being tested
Azithromycin
Keywords
Chlamydia trachomatis
Medical subject headings
Trachoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AzithromycinDrug

    Also called Zithromax, Zmax

    1 gm Azithromycin orally, provided as four 250 mg tablets for adults; pediatric suspension will be provided to children > 1 year old (20 mg/kg body weight) to a maximal dose of 500 mg. One dose vs 2 doses given 30 days apart.

Study groups in NCT00286026
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1ExperimentalSubjects residing in villages assigned to treatment arm 1 will receive a clinical evaluation for trachoma and provide a swab specimen of conjunctivae of the R eye at enrollment (Day 0); will be treated with Azithromycin at Day 30; will be re-screened (clinical evaluation and swab specimen of R eye collected) at Day 60; and again at Day 360.
Receives: Drug: Azithromycin
Arm 2ExperimentalSubjects residing in villages assigned to treatment arm 2 will receive a clinical evaluation for trachoma and provide a swab specimen of conjunctivae of the R eye at enrollment (Day 0), as well as receive an initial treatment with Azithromycin; will receive a second dose of Azithromycin at Day 30; will be re-screened (clinical evaluation and swab specimen of R eye collected) at Day 60; and again at Day 360.
Receives: Drug: Azithromycin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis diagnosed by use of NAAT

    Measured: One-year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Feb 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2005
  3. Primary completionAug 2007
  4. Study completionAug 2009

Why it stopped: Prevalence of infection for screened population too low (\<7%) to enroll anyone.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00286026
Sponsor's protocol ID
H1079-17254
Other IDs
5R01AI048789
Status last verified
Apr 2012
First submitted
31 Jan 2006
Last updated
16 Apr 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Mabey D, Fraser-Hurt N. Antibiotics for trachoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD001860. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001860.

    PubMed 11869610
  • Burton MJ, Frick KD, Bailey RL, Bowman RJ. Azithromycin for the treatment and control of trachoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2002 Feb;3(2):113-20. doi: 10.1517/14656566.3.2.113.

    PubMed 11829725
  • Dawson CR, Schachter J. Should trachoma be treated with antibiotics? Lancet. 2002 Jan 19;359(9302):184-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07463-9. No abstract available.

    PubMed 11812548
  • Bain DL, Lietman T, Rasmussen S, Kalman S, Fan J, Lammel C, Zhang JZ, Dawson CR, Schachter J, Stephens RS. Chlamydial genovar distribution after community wide antibiotic treatment. J Infect Dis. 2001 Dec 15;184(12):1581-8. doi: 10.1086/324661. Epub 2001 Dec 3.

    PubMed 11740734
  • Pechere JC. New perspectives on macrolide antibiotics. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2001;18 Suppl 1:S93-7. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00393-4.

    PubMed 11574203
  • Fraser-Hurt N, Bailey RL, Cousens S, Mabey D, Faal H, Mabey DC. Efficacy of oral azithromycin versus topical tetracycline in mass treatment of endemic trachoma. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(7):632-40.

    PubMed 11477966
  • Tabbara KF. Trachoma: a review. J Chemother. 2001 Apr;13 Suppl 1:18-22. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.2001.11782323.

    PubMed 11434524
  • Treadway G. Azithromycin: a new 15-membered macrolide. Jpn J Antibiot. 2001 Feb;54 Suppl A:70-6.

    PubMed 11296412
  • Bailey R, Lietman T. The SAFE strategy for the elimination of trachoma by 2020: will it work? Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):233-6. Epub 2003 Jul 7.

    PubMed 11285668
  • Frick KD, Lietman TM, Holm SO, Jha HC, Chaudhary JS, Bhatta RC. Cost-effectiveness of trachoma control measures: comparing targeted household treatment and mass treatment of children. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):201-7. Epub 2003 Jul 7.

    PubMed 11285663
  • Holm SO, Jha HC, Bhatta RC, Chaudhary JS, Thapa BB, Davis D, Pokhrel RP, Yinghui M, Zegans M, Schachter J, Frick KD, Tapert L, Lietman TM. Comparison of two azithromycin distribution strategies for controlling trachoma in Nepal. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):194-200. Epub 2003 Jul 7.

    PubMed 11285662
  • Lietman T, Fry A. Can we eliminate trachoma? Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Apr;85(4):385-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.4.385. No abstract available.

    PubMed 11264123
  • Duran JM, Amsden GW. Azithromycin: indications for the future? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2000 Mar;1(3):489-505. doi: 10.1517/14656566.1.3.489.

    PubMed 11249533
  • Solomon AW, Akudibillah J, Abugri P, Hagan M, Foster A, Bailey RL, Mabey DC. Pilot study of the use of community volunteers to distribute azithromycin for trachoma control in Ghana. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(1):8-14. Epub 2003 Nov 5.

    PubMed 11217675
  • West S. The red eye. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 23;343(21):1577. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011233432117. No abstract available.

    PubMed 11184764

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Azithromycin in people with Trachoma, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis diagnosed by use of NAAT (time frame: One-year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00286026, which also lists 27 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in