Rectal CancerPhase 3COLORIINCT00297791
COLOR II: Laparoscopic Versus Open Rectal Cancer Removal
A Phase 3 study testing surgery in people with Rectal Cancer, run by Nova Scotia Health Authority at 35 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
COLOR II is a randomized, international, multi center study comparing the outcomes of laparoscopic and conventional resection of rectal carcinoma below 15 cm with curative intent. Clinical and operative data will be collected centrally in the coordinating centre in Halifax, Canada. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,044 participants
- Where
- 35 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2004to Sep 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- solitary rectal cancer observed at colonoscopy or on barium X-ray
- no evidence of distant metastases
- distal border of the tumor within 15 cm of the anal verge at rigid rectoscopy or under linea conjugata at lateral barium enema radiography
- suitable for elective surgical resection
- informed consent
Who cannot join
- T1 tumors treated by locl excision
- T4 tumors
- patients under 18 years of age
- signs of acute intestinal obstruction
- more than one colorectal tumor
- Familial Adenomatosis Polyposis, Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer
Show all 13Show fewer
- active crohn's or active ulcerative colitis
- scheduled need for other synchronous colon surgery
- preoperative indication of invasion of adjacent organs, immobile at palpation or CT showing invasion
- preoperative evidence of metastases (at least chest X-ray and liver ultrasound)
- other malignancies in medical history except adequately treated basocellular carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri
- absolute contraindications to general anesthesia or prolonged pneumoperitoneum (ASA class > III)
- pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
35 sites in 9 countries.
35 sites in 9 countries
Denmark7 sites
Aalborg Hospital
Aalborg
SVS Esbjerg
Esbjerg
Amtssygehus i Gentofte
Gentofte Municipality
Hilleröd Hospital
Hilleröd
Odense Universitetshospital
Odense
Roskilde Hospital
Roskilde
Viborg
Viborg
Netherlands7 sites
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
's-Hertogenbosch
Academisch Medisch Centrum
Amsterdam
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Amsterdam
VU Medisch Centrum
Amsterdam
Rijnland Ziekenhuis
Leiderdorp
Erasmus Medical Centre
Rotterdam
Medisch Centrum Rijnmond-Zuid
Rotterdam
Germany5 sites
Ludwig-Maximilians Universität Klinikum Großhadern
München
Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef
Regensburg
University Hospital Regensburg
Regensburg
Marienhospital
Stuttgart
Wuerzburg University
Würzburg
Spain5 sites
Hospital Clinic i Provencial de Barcelona
Barcelona
Hospital de Sant Pau
Barcelona
Hospital S.A.S. de Jerez
Cadiz
Hospital del Sureste de Madrid
Madrid
Arrixaca Hospital Universitario
Murcia
Sweden5 sites
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg
Örebro Hospital
Örebro
Kärnsjukhuset
Skvöde
Ersta Hospital
Stockholm
Uddevalla Hospital
Uddevalla
Canada3 sites
Royal Alexandra Hospital, University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta
CDHA/ Dalhousie University
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9
University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer.
COLOR II is a randomized, international, multi center study comparing the outcomes of laparoscopic and conventional resection of rectal carcinoma below 15 cm with curative intent. Clinical and operative data will be collected centrally in the coordinating centre in Halifax, Canada. Quality of life and costs will be assessed on a national basis.
Read the detailed description
The design involves allocation of all suitable consecutive patients with rectal carcinoma to either of the two procedures at a randomization ratio of 2:1 in favor of the laparoscopic procedure. Excluded are patients with a carcinoma treated by local resection and palliative resections. The trial will be stratified according to participating centre, resection type, and preoperative radiotherapy.
If the 95% CI for the difference of the 3-year locoregional recurrence rates excludes a difference greater than 5% in favor of the conventional procedure, non-inferiority of the laparoscopic procedure will be concluded. Assuming both rates are 10%, 1000 evaluable cases are required in total for a power of 80%.
Analysis will be primarily on an intention to treat basis. Definition of conversion is defined by protocol.
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer
- Being tested
- surgery
- Keywords
- rectal cancer, laparoscopic technique, open technique, clinical trial, multicenter study, randomized controlled trial, Tumor Below 15cm, curative surgical resection, no evidence for distant metastases
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
surgeryProcedure or surgery
Also called observation following intervention
randomized to open or laparoscopic technique
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Other | surgery (open or laparoscopic) and observation Receives: Procedure: surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
locoregional recurrence rate
Measured: 3 years post operatively
Secondary outcomes (11)
survival free of cancer recurrence
Measured: three, five and seven years post-operatively
overall survival
Measured: three, five and seven years post-operatively
port-site and wound-site recurrences
Measured: annually for seven years
distant metastases rate
Measured: annually for seven years
operative mortality and morbidity
Measured: 8 week or in-hospital
macroscopic evaluation of the resected specimen
Measured: post-operative
duration of in-hospital stay
Measured: post-operative
duration of absence of work
Measured: 8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
postoperative health related quality of life,including standardized questionnaires on sexual and bladder function
Measured: weekly for 8 weeks
in-hospital direct and indirect costs
Measured: seven years
out-of-hospital postoperative costs
Measured: seven years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Mar 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2004
- Primary completionApr 2013
- Study completionSep 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Nova Scotia Health AuthorityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,044 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nova Scotia Health Authority
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jaap Bonjer, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Dalhousie University, and VUMC, the NetherlandsMarius Hoogerboord, Principal investigator, Nova Scotia Health Authority
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00297791
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDHA007
- Acronym
- COLORII
- Status last verified
- Jul 2013
- First submitted
- 27 Feb 2006
- Last updated
- 21 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Andersson J, Angenete E, Gellerstedt M, Haglind E. Developing a multivariable prediction model of global health-related quality of life in patients treated for rectal cancer: a prospective study in five countries. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Mar 5;39(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04605-y.
PubMed 38441657Koedam TWA, Bootsma BT, Deijen CL, van de Brug T, Kazemier G, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Haglind E, Tuynman JB, Daams F, Bonjer HJ; on behalf of the COLOR COLOR II study group. Oncological Outcomes After Anastomotic Leakage After Surgery for Colon or Rectal Cancer: Increased Risk of Local Recurrence. Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):e420-e427. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003889.
PubMed 32224742Petersson J, Koedam TW, Bonjer HJ, Andersson J, Angenete E, Bock D, Cuesta MA, Deijen CL, Furst A, Lacy AM, Rosenberg J, Haglind E; COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection (COLOR) II Study Group. Bowel Obstruction and Ventral Hernia After Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer in A Randomized Trial (COLOR II). Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):53-57. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002790.
PubMed 29746337Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E; COLOR II Study Group. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1324-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882.
PubMed 25830422Andersson J, Abis G, Gellerstedt M, Angenete E, Angeras U, Cuesta MA, Jess P, Rosenberg J, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E. Patient-reported genitourinary dysfunction after laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery in a randomized trial (COLOR II). Br J Surg. 2014 Sep;101(10):1272-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9550. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
PubMed 24924798Andersson J, Angenete E, Gellerstedt M, Angeras U, Jess P, Rosenberg J, Furst A, Bonjer J, Haglind E. Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer in a randomized trial. Br J Surg. 2013 Jun;100(7):941-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9144.
PubMed 23640671van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ; COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):210-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
PubMed 23395398Color II Study Group; Buunen M, Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Haglind E, Kurlberg G, Rosenberg J, Lacy AM, Cuesta MA, D'Hoore A, Furst A, Lange JF, Jess P, Bulut O, Poornoroozy P, Jensen KJ, Christensen MM, Lundhus E, Ovesen H, Birch D, Iesalnieks I, Jager C, Kreis M, van riet Y, van der Harst E, Gerhards MF, Bemelman WA, Hansson BM, Neijenhuis PA, Prins HA, Balague C, Targarona E, Lujan Mompean JA, Franco Osorio JD, Garcia Molina FJ, Skullman S, Lackberg Z, Kressner U, Matthiessen P, Kim SH, Poza AA. COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Dan Med Bull. 2009 May;56(2):89-91.
PubMed 19486621
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00297791
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COLORII / CDHA007
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer
- Keywords
- rectal cancer, laparoscopic technique, open technique, clinical trial, multicenter study, randomized controlled trial, Tumor Below 15cm, curative surgical resection
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,044 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nova Scotia Health AuthorityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2004
- Primary completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Mar 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
COLOR II is a randomized, international, multi center study comparing the outcomes of laparoscopic and conventional resection of rectal carcinoma below 15 cm with curative intent. Clinical and operative data will be collected centrally in the coordinating centre in Halifax, Canada. Quality of life and costs will be assessed on a national basis.
Detailed description
The design involves allocation of all suitable consecutive patients with rectal carcinoma to either of the two procedures at a randomization ratio of 2:1 in favor of the laparoscopic procedure. Excluded are patients with a carcinoma treated by local resection and palliative resections. The trial will be stratified according to participating centre, resection type, and preoperative radiotherapy.
If the 95% CI for the difference of the 3-year locoregional recurrence rates excludes a difference greater than 5% in favor of the conventional procedure, non-inferiority of the laparoscopic procedure will be concluded. Assuming both rates are 10%, 1000 evaluable cases are required in total for a power of 80%.
Analysis will be primarily on an intention to treat basis. Definition of conversion is defined by protocol.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Other | Procedure: surgerysurgery (open or laparoscopic) and observation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- solitary rectal cancer observed at colonoscopy or on barium X-ray
- no evidence of distant metastases
- distal border of the tumor within 15 cm of the anal verge at rigid rectoscopy or under linea conjugata at lateral barium enema radiography
- suitable for elective surgical resection
- informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- T1 tumors treated by locl excision
- T4 tumors
- patients under 18 years of age
- signs of acute intestinal obstruction
- more than one colorectal tumor
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| surgeryAlso: observation following interventionrandomized to open or laparoscopic technique | Procedure or surgery | 1 |
Primary outcome
locoregional recurrence rate
Time frame: 3 years post operatively
11 secondary outcomes
survival free of cancer recurrence
Time frame: three, five and seven years post-operatively
overall survival
Time frame: three, five and seven years post-operatively
port-site and wound-site recurrences
Time frame: annually for seven years
distant metastases rate
Time frame: annually for seven years
operative mortality and morbidity
Time frame: 8 week or in-hospital
macroscopic evaluation of the resected specimen
Time frame: post-operative
duration of in-hospital stay
Time frame: post-operative
duration of absence of work
Time frame: 8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
postoperative health related quality of life,including standardized questionnaires on sexual and bladder function
Time frame: weekly for 8 weeks
in-hospital direct and indirect costs
Time frame: seven years
out-of-hospital postoperative costs
Time frame: seven years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Aug 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38441657Andersson J, Angenete E, Gellerstedt M, Haglind E. Developing a multivariable prediction model of global health-related quality of life in patients treated for rectal cancer: a prospective study in five countries. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Mar 5;39(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04605-y.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32224742Koedam TWA, Bootsma BT, Deijen CL, van de Brug T, Kazemier G, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Haglind E, Tuynman JB, Daams F, Bonjer HJ; on behalf of the COLOR COLOR II study group. Oncological Outcomes After Anastomotic Leakage After Surgery for Colon or Rectal Cancer: Increased Risk of Local Recurrence. Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):e420-e427. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003889.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29746337Petersson J, Koedam TW, Bonjer HJ, Andersson J, Angenete E, Bock D, Cuesta MA, Deijen CL, Furst A, Lacy AM, Rosenberg J, Haglind E; COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection (COLOR) II Study Group. Bowel Obstruction and Ventral Hernia After Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer in A Randomized Trial (COLOR II). Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):53-57. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002790.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25830422Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E; COLOR II Study Group. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1324-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24924798Andersson J, Abis G, Gellerstedt M, Angenete E, Angeras U, Cuesta MA, Jess P, Rosenberg J, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E. Patient-reported genitourinary dysfunction after laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery in a randomized trial (COLOR II). Br J Surg. 2014 Sep;101(10):1272-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9550. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23640671Andersson J, Angenete E, Gellerstedt M, Angeras U, Jess P, Rosenberg J, Furst A, Bonjer J, Haglind E. Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer in a randomized trial. Br J Surg. 2013 Jun;100(7):941-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9144.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23395398van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ; COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):210-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19486621Color II Study Group; Buunen M, Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Haglind E, Kurlberg G, Rosenberg J, Lacy AM, Cuesta MA, D'Hoore A, Furst A, Lange JF, Jess P, Bulut O, Poornoroozy P, Jensen KJ, Christensen MM, Lundhus E, Ovesen H, Birch D, Iesalnieks I, Jager C, Kreis M, van riet Y, van der Harst E, Gerhards MF, Bemelman WA, Hansson BM, Neijenhuis PA, Prins HA, Balague C, Targarona E, Lujan Mompean JA, Franco Osorio JD, Garcia Molina FJ, Skullman S, Lackberg Z, Kressner U, Matthiessen P, Kim SH, Poza AA. COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Dan Med Bull. 2009 May;56(2):89-91.
Related trials for Rectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jaap Bonjer, MD, PhD principal investigator
Dalhousie University, and VUMC, the Netherlands
Marius Hoogerboord principal investigator
Nova Scotia Health Authority
35 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing surgery in people with Rectal Cancer, run by Nova Scotia Health Authority at 35 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 35 sites in Denmark, Netherlands, Germany, Spain, Sweden and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
locoregional recurrence rate (time frame: 3 years post operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00297791, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2024.