AzTrials
AzTrials

Crohn DiseasePhase 2NCT00317369

A Dose-finding Study of OPC-6535 in Patients With Active Crohn's Disease

A Phase 2 study testing OPC-6535(Tetomilast) in people with Crohn Disease, run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. at 8 sites in Japan.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study to examine the safety and efficacy of OPC-6535 and determine its optimal dose by once-daily oral administration at 0, 25, or 50 mg for 8 weeks in combination with a fixed oral dose of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) or in combination with a fixed oral dose of 5-ASA and enteral nutrition in… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Crohn Disease
What is being tested?
OPC-6535(Tetomilast)
How many people
29 participants
Where
8 sitesJapan
Study dates
May 2006to Aug 2007
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with active Crohn's disease
  • Patients who have a primary lesion in either the small intestine or the large intestine
  • Patients who have been receiving an oral 5-ASA formulation at a fixed regimen and at a fixed dose
  • Patients who have either never received enteral nutrition or have been receiving enteral nutrition at a fixed intake of 1200 kcal/day or less
  • Either inpatient or outpatient

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have an external fistula (including anal fistula) in which persistent drainage is observed (and who require treatment with antibiotics or synthetic antibacterial agents)
  • Patients with short bowel syndrome (and who require intravenous nutritional support due to insufficient intestinal nutrient uptake)
  • Patients with an artificial anus
  • Patients who have a complication of serious infectious disease (intra-abdominal abscess, etc.)
  • Patients who have a complication of malignant tumor
  • Female patients who are pregnant, lactating, or possibly pregnant, or who wish to become pregnant during the study period

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country.

8 sites in 1 country

Japan8 sites
  • Study site

    Chubu Region

  • Study site

    Chugoku Region

  • Study site

    Hokkaido Region

  • Study site

    Kanto Region

  • Study site

    Kinki Region

  • Study site

    Kyushu Region

  • Study site

    Shikoku Region

  • Study site

    Touhoku Region

Other trials in Japan

About this study

The purpose of this study to examine the safety and efficacy of OPC-6535 and determine its optimal dose by once-daily oral administration at 0, 25, or 50 mg for 8 weeks in combination with a fixed oral dose of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) or in combination with a fixed oral dose of 5-ASA and enteral nutrition in patients with active Crohn's disease.

Conditions
Crohn Disease
Being tested
OPC-6535(Tetomilast)
Keywords
OPC-6535, Crohn's disease
Medical subject headings
Crohn Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OPC-6535(Tetomilast)Drug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical Improvement Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Clinical Improvement/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100) After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

    Definition of clinical improvement: Total Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score improved by at least 70 points from the baseline score or to below 150 (CDAI < 150: Remission, CDAI > 450: severe disease)

    Measured: Week 8

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Clinical Improvement Rate After 2 and 4 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

    Definition of clinical improvement: Total CDAI score improved by at least 70 points from the baseline score or to below 150 (CDAI < 150: Remission, CDAI > 450: severe disease)

    Measured: Week 2, Week 4

  2. Remission Rate (Number of Patients Showing Remission/Number of Patients Evaluated x 100) After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

    Definition of remission: Total CDAI score improved to below 150

    Measured: Week 2, Week 4,Week 8

  3. Clinical Improvement Rate (50) by Change in Total CDAI Score (Number of Subjects for Each Change/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100) After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

    Definition of clinical improvement (50) : Total CDAI score improved by at least 50 points from the baseline score or to below 150 (CDAI < 150: Remission, CDAI > 450: severe disease)

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Total CDAI Score After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

    CDAI scores range approximately from 0 to 600, higher scores indicating greater disease activity (CDAI < 150: Remission, CDAI > 450: Very severe). A negative change in mean score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8

  5. Mean Change From the Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

    The IBDQ has been frequently adopted in Japanese and overseas clinical assessments as a scale for evaluating the quality of life (QOL) of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The IBDQ score was calculated as the sum of the responses (each ranging from 1 to 7) to all 32 questions that address symptoms as a result of Crohn's disease: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function, and social function. Total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QOL.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 8

  6. Mean Change From the Baseline in Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) Score After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

    Large bowel endoscopic findings were assessed based on the CDEIS. The CDEIS considers deep ulcer, superficial ulcer, lesion ratio of , and ulcer ratio of the 5 pre-defined segments of the colon (small intestine, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score ranges from 0 to 44 where higher scores indicate more severe disease.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 8

  7. Mean Change in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level From the Baseline After 4 and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4 and 8

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Apr 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2006
  3. Primary completion11 Jul 2007
  4. Study completionAug 2007

Why it stopped: Efficacy was not cleared at US study

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
29 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00317369
Sponsor's protocol ID
197-05-001
Other IDs
JapicCTI-060217
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
21 Apr 2006
Last updated
15 Feb 2021
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing OPC-6535(Tetomilast) in people with Crohn Disease, run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. at 8 sites in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Feb 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical Improvement Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Clinical Improvement/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100) After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration (time frame: Week 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in