Colorectal CancerPhase 2NCT00303745
Irinotecan With or Without Capecitabine as Second-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Progressive, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Cannot Be Removed By Surgery
A Phase 2 study testing capecitabine and irinotecan hydrochloride in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive at 23 sites in France.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as irinotecan and capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 75 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- capecitabine and irinotecan hydrochloride
- How many people
- 78 participants
- Where
- 23 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Jun 2006to not given
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 75 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum
- Unresectable disease
- Documented progressive disease during first-line/palliative chemotherapy
- Measurable disease ≥ 1 cm that is outside prior radiation field
- No brain metastases
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- WHO performance status 0-2
- Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
- No contraindication to chemotherapy
- Creatinine clearance ≥ 40 mL/min
- Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm^3
- Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm^3
- Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 3 times normal (5 times normal if hepatic involvement)
- Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times normal
- Transaminases ≤ 5 times normal
- No symptomatic coronary disease or cardiac insufficiency
- No enteropathy or chronic diarrhea
- No unresolved intestinal occlusion or subocclusion
- No history of severe unexpected reaction to a fluoropyrimidine
- No other active malignancy in the past 2 years
- No hypersensitivity to irinotecan hydrochloride or its excipients
- No hypersensitivity to capecitabine or fluorouracil
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- See Disease Characteristics
- No prior extensive resection
- No concurrent sorivudine or similar analogs (e.g., brivudine)
- No other concurrent anticancer therapy
- Concurrent radiotherapy allowed for nontarget lesions
Trial locations and contacts
23 sites in 1 country.
23 sites in 1 country
France23 sites
Centre Hospitalier d'Abbeville
Abbeville, 80101
Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine
Boucher, 33300
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Pare - Boulogne
Boulogne, F-92104
Centre Hospitalier
Chalon-sur-Saône, F-71321
Hopital Antoine Beclere
Clamart, 92141
Hopital Du Bocage
Dijon, 21034
Clinique Pasteur
Guilherand-Granges, 07500
CMC Les Ormeaux
Le Havre, 76600
C. H. Du Mans
Le Mans, 72037
Hopital Robert Boulin
Libourne, 33500
Polyclinique des Quatre Pavillons
Lormont, 33310
CHR D'Orleans - Hopital de la Source
Orléans, 45100
Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou
Paris, 75015
Hopital Bichat - Claude Bernard
Paris, 75018
CHU Pitie-Salpetriere
Paris, 75651
Hopital Cochin
Paris, 75674
Centre Hospitalier de Perpignan
Perpignan, 66046
Hopital Sebastopol, C.H.U. de Reims
Reims, 51092
Centre Eugene Marquis
Rennes, 35042
Hopital Charles Nicolle
Rouen, 76031
C.H. Senlis
Senlis, 60309
CHRU de Tours - Hopital Trousseau
Tours, 37044
Centre Hospitalier General - St. Nicolas
Verdun, 55107
About this study
Official title: Randomized Study of Second-Line Therapy Comprising Irinotecan With or Without Capecitabine in Patients Aged At Least 75 Years With Colorectal Cancer
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as irinotecan and capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether irinotecan and capecitabine are more effective than irinotecan alone in treating colorectal cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying irinotecan and capecitabine to see how well they work as second-line therapy compared to irinotecan alone in treating older patients with progressive, metastatic colorectal cancer that cannot be removed by surgery.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the objective response or stable disease rate in elderly patients with unresectable, progressive, metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan hydrochloride with vs without capecitabine.
Secondary
- Compare the tolerability of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare the quality of life and ability to maintain self-sufficiency of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the progression-free and overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is an open-label, randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, WHO performance status (0 or 1 vs 2), number of associated comorbidities (Charlson index 0-2 vs > 2), and age (75-79 vs ≥ 80). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 90 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive oral capecitabine on days 1-14 and irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 90 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then every 12 weeks thereafter.
After completion of study therapy, patients are followed every 12 weeks.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 78 patients will be accrued for this study.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Being tested
- capecitabine, irinotecan hydrochloride
- Keywords
- adenocarcinoma of the colon, recurrent colon cancer, stage IV colon cancer, adenocarcinoma of the rectum, recurrent rectal cancer, stage IV rectal cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Colonic Neoplasms, Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Objective response
Stable disease rate
Secondary outcomes (3)
Tolerability
Quality of life
Progression-free and overall survival
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Mar 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Emmanuel Mitry, MD, PhD, Hopital Ambroise PareThomas Aparicio, Study chair, Hopital Bichat - Claude Bernard
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00303745
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000453857
- Other IDs
- FFCD-0305, EU-20545, EUDRACT-2004-004742-40
- Status last verified
- Dec 2006
- First submitted
- 15 Mar 2006
- Last updated
- 24 Jul 2008
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jul 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Study of Second-Line Therapy Comprising Irinotecan With or Without Capecitabine in Patients Aged At Least 75 Years With Colorectal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00303745
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000453857
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Keywords
- adenocarcinoma of the colon, recurrent colon cancer, stage IV colon cancer, adenocarcinoma of the rectum, recurrent rectal cancer, stage IV rectal cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Federation Francophone de Cancerologie DigestiveUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2006
- First posted
- 17 Mar 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as irinotecan and capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether irinotecan and capecitabine are more effective than irinotecan alone in treating colorectal cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying irinotecan and capecitabine to see how well they work as second-line therapy compared to irinotecan alone in treating older patients with progressive, metastatic colorectal cancer that cannot be removed by surgery.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the objective response or stable disease rate in elderly patients with unresectable, progressive, metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan hydrochloride with vs without capecitabine.
Secondary
- Compare the tolerability of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare the quality of life and ability to maintain self-sufficiency of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the progression-free and overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is an open-label, randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, WHO performance status (0 or 1 vs 2), number of associated comorbidities (Charlson index 0-2 vs > 2), and age (75-79 vs ≥ 80). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 90 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive oral capecitabine on days 1-14 and irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 90 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then every 12 weeks thereafter.
After completion of study therapy, patients are followed every 12 weeks.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 78 patients will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 75 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| capecitabine | Drug | – |
| irinotecan hydrochloride | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Objective response
Stable disease rate
3 secondary outcomes
Tolerability
Quality of life
Progression-free and overall survival
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jul 2008.
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Emmanuel Mitry, MD, PhD
Hopital Ambroise Pare
Thomas Aparicio study chair
Hopital Bichat - Claude Bernard
23 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing capecitabine and irinotecan hydrochloride in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive at 23 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 23 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Objective response. The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2008.