AzTrials
AzTrials

Crohn's DiseasePhase 3NCT00300118

Oral Budesonide vs. Oral Mesalazine in Active Crohn's Disease (CD)

A Phase 3 study testing budesonide and mesalazine in people with Crohn's Disease, run by Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether mesalazine or budesonide is more active in the treatment of active Crohn's disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Crohn's Disease
What is being tested?
budesonide and mesalazine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
311 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Sep 2004to May 2008
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Symptoms of Crohn's disease since at least 3 months; diagnosis confirmed by endoscopic and histological, or endoscopic and radiological criteria [endoscopy not older than 12 months or if older, then clinical signs (e.g. pain localization, pain intensity, blood in stool) and behaviour (according to Vienna classification) should be unchanged compared to former episodes]
  • Localisation of CD either in terminal ileum, ascending colon or ileocolitis
  • Active phase of disease (200 < CDAI < 400)

Who cannot join

  • Known Crohn's lesion in the upper GI-tract (up to and including the jejunum) with present symptoms
  • CD in the rectum currently present
  • Short bowel syndrome
  • Septic complications
  • Baseline stool positive for germs causing bowel disease
  • Abscess, perforation or active fistulas
Show all 21Show fewer
  • Ileostomy or colostomy
  • Resection of more than 50 cm of the ileum
  • Bowel surgery within the last 3 months
  • Immediate surgery required
  • Clinical signs of stricturing disease
  • Subileus within the last 6 months
  • Suspicion of ileus, subileus or corresponding symptomatology
  • Contra-indications, special warnings and precautions mentioned in SmPC
  • Treatment with immunosuppressants, cytostatics, 6-TG, methotrexate, or cyclosporine within the last 3 months; in case of treatment with azathioprine or 6-MP the drugs have to be used for maintenance of remission only and dosage has to be unchanged within the last 3 months before baseline visit and during the study
  • Treatment with ketoconazole, ciprofloxacin or other CYP3A inhibitors within the last month before baseline visit
  • Treatment with anti-TNF-a therapy within 6 months before baseline visit
  • Conventional steroids (iv, po, rectal) within 2 weeks before the study
  • > 6 mg/d budesonide po or > 3 g/d mesalazine po within 2 weeks before the study
  • Patients known to be steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent from former CD episodes
  • Treatment of study disease with oral antibiotics (e.g., metronidazole) within the last 2 weeks

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Ev. Krankenhaus Hattingen GmbH

    Hattingen, 45525

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomized, Multicentre Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Budesonide (9 mg) and Oral Mesalazine (4.5 g) in Moderately Active Crohn's Disease Patients

The purpose of this study is to determine whether mesalazine or budesonide is more active in the treatment of active Crohn's disease.

Read the detailed description

Crohn's disease is often treated with glucocorticoids or mesalazine. Both drugs are indicated for active Crohn's disease. Treatment with mesalazine is indicated for the treatment of mildly to moderately active Crohn's disease. Budesonide 9 mg/day or mesalazine 4.5 g/day are better than lower doses.

So far only one trial compares the efficacy and safety of budesonide and 5-ASA. The result of this trial is that budesonide is more effective in inducing remission than mesalazine. The primary objective of this trial is to confirm this result for other presentations of budesonide and mesalazine; i.e. Budenofalk® capsules (9 mg/day) and Salofalk® tablets (Eudragit-L-coated oral mesalazine; 4.5 g/day) in moderately active Crohn's disease. Mesalazine is used in this trial as a comparator.

Conditions
Crohn's Disease
Being tested
budesonide, mesalazine
Medical subject headings
Crohn Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • budesonideDrug

    9 mg

  • mesalazineDrug

    4.5 g

Study groups in NCT00300118
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: budesonide
BActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: mesalazine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of remission

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Response to treatment

  2. Time to response

  3. Time to remission

  4. PGA

  5. QoL

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Mar 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2004
  3. Primary completionMay 2008
  4. Study completionMay 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
311 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00300118
Sponsor's protocol ID
BUC-52/CDA
Other IDs
2004-001213-34, 2004
Status last verified
May 2014
First submitted
7 Mar 2006
Last updated
19 May 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Tromm A, Bunganic I, Tomsova E, Tulassay Z, Lukas M, Kykal J, Batovsky M, Fixa B, Gabalec L, Safadi R, Kramm HJ, Altorjay I, Lohr H, Koutroubakis I, Bar-Meir S, Stimac D, Schaffeler E, Glasmacher C, Dilger K, Mohrbacher R, Greinwald R; International Budenofalk Study Group. Budesonide 9 mg is at least as effective as mesalamine 4.5 g in patients with mildly to moderately active Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 2011 Feb;140(2):425-434.e1; quiz e13-4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Nov 9.

    PubMed 21070781

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing budesonide and mesalazine in people with Crohn's Disease, run by Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of remission. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00300118, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in