AnemiaPhase 3NCT00317239
VIT45 Versus Oral Iron in the Treatment of Anemia in Non-Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease
A Phase 3 study testing Ferrous Sulfate tablets and Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) in people with Anemia, run by American Regent, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study compares the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) iron (VIT45) versus oral iron (ferrous sulfate) administered to subjects who suffer from anemia and are diagnosed with non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Anemia
- What is being tested?
- Ferrous Sulfate tablets and Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 255 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2005to Aug 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Males or females > or = 12 years of age
- NDD-CKD subjects
- Baseline hemoglobin < or = 11g/dl
- Stable erythropoietin (EPO) status
Who cannot join
- Known hypersensitivity to ferrous sulfate or IV iron
- Unstable EPO status
- Anemia not related to CKD
- Chronic, serious infection
- Recent IV iron
- Recent blood transfusion
Show all 10Show fewer
- Recent blood loss
- Need for surgery
- Received investigational drug within 30 days
- Female subjects who are pregnant or lactating
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Luitpold Pharmaceuticals
Norristown, Pennsylvania, 19403
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Safety & Efficacy of a Unique Intravenous Iron (VIT45) Preparation vs Oral Iron in the Treatment of Anemia in Non-Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease
This study compares the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) iron (VIT45) versus oral iron (ferrous sulfate) administered to subjects who suffer from anemia and are diagnosed with non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD).
Read the detailed description
This study compares the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) iron (VIT45) versus oral iron (ferrous sulfate) administered to subjects who suffer from anemia and are diagnosed with non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD).
- Conditions
- Anemia
- Being tested
- Ferrous Sulfate tablets, Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
- Keywords
- Anemia, Chronic Kidney Disease, Iron
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ferrous Sulfate tabletsDrug
325 mg/TID x 8 weeks
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)Drug
A maximum dose of 1,000 mg of FCM over 15 minutes on day 0, and a maximum dose of 500 mg of FCM over 15 minutes on days 17 and 31 based on Ferritin and TSAT values.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) | Experimental | A maximum dose of 1,000 mg of FCM over 15 minutes on day 0, and a maximum dose of 500 mg of FCM over 15 minutes on days 17 and 31 based on Ferritin and TSAT values. Receives: Drug: Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) |
| Ferrous Sulfate tablets | Active comparator | 325 mg/TID x 8 weeks Receives: Drug: Ferrous Sulfate tablets |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Subjects Achieving an Increase in Hemoglobin ≥1g/dL
Measured: anytime during the study
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Apr 2006 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2005
- Primary completionFeb 2007
- Study completionAug 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 255 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- American Regent, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00317239
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1VIT04004
- Status last verified
- Jan 2018
- First submitted
- 20 Apr 2006
- Last updated
- 20 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Qunibi WY, Martinez C, Smith M, Benjamin J, Mangione A, Roger SD. A randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous ferric carboxymaltose with oral iron for treatment of iron deficiency anaemia of non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 May;26(5):1599-607. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq613. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
PubMed 20929915Qunibi W, Martinez C, Smith M, Benjamin J, Dinh Q. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing IV Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) to Oral Iron in Anemic Patients with Non-Dialysis-Dependent CKD. American Society of Nephrology Renal Week 2007.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Safety & Efficacy of a Unique Intravenous Iron (VIT45) Preparation vs Oral Iron in the Treatment of Anemia in Non-Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00317239
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1VIT04004
- Conditions
- Anemia
- Keywords
- Anemia, Chronic Kidney Disease, Iron
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 255 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- American Regent, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2005
- Primary completion
- Feb 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Apr 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Nov 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study compares the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) iron (VIT45) versus oral iron (ferrous sulfate) administered to subjects who suffer from anemia and are diagnosed with non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD).
Detailed description
This study compares the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) iron (VIT45) versus oral iron (ferrous sulfate) administered to subjects who suffer from anemia and are diagnosed with non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) | Experimental | Drug: Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)A maximum dose of 1,000 mg of FCM over 15 minutes on day 0, and a maximum dose of 500 mg of FCM over 15 minutes on days 17 and 31 based on Ferritin and TSAT values. |
| Ferrous Sulfate tablets | Active comparator | Drug: Ferrous Sulfate tablets325 mg/TID x 8 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Males or females > or = 12 years of age
- NDD-CKD subjects
- Baseline hemoglobin < or = 11g/dl
- Stable erythropoietin (EPO) status
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Known hypersensitivity to ferrous sulfate or IV iron
- Unstable EPO status
- Anemia not related to CKD
- Chronic, serious infection
- Recent IV iron
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrous Sulfate tablets325 mg/TID x 8 weeks | Drug | Ferrous Sulfate tablets |
| Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)A maximum dose of 1,000 mg of FCM over 15 minutes on day 0, and a maximum dose of 500 mg of FCM over 15 minutes on days 17 and 31 based on Ferritin and TSAT values. | Drug | Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) |
Primary outcome
Number of Subjects Achieving an Increase in Hemoglobin ≥1g/dL
Time frame: anytime during the study
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Feb 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 20929915Qunibi WY, Martinez C, Smith M, Benjamin J, Mangione A, Roger SD. A randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous ferric carboxymaltose with oral iron for treatment of iron deficiency anaemia of non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 May;26(5):1599-607. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq613. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
- Results publicationQunibi W, Martinez C, Smith M, Benjamin J, Dinh Q. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing IV Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) to Oral Iron in Anemic Patients with Non-Dialysis-Dependent CKD. American Society of Nephrology Renal Week 2007.
Related trials for Anemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
The Safety and Efficacy of Daratumumab in Patients With Refractory Aplastic Anemia
Aplastic Anemia, Refractory
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study of YTS109 Cell Injection in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, Anti-CD19 STAR T-cell Therapy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Systematic Intraoperative Cell Salvage in On-Pump Cardiac Surgery Within a Mature Patient Blood Management Programme
Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Blood Transfusion
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingObservational study
Defining the Natural History of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Fanconi Anemia
Fanconi Anemia, Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ferrous Sulfate tablets and Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) in people with Anemia, run by American Regent, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Nov 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Subjects Achieving an Increase in Hemoglobin ≥1g/dL (time frame: anytime during the study). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00317239, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Feb 2018.