Fecal IncontinenceNCT00307476
Comparison of Rectal Trumpet and Standard Care
A study testing Rusch Nasopharyngeal Airway in people with Fecal Incontinence, run by Christiana Care Health Services at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Primary: To determine the effectiveness of the rectal trumpet compared to the standard care in maintaining skin integrity in patients with fecal incontinence. Hypothesis (H1): There will be no difference in the failure rates of rectal area skin integrity between subjects receiving the rectal trumpet and those… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Fecal Incontinence
- What is being tested?
- Rusch Nasopharyngeal Airway
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2005to 25 Jun 2007
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diarrhea - two episodes of loose or watery stool in a 12 hour period
- ≥ 18 years of age
- English-speaking patient or guardian
- Intact skin, may be reddened without breakdown
- Doctor's order for rectal trumpet if patient randomized to treatment group
Who cannot join
- prolapsed anal sphincter
- active rectal bleeding
- colorectal cancer
- bleeding precautions
- rectal tone rated 1 (gaping) or 2 (lax)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Christiana Care Health Systems
Newark, Delaware, 19718
Christiana Care Health Systems-Wilmington
Wilmington, Delaware, 19801
About this study
Official title: A Clinical Comparison of the Rectal Trumpet and Standard Care in Acutely Ill Patients With Fecal Incontinence
Primary: To determine the effectiveness of the rectal trumpet compared to the standard care in maintaining skin integrity in patients with fecal incontinence.
Hypothesis (H1): There will be no difference in the failure rates of rectal area skin integrity between subjects receiving the rectal trumpet and those receiving treatment as usual (staqndard care).
Secondary: To determine the ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and level of patient comfort with the rectal trumpet compared to the standard care in patients with fecal incontinence.
Secondary (exploratory) hypotheses:
There will be differences in the ease of use of the devices, costs of the devices, and patient comfort relative to the devices.
Read the detailed description
Method:
Subjects:
A convenience sample of 80 adult male and female patients in the Wilmington Intensive Care Unit (WICU), Surgical Critical Care Center (SCCC), Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU), and 6D Step-Down, TSU, 5A, 5E/W, will be recruited. After obtaining informed consent, subjects will be randomized to one of two groups (experimental: rectal trumpet or standard treatment: Hollister fecal incontinent collector).
Inclusion Criteria: Patients who meet the following criteria:
- Diarrhea - two episodes of loose or watery stool in a 12 hour period
- ≥ 18 years of age
- English-speaking patient or guardian
- Intact skin, may be discolored without breakdown
- Doctor's order for rectal trumpet (if randomized to treatment group)
Exclusion Criteria: Patients will be excluded from this study if any of the following are present:
- prolapsed anal sphincter
- active rectal bleeding
- colorectal cancer
- bleeding precautions
- rectal tone rated 1 (gaping) or 2 (lax)
Instruments:
The data collection instruments used in this study are investigator-developed (see Appendix A - Data Collection Tool). Data will be collected by study and unit nurses at baseline, every eight hours, and PRN throughout the duration of the study. Data will have subject identification removed and subject number assigned.
Digital pictures of patients with any identifying marks (e.g., tattoos, birthmarks, piercings) will have these marks edited out.
Procedure:
A comparison study will be conducted. The staff nurse will identify patients with two or greater episodes of loose or watery stool in a 12 hour period and contact study team. Study team member will determine if patient meets additional inclusion criteria #2, #3, #4, and #5 and does not have exclusion criteria #1, #2 or #3. Once this is determined, the study team member will approach patient or family for consent to participate in study. After consent is obtained, study team member will evaluate patient for remaining exclusion criteria (#4). Rectal tone will be assessed and rated by performing a digital rectal exam. If assessed tone is rated gaping (1) or lax (2), patient is excluded from study.
Patients meeting all study criteria will be randomized to either the rectal trumpet group or the standard treatment. The Numeric Pain Intensity Scale (0-10) or staff observation of physiological indicators (e.g., restlessness, sweating, tachycardia, lacrimation, pupil dilatation, poor ventilator synchrony) for disoriented or unresponsive patients will be used prior to and immediately after placement of either device in order to assess patient comfort. Comfort will be assessed every 8 hours on all oriented patients using the Numeric Pain Intensity Scale.
For placement of rectal trumpet (Rusch nasopharyngeal airway-32FR): Patient's skin is cleansed with Smith and Nephew Personal cleanser and rinsed thoroughly with water to remove any soap residue and dried. Apply 3M no sting barrier film to provide skin protectant. Attach the shaft end of the trumpet to a urinary drainage bag. Using hemostats, clamp the tubing beneath the sample port of the drainage bag. Instill 5cc of mineral oil through the flange end of the trumpet, being careful not to over fill or spill mineral oil onto flange. Release the clamp and allow the mineral oil to drain into urinary drainage bag. If possible, place patient into side-lying position with knees drawn toward the chest. Fold flange into quarters, insert into the rectum. Pull back gently until there is slight resistance. Secure the drainage bag to the bed frame. Drainage tubing should be positioned to prevent tension or pull on trumpet.
Staff will be educated on proper placement of both devices and need for reapplication/reinsertion of either device prior to study initiation. Education will be provided to staff on the following units: SCCC, MICU, 6DSD, and WICU.
Study patients will be assessed every 8 hours and PRN for signs of skin breakdown, stool leakage around devices, dislodgement, or discomfort from devices using the Numeric Pain Intensity Scale for oriented patients. Failure of the fecal incontinent collector will include: leakage within 24 hours of application X 2 attempts at placement, or skin breakdown. Failure of the rectal trumpet will include: leakage X 2 around trumpet with proper positioning within a 24 hour period, skin breakdown, expelling trumpet with continuation of diarrhea X 3 in a 24 hour period, or if the oriented patient, when assessed for discomfort every 8 hours, rates discomfort 2 points above previous rating level of discomfort or requests removal of device due to discomfort.
Selected digital pictures of patients' skin will be taken to establish inter-rater reliability with respect to skin assessment and to provide photographic evidence of skin maintenance, healing, or failure with use of either device. A representative from the Medical Photography department will instruct investigators on digital photographing of patients' skin. Completion of trial will be the return of continence, stool becoming formed, discharge from unit of study, or 14 days whichever comes first.
- Conditions
- Fecal Incontinence
- Being tested
- Rusch Nasopharyngeal Airway
- Keywords
- Fecal Incontinence, Fecal Containment Devices, Skin Integrity
- Medical subject headings
- Fecal Incontinence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rusch Nasopharyngeal AirwayDevice
For placement of rectal trumpet (Rusch nasopharyngeal airway-32FR): Patient's skin is cleansed with Smith and Nephew Personal cleanser and rinsed thoroughly with water to remove any soap residue and dried. Apply 3M no sting barrier film to provide skin protectant. Attach the shaft end of the trumpet to a urinary drainage bag. Using hemostats, clamp the tubing beneath the sample port of the drainage bag. Instill 5cc of mineral oil through the flange end of the trumpet, being careful not to over fill or spill mineral oil onto flange. Release the clamp and allow the mineral oil to drain into urinary drainage bag. If possible, place patient into side-lying position with knees drawn toward the chest. Fold flange into quarters, insert into the rectum. Pull back gently until there is slight resistance. Secure the drainage bag to the bed frame. Drainage tubing should be positioned to prevent tension or pull on trumpet.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| rectal trumpet | Active comparator | Patients meeting all study criteria will be randomized to either the rectal trumpet group or the standard treatment.
For placement of rectal trumpet (Rusch nasopharyngeal airway-32FR): Receives: Device: Rusch Nasopharyngeal Airway |
| standard treatment | Other | Patients meeting all study criteria will be randomized to either the rectal trumpet group or the standard treatment. The Numeric Pain Intensity Scale (0-10) or staff observation of physiological indicators (e.g., restlessness, sweating, tachycardia, lacrimation, pupil dilatation, poor ventilator synchrony) for disoriented or unresponsive patients will be used prior to and immediately after placement of either device in order to assess patient comfort. Comfort will be assessed every 8 hours on all oriented patients using the Numeric Pain Intensity Scale. Receives: Device: Rusch Nasopharyngeal Airway |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Skin integrity
Secondary outcomes (3)
Ease of use
Cost effectiveness
Patient comfort
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Mar 2006 (estimated)
- Study start1 Sep 2005
- Primary completion25 Jun 2007
- Study completion25 Jun 2007
Why it stopped: Unable to recruit target enrollment numbers
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Fecal IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Christiana Care Health Services
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Association of Critical Care Nurses, Wound Ostomy Continence Nurses Society and Hollister
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Denise Netta-Turner, BSN, Principal investigator, Christiana Care Health Systems
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00307476
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 24200
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 24 Mar 2006
- Last updated
- 13 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: inadequate data to share
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Clinical Comparison of the Rectal Trumpet and Standard Care in Acutely Ill Patients With Fecal Incontinence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00307476
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 24200
- Conditions
- Fecal Incontinence
- Keywords
- Fecal Incontinence, Fecal Containment Devices, Skin Integrity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Unable to recruit target enrollment numbers
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Christiana Care Health ServicesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Association of Critical Care Nurses, Wound Ostomy Continence Nurses Society and Hollister
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2005 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Jun 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Jun 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Mar 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary: To determine the effectiveness of the rectal trumpet compared to the standard care in maintaining skin integrity in patients with fecal incontinence.
Hypothesis (H1): There will be no difference in the failure rates of rectal area skin integrity between subjects receiving the rectal trumpet and those receiving treatment as usual (staqndard care).
Secondary: To determine the ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and level of patient comfort with the rectal trumpet compared to the standard care in patients with fecal incontinence.
Secondary (exploratory) hypotheses:
There will be differences in the ease of use of the devices, costs of the devices, and patient comfort relative to the devices.
Detailed description
Method:
Subjects:
A convenience sample of 80 adult male and female patients in the Wilmington Intensive Care Unit (WICU), Surgical Critical Care Center (SCCC), Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU), and 6D Step-Down, TSU, 5A, 5E/W, will be recruited. After obtaining informed consent, subjects will be randomized to one of two groups (experimental: rectal trumpet or standard treatment: Hollister fecal incontinent collector).
Inclusion Criteria: Patients who meet the following criteria:
- Diarrhea - two episodes of loose or watery stool in a 12 hour period
- ≥ 18 years of age
- English-speaking patient or guardian
- Intact skin, may be discolored without breakdown
- Doctor's order for rectal trumpet (if randomized to treatment group)
Exclusion Criteria: Patients will be excluded from this study if any of the following are present:
- prolapsed anal sphincter
- active rectal bleeding
- colorectal cancer
- bleeding precautions
- rectal tone rated 1 (gaping) or 2 (lax)
Instruments:
The data collection instruments used in this study are investigator-developed (see Appendix A - Data Collection Tool). Data will be collected by study and unit nurses at baseline, every eight hours, and PRN throughout the duration of the study. Data will have subject identification removed and subject number assigned.
Digital pictures of patients with any identifying marks (e.g., tattoos, birthmarks, piercings) will have these marks edited out.
Procedure:
A comparison study will be conducted. The staff nurse will identify patients with two or greater episodes of loose or watery stool in a 12 hour period and contact study team. Study team member will determine if patient meets additional inclusion criteria #2, #3, #4, and #5 and does not have exclusion criteria #1, #2 or #3. Once this is determined, the study team member will approach patient or family for consent to participate in study. After consent is obtained, study team member will evaluate patient for remaining exclusion criteria (#4). Rectal tone will be assessed and rated by performing a digital rectal exam. If assessed tone is rated gaping (1) or lax (2), patient is excluded from study.
Patients meeting all study criteria will be randomized to either the rectal trumpet group or the standard treatment. The Numeric Pain Intensity Scale (0-10) or staff observation of physiological indicators (e.g., restlessness, sweating, tachycardia, lacrimation, pupil dilatation, poor ventilator synchrony) for disoriented or unresponsive patients will be used prior to and immediately after placement of either device in order to assess patient comfort. Comfort will be assessed every 8 hours on all oriented patients using the Numeric Pain Intensity Scale.
For placement of rectal trumpet (Rusch nasopharyngeal airway-32FR): Patient's skin is cleansed with Smith and Nephew Personal cleanser and rinsed thoroughly with water to remove any soap residue and dried. Apply 3M no sting barrier film to provide skin protectant. Attach the shaft end of the trumpet to a urinary drainage bag. Using hemostats, clamp the tubing beneath the sample port of the drainage bag. Instill 5cc of mineral oil through the flange end of the trumpet, being careful not to over fill or spill mineral oil onto flange. Release the clamp and allow the mineral oil to drain into urinary drainage bag. If possible, place patient into side-lying position with knees drawn toward the chest. Fold flange into quarters, insert into the rectum. Pull back gently until there is slight resistance. Secure the drainage bag to the bed frame. Drainage tubing should be positioned to prevent tension or pull on trumpet.
Staff will be educated on proper placement of both devices and need for reapplication/reinsertion of either device prior to study initiation. Education will be provided to staff on the following units: SCCC, MICU, 6DSD, and WICU.
Study patients will be assessed every 8 hours and PRN for signs of skin breakdown, stool leakage around devices, dislodgement, or discomfort from devices using the Numeric Pain Intensity Scale for oriented patients. Failure of the fecal incontinent collector will include: leakage within 24 hours of application X 2 attempts at placement, or skin breakdown. Failure of the rectal trumpet will include: leakage X 2 around trumpet with proper positioning within a 24 hour period, skin breakdown, expelling trumpet with continuation of diarrhea X 3 in a 24 hour period, or if the oriented patient, when assessed for discomfort every 8 hours, rates discomfort 2 points above previous rating level of discomfort or requests removal of device due to discomfort.
Selected digital pictures of patients' skin will be taken to establish inter-rater reliability with respect to skin assessment and to provide photographic evidence of skin maintenance, healing, or failure with use of either device. A representative from the Medical Photography department will instruct investigators on digital photographing of patients' skin. Completion of trial will be the return of continence, stool becoming formed, discharge from unit of study, or 14 days whichever comes first.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| rectal trumpet | Active comparator | Device: Rusch Nasopharyngeal AirwayPatients meeting all study criteria will be randomized to either the rectal trumpet group or the standard treatment. For placement of rectal trumpet (Rusch nasopharyngeal airway-32FR): |
| standard treatment | Other | Device: Rusch Nasopharyngeal AirwayPatients meeting all study criteria will be randomized to either the rectal trumpet group or the standard treatment. The Numeric Pain Intensity Scale (0-10) or staff observation of physiological indicators (e.g., restlessness, sweating, tachycardia, lacrimation, pupil dilatation, poor ventilator synchrony) for disoriented or unresponsive patients will be used prior to and immediately after placement of either device in order to assess patient comfort. Comfort will be assessed every 8 hours on all oriented patients using the Numeric Pain Intensity Scale. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diarrhea - two episodes of loose or watery stool in a 12 hour period
- ≥ 18 years of age
- English-speaking patient or guardian
- Intact skin, may be reddened without breakdown
- Doctor's order for rectal trumpet if patient randomized to treatment group
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- prolapsed anal sphincter
- active rectal bleeding
- colorectal cancer
- bleeding precautions
- rectal tone rated 1 (gaping) or 2 (lax)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rusch Nasopharyngeal AirwayFor placement of rectal trumpet (Rusch nasopharyngeal airway-32FR): Patient's skin is cleansed with Smith and Nephew Personal cleanser and rinsed thoroughly with water to remove any soap residue and dried. Apply 3M no sting barrier film to provide skin protectant. Attach the shaft end of the trumpet to a urinary drainage bag. Using hemostats, clamp the tubing beneath the sample port of the drainage bag. Instill 5cc of mineral oil through the flange end of the trumpet, being careful not to over fill or spill mineral oil onto flange. Release the clamp and allow the mineral oil to drain into urinary drainage bag. If possible, place patient into side-lying position with knees drawn toward the chest. Fold flange into quarters, insert into the rectum. Pull back gently until there is slight resistance. Secure the drainage bag to the bed frame. Drainage tubing should be positioned to prevent tension or pull on trumpet. | Device | rectal trumpet, standard treatment |
Primary outcome
Skin integrity
3 secondary outcomes
Ease of use
Cost effectiveness
Patient comfort
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Feb 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. inadequate data to share
Related trials for Fecal Incontinence
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Recruiting
Acute Genital Nerve Stimulation for Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Individuals Living With Spinal Cord Injury
Fecal Incontinence
Recruiting
At-Home Genital Nerve Stimulation for SCI Bowel
Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
Postpartum Health Trajectories the First Year After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury and the Impact of a Group-Based Intervention
Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury
Recruiting
Outcome Research in Bowel Irrigation Techniques for the Treatment of Chronic Constipation and/or Faecal Incontinence
Faecal Incontinence, Chronic Constipation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Denise Netta-Turner, BSN principal investigator
Christiana Care Health Systems
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Rusch Nasopharyngeal Airway in people with Fecal Incontinence, run by Christiana Care Health Services at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Skin integrity. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2023.