AzTrials
AzTrials

SyncopeNCT00295204

Evaluation of a Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry System Versus Standard Loop Event Monitor

An observational study of Syncope and Pre-Syncope, run by Cardionet at 13 sites in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Comparing the arrhythmia diagnostic yield of MCOT as compared to standard loop event monitors in patients presenting with palpitations, syncope or near syncope occurring less frequently than every 24 hours. Patients randomized and are enrolled for 30 days. Prior testing required: 24 hours of non diagnostic monitoring, Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Syncope, Pre-Syncope, Palpitations
How many people
300 participants
Where
13 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2005to Oct 2006
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • syncope, pre-syncope or palpitations less frequently than every 24 hours Pre-syncope without loss of consciousness defined as transient dizziness, leghtheadedness, unsteadiness or weak spells: syncopal events with or without warning: palpitations Subjects with non-diagnostic 24 hours of monitoring related to symptoms within 45 days of enrollment into study Subject able to understand, assent to , and willing to sign the Informed Consent Form.

Who cannot join

  • Class IV heart failure Post Myocardial infarction less than or equal to 3 months Unstable angina defined as chest pain at rest, new onset of angina, or a change in existing patterns of angina.
  • Subjects who are candidatees for or have had recent (less than or equal to 3 monthr) heart valve surgery History of sustained ventricualr tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation documented EF 35% or less with complex ectopy defined as PVC's 10 or greater per hour.
  • Subject is less than 18 years old at the time of signing informed consent. Any condition which may prohibit the completion of or compliance with the protocol.

Trial locations and contacts

13 sites in 1 country.

13 sites in 1 country

United States13 sites
  • Abington Medical Specialists

    Abington, Pennsylvania, 19001

  • Medicor Cardiology, PA

    Bridgewater, New Jersey, 08807

  • Central Bucks Cardiology

    Doylestown, Pennsylvania, 18901

  • Central Bucks Specialitsts, LTD

    Doylestown, Pennsylvania, 18901

  • Garden State Cardiovascular Associates

    Elizabeth, New Jersey, 07202

  • Cardiovascular Associates of NY

    Flushing, New York, 11355

  • PA Heart and Vascular Group

    Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, 19046

  • Lancaster Heart and Stroke Foundation

    Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17603

  • Monmouth Cardiology Associates, LLC

    Ocean City, New Jersey, 07712

  • Southwestern PA Cardiology Associates

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15219

  • Pottstown Medical Specialistsq

    Pottstown, Pennsylvania, 19464

  • Virginia Cardiovascular Specialist

    Richmond, Virginia, 23226

  • Cardiology Consultants of Phladelphia

    Yardley, Pennsylvania, 19067

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of a Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry System (CardioNet) Versus Standard Loop Event Monitor: A Multi-Center Randomized Study

Comparing the arrhythmia diagnostic yield of MCOT as compared to standard loop event monitors in patients presenting with palpitations, syncope or near syncope occurring less frequently than every 24 hours. Patients randomized and are enrolled for 30 days. Prior testing required: 24 hours of non diagnostic monitoring,

Read the detailed description

Cardiac monitoring is used for diagnosing patient with symptoms. Holter monitoring or cardiac loop monitoring are the tests most ofter prescribed for patients depending on the frequency of symptoms. If the symptoms occur daily, a Holter may be prescribed, but when the symptoms become less frequent the diagnostic yield of Holter monitoring declines greatly. The current yields are approximately 5-10% depending on the indication. When the Holter is not longer an option for patients with infrequent symptoms a cardiac loop event monitor is prescribed to make a diagnosis. The yields on this monitoring also average approximately 25-35%. We feel that the yield on the Mobile Cardiac Ouptatient Telemetry (MCOT) service proviced by CardioNet is significantly higher due to the fact that every beat is analyzed using an algorithm and that many times the arrhythmia causing the symptoms has ended before the patient is able to press the button on the loop monitor to record the ECG. This study compares the MCOT service with Patients over 18 years of age experiencing syncope, near syncope or palpitations less frequently than daily. Require 24 hours of non-diagnostic ECG monitoring prior to randomization. Patients remain on monitoring for 30 days unless an arrhythmia diagnosis is made. The primary endpoint is confirmation of exclusion of a probable arrhythmic cause of pre-syncope, syncope or palpitations experienced by the subject prior to enrollment in the study. Secondary endpoints include time to diagnosis, time to detection of clinically significant arrhythmias, comparison of non-clinicaly significant arrhythmias, rate of asymptomatic arrhythmias both clinically and non clinically significant and a diagnosis related resource utilization. The study size is 300 subjects.

Keywords
Syncope, pre-syncope, palpitations
Medical subject headings
Syncope

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Feb 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2005
  3. Study completionOct 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
300 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00295204
Sponsor's protocol ID
05-002
Status last verified
Feb 2006
First submitted
21 Feb 2006
Last updated
3 Aug 2006
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Syncope and Pre-Syncope, run by Cardionet at 13 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Aug 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 13 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Aug 2006.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in