Coronary StenosisPhase 2/3NCT00301522
Randomized Trial Evaluating Slow-Release Formulation TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents to Treat De Novo Coronary Lesions
A Phase 2/3 study testing TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent, Slow-Formulation and Express2 in people with Coronary Stenosis, run by Boston Scientific Corporation at 72 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to further evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the TAXUS Express2 Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in long lesion lengths, small and large vessel diameters and with multiple overlapping stents in the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Stenosis
- What is being tested?
- TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent, Slow-Formulation and Express2
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,108 participants
- Where
- 72 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2003to Apr 2009
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient was ≥ 18 years old.
- Eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention.
- Documented stable angina pectoris.
- LVEF of greater than 25%.
- Acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass grafting.
- Target lesion segment is located within a single native coronary vessel.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Target lesion was de novo.
- RVD was greater than 2.25 mm and less than 4.0 mm .and patient and/or lesion fulfilled protocol defined subgroups.
- Cumulative target lesion length was greater than 10 mm and less than 46mm assessed after pre-dilatation with standard balloon or cutting balloon angioplasty, including adjacent areas of dissection that were covered.
- Target lesion diameter stenosis less than 50% before pre-dilatation .
- Vessel and lesion morphology such that the lesion was treated only with study stent(s); no planned use of commercial stents.
Who cannot join
- Known hypersensitivity to paclitaxel.
- Any previous or planned treatment with a non-study anti-restenotic drug-coated or drug-eluting coronary stent.
- Planned use of both the study stent and a non-study stent in the treatment of the target vessel.
- Previous or planned treatment with intravascular brachytherapy in the target vessel.
- Recent MI.
- CK-MB greater than 2x the local laboratory's upper limit of normal.
Show all 29Show fewer
- Cerebrovascular accident within 6 months of randomization.
- Planned CABG ≤ 9 months post index procedure.
- Acute or chronic renal dysfunction.
- Leukopenia.
- Thrombocytopenia or thrombocytosis.
- Active peptic ulcer or active gastrointestinal bleeding, or previously active within 6 months.
- Known allergy to stainless steel.
- Any prior true anaphylactic reaction to contrast agents.
- Contraindication to ASA or to both clopidogrel and ticlopidine.
- Patient was on warfarin or it was anticipated that treatment with warfarin would have been required during any period within 6 months post the index procedure.
- Patient was or had been treated with chemotherapeutic agents within 12 months of the index procedure.
- Anticipated treatment with paclitaxel, oral rapamycin or colchicine during any period in the 9 months post index procedure.
- Male or female with known intention to procreate within 3 months post index procedure.
- Co-morbid condition(s) that could limit the patient's ability to participate in the study, limit compliance with follow-up requirements or impact the scientific integrity of the study.
- Planned surgical procedure requiring withdrawal of any anti-platelet therapy within 6 months post index procedure.
- Currently participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not completed the primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the endpoints of this study.
- Unprotected left main coronary artery disease.
- Target lesion was ostial in location.
- Target lesion and/or target vessel proximal to the target lesion was moderately or severely calcified.
- Target lesion was located within or distal to a > 60° bend in the vessel.
- Side branch of the target lesion included ostial narrowing ≥ 50% DS and was ≥ 2.0 mm diameter.
- Target lesion was totally occluded.
- Angiographic presence of probable or definite thrombus.
Trial locations and contacts
72 sites in 1 country.
72 sites in 1 country
United States72 sites
Albany Medical Center/Capital Cardiovascular Associates
Albany, New York, 12208
Piedmont Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
St. Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Palm Beach Heart Research Institute, LLC
Atlantis, Florida, 33462
Aurora Denver Cardiology
Aurora, Colorado, 80012
South Austin Hospital/Capital Cardiovascular Specialists
Austin, Texas, 78745
Baptist Medical Center Princeton
Birmingham, Alabama, 35211
Cardiovascular Associates PC/Baptist Medical Center Montclair
Birmingham, Alabama, 35213
UAB Interventional Cardiology
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Buffalo General Hospital
Buffalo, New York, 14215
Lahey Clinic Hospital
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805
Mid-Carolina Cardiology Research Division/Presbyterian Hospital
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
The Lindner Clinical Trial Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Clearwater Cardiovascular and Interventional Consultants
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
South Carolina Heart Center
Columbia, South Carolina, 29204
MidWest Cardiology Research Foundation/Riverside Methodist Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Cardiovascular Research Institute of Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246
St. John's Hospital and Medical Center
Detroit, Michigan, 48236
North Ohio Research, Ltd
Elyria, Ohio, 44035
Evanston Northwestern Health Care
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
Spectrum Health Hospitals
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503
LeBauer Cardiovascular Research Foundation
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
University of Texas Houston Hermann Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
Saint Luke's Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Scripps Memorial Hospital LaJolla
La Jolla, California, 92037
St. Mary's Medical Center
Langhorne, Pennsylvania, 19047
Central Baptist Hospital
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503
Nebraska Heart Institute
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68526
Midwest Heart Foundation
Lombard, Illinois, 60148
Miami International Cardiology Consultants
Miami Beach, Florida, 33137
St. Luke's Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215
Minneapolis Heart Institute
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407
St. Thomas Hospital
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205
Ochsner Clinic Foundation
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10021
Lenox Hill Hospital
New York, New York, 10021
New York Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 10021
Mt. Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029
Saint Michael's Medical Center
Newark, New Jersey, 07102
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Mediquest Research Group, Inc.
Ocala, Florida, 34471
Oklahoma Cardiovascular Research Group
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120
Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, 32803
Cardiac & Vascular Research Center of Northern Michigan
Petoskey, Michigan, 49770
Arizona Heart Institute and Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Maine Medical Center
Portland, Maine, 04102
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
Utah Valley Regional Medical Center
Provo, Utah, 84604
Wake Heart Research
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27610
Mayo Clinic/Saint Mary's Hospital
Rochester, Minnesota, 55902
Rochester General Hospital
Rochester, New York, 14641
St. Francis Hospital
Roslyn, New York, 11576
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
University of California Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95817
Mercy General Hospital
Sacramento, California, 95819
The Heart & Vascular Institute of Florida
Safety Harbor, Florida, 34695
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Shawnee Mission Medical Center
Shawnee Mission, Kansas, 66204
Barnes Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Stanford Medical Center
Stanford, California, 94305
Washington Adventist Hospital
Takoma Park, Maryland, 20912
Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Forsyth Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
About this study
Official title: TAXUS V: De Novo Lesion: A Randomized, Double-blind Trial to Assess TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents, SR Formulation, in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Lesions
The primary objective of this study is to further evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the TAXUS Express2 Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in long lesion lengths, small and large vessel diameters and with multiple overlapping stents in the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions
Read the detailed description
The primary endpoint is the incidence rate of TVR through 9 months post index procedure. In this protocol, TVR must be ischemia driven, based on the presence of symptoms, positive functional testing or Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) severity of restenosis.
Secondary endpoints include the following:
- Incidence rates of composite MACE and the individual components of MACE assessed at discharge, 1, 4 and 9 months post index procedure and annually for 5 years (i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post index procedure).
- Stent thrombosis rate.
- TVF.
- Clinical procedural success and technical success.
- Binary restenosis rate.
- Additional angiographic endpoints to be measured in all patients with 9 month angiographic follow-up include:
- Absolute lesion length
- Reference Vessel Diameter (RVD)
- Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD)
- Percent diameter stenosis (% DS)
- Acute gain
- Late loss
- Loss index
- Patterns of recurrent restenosis, including edge effect
- Coronary aneurysm
- IVUS Substudy
- Identification of potential safety issues, i.e., incomplete stent apposition.
- change in neointimal volume from post procedure to follow-up
- change in MLD within stent
- minimum lumen area (MLA) within stent
- lumen, plaque and vessel measurements at the stent edges (outside stent)
- Conditions
- Coronary Stenosis
- Being tested
- TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent, Slow-Formulation, Express2
- Keywords
- Coronary, Artery, Stenosis, Drug-eluting, stent, restenosis, revascularization
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Stenosis, Constriction, Pathologic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent, Slow-FormulationDevice
Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent, Slow-Formulation
Express2Device
Coronary Stent System
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent, Slow-Formulation |
| Arm 2 | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Express2 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence rate of TVR through 9 months post index procedure
Measured: 9 Months
Secondary outcomes (19)
• Incidence rates of composite MACE and the individual components of MACE assessed at discharge, 1, 4 and 9 months post index procedure and annually for 5 years (i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post index procedure).
Measured: 5 Years
Stent thrombosis rate
Measured: 5 Years
Target Vessel Failure
Measured: 5 Years
Clinical procedural success and technical success
Measured: 5 years
Binary restenosis rate.
Measured: 5 Years
Absolute lesion length
Measured: 9 Months
Reference Vessel Diameter (RVD)
Measured: 9 Months
Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD)
Measured: 9 Months
Percent diameter stenosis (% DS)
Measured: 9 Months
Acute gain
Measured: 9 Months
Late loss
Measured: 9 Months
Loss index
Measured: 9 Months
Patterns of recurrent restenosis, including edge effect
Measured: 9 Months
Coronary aneurysm
Measured: 9 Months
Identification of potential safety issues, i.e., incomplete stent apposition.
Measured: 9 Months
change in neointimal volume from post procedure to follow-up
Measured: 9 Months
change in MLD within stent
Measured: 9 Months
minimum lumen area (MLA) within stent
Measured: 9 Months
lumen, plaque and vessel measurements at the stent edges (outside stent)
Measured: 9 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Mar 2006 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2003
- Primary completionDec 2004
- Study completionApr 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary StenosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boston Scientific CorporationThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 1,108 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Gregg W. Stone, MD, Principal investigator, Columbia UniversityStephen G. Ellis, MD, Principal investigator, The Cleveland Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00301522
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TAXUS V De novo
- Other IDs
- S5442
- Status last verified
- Aug 2010
- First submitted
- 9 Mar 2006
- Last updated
- 6 Aug 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cannon L, Mann JT, Greenberg JD, Spriggs D, O'Shaughnessy CD, DeMaio S, Hall P, Popma JJ, Koglin J, Russell ME; TAXUS V Investigators. Comparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1215-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.10.1215.
PubMed 16160130Wakabayashi K, Mintz GS, Weissman NJ, Stone GW, Ellis SG, Grube E, Ormiston JA, Turco MA, Pakala R, Xue Z, Desale S, Laynez-Carnicero A, Romaguera R, Sardi G, Pichard AD, Waksman R. Impact of drug-eluting stents on distal vessels. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Apr;5(2):211-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.965780. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
PubMed 22496083Doi H, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Yu A, Wang H, Mandinov L, Popma JJ, Ellis SG, Grube E, Dawkins KD, Weissman NJ, Turco MA, Ormiston JA, Stone GW. Impact of post-intervention minimal stent area on 9-month follow-up patency of paclitaxel-eluting stents: an integrated intravascular ultrasound analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI and TAXUS ATLAS Workhorse, Long Lesion, and Direct Stent Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec;2(12):1269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.005.
PubMed 20129555
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Aug 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- TAXUS V: De Novo Lesion: A Randomized, Double-blind Trial to Assess TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents, SR Formulation, in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Lesions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00301522
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TAXUS V De novo
- Conditions
- Coronary Stenosis
- Keywords
- Coronary, Artery, Stenosis, Drug-eluting, stent, restenosis, revascularization
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,108 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Scientific CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2003
- Primary completion
- Dec 2004 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Mar 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to further evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the TAXUS Express2 Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in long lesion lengths, small and large vessel diameters and with multiple overlapping stents in the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions
Detailed description
The primary endpoint is the incidence rate of TVR through 9 months post index procedure. In this protocol, TVR must be ischemia driven, based on the presence of symptoms, positive functional testing or Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) severity of restenosis.
Secondary endpoints include the following:
- Incidence rates of composite MACE and the individual components of MACE assessed at discharge, 1, 4 and 9 months post index procedure and annually for 5 years (i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post index procedure).
- Stent thrombosis rate.
- TVF.
- Clinical procedural success and technical success.
- Binary restenosis rate.
- Additional angiographic endpoints to be measured in all patients with 9 month angiographic follow-up include:
- Absolute lesion length
- Reference Vessel Diameter (RVD)
- Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD)
- Percent diameter stenosis (% DS)
- Acute gain
- Late loss
- Loss index
- Patterns of recurrent restenosis, including edge effect
- Coronary aneurysm
- IVUS Substudy
- Identification of potential safety issues, i.e., incomplete stent apposition.
- change in neointimal volume from post procedure to follow-up
- change in MLD within stent
- minimum lumen area (MLA) within stent
- lumen, plaque and vessel measurements at the stent edges (outside stent)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | Device: TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent, Slow-Formulation |
| Arm 2 | Active comparator | Device: Express2 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patient was ≥ 18 years old.
- Eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention.
- Documented stable angina pectoris.
- LVEF of greater than 25%.
- Acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass grafting.
Key exclusion criteria (29 listed)
- Known hypersensitivity to paclitaxel.
- Any previous or planned treatment with a non-study anti-restenotic drug-coated or drug-eluting coronary stent.
- Planned use of both the study stent and a non-study stent in the treatment of the target vessel.
- Previous or planned treatment with intravascular brachytherapy in the target vessel.
- Recent MI.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent, Slow-FormulationPaclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent, Slow-Formulation | Device | Arm 1 |
| Express2Coronary Stent System | Device | Arm 2 |
Primary outcome
Incidence rate of TVR through 9 months post index procedure
Time frame: 9 Months
19 secondary outcomes
• Incidence rates of composite MACE and the individual components of MACE assessed at discharge, 1, 4 and 9 months post index procedure and annually for 5 years (i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post index procedure).
Time frame: 5 Years
Stent thrombosis rate
Time frame: 5 Years
Target Vessel Failure
Time frame: 5 Years
Clinical procedural success and technical success
Time frame: 5 years
Binary restenosis rate.
Time frame: 5 Years
Absolute lesion length
Time frame: 9 Months
Reference Vessel Diameter (RVD)
Time frame: 9 Months
Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD)
Time frame: 9 Months
Percent diameter stenosis (% DS)
Time frame: 9 Months
Acute gain
Time frame: 9 Months
Late loss
Time frame: 9 Months
Loss index
Time frame: 9 Months
Patterns of recurrent restenosis, including edge effect
Time frame: 9 Months
Coronary aneurysm
Time frame: 9 Months
Identification of potential safety issues, i.e., incomplete stent apposition.
Time frame: 9 Months
change in neointimal volume from post procedure to follow-up
Time frame: 9 Months
change in MLD within stent
Time frame: 9 Months
minimum lumen area (MLA) within stent
Time frame: 9 Months
lumen, plaque and vessel measurements at the stent edges (outside stent)
Time frame: 9 Months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Aug 2010.
- Results publication: PubMed 16160130Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cannon L, Mann JT, Greenberg JD, Spriggs D, O'Shaughnessy CD, DeMaio S, Hall P, Popma JJ, Koglin J, Russell ME; TAXUS V Investigators. Comparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1215-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.10.1215.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22496083Wakabayashi K, Mintz GS, Weissman NJ, Stone GW, Ellis SG, Grube E, Ormiston JA, Turco MA, Pakala R, Xue Z, Desale S, Laynez-Carnicero A, Romaguera R, Sardi G, Pichard AD, Waksman R. Impact of drug-eluting stents on distal vessels. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Apr;5(2):211-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.965780. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20129555Doi H, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Yu A, Wang H, Mandinov L, Popma JJ, Ellis SG, Grube E, Dawkins KD, Weissman NJ, Turco MA, Ormiston JA, Stone GW. Impact of post-intervention minimal stent area on 9-month follow-up patency of paclitaxel-eluting stents: an integrated intravascular ultrasound analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI and TAXUS ATLAS Workhorse, Long Lesion, and Direct Stent Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec;2(12):1269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.005.
Related trials for Coronary Stenosis
Recruiting
SYMmetric Valve fraME Expansion To Reduce hYpoattenuated Leaflet Thickening After Balloon-expandable TAVI: the SYMMETRY Trial
Aortic Valve Stenosis and/or Insufficiency, Hypoattenuated Leaflet Thickening
RecruitingObservational study
Spanish Prospective Registry of Hydra THV for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis, Valvular Heart Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Korea VHD Echo Study: Surveillance of Aortic, Mitral & Tricuspid Patients - Insights From Real-world Practice
Heart Valve Diseases, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
Human Experimental Models of Pain (HEMP)
Acute Pain
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gregg W. Stone, MD principal investigator
Columbia University
Stephen G. Ellis, MD principal investigator
The Cleveland Clinic
72 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent, Slow-Formulation and Express2 in people with Coronary Stenosis, run by Boston Scientific Corporation at 72 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 29 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 72 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence rate of TVR through 9 months post index procedure (time frame: 9 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00301522, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2010.