Type 2 Diabetes MellitusPhase 4NCT00311818
Insulin Glargine in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
A Phase 4 study testing Insulin glargine in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Sanofi.
Trial summary
Primary objective: To compare efficacy of oral antidiabetics (OAD) combination therapy with either HOE901 insulin analogue once daily or Lispro insulin analogue at mealtime in terms of change in HbA1c (baseline to endpoint). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Insulin glargine
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2003to May 2005
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes mellitus for at least 1 year (no history of ketoacidosis) and treatment with oral antidiabetics (OAD) for at least 6 months prior to study entry
- Subjects poorly controlled with previous OAD treatment: any mono or combination therapy approved in combination with insulin according to local SPCs (summary of product characteristics), not including use of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, at a stable dose for least 3 month prior to study entry
- Poor metabolic control with HbA1c (glycosylated hemoglobin) values between 7.5 % and 10.5 % and FBG > or = 120 mg/dl (6.6 mmol/l)
- Body mass index < or = 35 kg/m2
- Ability and willingness of a tight antidiabetic therapy under a stable life-style with regular meals and to perform blood glucose self monitoring and especially blood glucose profiles using a blood glucose meter at home, as evidence by daily FBG measurements and a complete 8-point blood glucose profile obtained over a 24-hour period
Who cannot join
- Treatment with any insulin in the last 4 weeks prior to study entry
- Diabetes mellitus following pancreatectomy
- GAD positive (glutamic acid decarboxylase)
- Diabetic retinopathy with surgical treatment (laser photocoagulation or vitrectomy) in the 3 months prior to study entry or which may require surgical treatment within 3 months of study entry
- Pregnant or breast-feeding
- Women of childbearing potential who did not take adequate contraceptive protection such as systemic hormones (birth control pills, implant), intrauterine device, or a barrier method (diaphragm with intravaginal spermicidal, cervical cap, male or female condom)
Show all 15Show fewer
- History of hypersensitivity to the study medication or to drugs with similar chemical structures
- Treatment with any investigational drug in the last 3 months before study entry
- Previous enrollment in a study involving HOE901 insulin analogue
- Likelihood of requiring treatment during the study period with drugs not permitted by the study protocol (e.g. non-cardio selective beta-blockers, systemic corticosteroids)
- Clinically relevant cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hepatic, neurologic, endocrine, hematological or other major systemic disease making implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study results difficult
- History of drug or alcohol abuse
- Impaired hepatic function, as shown by, but not limited to,alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) or aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) above 3x the upper limit of normal, if no lower values are required by the individually administered OAD
- Impaired renal function, as shown by, but not limited to, serum creatinine > 177 mmol/l (> 2 mg/dl), if no lower values are required by the individually administered OAD
- The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.
About this study
Official title: 44-week, Parallel, Open, Randomized, Multinational, Multi-center Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of the Combination Therapy of an Oral Anti-diabetic Drug Treatment With Either HOE901 Insulin Once Daily or Lispro Insulin Analogue at Mealtime in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Poorly Controlled With Oral Anti-diabetic Drug Treatment.
Primary objective:
- To compare efficacy of oral antidiabetics (OAD) combination therapy with either HOE901 insulin analogue once daily or Lispro insulin analogue at mealtime in terms of change in HbA1c (baseline to endpoint).
Secondary objectives:
- To compare the OAD combination therapy with either HOE901 insulin analogue once daily or Lispro insulin analogue at mealtime in terms of efficacy and safety.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Insulin glargine
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Insulin glargineDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Frequency of subjects with HbA1c: ≤ 6.5 %, 6.5 %< HbA1c ≤ 7.0 %, 7.0 %<HbA1c ≤ 8.0 % and HbA1c > 8.0 %
Measured: at endpoint
Secondary outcomes (8)
Change in fasting blood glucose, (FBG)
Measured: baseline to endpoint
Frequency of subjects with: FBG ≤ 100 mg/dl (5.5 mmol/l), 100 mg/dl < FBG ≤ 126 mg/dl(7.0 mmol/l) and FBG > 126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l)
Measured: at endpoint
Change in nocturnal blood glucose
Measured: baseline to endpoint
Change in fasting plasma glucose
Measured: baseline to endpoint and all visits
Change in mean daytime blood glucose
Measured: baseline to endpoint
Change in mean daily blood glucose
Measured: baseline to endpoint
Change in blood glucose at the remaining time points of the 8-point-blood glucose profiles
Measured: baseline to endpoint
Frequency of subjects with hypoglycemic events (overall, severe, nocturnal, symptomatic)
Measured: from the inform consent signature to the end of the study
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Apr 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2003
- Primary completionMay 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 2 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Valérie Pilorget, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00311818
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HOE901_4040
- Status last verified
- Sep 2009
- First submitted
- 5 Apr 2006
- Last updated
- 15 Sep 2009
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Bretzel RG, Nuber U, Landgraf W, Owens DR, Bradley C, Linn T. Once-daily basal insulin glargine versus thrice-daily prandial insulin lispro in people with type 2 diabetes on oral hypoglycaemic agents (APOLLO): an open randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008 Mar 29;371(9618):1073-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60485-7.
PubMed 18374840
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Sep 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- 44-week, Parallel, Open, Randomized, Multinational, Multi-center Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of the Combination Therapy of an Oral Anti-diabetic Drug Treatment With Either HOE901 Insulin Once Daily or Lispro Insulin Analogue at Mealtime in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Poorly Controlled With Oral Anti-diabetic Drug Treatment.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00311818
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HOE901_4040
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2003
- Primary completion
- May 2005 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Apr 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary objective:
- To compare efficacy of oral antidiabetics (OAD) combination therapy with either HOE901 insulin analogue once daily or Lispro insulin analogue at mealtime in terms of change in HbA1c (baseline to endpoint).
Secondary objectives:
- To compare the OAD combination therapy with either HOE901 insulin analogue once daily or Lispro insulin analogue at mealtime in terms of efficacy and safety.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes mellitus for at least 1 year (no history of ketoacidosis) and treatment with oral antidiabetics (OAD) for at least 6 months prior to study entry
- Subjects poorly controlled with previous OAD treatment: any mono or combination therapy approved in combination with insulin according to local SPCs (summary of product characteristics), not including use of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, at a stable dose for least 3 month prior to study entry
- Poor metabolic control with HbA1c (glycosylated hemoglobin) values between 7.5 % and 10.5 % and FBG > or = 120 mg/dl (6.6 mmol/l)
- Body mass index < or = 35 kg/m2
- Ability and willingness of a tight antidiabetic therapy under a stable life-style with regular meals and to perform blood glucose self monitoring and especially blood glucose profiles using a blood glucose meter at home, as evidence by daily FBG measurements and a complete 8-point blood glucose profile obtained over a 24-hour period
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Treatment with any insulin in the last 4 weeks prior to study entry
- Diabetes mellitus following pancreatectomy
- GAD positive (glutamic acid decarboxylase)
- Diabetic retinopathy with surgical treatment (laser photocoagulation or vitrectomy) in the 3 months prior to study entry or which may require surgical treatment within 3 months of study entry
- Pregnant or breast-feeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin glargine | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Frequency of subjects with HbA1c: ≤ 6.5 %, 6.5 %< HbA1c ≤ 7.0 %, 7.0 %<HbA1c ≤ 8.0 % and HbA1c > 8.0 %
Time frame: at endpoint
8 secondary outcomes
Change in fasting blood glucose, (FBG)
Time frame: baseline to endpoint
Frequency of subjects with: FBG ≤ 100 mg/dl (5.5 mmol/l), 100 mg/dl < FBG ≤ 126 mg/dl(7.0 mmol/l) and FBG > 126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l)
Time frame: at endpoint
Change in nocturnal blood glucose
Time frame: baseline to endpoint
Change in fasting plasma glucose
Time frame: baseline to endpoint and all visits
Change in mean daytime blood glucose
Time frame: baseline to endpoint
Change in mean daily blood glucose
Time frame: baseline to endpoint
Change in blood glucose at the remaining time points of the 8-point-blood glucose profiles
Time frame: baseline to endpoint
Frequency of subjects with hypoglycemic events (overall, severe, nocturnal, symptomatic)
Time frame: from the inform consent signature to the end of the study
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Sep 2009.
- Results publication: PubMed 18374840Bretzel RG, Nuber U, Landgraf W, Owens DR, Bradley C, Linn T. Once-daily basal insulin glargine versus thrice-daily prandial insulin lispro in people with type 2 diabetes on oral hypoglycaemic agents (APOLLO): an open randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008 Mar 29;371(9618):1073-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60485-7.
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Valérie Pilorget study director
Sanofi
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Insulin glargine in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Sanofi.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Frequency of subjects with HbA1c: ≤ 6.5 %, 6.5 %< HbA1c ≤ 7.0 %, 7.0 %<HbA1c ≤ 8.0 % and HbA1c > 8.0 % (time frame: at endpoint). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00311818, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2009.