AzTrials
AzTrials

InfluenzaNCT00311701

Chart Review of Antivirals for Influenza in Infants

An observational study of Influenza, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 16 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This retrospective study conducted in Canada and the US involves a chart review to assess the safety of oseltamivir (Tamiflu®) compared to alternate antiviral therapy, amantidine or rimantidine, administered to children less than 12 months of age with diagnosed or suspected influenza. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 11 months
Conditions the study is for
Influenza
How many people
200 participants
Where
16 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Nov 2005to Dec 2006
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 11 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female study participants less than 12 months of age
  • Suspected or laboratory diagnosis of influenza
  • Treated with oseltamivir, rimantadine or amantadine

Who cannot join

  • None listed

Trial locations and contacts

16 sites in 2 countries.

16 sites in 2 countries

United States15 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233-0011

  • MetroHealth Medical Center

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44109

  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75390-9063

  • University of Colorado

    Denver, Colorado, 80218

  • Cook Children's Medical Center

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76104

  • Creighton University

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68198-2162

  • Children's Hospital of Orange County

    Orange, California, 92868

  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Oregon Health Sciences University

    Portland, Oregon, 97201-3098

  • Arkansas Children's Hospital

    Pulaski, Arkansas, 72202

  • University of Utah

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132

  • The University of Texas Health Science Center

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229-3900

  • Children's Hospital and Health Center

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • Seattle Children's Hospital

    Seattle, Washington, 98105

  • Washington University in St. Louis

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

Other trials in United States

Canada1 site
  • University of Alberta

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Retrospective Chart Review to Assess the Safety of Oseltamivir (Tamiflu®) Compared to Alternate Antiviral Therapy (Amantadine or Rimantadine) Administered to Children Less Than 12 Months of Age With Diagnosed or Suspected Influenza (CASG 113)

This retrospective study conducted in Canada and the US involves a chart review to assess the safety of oseltamivir (Tamiflu®) compared to alternate antiviral therapy, amantidine or rimantidine, administered to children less than 12 months of age with diagnosed or suspected influenza. The objectives are to describe the frequency of neurological and all other adverse events possibly related to administration of these antivirals in these infants. Investigators will also compare frequency of adverse events at various doses of oseltamivir in these children. Critical endpoints to be collected include frequency and severity of adverse events, particularly those relating to central nervous system complications. A sub-investigator will travel to each of the participating sites to collect data related to each infant's health prior to becoming ill, health status at time of influenza diagnosis, dosing regimen, reported neurological events post-dosing, and all reported adverse events post-dosing.

Read the detailed description

The study is a retrospective review of charts of children less than 12 months of age that were diagnosed with influenza and treated with oseltamivir. The chart review will focus on assessment of neurological and other adverse events that may have been related to the administration of oseltamivir. A control population will consist of children less than 12 months treated with either rimantadine or amantadine. The administration of oseltamivir to children at high risk (i.e. immunocompromised hosts) less than 12 months old with influenza is frequently considered in medical practice despite the findings of neurotoxicity in a juvenile rat study. Since oseltamivir is the only active treatment against H5N1 influenza strains, it is imperative to understand the ramifications of its potential widespread use in very young infants in the event of an outbreak. This study is designed to gather documented evidence by which the circumstances of use and defined outcomes can be described. Patient selection will be made by review of hospital inpatient medical records, emergency room medical records and/or pharmacy records to identify patients less than 1 yr old dosed with oseltamivir suspension. Redacting the charts will be done in a manner that will obscure personal health information (individual identifiers) without obscuring the necessary clinical data. A separate research data collection form will be prepared on which critical information can be transcribed that would subsequently be available for analysis. Critical information to be captured at the time of initiating oseltamivir treatment includes: age, birth history, gender, underlying medical conditions, presenting influenza symptoms, if done, type of flu test and dose regime. Critical endpoints to be collected will include the frequency and severity of adverse events, particularly those relating to central nervous system complications.

Conditions
Influenza
Keywords
Influenza, pediatric
Medical subject headings
Influenza, Human

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Apr 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2005
  3. Study completionDec 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
200 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00311701
Sponsor's protocol ID
05-0111
Other IDs
CASG 113, N01AI30025C, N01AI30025
Status last verified
Oct 2007
First submitted
5 Apr 2006
Last updated
13 May 2011
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Influenza, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 16 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 16 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in