Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePhase 2NCT00292448
A Randomised, Double-blind, Crossover Study of Ba679BR Respimat in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
A Phase 2 study testing Ba 679 BR Respimat and Tiotropium (Spiriva) inhalation capsule 18 ug in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 27 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
The objective of this trial is to compare the efficacy and the safety of Ba 679 BR Respimat 5 ug once daily to tiotropium inhalation capsule 18 ug (Spiriva inhalation capsule) in a crossover study of 4-week treatment periods in patients with COPD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- What is being tested?
- Ba 679 BR Respimat and Tiotropium (Spiriva) inhalation capsule 18 ug
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- How many people
- 157 participants
- Where
- 27 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- Feb 2006to Mar 2007
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
participation in the trial 2. All patients must have a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and must meet the following spirometric criteria:
? Patients must have relatively stable, moderate to severe airway obstruction with an FEV1 =< 70% of predicted normal* and FEV1 =< 70% of FVC (Visits 1 and 2).
*: Predicted normal values will be calculated according to the formulas for Japanese predicted normal values (R05-0607) (see below).
Males: FEV1 predicted (L) = 0.036 x (height (cm)) ? 0.028 x age (years) ? 1.178 Females: FEV1 predicted (L) = 0.022 x (height (cm)) ? 0.022 x age (years) ? 0.005
? Patients must maintain stable COPD medications for 1 month prior to Visit 1. 3. Male or female patients 40 years of age or older. 4. Patients must be current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of more than 10 pack years.
Pack Years = [Number of cigarettes/ day / 20] x years of smoking 5. Patients must be able to perform technically acceptable pulmonary function tests.
- Patients must be able to inhale medication in a competent manner from the Respimat inhaler and the HandiHaler.
Patients with/who:
- Significant diseases except COPD
- Clinically relevant abnormal haematology, blood chemistry, or urinalysis
- Recent history of MI
- Any cardiac arrhythmia requiring drug therapy or who have been hospitalised for heart failure within the past 3 yrs
- Cancer within the last 5 yrs
- Symptomatic prostatic hypertrophy or bladder neck obstruction
- Narrow-angle glaucoma
- History of asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic disease, or who have a total blood eosinophil count >= 600 mm3
- History of life-threatening pulmonary obstruction, or cystic fibrosis or clinically evident bronchiectasis
- Active tuberculosis
- History of and/or active significant alcohol or drug abuse
- Underwent thoracotomy with pulmonary resection
- Completed a pulmonary rehabilitation program within the 6 weeks prior to the Scr. Visit or who are currently in a pulmonary rehabilitation program
- Regularly use daytime oxygen for more than 1 h/day and in the investigator?s opinion unable to abstain from the use of oxygen
- Took an investigational drug within 1 m or 6 half lives prior to Scr. Visit
- Beta-blockers
- Anti-allergic drugs or antihistamines for asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic disease, or other allergic disease with a total blood eosinophil count >= 600 mm3
- Oral corticosteroids at unstable doses or at doses in excess of the equivalent of 10 mg of prednisone/day or 20 mg every other day
- Hypersensitivity to anticholinergic drugs, or components of the Respimat delivery system, to lactose or any other component of the inhalation capsule deliver system
- Pregnant or suspect of pregnant or women who are willing to become pregnant during the study period or nursing women
- Who are currently participating in another study
- The randomisation of patients with any respiratory infection or COPD exacerbation in the 6 weeks prior to the Scr. Visit or during the scr. period should be postponed
Trial locations and contacts
27 sites in 1 country.
27 sites in 1 country
Japan27 sites
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Akita, Akita, 010-1495
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8431
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bunkyo-ku,Tokyo, 113-0022
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Habikino, Osaka, 583-8588
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Inashiki-gun, Ibaraki, 300-0395
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Itami, Hyogo, 664-8540
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kamogawa, Chiba, 296-0041
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kishiwada, Osaka, 596-8501
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Komaki, Aichi, 485-0044
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kyoto, Kyoto, 606-8507
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Morioka, Iwate, 020-8505
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Osaka, Osaka, 545-8586
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Osakasayama, Osaka, 589-0014
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sakai, Osaka, 591-8555
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sendai, Miyagi, 981-8563
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sendai, Miyagi, 984-8560
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Seto, Aichi, 489-8642
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-1096
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Toyonaka, Osaka, 560-8552
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wakayama, Wakayama, 641-0012
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0051
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Yokote, Akita, 013-8610
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Crossover Efficacy and Safety Comparison of 4-week Treatment Periods of Ba 679 BR Respimat® 5 μg and Tiotropium Inhalation Capsule 18 μg in Patients With COPD
The objective of this trial is to compare the efficacy and the safety of Ba 679 BR Respimat 5 ug once daily to tiotropium inhalation capsule 18 ug (Spiriva inhalation capsule) in a crossover study of 4-week treatment periods in patients with COPD.
Read the detailed description
This is a 16-week, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study of 4-week randomised treatment periods to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of 5 ug of Ba 679 BR inhalation solution from Respimat compared to tiotropium inhalation powder capsule (18 ug) via HandiHaler in patients with COPD. The two 4-week randomised treatment periods are separated by 4-week washout period.
Study Hypothesis:
The primary aim of this trial is to demonstrate non-inferiority of lung function response to 5 ug (2 actuations of 2.5 ug) of Ba679BR Respimat delivered by the Respimat inhaler once daily compared to tiotropium (18 ug) inhaled as powder capsule from the HandiHaler once daily at the end of 4-week treatment periods in patients with COPD. The hypothesis test of non-inferiority will be performed at alpha = 0.025 (one-sided).
Comparison(s):
The primary efficacy endpoint is the trough FEV1 response determined at the end of each 4-week period of randomised treatment.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Being tested
- Ba 679 BR Respimat, Tiotropium (Spiriva) inhalation capsule 18 ug
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ba 679 BR RespimatDrug
Tiotropium (Spiriva) inhalation capsule 18 ugDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary outcome is the trough FEV1 response determined at the end of each 4-week period of randomised treatment.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Trough FVC response after 4 weeks, peak response (FEV1 and FVC) to first dose, peak response (FEV1 and FVC) after 4 weeks, FEV1 AUC0-3h and FVC AUC0-3h response to first dose and after 4 weeks, individual FEV1and FVC measurements at each time point.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Feb 2006 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2006
- Study completionMar 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boehringer IngelheimThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 157 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Boehringer Ingelheim Study Coordinator, Study chair, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00292448
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 205.291
- Status last verified
- Oct 2013
- First submitted
- 15 Feb 2006
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2013
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Crossover Efficacy and Safety Comparison of 4-week Treatment Periods of Ba 679 BR Respimat® 5 μg and Tiotropium Inhalation Capsule 18 μg in Patients With COPD
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00292448
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 205.291
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 157 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer IngelheimIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2006
- Study completion
- Mar 2007
- First posted
- 16 Feb 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this trial is to compare the efficacy and the safety of Ba 679 BR Respimat 5 ug once daily to tiotropium inhalation capsule 18 ug (Spiriva inhalation capsule) in a crossover study of 4-week treatment periods in patients with COPD.
Detailed description
This is a 16-week, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study of 4-week randomised treatment periods to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of 5 ug of Ba 679 BR inhalation solution from Respimat compared to tiotropium inhalation powder capsule (18 ug) via HandiHaler in patients with COPD. The two 4-week randomised treatment periods are separated by 4-week washout period.
Study Hypothesis:
The primary aim of this trial is to demonstrate non-inferiority of lung function response to 5 ug (2 actuations of 2.5 ug) of Ba679BR Respimat delivered by the Respimat inhaler once daily compared to tiotropium (18 ug) inhaled as powder capsule from the HandiHaler once daily at the end of 4-week treatment periods in patients with COPD. The hypothesis test of non-inferiority will be performed at alpha = 0.025 (one-sided).
Comparison(s):
The primary efficacy endpoint is the trough FEV1 response determined at the end of each 4-week period of randomised treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ba 679 BR Respimat | Drug | – |
| Tiotropium (Spiriva) inhalation capsule 18 ug | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
The primary outcome is the trough FEV1 response determined at the end of each 4-week period of randomised treatment.
1 secondary outcome
Trough FVC response after 4 weeks, peak response (FEV1 and FVC) to first dose, peak response (FEV1 and FVC) after 4 weeks, FEV1 AUC0-3h and FVC AUC0-3h response to first dose and after 4 weeks, individual FEV1and FVC measurements at each time point.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2013.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Boehringer Ingelheim Study Coordinator study chair
Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.
27 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Ba 679 BR Respimat and Tiotropium (Spiriva) inhalation capsule 18 ug in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 27 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 27 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary outcome is the trough FEV1 response determined at the end of each 4-week period of randomised treatment.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2013.