AzTrials
AzTrials

Advanced Colorectal CancerPhase 3NCT00312000

Sequential Versus Combination Chemotherapy in Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma

A Phase 3 study testing capecitabine-irinotecan and capecitabine+irinotecan (1st line) in people with Advanced Colorectal Cancer, run by Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary objective:To assess the efficacy, defined as overall survival, of sequential versus combination chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Methodology Open, randomised multicenter phase III study. Randomisation by centre will be centralized. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Advanced Colorectal Cancer
What is being tested?
capecitabine-irinotecan and capecitabine+irinotecan (1st line)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
820 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2003to Dec 2006
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histology and staging disease
  • Histologically proven CRC; advanced disease, not amenable to curative surgery;
  • Of Note: In case of a single metastasis, histological or cytological proof of colorectal carcinoma should be obtained prior to randomisation.
  • Measurable or evaluable disease; Serum CEA as the only parameter for disease activity is not allowed.
  • General conditions
  • Written informed consent;
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Age 18 years and above;
  • WHO performance status 0-2;
  • Adequate bone marrow function(WBC > 3.0 x 109/L, platelets > 100 x 109/L, Hb > 6 mmol/L);
  • Adequate hepatic function: total bilirubin < 1. 5 x upper normal limit, ASAT and ALAT < 3 x upper normal limits; in case of liver metastases < 5 x upper normal limits
  • Adequate renal function: creatinin < 1. 5 x upper normal limits.
  • Other - Expected adequacy of follow-up.

Who cannot join

  • General conditions
  • Pregnancy or lactation;
  • Patients (M/F) with reproductive potential not implementing adequate contraceptives measures.
  • Prior or current history
  • Prior chemotherapy for advanced disease; prior adjuvant chemotherapy is allowed provided that the last administration was given > 6 months prior to randomisation.
  • Serious concomitant diseases preventing the safe administration of chemotherapy or likely to interfere with the study assessments;
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Serious active infections;
  • Inflammatory bowel disease or other diseases associated with chronic diarrhoea;
  • Previous extensive irradiation of the pelvis or abdomen;
  • Other malignancies in the past 5 years with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
  • Concomitant treatments
  • Concomitant (or within 4 weeks before randomisation) administration of any other experimental drug under investigation;
  • Concurrent treatment with any other anti-cancer therapy.

About this study

Official title: A Randomised Study of Sequential Versus Combination Chemotherapy in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma

Primary objective:To assess the efficacy, defined as overall survival, of sequential versus combination chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methodology Open, randomised multicenter phase III study. Randomisation by centre will be centralized. 820 patiënts with histologically proven advanced CRC; not amenable to curative surgery. Measurable or evaluable disease. Age 18 years and above. WHO performance status 0-2.

Read more

Test products:

Arm A: First line: capecitabine capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14 (q3),until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Second line: irinotecan 350 mg/m2 IV infusion on day 1 (q3),until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Third line: oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV infusion on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14 (q3). Arm B: First line: irinotecan 250 mg/m2 IV infusion in 30 minutes on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14 (q3), until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Second line: oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14 (q3), until progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients will be followed by CT-scan every 9 weeks for response while on treatment, or at any other moment when progression is suspected. After cessation of chemotherapy, patients will be followed every 3 months until death. Clinical and laboratory toxicity/symptomatology will be graded according to NCI common criteria.

Read the detailed description

Objectives: Primary objective:

To assess the efficacy, defined as overall survival, of sequential versus combination chemotherapy for advanced CRC.

Secondary objectives are to assess:

To assess Tumour response (CR, PR or SD) Progression free survival Quality of life Toxicity profile Methodology Open, randomised multicenter phase III study. Randomisation by centre will be centralized by IKC. Number of patients 820 Main criteria for inclusion Histology and staging disease

  • Histologically proven advanced CRC; not amenable to curative surgery;
  • Of Note: In case of a single metastasis, histological or cytological proof of colorectal carcinoma should be obtained prior to randomisation.
  • Measurable or evaluable disease. Serum CEA as the only parameter for disease activity is not allowed.

General conditions

  • Written informed consent;
  • Age 18 years and above;
  • WHO performance status 0-2;
  • Adequate bone marrow function (WBC > 3.0 x 109/L, platelets > 100 x 109/L, Hb > 6 mmol/L);
  • Adequate hepatic function: total bilirubin < 1. 5 x upper normal limit, ASAT and ALAT < 3 x upper normal limits (in case of liver metastases < 5 x upper normal limits);
  • Adequate renal function: creatinin < 1. 5 x upper normal limits. Other
  • Expected adequacy of follow-up.

Main criteria for exclusion General conditions

  • Pregnancy or lactation;
  • Patients (M/F) with reproductive potential not implementing adequate contraceptives measures.

Prior or current history

  • Prior chemotherapy for advanced disease; prior adjuvant chemotherapy is allowed, provided that the last drug administration took place more than 6 months prior to randomisation.
  • Serious concomitant diseases preventing the safe administration of chemotherapy or likely to interfere with the study assessments;
  • Serious active infections;
  • Inflammatory bowel disease or other diseases associated with chronic diarrhoea;
  • Previous extensive irradiation of pelvis or abdomen;
  • Other malignancies in the past 5 years with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.

Concomitant treatments

  • Concomitant (or within 4 weeks before randomisation) administration of any other experimental drug under investigation;
  • Concurrent treatment with any other anti-cancer therapy. Test product, dose and mode of administration Arm A First line: capecitabine

Every 3 weeks (q 3):

capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14. This schedule will be continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Continuation after 6 months without disease progression and/or severe toxicity at the investigator's discretion.

Second line: irinotecan

Every 3 weeks (q 3):

irinotecan 350 mg/m2 IV infusion on day 1. This schedule will be continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Continuation after 6 months without disease progression and/or severe toxicity at the investigator's discretion.

Third line: oxaliplatin plus capecitabine oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV infusion on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14. This schedule will be continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Continuation after 6 months without disease progression and/or severe toxicity at the investigator's discretion.

Arm B First line: irinotecan plus capecitabine

Every 3 weeks (q 3):

irinotecan 250 mg/m2 IV infusion in 30 minutes on day 1 2 hours after discontinuation of the infusion followed by capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14. This schedule will be continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Continuation after 6 months without disease progression and/or severe toxicity at the investigator's discretion.

Second line: oxaliplatin plus capecitabine

Every 3 weeks (q 3):

oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV infusion in 2 hours on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14. This schedule will be continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Continuation after 6 months without disease progression and/or severe toxicity at the investigator's discretion.

Duration of treatment and follow-up Treatment is continued until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Patients will be followed by CT-scan every 9 weeks for response while on treatment, or at any other moment when progression is suspected. After cessation of chemotherapy, patients will be followed every 3 months until death. Death or progression should be reported whenever it occurs.

Criteria for evaluation Efficacy All patients will be included in the survival analysis (intent-to-treat). All patients receiving > 9 weeks of treatment (i.e. 3 cycles) will be considered evaluable for response, unless documented progression occurred earlier.

Safety profile Safety will be analysed in each treatment group. Patients having received > treatment doses are evaluable for toxicity. Evaluation will be performed by patient and by cycle on the intent-to-treat population. Clinical and laboratory toxicity/symptomatology will be graded according to NCI common criteria. The adverse events which are not reported in NCI common criteria will be graded as: mild, moderate, severe, life threatening.

Statistical methodology The expected median survival in Arm A (standard arm) is 14 months. It is anticipated that the median survival in Arm B (experimental arm) will be 19 months. 620 patients (310 in each arm) are needed to show this increase in median survival (>=0,05 and >=0,80).

Stratification parameters Patients will be stratified for the following parameters:

  • WHO performance status 0-1 vs 2
  • Serum LDH normal versus above normal
  • Prior adjuvant therapy versus no prior adjuvant therapy
  • Predominant localisation of metastases in the liver vs extrahepatic site(s)
  • Per participating institution
Being tested
capecitabine-irinotecan, capecitabine+irinotecan (1st line)
Keywords
colorectal, cancer, capecitabine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • capecitabine-irinotecanDrug

    1. st line capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14
    2. nd line q 3 w irinotecan 350 mg/m2 IV infusion on day 1
  • capecitabine+irinotecan (1st line)Drug

    q 3 w irinotecan 250 mg/m2 IV infusion in 30 minutes on day 1 2 hours after discontinuation of the infusion followed by capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14

Study groups in NCT00312000
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Capecitabine-irinotecanActive comparator1st line- 2nd line (3rd line oxaliplatin plus capecitabine)
Receives: Drug: capecitabine-irinotecan
2capecitabine plus irinotecanExperimental1st line (2nd line oxaliplatin plus capecitabine)
Receives: Drug: capecitabine+irinotecan (1st line)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall survival

    Measured: study duration

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Tumour response

    Measured: study duration

  2. Progression free survival

    Measured: study duration

  3. Quality of life

    Measured: study duration

  4. Toxicity profile

    Measured: study duration

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Apr 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2003
  3. Primary completionFeb 2006
  4. Study completionDec 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
820 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00312000
Sponsor's protocol ID
CAIRO1
Status last verified
Sep 2008
First submitted
5 Apr 2006
Last updated
8 Sep 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Koopman M, Antonini NF, Douma J, Wals J, Honkoop AH, Erdkamp FL, de Jong RS, Rodenburg CJ, Vreugdenhil G, Akkermans-Vogelaar JM, Punt CJ. Randomised study of sequential versus combination chemotherapy with capecitabine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer, an interim safety analysis. A Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) phase III study. Ann Oncol. 2006 Oct;17(10):1523-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl179. Epub 2006 Jul 27.

    PubMed 16873425
  • Koopman M, Antonini NF, Douma J, Wals J, Honkoop AH, Erdkamp FL, de Jong RS, Rodenburg CJ, Vreugdenhil G, Loosveld OJ, van Bochove A, Sinnige HA, Creemers GM, Tesselaar ME, Slee PHTJ, Werter MJ, Mol L, Dalesio O, Punt CJ. Sequential versus combination chemotherapy with capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer (CAIRO): a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Jul 14;370(9582):135-142. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61086-1.

    PubMed 17630036
  • van Kessel CS, Samim M, Koopman M, van den Bosch MA, Borel Rinkes IH, Punt CJ, van Hillegersberg R. Radiological heterogeneity in response to chemotherapy is associated with poor survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jul;49(11):2486-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.03.027. Epub 2013 May 18.

    PubMed 23692811

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing capecitabine-irinotecan and capecitabine+irinotecan (1st line) in people with Advanced Colorectal Cancer, run by Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall survival (time frame: study duration). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00312000, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in