SpondylarthropathiesPhase 4NCT00298012
Methotrexate in the Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis
A Phase 4 study testing Methotrexate in people with Spondylarthropathies and Spondylitis, Ankylosing, run by Rheumatism Foundation Hospital at 5 sites in Finland.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of oral methotrexate for the treatment of active axial spondyloarthritis (early ankylosing spondylitis or spondyloarthritis with sacroiliitis). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spondylarthropathies, Spondylitis, Ankylosing
- What is being tested?
- Methotrexate
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesFinland
- Study dates
- Mar 2006to not given
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Inflammatory back pain (definition in Calin et al. JAMA 1977;237:2613-4) as the presenting symptom,
- Positive laboratory test result for HLA-B27,
- Active sacroiliitis in MRI read by qualified radiologist,
- Active disease despite treatment with at least two NSAIDs.
- Active disease is defined as:
- a score of ≥ 30 mm for morning stiffness (average of 2 scores on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS] analysing duration and intensity of morning stiffness),
- scores of ≥ 30 mm VAS for 2 of the following 3 parameters: patient's global assessment of disease activity, back pain and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI).
Who cannot join
- Known hypersensitivity to methotrexate
- Have received sulfasalazine within 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent
- Using oral corticosteroids on a dose equivalent to ≥10 mg of prednisone/day
- Any concomitant rheumatic disease other than spondyloarthritis
- Fibromyalgia
- Pregnant or breast feeding
Show all 10Show fewer
- Have had a serious infection within 1 month
- Have any known malignancy or have a history of malignancy within the previous 5 years
- Have current signs or symptoms of severe or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematologic, gastrointestinal or pulmonary disease
- Grade 3 or 4 changes in radiographs of sacroiliac joints (grading of radiographs according to the New York criteria)
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
Finland5 sites
Rheumatism Foundation Hospital
Heinola
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Helsinki
Central Finland Central Hospital
Jyväskylä
Kuopio University Hospital
Kuopio
Tampere University Hospital
Tampere
About this study
Official title: Methotrexate in the Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis. A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of oral methotrexate for the treatment of active axial spondyloarthritis (early ankylosing spondylitis or spondyloarthritis with sacroiliitis). Efficacy will be measured by reduction in the signs and symptoms of active spondyloarthritis including effects on back pain and stiffness, range of motion in the spine, physical function, quality of life and incidence of arthritis, enthesitis and anterior uveitis.
Read the detailed description
The established classification criteria for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) rely on the combination of clinical symptoms plus radiographic sacroiliitis of at least grade 2 bilaterally or grade 3 unilaterally. It usually takes several years for definite radiographic sacroiliitis to evolve. Diagnosis of AS may be delayed up to 10 years after the onset of symptoms, if diagnosis is based on the radiographic findings.
A group of leading experts in the field of spondyloarthropathies proposed in 2004 the term "axial spondyloarthritis" as an attempt to narrow the gap of 5-10 years between the first symptoms and the diagnosis of AS (Rudwaleit et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63:535-43). Using the proposed approach, an early diagnosis of AS (or axial spondyloarthritis) can be made with a high degree of confidence, when at least two to three spondyloarthritis features (clinical findings, laboratory tests or skeletal imaging) are present. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac joints appears to be especially useful tool in the diagnosis of early AS. Early diagnosis and treatment could probably prevent structural damage and lead to better functional outcomes.
Treatment of AS has largely consisted of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Most disease modifying antirheumatic drugs are not effective in axial manifestations. Sulfasalazine has some efficacy on peripheral symptoms. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha blocking drugs infliximab and etanercept are effective in both axial and peripheral manifestations of the disease. According to consensus statement, the initiation of anti-TNF alpha therapy requires a definitive diagnosis of AS, which is based on radiographic evidence of sacroiliitis.
It is well documented, that oral methotrexate is effective and safe in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Still, studies proving its usefulness for the treatment of AS are lacking. To this date, three small randomised and controlled trials to clarify this issue have been conducted. The dose of methotrexate used in these studies was low, only 7,5 - 10 mg per week. One of these studies showed a benefit in the active treatment group. There was no statistically significant benefit of methotrexate in the two other studies.
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of oral methotrexate in adult subjects with active axial spondyloarthritis. Subjects will be randomly assigned to placebo or methotrexate treatment groups. All subjects in the active treatment group receive at least a dose of 15 mg per week of oral methotrexate. To reduce mucosal, gastrointestinal and haematologic side effects of low-dose methotrexate all study subjects receive also a dose of 5 mg per week of folic acid. A stable dose of NSAID during the study is permitted. The duration of the double-blinded treatment period is 24 weeks.
Efficacy of the treatment is measured by reduction in the signs and symptoms of axial spondyloarthritis at weeks 12 and 24. If the primary outcome of ASAS20 (ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis response criteria, improvement of at least 20 % in patient reported symptoms) is not met at the week 12, the dose of methotrexate or corresponding placebo will be increased to 20 mg per week during weeks 12 to 24.
Clinical history of anterior uveitis and its incidence during the study is also recorded. An ophthalmologic examination is performed at baseline and week 24.
To a subset of patients a MRI scan of sacroiliac joints will be done also at week 24, to assess changes of active inflammatory lesions as detected by MRI.
An extension study of radiological progression is also planned. X-ray changes of sacroiliac joints and lumbosacral spine will be assessed at baseline and at 3 and 5 years.
- Conditions
- Spondylarthropathies, Spondylitis, Ankylosing
- Being tested
- Methotrexate
- Keywords
- Methotrexate, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Anterior uveitis
- Medical subject headings
- Spondylarthropathies, Spondylitis, Ankylosing, Uveitis, Anterior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MethotrexateDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
ASAS20
Secondary outcomes (6)
ASAS40
ASAS5/6
ASAS partial remission
Incidence of arthritis
Incidence of anterior uveitis
BASDAI
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Mar 2006 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SpondylarthropathiesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rheumatism Foundation Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma
- Investigators
- Matti Laitinen, MD, Principal investigator, Rheumatism Foundation Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00298012
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2005-001202-60
- Other IDs
- 2005
- Status last verified
- Jan 2009
- First submitted
- 28 Feb 2006
- Last updated
- 5 Jan 2009
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jan 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Methotrexate in the Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis. A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00298012
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2005-001202-60
- Conditions
- Spondylarthropathies, Spondylitis, Ankylosing
- Keywords
- Methotrexate, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Anterior uveitis
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Withdrawn
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Rheumatism Foundation HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma
- Study start
- Mar 2006
- First posted
- 1 Mar 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of oral methotrexate for the treatment of active axial spondyloarthritis (early ankylosing spondylitis or spondyloarthritis with sacroiliitis). Efficacy will be measured by reduction in the signs and symptoms of active spondyloarthritis including effects on back pain and stiffness, range of motion in the spine, physical function, quality of life and incidence of arthritis, enthesitis and anterior uveitis.
Detailed description
The established classification criteria for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) rely on the combination of clinical symptoms plus radiographic sacroiliitis of at least grade 2 bilaterally or grade 3 unilaterally. It usually takes several years for definite radiographic sacroiliitis to evolve. Diagnosis of AS may be delayed up to 10 years after the onset of symptoms, if diagnosis is based on the radiographic findings.
A group of leading experts in the field of spondyloarthropathies proposed in 2004 the term "axial spondyloarthritis" as an attempt to narrow the gap of 5-10 years between the first symptoms and the diagnosis of AS (Rudwaleit et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63:535-43). Using the proposed approach, an early diagnosis of AS (or axial spondyloarthritis) can be made with a high degree of confidence, when at least two to three spondyloarthritis features (clinical findings, laboratory tests or skeletal imaging) are present. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac joints appears to be especially useful tool in the diagnosis of early AS. Early diagnosis and treatment could probably prevent structural damage and lead to better functional outcomes.
Treatment of AS has largely consisted of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Most disease modifying antirheumatic drugs are not effective in axial manifestations. Sulfasalazine has some efficacy on peripheral symptoms. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha blocking drugs infliximab and etanercept are effective in both axial and peripheral manifestations of the disease. According to consensus statement, the initiation of anti-TNF alpha therapy requires a definitive diagnosis of AS, which is based on radiographic evidence of sacroiliitis.
It is well documented, that oral methotrexate is effective and safe in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Still, studies proving its usefulness for the treatment of AS are lacking. To this date, three small randomised and controlled trials to clarify this issue have been conducted. The dose of methotrexate used in these studies was low, only 7,5 - 10 mg per week. One of these studies showed a benefit in the active treatment group. There was no statistically significant benefit of methotrexate in the two other studies.
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of oral methotrexate in adult subjects with active axial spondyloarthritis. Subjects will be randomly assigned to placebo or methotrexate treatment groups. All subjects in the active treatment group receive at least a dose of 15 mg per week of oral methotrexate. To reduce mucosal, gastrointestinal and haematologic side effects of low-dose methotrexate all study subjects receive also a dose of 5 mg per week of folic acid. A stable dose of NSAID during the study is permitted. The duration of the double-blinded treatment period is 24 weeks.
Efficacy of the treatment is measured by reduction in the signs and symptoms of axial spondyloarthritis at weeks 12 and 24. If the primary outcome of ASAS20 (ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis response criteria, improvement of at least 20 % in patient reported symptoms) is not met at the week 12, the dose of methotrexate or corresponding placebo will be increased to 20 mg per week during weeks 12 to 24.
Clinical history of anterior uveitis and its incidence during the study is also recorded. An ophthalmologic examination is performed at baseline and week 24.
To a subset of patients a MRI scan of sacroiliac joints will be done also at week 24, to assess changes of active inflammatory lesions as detected by MRI.
An extension study of radiological progression is also planned. X-ray changes of sacroiliac joints and lumbosacral spine will be assessed at baseline and at 3 and 5 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Inflammatory back pain (definition in Calin et al. JAMA 1977;237:2613-4) as the presenting symptom,
- Positive laboratory test result for HLA-B27,
- Active sacroiliitis in MRI read by qualified radiologist,
- Active disease despite treatment with at least two NSAIDs.
- a score of ≥ 30 mm for morning stiffness (average of 2 scores on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS] analysing duration and intensity of morning stiffness),
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Known hypersensitivity to methotrexate
- Have received sulfasalazine within 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent
- Using oral corticosteroids on a dose equivalent to ≥10 mg of prednisone/day
- Any concomitant rheumatic disease other than spondyloarthritis
- Fibromyalgia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
ASAS20
6 secondary outcomes
ASAS40
ASAS5/6
ASAS partial remission
Incidence of arthritis
Incidence of anterior uveitis
BASDAI
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jan 2009.
Related trials for Spondylarthropathies
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
Recruiting
Efficacy of a Self-Management Smartphone App to Improve Safety Skills in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis
Rhumatoid Arthisis, Spondyloarthritis (SA)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of HB0017 Injection in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of a Single Subcutaneous Injection in Low-Body-Weight Subjects; and Pharmacokinetics at Different Subcutaneous Injection Sites at the Same Dose
Psoriasis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn if Bimekizumab Given in Different Ways is Safe and Moves Similarly Throughout the Body Over Time in Adults
Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis
RecruitingPhase 4
Impact of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Analogs on Disease Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Matti Laitinen, MD principal investigator
Rheumatism Foundation Hospital
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Methotrexate in people with Spondylarthropathies and Spondylitis, Ankylosing, run by Rheumatism Foundation Hospital at 5 sites in Finland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
ASAS20. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2009.