MalariaPhase 4NCT00317590
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of a Rapid Diagnostic Test for Malaria
A Phase 4 study testing Rapid Diagnostic Test for Malaria (Paracheck®) in people with Malaria, run by Centro per le Malattie Tropicali at 1 site in Burkina Faso.
Trial summary
There is increasing evidence from African countries, including Burkina Faso, that at least in some settings/seasons the proportion of fevers attributable to malaria is low or very low: this means that the current strategy of treating all fever cases as malaria is only to the advantage of very few. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 months and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Malaria
- What is being tested?
- Rapid Diagnostic Test for Malaria (Paracheck®)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 4,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBurkina Faso
- Study dates
- Apr 2006to Oct 2006
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 months and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients > 6 months presenting to clinical consultation and consenting to participate/with parental consent to participate.
Who cannot join
- Refusal to participate.
- Severe clinical conditions with emergency treatment needed as judged by the clinical officer.
- Pregnancy NOT an exclusion criterion
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Burkina Faso1 site
Districts Médicaux de Banfora et de Bobo 15
Bobo-Dioulasso, Hauts-Bassins Region
About this study
Official title: Evaluation de l'utilité et du coût-efficacité du Test Rapide Paracheck® Pour la Prise en Charge Des Cas de Paludisme Dans Les régions Des Hauts Bassins et Des Cascades, au Burkina Faso
There is increasing evidence from African countries, including Burkina Faso, that at least in some settings/seasons the proportion of fevers attributable to malaria is low or very low: this means that the current strategy of treating all fever cases as malaria is only to the advantage of very few. Rapid, antigenic tests might be of help, particularly in peripheral health centres such as the "Centres de Santé et Promotion Sociale" (CSPS) that lack any laboratory facilities. Nevertheless two major problems could arise:
- False negatives: as only the negative result would change the decision to treat, versus the current "presumptive" strategy, false negatives would not be treated for malaria.
- False positives: they would be exposed to the risk to be left without treatment for the true cause of their fever instead.
Read more
The main purpose of this study is to assess if the short term outcome of febrile patients treated after testing with the Rapid Diagnostic Test Paracheck® is at least equivalent (not inferior) to that of controls (presumptively treated without any test) in terms of clearance of fever and other major symptoms and signs.
To do so, febrile patients will be randomly assigned to be submitted to the test before clinical decision, or to be managed the usual way with no test. A follow up will be carried out at Day 4th in order to determine the proportion of patients in both groups with persistence of fever and other main clinical symptoms.
Read the detailed description
Primary outcome: proportion of cases (fever patients randomised to be submitted to the rapid test before treatment) and controls (fever patients randomised not to be submitted to the rapid test) with persisting fever at follow-up.
Secondary outcomes:
- proportion of cases (fever patients randomised to be submitted to the rapid test before treatment) and controls (fever patients randomised not to be submitted to the rapid test) with persisting/new major clinical symptoms/signs and/or clinical complications at follow-up;
- proportion of cases and controls referred to hospital;
- prevalence of malaria infection among febrile and not febrile patients;
- attributable fraction (AF) of fever episodes to malaria infection (as established by subsequent microscopic examination of blood slide and determination of the parasitemia level);
- optimal cut-off level of parasitemia(treatment threshold) in order to define a case of malaria disease vs. a simple malaria infection (i.e., presence of malaria parasites in the blood but presumably not the cause of fever);
- performances of Paracheck® (sensitivity, specificity and predictive values) on malaria disease in the field, compared with expert reading;
- proportion of cases and controls with malaria disease that have not been treated with antimalarials/have been treated for other presumed causes of fever;
- proportion of cases and controls without malaria disease that have been treated with antimalarials/ have not been treated for other presumed causes of fever;
- proportion of cases and control receiving any other treatment, at enrolment and/or at follow up.
Cost - effectiveness models will take into account all costs involved in diagnosis and treatment both for malaria and other conditions.
Sample size. Sample size is determined for the main clinical outcome under study, that is, fever clearance. Expected freq of fever persistence at day 4th: 40 %; maximal accepted difference 10%; power of study 90%; alpha error 5%: sample size 814. We plan to enrol at least 500 subjects with fever per arm in both seasons, in order to account for loss to follow up.
Expected total enrolment: 4000 (1000 fever cases and 1000 patients without fever in each study period). Only fever patients will be randomised to be submitted or not to the rapid test. Patients without fever will be consecutively enrolled and submitted to malaria slides and clinical questionnaire, but not to the rapid test.
Study start: 24th April 2006.
Second Phase: 2nd October 2006.
In each study period at the end of the dry season and the end of the rainy season, for up to to three weeks in each study period, all patients > 6 months, presenting for clinical consultation at one of the 10 peripheral health centres participating in the study, responding to inclusion criteria and consenting to participate/with parental consent to participate, will be enrolled. All will be submitted free of charge to a thick film and a thin film for malaria, and a brief questionnaire on clinical history. All slides will be stored for further reading. Those patients with fever at presentation (axillary temperature >= 37.5°C), will be randomised (based on computer-generated random number lists) either to be submitted to a Paracheck® rapid test for malaria (cases), or to be managed the usual way, that is, on clinical grounds alone (controls). Only Paracheck® result will be used for decision on malaria treatment for cases. Treatment of controls, and treatment of any other condition for both cases and controls, will solely depend on the judgment of the clinical officer. No other formal algorithm will be followed than the national guidelines.
Sensitisation of the study sites and information to the public has been carried out before the start of the intervention. A detailed information about the study purposes and implications will be provided to all patients attending the clinical consultation, and witnessed signed informed consent will be obtained.
Inclusion criteria. All patients > 6 months presenting to clinical consultation and consenting to participate/with parental consent to participate.
Exclusion criteria. Refusal to participate. Severe clinical conditions with emergency treatment needed as judged by the clinical officer. Pregnancy not an exclusion criterion.
Follow-up. This will be carried out ad Day 4th after recruitment for fever patients only. The following main outcomes will be determined at follow-up:
- Duration/clearance of fever, time of fever clearance;
- Duration/clearance of other clinical symptoms/signs registered at entry;
- Appearance of new clinical symptoms/signs, including danger signs, according to a checklist;
- Patients submitted to new / modified treatment
- Patients needing referral to hospital
- Deaths.
- Conditions
- Malaria
- Being tested
- Rapid Diagnostic Test for Malaria (Paracheck®)
- Keywords
- Diagnosis, Rapid Diagnostic Test, Management, Attributable Fraction, Threshold
- Medical subject headings
- Malaria, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rapid Diagnostic Test for Malaria (Paracheck®)Device
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clearance of fever
Secondary outcomes (4)
Clearance of major clinical symptoms/signs
Attributable fraction (AF) of fever episodes to malaria
Performances of Paracheck® (sensitivity, specificity and predictive values) on malaria disease
Cost-effectiveness of Paracheck® vs. presumptive (clinical) management of fever
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Apr 2006 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2006
- Study completionOct 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for MalariaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 4,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centro per le Malattie Tropicali
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
- Investigators
- Zeno Bisoffi, MD, DTM&H, Principal investigator, Centro per le Malattie Tropicali, Ospedale S. Cuore, Negrar (Verona), Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00317590
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AnKaHeresoRDT
- Status last verified
- Oct 2007
- First submitted
- 23 Apr 2006
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2007
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Oct 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation de l'utilité et du coût-efficacité du Test Rapide Paracheck® Pour la Prise en Charge Des Cas de Paludisme Dans Les régions Des Hauts Bassins et Des Cascades, au Burkina Faso
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00317590
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AnKaHeresoRDT
- Conditions
- Malaria
- Keywords
- Diagnosis, Rapid Diagnostic Test, Management, Attributable Fraction, Threshold
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 4,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centro per le Malattie TropicaliUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
- Study start
- Apr 2006
- Study completion
- Oct 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Apr 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There is increasing evidence from African countries, including Burkina Faso, that at least in some settings/seasons the proportion of fevers attributable to malaria is low or very low: this means that the current strategy of treating all fever cases as malaria is only to the advantage of very few. Rapid, antigenic tests might be of help, particularly in peripheral health centres such as the "Centres de Santé et Promotion Sociale" (CSPS) that lack any laboratory facilities. Nevertheless two major problems could arise:
- False negatives: as only the negative result would change the decision to treat, versus the current "presumptive" strategy, false negatives would not be treated for malaria.
- False positives: they would be exposed to the risk to be left without treatment for the true cause of their fever instead.
The main purpose of this study is to assess if the short term outcome of febrile patients treated after testing with the Rapid Diagnostic Test Paracheck® is at least equivalent (not inferior) to that of controls (presumptively treated without any test) in terms of clearance of fever and other major symptoms and signs.
To do so, febrile patients will be randomly assigned to be submitted to the test before clinical decision, or to be managed the usual way with no test. A follow up will be carried out at Day 4th in order to determine the proportion of patients in both groups with persistence of fever and other main clinical symptoms.
Detailed description
Primary outcome: proportion of cases (fever patients randomised to be submitted to the rapid test before treatment) and controls (fever patients randomised not to be submitted to the rapid test) with persisting fever at follow-up.
Secondary outcomes:
- proportion of cases (fever patients randomised to be submitted to the rapid test before treatment) and controls (fever patients randomised not to be submitted to the rapid test) with persisting/new major clinical symptoms/signs and/or clinical complications at follow-up;
- proportion of cases and controls referred to hospital;
- prevalence of malaria infection among febrile and not febrile patients;
- attributable fraction (AF) of fever episodes to malaria infection (as established by subsequent microscopic examination of blood slide and determination of the parasitemia level);
- optimal cut-off level of parasitemia(treatment threshold) in order to define a case of malaria disease vs. a simple malaria infection (i.e., presence of malaria parasites in the blood but presumably not the cause of fever);
- performances of Paracheck® (sensitivity, specificity and predictive values) on malaria disease in the field, compared with expert reading;
- proportion of cases and controls with malaria disease that have not been treated with antimalarials/have been treated for other presumed causes of fever;
- proportion of cases and controls without malaria disease that have been treated with antimalarials/ have not been treated for other presumed causes of fever;
- proportion of cases and control receiving any other treatment, at enrolment and/or at follow up.
Cost - effectiveness models will take into account all costs involved in diagnosis and treatment both for malaria and other conditions.
Sample size. Sample size is determined for the main clinical outcome under study, that is, fever clearance. Expected freq of fever persistence at day 4th: 40 %; maximal accepted difference 10%; power of study 90%; alpha error 5%: sample size 814. We plan to enrol at least 500 subjects with fever per arm in both seasons, in order to account for loss to follow up.
Expected total enrolment: 4000 (1000 fever cases and 1000 patients without fever in each study period). Only fever patients will be randomised to be submitted or not to the rapid test. Patients without fever will be consecutively enrolled and submitted to malaria slides and clinical questionnaire, but not to the rapid test.
Study start: 24th April 2006.
Second Phase: 2nd October 2006.
In each study period at the end of the dry season and the end of the rainy season, for up to to three weeks in each study period, all patients > 6 months, presenting for clinical consultation at one of the 10 peripheral health centres participating in the study, responding to inclusion criteria and consenting to participate/with parental consent to participate, will be enrolled. All will be submitted free of charge to a thick film and a thin film for malaria, and a brief questionnaire on clinical history. All slides will be stored for further reading. Those patients with fever at presentation (axillary temperature >= 37.5°C), will be randomised (based on computer-generated random number lists) either to be submitted to a Paracheck® rapid test for malaria (cases), or to be managed the usual way, that is, on clinical grounds alone (controls). Only Paracheck® result will be used for decision on malaria treatment for cases. Treatment of controls, and treatment of any other condition for both cases and controls, will solely depend on the judgment of the clinical officer. No other formal algorithm will be followed than the national guidelines.
Sensitisation of the study sites and information to the public has been carried out before the start of the intervention. A detailed information about the study purposes and implications will be provided to all patients attending the clinical consultation, and witnessed signed informed consent will be obtained.
Inclusion criteria. All patients > 6 months presenting to clinical consultation and consenting to participate/with parental consent to participate.
Exclusion criteria. Refusal to participate. Severe clinical conditions with emergency treatment needed as judged by the clinical officer. Pregnancy not an exclusion criterion.
Follow-up. This will be carried out ad Day 4th after recruitment for fever patients only. The following main outcomes will be determined at follow-up:
- Duration/clearance of fever, time of fever clearance;
- Duration/clearance of other clinical symptoms/signs registered at entry;
- Appearance of new clinical symptoms/signs, including danger signs, according to a checklist;
- Patients submitted to new / modified treatment
- Patients needing referral to hospital
- Deaths.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 months and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients > 6 months presenting to clinical consultation and consenting to participate/with parental consent to participate.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Refusal to participate.
- Severe clinical conditions with emergency treatment needed as judged by the clinical officer.
- Pregnancy NOT an exclusion criterion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid Diagnostic Test for Malaria (Paracheck®) | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Clearance of fever
4 secondary outcomes
Clearance of major clinical symptoms/signs
Attributable fraction (AF) of fever episodes to malaria
Performances of Paracheck® (sensitivity, specificity and predictive values) on malaria disease
Cost-effectiveness of Paracheck® vs. presumptive (clinical) management of fever
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Oct 2007.
Related trials for Malaria
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Trajectories and Mechanisms of Recovery From Malaria: An Observational Study
Malaria
Not yet recruiting
Positron Emission Tomography and Organ-Specific Changes in Participants Co-Enrolled in NIH Studies of Plasmodium Vivax Controlled Human Malaria Infection
Healthy Volunteer, Malaria
Recruiting
The Effects of Iron Treatment on Vaccine Immunogenicity in Kenyan Infants With Iron Deficiency
Iron Deficiencies
RecruitingObservational study
Host and Parasite Factors That Influence Susceptibility to Malaria Infection and Disease During Pregnancy and Early Childhood in Ouelessebougou and Bamako, Mali
Malaria
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of PfSPZ-LARC2 Vaccine Against CHMI in Malaria-Naïve Adults
Malaria Falciparum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Zeno Bisoffi, MD, DTM&H principal investigator
Centro per le Malattie Tropicali, Ospedale S. Cuore, Negrar (Verona), Italy
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Rapid Diagnostic Test for Malaria (Paracheck®) in people with Malaria, run by Centro per le Malattie Tropicali at 1 site in Burkina Faso.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Burkina Faso. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clearance of fever. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2007.