PregnancyNCT00291044
HSV Seroprevalence and Diagnosis of Genital Herpes in Pregnant Women
An observational study of Pregnancy, run by Stony Brook University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Brief summary: The current management guidelines recommended by ACOG rely on history as a screening method to determine pregnant women who are at risk for transmitting herpes to their newborn. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pregnancy
- What is being tested?
- testing for HSV 1 and 2 IgG type specific antibosy
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2005to Sep 2009
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: pregnant subjects
Who may be able to join
- pregnant 24 weeks or less
Who cannot join
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Brief summary: The current management guidelines recommended by ACOG rely on history as a screening method to determine pregnant women who are at risk for transmitting herpes to their newborn. History fails completely in identifying the women most at risk of transmitting herpes to their newborn - the seronegative woman who acquires a primary infection from her partner during pregnancy. Despite recent advances, both pregnant women and newborns continue to be at risk of acquiring herpes infection. Genital herpes infections are epidemic in the United States. In the early 1990's, 25% of women in the US were seropositive for the HSV-2 antibody. These numbers are likely higher now. The incidence of neonatal herpes in the US cannot be accurately estimated since it is not a reportable disease. However, in some areas of the US, the incidence is 1 in 3,200 live births which would translate to an incidence of approximately three infants a day in the US . In other areas of the US, the incidence is even higher, approaching 1 in 1,500 liveborns. This protocol examines patient acceptance of HSV-1 and HSV-2 type specific serologic testing and assesses patient counseling tools. In addition, seroprevalence of HSV-2 in pregnant patients will be collected and evaluated.
Read the detailed description
Detailed Description: Despite recent advances, both pregnant women and newborns continue to be at risk of acquiring herpes infection. Genital herpes infections are epidemic in the United States. In the early 1990's, 25% of women in the US were seropositive for the HSV-2 antibody (Fleming, 1997). These numbers are likely higher now. The incidence of neonatal herpes in the US cannot be accurately estimated since it is not a reportable disease. However, in some areas of the US, the incidence is 1 in 3,200 live births which would translate to an incidence of approximately three infants a day in the US (Brown, 2003). In other areas of the US, the incidence is even higher, approaching 1 in 1,500 liveborns (Whitley, personal communication, December 2002).
The current management guidelines recommended by ACOG (Guidelines for Perinatal Care, 2002) rely on history as a screening method to determine pregnant women who are at risk for transmitting herpes to their newborn. Based on data reported in NHANES III, history is an unreliable method of determining those who are infected with genital herpes (Fleming, 1997). Most importantly, history fails completely in identifying the women most at risk of transmitting herpes to their newborn - the seronegative woman who acquires a primary infection from her partner during pregnancy.
Since at-risk women can now be accurately identified by new and more accurate type-specific serologic tests, effective prevention strategies should be instituted to minimize risk of transmission to the neonate. The first obligation is to diagnose who is at risk. The highest risk is that of neonatal transmission from a mother experiencing a primary genital HSV-1 or HSV-2 infection in late pregnancy. Studies indicate that approximately 1.3% of women seroconvert during pregnancy and, among those who do, the risk of neonatal transmission is as high as 30 - 50% (Brown 1991). Conversely, the rate of neonatal transmission from women with recurrent genital herpes infection is low (<1%) (Brown, 1991, 1997; Smith, 1998; Arvin, 1986; Fonnest, 1997). However, since genital herpes is so common, the total number of cases of neonatal herpes from women with recurrent disease remains high (Fleming, 1997; STD Guidelines, 2002). Once a mother is identified as being infected with HSV-2, the health care providers - both pediatrician and obstetrician - can be alerted to the potential risk of neonatal herpes.
Management of pregnant women with or without herpes infections should include steps designed to minimize the risk of herpes transmission to neonates. This protocol examines patient acceptance of HSV-1 and HSV-2 type specific serologic testing and assesses patient counseling tools. In addition, seroprevalence of HSV-2 in pregnant patients will be collected and evaluated.
STUDY DESIGN
This is a non-treatment study of acceptance rates of HSV-1 and HSV-2 type specific serologic testing by pregnant women and their partners. This study will also evaluate Health Care Provider time spent in counseling, effectiveness of counseling tools/sessions, and acceptance of antiviral suppression by pregnant women and/or their partners. In addition, HSV-2 seroprevalence will be assessed. This study will be conducted at a single center (Obstetrics and Gynecology Office) and is not designed to yield nationally representative estimates of HSV-2 seroprevalence rates.
Pregnant women who present for their first prenatal visit will be invited to enroll. A total of 300 patients will be enrolled.
The clinician or staff will describe the study to the patient based on the provided description.
If the patient is interested in participating in the study, she will be given an informed consent to sign, told that the blood test is to determine whether she is seropositive or seronegative for genital herpes (HSV-2) and the virus that causes cold sores (HSV-1), and given a demographic form to complete. If the patient is willing to be tested for HSV-1 and HSV-2, she will continue with counseling and completion of questionnaires. For those patients willing to be tested, counseling and questionnaires will be completed during visit 1 and visit 2. For those patients who are unwilling to be tested, counseling and questionnaires will be administered during this first visit.
The investigator and office staff will monitor time spent in each counseling session, and also provide assessment of effectiveness and satisfaction with counseling tools.
STUDY ASSESSMENTS AND PROCEDURES
Screening and Assessments
Prior to inviting the patient to take part in the clinical trial, each patient's chart should be reviewed to be certain that the patient does not have a known history of genital herpes or prior knowledge of HSV-2 seropositivity.
Prior to enrollment of patients in the study, the investigator and appropriate study personnel will be provided with training on HSV serologic testing and provided with the counseling tools. This will ensure that all patients receive standardized HSV counseling at the initial visit and during the follow-up visit when test results are discussed.
It is important to note that ideally, the same person on staff should administer the Counseling Scripts using verbiage consistent with the provided scripts This should be administered with care and concern in a private setting. The counselor then should give the patient sufficient time to ask questions.
Following is an outline of study assessments and procedures Visit #1
- The clinician or staff will describe the study to the patient by the following script:
This study involves your willingness to have a blood test to determine if you are infected with the virus that causes genital herpes or the virus that causes cold sores. If you decide to participate in this study and decide to have the blood test or even if you decide NOT to have the blood test, you will be asked to complete questionnaires and counseling sessions given by the office staff. This will be a time commitment of about 1 hour and may include an additional 20 minute office visit next week.
- All patients willing to be a part of the study will sign an informed consent
- Patients will complete a Demographics Questionnaire
Patients willing to be tested will:
- Sign informed consent for blood test
- Have blood drawn for serological assessment via the FOCUS HerpeSelect 1 and 2 ELISA assay.
- Receive counseling
- Complete Questionnaire on Understanding Counseling
- Age, race and infection history will be documented on the CRF based on information from the patient's chart and the medical history sheet routinely used by the clinic (completed by the patient)
- Be given brochure and one-page information sheet
- Instruct the patient to read the entire brochure but to also focus on Page 4, the section related to pregnancy
- Schedule visit in one week (Visit 2)
Patients unwilling to be tested will:
- Complete Questionnaire about Barriers to Testing
- Receive counseling
- After receipt of counseling the patient will be asked again if willing to be tested
- If willing to be tested o Go to list of "patients willing to be tested, sign the informed consent for the blood test and draw the blood test without further counseling at this visit.
- If not willing to be tested
- Complete Understanding of Counseling and Survey on Satisfaction with Counseling
- Be given brochure and one-page information sheet
- Instruct the patient to read the entire brochure but to also focus on Page 4, the section related to pregnancy
- Repeat barriers questionnaire
- Schedule next visit (continue with prenatal visits consistent with standard of care)
- At next visit, ask again if willing to be tested (if yes, clinic staff will proceed with assessments and procedures under patients willing to be tested [above] except third bullet point, Receive Counseling and sixth bullet point Complete questionnaire Understanding Counseling. Offer the patient the brochure and information sheet again.
- If at any point during the study the patient changes her mind and becomes willing to be tested, document the reason for this change in the CRF.
- Investigator/staff will document time spent for counseling in the case report form
Follow Up Assessment
Visit #2
Patients willing to be tested will:
- Be given results of the HSV-1 and HSV-2 serologic test
- Receive Counseling
- Patients with negative HSV-2 serologic test If the woman is HSV-1 seronegative, counsel her with the section of the Script: For patients who are HSV-1 seronegative
- Encourage the patient to discuss her test results and its meaning with her partner
- Ask the following question (answer will be documented in the case report form by Yes/No response):
- Do you know if your partner is positive for HSV-1 or HSV-2 . If NO to either HSV-1 and HSV-2, follow up as described below.
Follow-up visit
- During normally scheduled pre-natal visits (up to week 28), ask the patient if her partner had been tested. Document answer in the case report form.
OR
- Patients with positive HSV-2 serologic test If the woman is HSV-1 seronegative, counsel her with the section of the Script: For patients who are HSV-1 seronegative
- Encourage the patient to discuss her test results and its meaning with her partner
- Give the patient the brochure (Taking Charge of your Life and instruct the patient to read the entire brochure but to also focus on the section related to pregnancy
- Ask the following questions (answer will be documented in the case report form by Yes/No response):
- Are you willing to take medicine to treat your herpes during your pregnancy?
- Do you know if your partner is positive for HSV-1 or HSV-2 . If NO to either HSV-1 or HSV-2, follow up as described below.
Follow-up visit
- During normally scheduled prenatal visits (up to week 28), ask the patient if her partner had been tested. Document answer in the case report form.
- Complete Understanding Counseling Questionnaire [appropriate questionnaire for seronegative or seropositive patients, respectively] and Survey of Satisfaction with Counseling,
Investigator/counseling staff will:
- Document time spent for counseling and for ordering HSV-1 and HSV-2 blood tests for each patient in the case report form Upon completion of study, complete Satisfaction with Counseling Tools Questionnaire
HEALTH OUTCOMES
At the first visit a self administered questionnaire regarding barriers to testing will be given to each eligible patient refusing to be tested. After counseling, this questionnaire will be repeated for those patients who still refuse testing. All patients will be counseled and will be given two self administered questionnaires. One questionnaire will assess the patient's understanding of the counseling and the other will assess the patient's satisfaction with the counseling session. At the second visit, those patients who were tested will receive their test results and will be counseled on their status (positive or negative). These patients will receive two self administered questionnaires. One questionnaire will assess the patient's understanding of counseling (specific to their status), and the other will assess the patient's satisfaction with the counseling session. A separate self administered questionnaire will be given to the investigator and/or appropriate office personnel to assess their satisfaction with the counseling tools and sessions.
DATA ANALYSIS AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Hypotheses
This is a non-treatment study in pregnant women to assess the acceptances of HSV serologic testing and their understanding and satisfaction with counseling tools.
Interim Analysis
An interim analysis is not planned.
Primary Analysis
- The percentage of pregnant patients who accept HSV-1 and HSV-2 type specific testing
Secondary Analyzes
- The mean (SD) percent and frequencies (n, %) of questions answered correctly by all subjects in the "Understanding Counseling" questionnaire
- The mean (SD) percent and frequencies (n, %) of questions answered correctly by seronegative subjects in the "Understanding Counseling" questionnaire
- The frequencies (n, %) and mean (SD) percent of questions answered correctly by seropositive subjects in the "Understanding Counseling" questionnaire
- The frequencies (n, %) and mean (SD) scores for each item in the "Satisfaction with Counseling" (for the patient) scale
- The frequencies (n, %) and mean (SD) scores for each item in the "Satisfaction with Counseling Tools" ( for the counselor) scale
- The percentage of partners of pregnant women who were tested
- The percentage of pregnant women (who are HSV-2 positive) who would accept antiviral suppressive therapy during pregnancy
- The frequencies (n, %) and mean (SD) scores for each reason/item in the "Reason For Choosing Not To Be Tested" scale
- The mean (SD) total time (in minutes) spent by the investigator and clinic staff in obtaining the both the HSV-2 type specific serologic test and counseling
- Conditions
- Pregnancy
- Being tested
- testing for HSV 1 and 2 IgG type specific antibosy
- Keywords
- pregnancy, genital herpes
- Medical subject headings
- Herpes Genitalis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
testing for HSV 1 and 2 IgG type specific antibosyOther
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
% of patients willing to be tested
Secondary outcomes (1)
Barriers to be tested for HSV
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Feb 2006 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2005
- Study completionSep 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PregnancyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stony Brook University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- David A Baker, MD, Principal investigator, Stony Brook University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00291044
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VAL R116
- Status last verified
- Nov 2010
- First submitted
- 9 Feb 2006
- Last updated
- 19 Nov 2010
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Arvin AM, Hensleigh PA, Prober CG, et al. Failure of antepartum maternal cultures to predict the infant's risk of exposure to herpes simplex virus at delivery. N Engl J Med 1986; 315:796-800. 2. Brown ZA, Benedetti J, Ashley R, et al. Neonatal herpes simplex virus infection in relation to asymptomatic maternal infection at the time of labor. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:1247-1252. 3. Brown ZA, Selke S, Zeh J, et al. The acquisition of herpes simplex virus during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:509-515. 4. Brown ZA, Wald A, Morrow RA, et al. Effect of Serologic Status and Cesarean Delivery on Transmission Rates of Herpes Simplex Virus from Mother to Infant. JAMA 2003; 289:203-209. 5. Fleming DT, McQuillan GM, Johnson RE, et al. Herpes simplex virus type 2 in the United States, 1976 to 1994. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:1105-1111. 6. Fonnest G, de la Fuente Fonnest I, Weber T. Neonatal herpes in Denmark 1977-1991. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76:355-358. 7. Guidelines for Perinatal Care: AAP, ACOG, 2002. pp. 292-297. 8. Sexually Transmitted Disease Treatment Guidelines 2002. MMWR 2002; 51:12- 9. Smith JR, Cowan FM, Munday P. The management of herpes simplex virus infection in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105:255-260.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Nov 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- HSV Seroprevalence and Diagnosis of Genital Herpes in Pregnant Women
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00291044
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VAL R116
- Conditions
- Pregnancy
- Keywords
- pregnancy, genital herpes
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Stony Brook UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2005
- Study completion
- Sep 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Feb 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Brief summary: The current management guidelines recommended by ACOG rely on history as a screening method to determine pregnant women who are at risk for transmitting herpes to their newborn. History fails completely in identifying the women most at risk of transmitting herpes to their newborn - the seronegative woman who acquires a primary infection from her partner during pregnancy. Despite recent advances, both pregnant women and newborns continue to be at risk of acquiring herpes infection. Genital herpes infections are epidemic in the United States. In the early 1990's, 25% of women in the US were seropositive for the HSV-2 antibody. These numbers are likely higher now. The incidence of neonatal herpes in the US cannot be accurately estimated since it is not a reportable disease. However, in some areas of the US, the incidence is 1 in 3,200 live births which would translate to an incidence of approximately three infants a day in the US . In other areas of the US, the incidence is even higher, approaching 1 in 1,500 liveborns. This protocol examines patient acceptance of HSV-1 and HSV-2 type specific serologic testing and assesses patient counseling tools. In addition, seroprevalence of HSV-2 in pregnant patients will be collected and evaluated.
Detailed description
Detailed Description: Despite recent advances, both pregnant women and newborns continue to be at risk of acquiring herpes infection. Genital herpes infections are epidemic in the United States. In the early 1990's, 25% of women in the US were seropositive for the HSV-2 antibody (Fleming, 1997). These numbers are likely higher now. The incidence of neonatal herpes in the US cannot be accurately estimated since it is not a reportable disease. However, in some areas of the US, the incidence is 1 in 3,200 live births which would translate to an incidence of approximately three infants a day in the US (Brown, 2003). In other areas of the US, the incidence is even higher, approaching 1 in 1,500 liveborns (Whitley, personal communication, December 2002).
The current management guidelines recommended by ACOG (Guidelines for Perinatal Care, 2002) rely on history as a screening method to determine pregnant women who are at risk for transmitting herpes to their newborn. Based on data reported in NHANES III, history is an unreliable method of determining those who are infected with genital herpes (Fleming, 1997). Most importantly, history fails completely in identifying the women most at risk of transmitting herpes to their newborn - the seronegative woman who acquires a primary infection from her partner during pregnancy.
Since at-risk women can now be accurately identified by new and more accurate type-specific serologic tests, effective prevention strategies should be instituted to minimize risk of transmission to the neonate. The first obligation is to diagnose who is at risk. The highest risk is that of neonatal transmission from a mother experiencing a primary genital HSV-1 or HSV-2 infection in late pregnancy. Studies indicate that approximately 1.3% of women seroconvert during pregnancy and, among those who do, the risk of neonatal transmission is as high as 30 - 50% (Brown 1991). Conversely, the rate of neonatal transmission from women with recurrent genital herpes infection is low (<1%) (Brown, 1991, 1997; Smith, 1998; Arvin, 1986; Fonnest, 1997). However, since genital herpes is so common, the total number of cases of neonatal herpes from women with recurrent disease remains high (Fleming, 1997; STD Guidelines, 2002). Once a mother is identified as being infected with HSV-2, the health care providers - both pediatrician and obstetrician - can be alerted to the potential risk of neonatal herpes.
Management of pregnant women with or without herpes infections should include steps designed to minimize the risk of herpes transmission to neonates. This protocol examines patient acceptance of HSV-1 and HSV-2 type specific serologic testing and assesses patient counseling tools. In addition, seroprevalence of HSV-2 in pregnant patients will be collected and evaluated.
STUDY DESIGN
This is a non-treatment study of acceptance rates of HSV-1 and HSV-2 type specific serologic testing by pregnant women and their partners. This study will also evaluate Health Care Provider time spent in counseling, effectiveness of counseling tools/sessions, and acceptance of antiviral suppression by pregnant women and/or their partners. In addition, HSV-2 seroprevalence will be assessed. This study will be conducted at a single center (Obstetrics and Gynecology Office) and is not designed to yield nationally representative estimates of HSV-2 seroprevalence rates.
Pregnant women who present for their first prenatal visit will be invited to enroll. A total of 300 patients will be enrolled.
The clinician or staff will describe the study to the patient based on the provided description.
If the patient is interested in participating in the study, she will be given an informed consent to sign, told that the blood test is to determine whether she is seropositive or seronegative for genital herpes (HSV-2) and the virus that causes cold sores (HSV-1), and given a demographic form to complete. If the patient is willing to be tested for HSV-1 and HSV-2, she will continue with counseling and completion of questionnaires. For those patients willing to be tested, counseling and questionnaires will be completed during visit 1 and visit 2. For those patients who are unwilling to be tested, counseling and questionnaires will be administered during this first visit.
The investigator and office staff will monitor time spent in each counseling session, and also provide assessment of effectiveness and satisfaction with counseling tools.
STUDY ASSESSMENTS AND PROCEDURES
Screening and Assessments
Prior to inviting the patient to take part in the clinical trial, each patient's chart should be reviewed to be certain that the patient does not have a known history of genital herpes or prior knowledge of HSV-2 seropositivity.
Prior to enrollment of patients in the study, the investigator and appropriate study personnel will be provided with training on HSV serologic testing and provided with the counseling tools. This will ensure that all patients receive standardized HSV counseling at the initial visit and during the follow-up visit when test results are discussed.
It is important to note that ideally, the same person on staff should administer the Counseling Scripts using verbiage consistent with the provided scripts This should be administered with care and concern in a private setting. The counselor then should give the patient sufficient time to ask questions.
Following is an outline of study assessments and procedures Visit #1
- The clinician or staff will describe the study to the patient by the following script:
This study involves your willingness to have a blood test to determine if you are infected with the virus that causes genital herpes or the virus that causes cold sores. If you decide to participate in this study and decide to have the blood test or even if you decide NOT to have the blood test, you will be asked to complete questionnaires and counseling sessions given by the office staff. This will be a time commitment of about 1 hour and may include an additional 20 minute office visit next week.
- All patients willing to be a part of the study will sign an informed consent
- Patients will complete a Demographics Questionnaire
Patients willing to be tested will:
- Sign informed consent for blood test
- Have blood drawn for serological assessment via the FOCUS HerpeSelect 1 and 2 ELISA assay.
- Receive counseling
- Complete Questionnaire on Understanding Counseling
- Age, race and infection history will be documented on the CRF based on information from the patient's chart and the medical history sheet routinely used by the clinic (completed by the patient)
- Be given brochure and one-page information sheet
- Instruct the patient to read the entire brochure but to also focus on Page 4, the section related to pregnancy
- Schedule visit in one week (Visit 2)
Patients unwilling to be tested will:
- Complete Questionnaire about Barriers to Testing
- Receive counseling
- After receipt of counseling the patient will be asked again if willing to be tested
- If willing to be tested o Go to list of "patients willing to be tested, sign the informed consent for the blood test and draw the blood test without further counseling at this visit.
- If not willing to be tested
- Complete Understanding of Counseling and Survey on Satisfaction with Counseling
- Be given brochure and one-page information sheet
- Instruct the patient to read the entire brochure but to also focus on Page 4, the section related to pregnancy
- Repeat barriers questionnaire
- Schedule next visit (continue with prenatal visits consistent with standard of care)
- At next visit, ask again if willing to be tested (if yes, clinic staff will proceed with assessments and procedures under patients willing to be tested [above] except third bullet point, Receive Counseling and sixth bullet point Complete questionnaire Understanding Counseling. Offer the patient the brochure and information sheet again.
- If at any point during the study the patient changes her mind and becomes willing to be tested, document the reason for this change in the CRF.
- Investigator/staff will document time spent for counseling in the case report form
Follow Up Assessment
Visit #2
Patients willing to be tested will:
- Be given results of the HSV-1 and HSV-2 serologic test
- Receive Counseling
- Patients with negative HSV-2 serologic test If the woman is HSV-1 seronegative, counsel her with the section of the Script: For patients who are HSV-1 seronegative
- Encourage the patient to discuss her test results and its meaning with her partner
- Ask the following question (answer will be documented in the case report form by Yes/No response):
- Do you know if your partner is positive for HSV-1 or HSV-2 . If NO to either HSV-1 and HSV-2, follow up as described below.
Follow-up visit
- During normally scheduled pre-natal visits (up to week 28), ask the patient if her partner had been tested. Document answer in the case report form.
OR
- Patients with positive HSV-2 serologic test If the woman is HSV-1 seronegative, counsel her with the section of the Script: For patients who are HSV-1 seronegative
- Encourage the patient to discuss her test results and its meaning with her partner
- Give the patient the brochure (Taking Charge of your Life and instruct the patient to read the entire brochure but to also focus on the section related to pregnancy
- Ask the following questions (answer will be documented in the case report form by Yes/No response):
- Are you willing to take medicine to treat your herpes during your pregnancy?
- Do you know if your partner is positive for HSV-1 or HSV-2 . If NO to either HSV-1 or HSV-2, follow up as described below.
Follow-up visit
- During normally scheduled prenatal visits (up to week 28), ask the patient if her partner had been tested. Document answer in the case report form.
- Complete Understanding Counseling Questionnaire [appropriate questionnaire for seronegative or seropositive patients, respectively] and Survey of Satisfaction with Counseling,
Investigator/counseling staff will:
- Document time spent for counseling and for ordering HSV-1 and HSV-2 blood tests for each patient in the case report form Upon completion of study, complete Satisfaction with Counseling Tools Questionnaire
HEALTH OUTCOMES
At the first visit a self administered questionnaire regarding barriers to testing will be given to each eligible patient refusing to be tested. After counseling, this questionnaire will be repeated for those patients who still refuse testing. All patients will be counseled and will be given two self administered questionnaires. One questionnaire will assess the patient's understanding of the counseling and the other will assess the patient's satisfaction with the counseling session. At the second visit, those patients who were tested will receive their test results and will be counseled on their status (positive or negative). These patients will receive two self administered questionnaires. One questionnaire will assess the patient's understanding of counseling (specific to their status), and the other will assess the patient's satisfaction with the counseling session. A separate self administered questionnaire will be given to the investigator and/or appropriate office personnel to assess their satisfaction with the counseling tools and sessions.
DATA ANALYSIS AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Hypotheses
This is a non-treatment study in pregnant women to assess the acceptances of HSV serologic testing and their understanding and satisfaction with counseling tools.
Interim Analysis
An interim analysis is not planned.
Primary Analysis
- The percentage of pregnant patients who accept HSV-1 and HSV-2 type specific testing
Secondary Analyzes
- The mean (SD) percent and frequencies (n, %) of questions answered correctly by all subjects in the "Understanding Counseling" questionnaire
- The mean (SD) percent and frequencies (n, %) of questions answered correctly by seronegative subjects in the "Understanding Counseling" questionnaire
- The frequencies (n, %) and mean (SD) percent of questions answered correctly by seropositive subjects in the "Understanding Counseling" questionnaire
- The frequencies (n, %) and mean (SD) scores for each item in the "Satisfaction with Counseling" (for the patient) scale
- The frequencies (n, %) and mean (SD) scores for each item in the "Satisfaction with Counseling Tools" ( for the counselor) scale
- The percentage of partners of pregnant women who were tested
- The percentage of pregnant women (who are HSV-2 positive) who would accept antiviral suppressive therapy during pregnancy
- The frequencies (n, %) and mean (SD) scores for each reason/item in the "Reason For Choosing Not To Be Tested" scale
- The mean (SD) total time (in minutes) spent by the investigator and clinic staff in obtaining the both the HSV-2 type specific serologic test and counseling
Study design
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- pregnant subjects
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- pregnant 24 weeks or less
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| testing for HSV 1 and 2 IgG type specific antibosy | Other | – |
Primary outcome
% of patients willing to be tested
1 secondary outcome
Barriers to be tested for HSV
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Nov 2010.
- BackgroundArvin AM, Hensleigh PA, Prober CG, et al. Failure of antepartum maternal cultures to predict the infant's risk of exposure to herpes simplex virus at delivery. N Engl J Med 1986; 315:796-800. 2. Brown ZA, Benedetti J, Ashley R, et al. Neonatal herpes simplex virus infection in relation to asymptomatic maternal infection at the time of labor. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:1247-1252. 3. Brown ZA, Selke S, Zeh J, et al. The acquisition of herpes simplex virus during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:509-515. 4. Brown ZA, Wald A, Morrow RA, et al. Effect of Serologic Status and Cesarean Delivery on Transmission Rates of Herpes Simplex Virus from Mother to Infant. JAMA 2003; 289:203-209. 5. Fleming DT, McQuillan GM, Johnson RE, et al. Herpes simplex virus type 2 in the United States, 1976 to 1994. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:1105-1111. 6. Fonnest G, de la Fuente Fonnest I, Weber T. Neonatal herpes in Denmark 1977-1991. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76:355-358. 7. Guidelines for Perinatal Care: AAP, ACOG, 2002. pp. 292-297. 8. Sexually Transmitted Disease Treatment Guidelines 2002. MMWR 2002; 51:12- 9. Smith JR, Cowan FM, Munday P. The management of herpes simplex virus infection in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105:255-260.
Related trials for Pregnancy
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Population Pharmacokinetics of Temocillin in Acute Enterobacterial Pyelonephritis in Children
Pyelonephritis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David A Baker, MD principal investigator
Stony Brook University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pregnancy, run by Stony Brook University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
% of patients willing to be tested. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00291044, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2010.