DiabetesPhase 3NCT00313001
Effects of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 70/30 vs. Exenatide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Not Reaching Blood Glucose Targets on Metformin and a Sulfonylurea.
A Phase 3 study testing biphasic insulin aspart and exenatide in people with Diabetes and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Novo Nordisk A/S at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This trial is conducted in the United States of America (USA). The study will compare A1C reduction achieved in patients receiving biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 once or twice daily to patients receiving exenatide twice daily. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- biphasic insulin aspart and exenatide
- How many people
- 373 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2006to Jul 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Type 2 diabetes
- HbA1C: At least 8%
- Patients that were never treated with insulin before
- Current therapy with metformin and a sulfonylurea.
Who cannot join
- History of recurrent, severe hypoglycemia
- Hepatic insufficiency: ALT, AST or alkaline phosphatase > 2.5 times upper limits of laboratory's normal
- Renal insufficiency: serum creatinine > 1.3 mg/dL (males) or > 1.2 mg/dL (females)
- Severe gastrointestinal disease, including gastroparesis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Plainsboro, New Jersey, 08536
About this study
Official title: Effects of NovoLog® Mix 70/30 (Biphasic Insulin Aspart 70/30) BID and QD vs. Byetta™ Exenatide) BID on Glycemic Control: A Multicenter, 24-Week, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Achieving Glycemic Targets With Metformin and a Sulfonylurea
This trial is conducted in the United States of America (USA). The study will compare A1C reduction achieved in patients receiving biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 once or twice daily to patients receiving exenatide twice daily. Patients enrolled in the study will be insulin naive patients who have not achieved glycemic control with metformin and sulfonylurea.
- Conditions
- Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- biphasic insulin aspart, exenatide
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
biphasic insulin aspartDrug
exenatideDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Superiority as assessed by HbA1c reduction
Measured: at 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Safety variables
Patient satisfaction
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Apr 2006 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2006
- Primary completionJul 2007
- Study completionJul 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novo Nordisk A/SThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 373 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novo Nordisk A/S
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Global Clinical Registry (GCR, 1452), Study director, Novo Nordisk A/S
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00313001
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BIASP-1714
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 8 Apr 2006
- Last updated
- 6 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Bergenstal R, Lewin A, Bailey T, Chang D, Gylvin T, Roberts V; NovoLog Mix-vs.-Exenatide Study Group. Efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 versus exenatide in subjects with type 2 diabetes failing to achieve glycemic control with metformin and a sulfonylurea. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Jan;25(1):65-75. doi: 10.1185/03007990802597951.
PubMed 19210140
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of NovoLog® Mix 70/30 (Biphasic Insulin Aspart 70/30) BID and QD vs. Byetta™ Exenatide) BID on Glycemic Control: A Multicenter, 24-Week, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Achieving Glycemic Targets With Metformin and a Sulfonylurea
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00313001
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BIASP-1714
- Conditions
- Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 373 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novo Nordisk A/SIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2006
- Primary completion
- Jul 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Apr 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This trial is conducted in the United States of America (USA). The study will compare A1C reduction achieved in patients receiving biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 once or twice daily to patients receiving exenatide twice daily. Patients enrolled in the study will be insulin naive patients who have not achieved glycemic control with metformin and sulfonylurea.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Type 2 diabetes
- HbA1C: At least 8%
- Patients that were never treated with insulin before
- Current therapy with metformin and a sulfonylurea.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- History of recurrent, severe hypoglycemia
- Hepatic insufficiency: ALT, AST or alkaline phosphatase > 2.5 times upper limits of laboratory's normal
- Renal insufficiency: serum creatinine > 1.3 mg/dL (males) or > 1.2 mg/dL (females)
- Severe gastrointestinal disease, including gastroparesis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| biphasic insulin aspart | Drug | – |
| exenatide | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Superiority as assessed by HbA1c reduction
Time frame: at 24 weeks
2 secondary outcomes
Safety variables
Patient satisfaction
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jan 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 19210140Bergenstal R, Lewin A, Bailey T, Chang D, Gylvin T, Roberts V; NovoLog Mix-vs.-Exenatide Study Group. Efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 versus exenatide in subjects with type 2 diabetes failing to achieve glycemic control with metformin and a sulfonylurea. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Jan;25(1):65-75. doi: 10.1185/03007990802597951.
- Clinical Trials at Novo NordiskLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Global Clinical Registry (GCR, 1452) study director
Novo Nordisk A/S
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing biphasic insulin aspart and exenatide in people with Diabetes and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Novo Nordisk A/S at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Superiority as assessed by HbA1c reduction (time frame: at 24 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00313001, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2017.