Kidney TransplantPhase 2NCT00309270
Low Dose Sirolimus or CsA-Based Maintenance Immunosuppression After Induction With Campath-1 in Kidney Transplantation
A Phase 2 study testing Campath-1H in people with Kidney Transplant, run by Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
During the past 15 years, however, the superior immunosuppressive efficacy of CsA and the well-known toxicity of long-term steroid therapy have prompted trials of steroid withdrawal from renal allograft recipients at various intervals after transplantation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Kidney Transplant
- What is being tested?
- Campath-1H
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Feb 2003to Apr 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Eligible kidney transplant according to standard criteria
- Recipient of first kidney transplant
- Cadaver or living-related donor
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Panel reactive antibodies titer >50%
- HLA identical
- High risk of recurrence of renal disease (FSGS, vasculitis, membranous nephropathy)
- Primary and secondary hyperlipidemia
- Platelet count <150000/microliter
- Specific contraindication to the study drug
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized Study to Compare the Effect of Campath-1,Low Dose Sirolimus Versus Campath-1H, Low Dose CsA Both in Addition to Low Dose Mycophenolate Mofetil on Phenotypic and Functional Profiles of PBMCs in Kidney Transplant Recipients in a Steroid-Free Regimen
During the past 15 years, however, the superior immunosuppressive efficacy of CsA and the well-known toxicity of long-term steroid therapy have prompted trials of steroid withdrawal from renal allograft recipients at various intervals after transplantation. Steroid withdrawal or avoidance must be balanced against the associated risk of precipitating acute allograft rejection. Moreover, with the current immunosuppressive regimens, by 10 years approximately 50% of grafts will have been lost due mainly to chronic rejection or the side-effects of immunosuppressive therapy. Thus, the quest for therapies that might induce specific immune tolerance - ideally via short-term interventions that would target only the pathogenic immune response and leave the protective host immune response unimpaired - has provided a "holy grail" for transplant immunologists.
The humanized IgG monoclonal antibody Campath-1H has been hypothesized to provide enough immunosuppression that would allow maintenance therapy with low-dose CsA, and possibly reprogramming the immune system so to encourage tolerance processes. Despite Campath-1H immunosuppressive regimens have been claimed to induce a condition of "almost tolerance", this has not been proved nor evidence of development of persistent regulatory immune responses long-term post transplant has been provided. Thus, characterizing phenotypically and functionally distinct subsets of T-regulatory cells possibly generated selectively in non-rejecting transplant recipients in Campath-1H-based immunosuppressive regimens may help to find new noninvasive markers of immune system activation to tailor immunosuppressive protocols.
The primary aim of the study is to compare the effect of Campath-1H, low dose sirolimus versus Campath-1H, low dose CsA, both in addition to low dose MMF on phenotypic and functional profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in kidney transplant recipients in a steroid-free regimen.
Read the detailed description
The last 40 years have been a period of remarkable evolution of organ transplantation from nothing to a well-established form of treatment with good short-term results. These findings were achieved mainly using the conventional triple-drug regimen with cyclosporine (CsA), azathioprine (or mycophenolate mofetil, MMF), and steroids. During the past 15 years, however, the superior immunosuppressive efficacy of CsA and the well-known toxicity of long-term steroid therapy have prompted trials of steroid withdrawal from renal allograft recipients at various intervals after transplantation, Few transplant centers have also adopted a steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen. Reported benefit of eliminating steroids from immunosuppressive regimens of CsA-treated renal transplant recipients have included improvement of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, glucose intolerance and, in children, acceleration of growth. Avoiding these steroid-related side effects would contribute to improve long-term outcome of the grafts. These and other benefits of steroid withdrawal or avoidance must be balanced against the associated risk of precipitating acute allograft rejection. Moreover, with the current immunosuppressive regimens, by 10 years approximately 50% of grafts will have been lost due mainly to chronic rejection or the side-effects of immunosuppressive therapy. Thus, the quest for therapies that might induce specific immune tolerance - ideally via short-term interventions that would target only the pathogenic immune response and leave the protective host immune response unimpaired - has provided a "holy grail" for transplant immunologists. We now have a number of extremely powerful immunosuppressive drugs and antibodies with different mechanisms of action and the stage is set for a move from current continuous high dose immunosuppressive maintenance therapy to low dose or no maintenance immunosuppression. Indeed, true tolerance can occur in man, examples being successful bone marrow transplantation and patients with liver grafts who have stopped immunosuppression after years of good function.
The humanized IgG monoclonal antibody Campath-1H with a unique target CD52 on T, B lymphocytes and monocytes has been used to eliminate lymphocytes from the blood for more than a month in kidney transplant recipients. Given its potent but safe effect of depleting T and B cells, Campath-1H has been hypothesized to provide enough immunosuppression that would allow maintenance therapy with low-dose CsA, and possibly reprogramming the immune system so to encourage tolerance processes. This has been formally tested in 31 patients undergoing first cadaver renal allograft. The results with a mean two year follow-up have been encouraging, 29 patients having good graft function without receiving maintenance steroids. Similar results have been achieved recently combining Campath-1H and full dose sirolimus in renal transplant recipients. Twenty-three out of 24 patients had good graft function 1 year post transplant. However, most patients were on a lipid-lowering agent to counteract the hyperlipidemic effect of sirolimus. It should be also considered that in both clinical trials acute rejection episodes early post transplant occurred in 20-25% of the patients. Thus, to reduce the risk of hyperlipidemia associated with the current full-dose of sirolimus, while minimizing the risk of rejection, a combination regimen of low dose sirolimus and low dose MMF is worth investigating.
Despite Campath-1H immunosuppressive regimens have been claimed to induce a condition of "almost tolerance", this has not been proved nor evidence of development of persistent regulatory immune responses long-term post transplant has been provided. Thus, characterizing phenotypically and functionally distinct subsets of T-regulatory cells possibly generated selectively in non-rejecting transplant recipients in Campath-1H-based immunosuppressive regimens may help to find new noninvasive markers of immune system activation to tailor immunosuppressive protocols.
Aims of the study
This prospective study in adult kidney transplant recipients is designed with the following aims:
Primary To compare the effect of Campath-1H, low dose sirolimus versus Campath-1H, low dose CsA, both in addition to low dose MMF on phenotypic and functional profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in kidney transplant recipients in a steroid-free regimen.
Secondary
To compare in the two groups of kidney transplant recipients at 6 and 12 months post-Tx:
- Incidence of acute allograft rejection
- Time course of graft function (as serum creatinine concentration)
- Time course of glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
- Systolic and diastolic blood pressure
- Need for antihypertensive therapy
- Lipid profile (cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL)
- Need for statins
- Fasting blood glucose and need of antidiabetic agents
- 24 h urinary protein excretion rate
- Patient and graft survival
- Incidence of major adverse events (post-transplant anuria, major infections, cancer, abnormal liver function tests, and abnormal hematological blood cell count)
As an extension of the project, patients still on the study at month 12 post-transplant, with no biopsy evidence of acute or chronic rejection, persistent donor specific unresponsiveness and intact 3rd party response in MLR, presence of immune regulatory cells in the peripheral blood will undergo a program of sequential withdrawal of the maintenance low dose immunosuppressive drugs.
Randomization Group 1 (n=11): Campath-1H, low dose sirolimus, low dose MMF These patients will receive Campath-1H at day 0 of transplant. Low dose sirolimus (target to trough concentration of 5-10 ng/ml) and low dose MMF (750 mg twice a day) will be given orally starting on the day of transplant (the first few days through nasogastric tube).
Methylprednisolone (500 mg) will be administered intravenously on day 0, 1, and 2 posttransplant.
The first treatment will be performed 30 min before the dose of Campath-1H, to minimize reactions to cytokine release. Group 2 (n=10): Campath-1H, low dose CsA, low dose MMF The patients will receive Campath-1H at day 0 of transplant. Low dose CsA (target blood C2 level: 450-750 ng/ml) and low dose MMF (750 mg twice a day) will be given orally starting on the day of transplant (the first few days through nasogastric tube). Methylprednisolone will be administered intravenously on day 0 (500 mg), 1 (250 mg), and 2 (125 mg) post-transplant.
The first treatment will be performed 30 min before the dose of Campath-1H, to minimize reactions to cytokine release.
Randomization will be performed at the Clinical Research Center for Rare Disease Aldo eCele Daccò of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research.
Study design All patients entering the study will be managed according to standard protocols already in use at the participating Centers.A tissue sample will be taken from the kidney just after harvesting from the donor and, by percutaneous renal biopsy, at the end of the 12 month follow-up for morphological evaluation. Beside conventional histological examination. immunostaining for cytokines, and possible mediators of chronic renal injury (ET-1, TGF-β, RANTES) will be performed. Clinical parameters will be monitored at least every month. Functional parameter will be evaluated at month 6 and 12 post-transplant. Moreover,blood CsA C2, blood sirolimus trough levels, and plasma MMF trough levels will be monitored.
All patients will undergo immunophenotyping of circulating peripheral blood leukocytes at different time points post-transplant. All patients will also undergo lymphocyte function assays at different time points posttransplant.
These assays will be performed pre-transplant, at day 15 and 30 post-transplant (or at the time of acute rejection and after recovery of graft function), at month 6, 12 post-transplant or at the time of any biopsy due to chronic deterioration of graft function and at the time of graft loss.
At the same time points cytokine detection in antigen-activated T cells will be measured by ELISPOT assay.
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplant
- Being tested
- Campath-1H
- Keywords
- Campath-1H, low-dose immunosuppression, T regulatives cells
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Campath-1HDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time course of immunophenotyping and lymphocyte function assays in the two groups of kidney transplant recipients randomized to low-dose sirolimus or CsA- based maintenance immunosuppression after Campath-1H induction therapy
Graft function and survival
Safety of induction therapy with Campath-1H and low-dose maintenance immunosuppressive regimen
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Mar 2006 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2003
- Study completionApr 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Kidney TransplantStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 21 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Norberto Perico, MD, Principal investigator, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00309270
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAMPATH
- Status last verified
- Mar 2006
- First submitted
- 30 Mar 2006
- Last updated
- 22 May 2006
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 May 2006. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Randomized Study to Compare the Effect of Campath-1,Low Dose Sirolimus Versus Campath-1H, Low Dose CsA Both in Addition to Low Dose Mycophenolate Mofetil on Phenotypic and Functional Profiles of PBMCs in Kidney Transplant Recipients in a Steroid-Free Regimen
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00309270
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CAMPATH
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplant
- Keywords
- Campath-1H, low-dose immunosuppression, T regulatives cells
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 21 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological ResearchUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2003
- Study completion
- Apr 2010
- First posted
- 31 Mar 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
During the past 15 years, however, the superior immunosuppressive efficacy of CsA and the well-known toxicity of long-term steroid therapy have prompted trials of steroid withdrawal from renal allograft recipients at various intervals after transplantation. Steroid withdrawal or avoidance must be balanced against the associated risk of precipitating acute allograft rejection. Moreover, with the current immunosuppressive regimens, by 10 years approximately 50% of grafts will have been lost due mainly to chronic rejection or the side-effects of immunosuppressive therapy. Thus, the quest for therapies that might induce specific immune tolerance - ideally via short-term interventions that would target only the pathogenic immune response and leave the protective host immune response unimpaired - has provided a "holy grail" for transplant immunologists.
The humanized IgG monoclonal antibody Campath-1H has been hypothesized to provide enough immunosuppression that would allow maintenance therapy with low-dose CsA, and possibly reprogramming the immune system so to encourage tolerance processes. Despite Campath-1H immunosuppressive regimens have been claimed to induce a condition of "almost tolerance", this has not been proved nor evidence of development of persistent regulatory immune responses long-term post transplant has been provided. Thus, characterizing phenotypically and functionally distinct subsets of T-regulatory cells possibly generated selectively in non-rejecting transplant recipients in Campath-1H-based immunosuppressive regimens may help to find new noninvasive markers of immune system activation to tailor immunosuppressive protocols.
The primary aim of the study is to compare the effect of Campath-1H, low dose sirolimus versus Campath-1H, low dose CsA, both in addition to low dose MMF on phenotypic and functional profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in kidney transplant recipients in a steroid-free regimen.
Detailed description
The last 40 years have been a period of remarkable evolution of organ transplantation from nothing to a well-established form of treatment with good short-term results. These findings were achieved mainly using the conventional triple-drug regimen with cyclosporine (CsA), azathioprine (or mycophenolate mofetil, MMF), and steroids. During the past 15 years, however, the superior immunosuppressive efficacy of CsA and the well-known toxicity of long-term steroid therapy have prompted trials of steroid withdrawal from renal allograft recipients at various intervals after transplantation, Few transplant centers have also adopted a steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen. Reported benefit of eliminating steroids from immunosuppressive regimens of CsA-treated renal transplant recipients have included improvement of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, glucose intolerance and, in children, acceleration of growth. Avoiding these steroid-related side effects would contribute to improve long-term outcome of the grafts. These and other benefits of steroid withdrawal or avoidance must be balanced against the associated risk of precipitating acute allograft rejection. Moreover, with the current immunosuppressive regimens, by 10 years approximately 50% of grafts will have been lost due mainly to chronic rejection or the side-effects of immunosuppressive therapy. Thus, the quest for therapies that might induce specific immune tolerance - ideally via short-term interventions that would target only the pathogenic immune response and leave the protective host immune response unimpaired - has provided a "holy grail" for transplant immunologists. We now have a number of extremely powerful immunosuppressive drugs and antibodies with different mechanisms of action and the stage is set for a move from current continuous high dose immunosuppressive maintenance therapy to low dose or no maintenance immunosuppression. Indeed, true tolerance can occur in man, examples being successful bone marrow transplantation and patients with liver grafts who have stopped immunosuppression after years of good function.
The humanized IgG monoclonal antibody Campath-1H with a unique target CD52 on T, B lymphocytes and monocytes has been used to eliminate lymphocytes from the blood for more than a month in kidney transplant recipients. Given its potent but safe effect of depleting T and B cells, Campath-1H has been hypothesized to provide enough immunosuppression that would allow maintenance therapy with low-dose CsA, and possibly reprogramming the immune system so to encourage tolerance processes. This has been formally tested in 31 patients undergoing first cadaver renal allograft. The results with a mean two year follow-up have been encouraging, 29 patients having good graft function without receiving maintenance steroids. Similar results have been achieved recently combining Campath-1H and full dose sirolimus in renal transplant recipients. Twenty-three out of 24 patients had good graft function 1 year post transplant. However, most patients were on a lipid-lowering agent to counteract the hyperlipidemic effect of sirolimus. It should be also considered that in both clinical trials acute rejection episodes early post transplant occurred in 20-25% of the patients. Thus, to reduce the risk of hyperlipidemia associated with the current full-dose of sirolimus, while minimizing the risk of rejection, a combination regimen of low dose sirolimus and low dose MMF is worth investigating.
Despite Campath-1H immunosuppressive regimens have been claimed to induce a condition of "almost tolerance", this has not been proved nor evidence of development of persistent regulatory immune responses long-term post transplant has been provided. Thus, characterizing phenotypically and functionally distinct subsets of T-regulatory cells possibly generated selectively in non-rejecting transplant recipients in Campath-1H-based immunosuppressive regimens may help to find new noninvasive markers of immune system activation to tailor immunosuppressive protocols.
Aims of the study
This prospective study in adult kidney transplant recipients is designed with the following aims:
Primary To compare the effect of Campath-1H, low dose sirolimus versus Campath-1H, low dose CsA, both in addition to low dose MMF on phenotypic and functional profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in kidney transplant recipients in a steroid-free regimen.
Secondary
To compare in the two groups of kidney transplant recipients at 6 and 12 months post-Tx:
- Incidence of acute allograft rejection
- Time course of graft function (as serum creatinine concentration)
- Time course of glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
- Systolic and diastolic blood pressure
- Need for antihypertensive therapy
- Lipid profile (cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL)
- Need for statins
- Fasting blood glucose and need of antidiabetic agents
- 24 h urinary protein excretion rate
- Patient and graft survival
- Incidence of major adverse events (post-transplant anuria, major infections, cancer, abnormal liver function tests, and abnormal hematological blood cell count)
As an extension of the project, patients still on the study at month 12 post-transplant, with no biopsy evidence of acute or chronic rejection, persistent donor specific unresponsiveness and intact 3rd party response in MLR, presence of immune regulatory cells in the peripheral blood will undergo a program of sequential withdrawal of the maintenance low dose immunosuppressive drugs.
Randomization Group 1 (n=11): Campath-1H, low dose sirolimus, low dose MMF These patients will receive Campath-1H at day 0 of transplant. Low dose sirolimus (target to trough concentration of 5-10 ng/ml) and low dose MMF (750 mg twice a day) will be given orally starting on the day of transplant (the first few days through nasogastric tube).
Methylprednisolone (500 mg) will be administered intravenously on day 0, 1, and 2 posttransplant.
The first treatment will be performed 30 min before the dose of Campath-1H, to minimize reactions to cytokine release. Group 2 (n=10): Campath-1H, low dose CsA, low dose MMF The patients will receive Campath-1H at day 0 of transplant. Low dose CsA (target blood C2 level: 450-750 ng/ml) and low dose MMF (750 mg twice a day) will be given orally starting on the day of transplant (the first few days through nasogastric tube). Methylprednisolone will be administered intravenously on day 0 (500 mg), 1 (250 mg), and 2 (125 mg) post-transplant.
The first treatment will be performed 30 min before the dose of Campath-1H, to minimize reactions to cytokine release.
Randomization will be performed at the Clinical Research Center for Rare Disease Aldo eCele Daccò of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research.
Study design All patients entering the study will be managed according to standard protocols already in use at the participating Centers.A tissue sample will be taken from the kidney just after harvesting from the donor and, by percutaneous renal biopsy, at the end of the 12 month follow-up for morphological evaluation. Beside conventional histological examination. immunostaining for cytokines, and possible mediators of chronic renal injury (ET-1, TGF-β, RANTES) will be performed. Clinical parameters will be monitored at least every month. Functional parameter will be evaluated at month 6 and 12 post-transplant. Moreover,blood CsA C2, blood sirolimus trough levels, and plasma MMF trough levels will be monitored.
All patients will undergo immunophenotyping of circulating peripheral blood leukocytes at different time points post-transplant. All patients will also undergo lymphocyte function assays at different time points posttransplant.
These assays will be performed pre-transplant, at day 15 and 30 post-transplant (or at the time of acute rejection and after recovery of graft function), at month 6, 12 post-transplant or at the time of any biopsy due to chronic deterioration of graft function and at the time of graft loss.
At the same time points cytokine detection in antigen-activated T cells will be measured by ELISPOT assay.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Eligible kidney transplant according to standard criteria
- Recipient of first kidney transplant
- Cadaver or living-related donor
- Written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Panel reactive antibodies titer >50%
- HLA identical
- High risk of recurrence of renal disease (FSGS, vasculitis, membranous nephropathy)
- Primary and secondary hyperlipidemia
- Platelet count <150000/microliter
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Campath-1H | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Time course of immunophenotyping and lymphocyte function assays in the two groups of kidney transplant recipients randomized to low-dose sirolimus or CsA- based maintenance immunosuppression after Campath-1H induction therapy
Graft function and survival
Safety of induction therapy with Campath-1H and low-dose maintenance immunosuppressive regimen
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 May 2006.
Related trials for Kidney Transplant
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Effects of Felzartamab Infusions in Adults With Kidney Transplants Who Have Late Isolated Microvascular Inflammation
Microvascular Inflammation
RecruitingPhase 2/3
CIRTEN-Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant Recipients
Kidney Pancreas Transplantation
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Sequential Daratumumab Followed by Telitacicept for the Treatment of ABMR After Kidney Transplantation-A Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Antibody-mediated Rejection, Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR)
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Dd-cfDNA in Routine Patient Care in Kidney Transplant Recipients"
Renal Transplantation
Not yet recruiting
MYTP01 for Immune-Mediated Diseases
IgA Nephropathy, Kidney Transplant Recipients
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Norberto Perico, MD principal investigator
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Campath-1H in people with Kidney Transplant, run by Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time course of immunophenotyping and lymphocyte function assays in the two groups of kidney transplant recipients randomized to low-dose sirolimus or CsA- based maintenance immunosuppression after Campath-1H induction therapy. The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2006.