HypertensionNCT00286754
A Behavioral Intervention To Improve Hypertension Control In Veterans
A study testing SMI, HEI and UC in people with Hypertension, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a stage-matched intervention (SMI) will lower BP and improve treatment adherence compared to usual care (UC) or a health education intervention (HEI) in veterans with uncontrolled BP. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension
- What is being tested?
- SMI, HEI and UC
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 533 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2006to Sep 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients receiving continuity of care in the outpatient clinics will be eligible. This will be operationalized as 2 visits in the previous year.
- Adults (= 21 years) with hypertension, on antihypertensive medication for = 1 year, and who have current uncontrolled BP will be enrolled.
- Patients with CVD:
- chronic stable angina
- unstable angina
- uncomplicated myocardial infarction
Show all 14Show fewer
- coronary artery bypass surgery
- percutaneous coronary angioplasty
- atherectomy or stent placement
- chronic stable angina pectoris
- stable Class I or Class II congestive heart failure
- stroke
- peripheral vascular disease
- will be entered into the study if the CVD event or diagnosis occurred = 6 months ago.
Who cannot join
- Patients with limited life expectancy (< 1 year) due to severe co-existing non-CVD disease such as:
- terminal illnesses such as terminal cancer
- CVD < 6 months ago
- Class III or IV CHF
- severe psychiatric illness such as psychosis
- manic depression
Show all 20Show fewer
- alcohol abuse (> 21 drinks/week)
- serious chronic conditions like AIDS
- tuberculosis
- lupus
- and end-stage renal failure
- will be excluded.
- Other exclusions include inability to understand English
- Lack of a landline telephone
- Unable to follow the study protocol
- Recent major surgery (< 3 months)
- Patients who are temporarily in the area and plan to move in < 1 year or will not be available for follow-up
- Those unable to provide informed consent.
- All patients excluded and reason for exclusion will be recorded.
- Prior to recruitment, each patient will be informed about the study and informed consent obtained.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
VA New York Harbor Health Care System
New York, New York, 10010
About this study
Official title: A Behavioral Intervention to Improve Hypertension Control in Veterans
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a stage-matched intervention (SMI) will lower BP and improve treatment adherence compared to usual care (UC) or a health education intervention (HEI) in veterans with uncontrolled BP. The study will also examine the effect of SMI on patient's health-related quality of life, satisfaction, acceptability and determine its cost-effectiveness.
Read the detailed description
We propose a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of telephone-delivered interventions (SMI and HEI) to improve BP control.
Veterans with uncontrolled hypertension (n=533) will be randomized equally to 3 groups: 1) The SMI will use the Transtheoretical model (TTM) as the unifying framework. Veterans will receive TTM stage-matched counseling for exercise, diet, and medications via monthly counseling sessions. A social worker (SW) will assess each participant's behavior and deliver the appropriate tailored SMI based on their stage of change, decisional balance, self-efficacy and the skills model questions. 2) The HEI group receives monthly telephone calls by a SW during which they will receive education about hypertension management. 3) The UC group participates in all the in-person visits but does not receive monthly calls.
There will be an initial 6-month active intervention phase followed by a 6 month monitoring phase to assess sustainability. All participants will visit the VAMC's at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Outcomes of interest include BP; adherence (to diet, exercise and medications); quality of life; satisfaction; acceptability; cost and cost-effectiveness. Patients will be blinded to which of the intervention arms (SMI or HEI) they are in, SW's will be blinded to patient's BP and staff measuring outcomes will be blinded to study assignment. The study will be analyzed using longitudinal data analysis methods using an intention to treat strategy.
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Being tested
- SMI, HEI, UC
- Keywords
- Hypertension, Behavior modification, Randomized controlled trial, Treatment effectiveness, Telemedicine, Prevention
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SMIBehavioural
Stage-matched intervention
HEIBehavioural
Health Education Intervention
UCBehavioural
Usual Care
SMIBehavioural
Stage-matched intervention
HEIBehavioural
Health Education Intervention
UCBehavioural
Usual Care
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Stage-matched intervention (SMI) | Experimental | Stage-matched intervention (SMI) Receives: Behavioral: SMI; Behavioral: HEI; Behavioral: UC |
| Health Education Intervention (HEI) | Active comparator | Health Education Intervention (HEI) Receives: Behavioral: SMI; Behavioral: HEI; Behavioral: UC |
| Usual Care (UC) | No intervention | Usual Care (UC) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Blood Pressure Control
Blood pressure Control at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
Systolic Blood Pressure
Mean systolic Blood Pressure
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change in Proportion With BP Under Control From Baseline to 6 Months
Measured: 6 months
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Change in Number of Cardio Exercise Hours From Baseline to 6 Months
Measured: baseline and 6 months
Change in Morisky Score From Baseline to 6 Months
Morkisy medication adherence self-report questionnaire, a 4-item questionnaire scored from 0-4. A score of 4 is considered most adherent, and scores of less than 4 are defined as nonadherent
Measured: baseline and 6 months
Diet Stage of Change
The stages of change were: precontemplation, or no plans to adhere in <6 months; contemplation, or plans to adhere in 1-6 months; preparation, or plans to adhere within 1 month; action, or adherence for <6 months; and maintenance, or adherence for ≥ 6 months. Patients were considered adherent to diet if they reported eating the appropriate diet for hypertension (low in salt and fat with fruits, vegetables, and low-or non-fat dairy products) at least 6 days per week.
Measured: 6 months
Exercise Stage of Change
The stages of change were: precontemplation, or no plans to adhere in <6 months; contemplation, or plans to adhere in 1-6 months; preparation, or plans to adhere within 1 month; action, or adherence for <6 months; and maintenance, or adherence for ≥ 6 months. Exercise adherence was defined as self-reported aerobic exercise for at least 3 days per week for at least 20 minutes each time. We used the lower threshold for exercise adherence due to our patient population with multiple comorbidities, consistent with Federal guidelines for older adults with chronic conditions.
Measured: 6 months
Medication Stage of Change
The stages of change were: precontemplation, or no plans to adhere in <6 months; contemplation, or plans to adhere in 1-6 months; preparation, or plans to adhere within 1 month; action, or adherence for <6 months; and maintenance, or adherence for ≥ 6 months. Medication adherence was defined as self-report of taking BP medications as prescribed for at least 6 days per week.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Feb 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2006
- Primary completionJan 2010
- Study completionSep 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 533 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- US Department of Veterans Affairs
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sundar Natarajan, MD MSc, Principal investigator, VA New York Harbor Health Care System
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00286754
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IIR 04-170
- Status last verified
- May 2015
- First submitted
- 1 Feb 2006
- Last updated
- 1 Jun 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Ulmer M, Robinaugh D, Friedberg JP, Lipsitz SR, Natarajan S. Usefulness of a run-in period to reduce drop-outs in a randomized controlled trial of a behavioral intervention. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Sep;29(5):705-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 May 6.
PubMed 18565801Friedberg JP, Lipsitz SR, Natarajan S. Challenges and recommendations for blinding in behavioral interventions illustrated using a case study of a behavioral intervention to lower blood pressure. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jan;78(1):5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 Jun 13.
PubMed 19525084Friedberg JP, Rodriguez MA, Watsula ME, Lin I, Wylie-Rosett J, Allegrante JP, Lipsitz SR, Natarajan S. Effectiveness of a tailored behavioral intervention to improve hypertension control: primary outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Hypertension. 2015 Feb;65(2):440-6. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03483. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
PubMed 25403606Rodriguez MA, Wang B, Hyoung S, Friedberg J, Wylie-Rosett J, Fang Y, Allegrante JP, Lipsitz SR, Natarajan S. Sustained Benefit of Alternate Behavioral Interventions to Improve Hypertension Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Hypertension. 2021 Jun;77(6):1867-1876. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15192. Epub 2021 May 12.
PubMed 33979183
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jun 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Behavioral Intervention to Improve Hypertension Control in Veterans
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00286754
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IIR 04-170
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Keywords
- Hypertension, Behavior modification, Randomized controlled trial, Treatment effectiveness, Telemedicine, Prevention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 533 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- US Department of Veterans AffairsUS federal agency
- Study start
- Jul 2006
- Primary completion
- Jan 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Feb 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Apr 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a stage-matched intervention (SMI) will lower BP and improve treatment adherence compared to usual care (UC) or a health education intervention (HEI) in veterans with uncontrolled BP. The study will also examine the effect of SMI on patient's health-related quality of life, satisfaction, acceptability and determine its cost-effectiveness.
Detailed description
We propose a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of telephone-delivered interventions (SMI and HEI) to improve BP control.
Veterans with uncontrolled hypertension (n=533) will be randomized equally to 3 groups: 1) The SMI will use the Transtheoretical model (TTM) as the unifying framework. Veterans will receive TTM stage-matched counseling for exercise, diet, and medications via monthly counseling sessions. A social worker (SW) will assess each participant's behavior and deliver the appropriate tailored SMI based on their stage of change, decisional balance, self-efficacy and the skills model questions. 2) The HEI group receives monthly telephone calls by a SW during which they will receive education about hypertension management. 3) The UC group participates in all the in-person visits but does not receive monthly calls.
There will be an initial 6-month active intervention phase followed by a 6 month monitoring phase to assess sustainability. All participants will visit the VAMC's at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Outcomes of interest include BP; adherence (to diet, exercise and medications); quality of life; satisfaction; acceptability; cost and cost-effectiveness. Patients will be blinded to which of the intervention arms (SMI or HEI) they are in, SW's will be blinded to patient's BP and staff measuring outcomes will be blinded to study assignment. The study will be analyzed using longitudinal data analysis methods using an intention to treat strategy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Stage-matched intervention (SMI) | Experimental | Behavioral: SMI, Behavioral: HEI, Behavioral: UCStage-matched intervention (SMI) |
| Health Education Intervention (HEI) | Active comparator | Behavioral: SMI, Behavioral: HEI, Behavioral: UCHealth Education Intervention (HEI) |
| Usual Care (UC) | No intervention | –Usual Care (UC) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Patients receiving continuity of care in the outpatient clinics will be eligible. This will be operationalized as 2 visits in the previous year.
- Adults (= 21 years) with hypertension, on antihypertensive medication for = 1 year, and who have current uncontrolled BP will be enrolled.
- chronic stable angina
- unstable angina
- uncomplicated myocardial infarction
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Patients with limited life expectancy (< 1 year) due to severe co-existing non-CVD disease such as:
- terminal illnesses such as terminal cancer
- CVD < 6 months ago
- Class III or IV CHF
- severe psychiatric illness such as psychosis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SMIStage-matched intervention | Behavioural | Stage-matched intervention (SMI) |
| HEIHealth Education Intervention | Behavioural | Stage-matched intervention (SMI) |
| UCUsual Care | Behavioural | Stage-matched intervention (SMI) |
| SMIStage-matched intervention | Behavioural | Health Education Intervention (HEI) |
| HEIHealth Education Intervention | Behavioural | Health Education Intervention (HEI) |
| UCUsual Care | Behavioural | Health Education Intervention (HEI) |
Primary outcome
Blood Pressure Control
Time frame: 6 months
Blood pressure Control at 6 months
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time frame: 6 months
Mean systolic Blood Pressure
7 secondary outcomes
Change in Proportion With BP Under Control From Baseline to 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in Number of Cardio Exercise Hours From Baseline to 6 Months
Time frame: baseline and 6 months
Change in Morisky Score From Baseline to 6 Months
Time frame: baseline and 6 months
Diet Stage of Change
Time frame: 6 months
Exercise Stage of Change
Time frame: 6 months
Medication Stage of Change
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jun 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 18565801Ulmer M, Robinaugh D, Friedberg JP, Lipsitz SR, Natarajan S. Usefulness of a run-in period to reduce drop-outs in a randomized controlled trial of a behavioral intervention. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Sep;29(5):705-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 May 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 19525084Friedberg JP, Lipsitz SR, Natarajan S. Challenges and recommendations for blinding in behavioral interventions illustrated using a case study of a behavioral intervention to lower blood pressure. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jan;78(1):5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 Jun 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 25403606Friedberg JP, Rodriguez MA, Watsula ME, Lin I, Wylie-Rosett J, Allegrante JP, Lipsitz SR, Natarajan S. Effectiveness of a tailored behavioral intervention to improve hypertension control: primary outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Hypertension. 2015 Feb;65(2):440-6. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03483. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33979183Rodriguez MA, Wang B, Hyoung S, Friedberg J, Wylie-Rosett J, Fang Y, Allegrante JP, Lipsitz SR, Natarajan S. Sustained Benefit of Alternate Behavioral Interventions to Improve Hypertension Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Hypertension. 2021 Jun;77(6):1867-1876. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15192. Epub 2021 May 12.
Related trials for Hypertension
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The CoPenHagen PREeClampsia and cardIOvascUlar diSease Study
Pre-Eclampsia, Atherosclerosis
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History Study of Biomarkers in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Pulmonary Disease, Pulmonary Hypertension
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Furosemide vs Placebo in Severe Preeclampsia Postpartum
Severe Preeclampsia
Recruiting
Trial to Evaluate Safety And Effectiveness of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With Advancing Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Heart Diseases
Enrolling by invitationEarly Phase 1
Truway Diagnostic Tools in Primary Care
Chronic Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Obesity, Overweight
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sundar Natarajan, MD MSc principal investigator
VA New York Harbor Health Care System
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SMI, HEI and UC in people with Hypertension, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Apr 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Blood Pressure Control (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00286754, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2015.