Conscious SedationPhase 4NCT00318955
Post-Marketing Clinical Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine in Post-Operative Patients
A Phase 4 study testing Dexmedetomidine and Propofol in people with Conscious Sedation, run by Hospira, now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer at 13 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine at the time of extubation and after extubation, in patients requiring postoperative sedation in the ICU. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Conscious Sedation
- What is being tested?
- Dexmedetomidine and Propofol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 85 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- Nov 2005to Aug 2006
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient or legally acceptable representative (if acceptable by Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee) has signed and dated the Informed Consent after the study has been fully explained.
- Patient is male or female; at least 20 years of age.
- Patient who is in condition of American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I to III Class preoperatively
- Patient is orally intubated and anticipated to require sedation for mechanical ventilation for a minimum period of 4 hours following open-heart surgery, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), or major vascular surgery
- If patient is female with child bearing potential, she is to be non-pregnant, and not lactating
Who cannot join
- Patient with serious disturbance of the central nervous system (disturbance of consciousness).
- Patient has undergone or requires intracranial surgery during current hospitalization
- Patient requires muscle relaxant drugs after admission to the ICU (except when an endotracheal tube is reinserted).
- Patient requires epidural or intrathecal administration of analgesia/anesthesia after surgery and during their ICU stay.
- Patients for whom propofol or opioids are contraindicated.
- Patient has known or suspected allergies to any medication that might be administered during the course of the study.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Patient is obese (body mass index >35)
- Patient was recently hospitalized for drug overdose
- Patient for whom alpha-2 antagonists or alpha-2 agonists are contraindicated
- Patient is currently or previously treated, within 30 days before the start of the study, with an alpha-2 antagonist or alpha-2 receptor agonist.
- Patient has participated in another clinical study within 30 days prior to admission to the ICU and patient is currently participating in another clinical study.
- Patient was diagnosed with severe symptoms and judged likely to die within 24 hours.
- Patient is considered unable to undergo all procedures required by the protocol.
- Patient with excessive bleeding that is likely require reoperation.
- Patient with an ejection fraction of < 30%.
- Patient, in the opinion of the investigator or subinvestigator in the post-marketing clinical study, that has symptoms or factors that may increase his/her risk as a result of the clinical study, or that may not provide sufficient study data.
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country.
13 sites in 1 country
Japan13 sites
Nippon Medical School Hospital
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo
Hamamatsu University Hospital
Hamamatsu, Shizuoka
Kyushu University Hospital
Higashiku, Fukuoka
Hirosaki University Hospital
Hirosaki-shi, Aomori
Kagoshima University Medical and Dental Hospital
Kagoshima, Kagoshima-ken
Osaka City General Hospital
Miyakojima-ku, Osaka
Nagasaki University Hospital of Medicine and Dentistry
Nagasaki, Nagasaki
Okayama University Hospital of Medicine and Dentistry
Okayama, Okayama-ken
Kinki University Hospital
Osaka-Sayama-Shi, Osaka
Kyoto University Hospital
Sakyoku, Kyoto
Showa University Hospital
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo
Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo
Osaka University Hospital
Suita, Osaka
About this study
Official title: A Post-Marketing, Open-Label, Randomized, Comparative Study Comparing the Usefulness of Dexmedetomidine at the Time of Extubation and Post Extubation Period to Other Sedative Management in Post-Operative Patients
The purpose of this study is to assess efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine at the time of extubation and after extubation, in patients requiring postoperative sedation in the ICU.
Read the detailed description
The study is to conduct as a phase IV post-marketing clinical study in accordance with the approval condition of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride in Japan. The study will compare the use of dexmedetomidine in patient management at the time of extubation with other sedative/ analgesic management, Comparison is made in the use of dexmedetomidine in patient management between a group in which management is performed with dexmedetomidine and a group in which standard management is performed with propofol in patients requiring postoperative sedation in the ICU The usefulness of dexmedetomidine during postextubation period is also evaluated.
- Conditions
- Conscious Sedation
- Being tested
- Dexmedetomidine, Propofol
- Keywords
- Dexmedetomidine, Sedation, Extubation, Phase 4
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DexmedetomidineDrug
PropofolDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dexmedetomidine group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Dexmedetomidine |
| Propofol group | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Propofol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of patients who maintained a Richmond Agitation-Sedation score =0, -1, -2
Measured: Continuously from 1 hour before extubation or end of propofol infusion before extubation, whichever is later, to 1 hour after extubation
Secondary outcomes (11)
Variations in vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate) in patients
Measured: From 10 minutes before extubation to 10 minutes after extubation
Percentage of patients who required analgesia and received supplemental fentanyl before and after extubation
Measured: From 7 days prior to surgery to the start of surgery, and from the end of surgery to 48 hrs after the start of infusion
Percentage of patients with a total score of 3 on the Behavioral Pain Scale just before extubation
Measured: 10±2 minutes before extubation, 2±1 minutes after extubation
Percentage of patients who required supplemental sedation after extubation
Measured: After extubation to 24 hours after the start of study drug infusion.
Percentage of patients who require post-extubation analgesia and who received supplemental fentanyl after extubation
Measured: After extubation to 24 hours after the start of study drug infusion.
Amount of supplemental fentanyl required after extubation
Measured: After extubation to 24 hours after the start of study drug infusion.
Ratio of time with a Richmond Agitation-Sedation score ≥+1
Measured: From 1 hour before extubation or the end of propofol infusion before extubation, whichever was later, to 1 hour after extubation
Distribution of Richmond Agitation-Sedation score most frequently recorded while intubated
Measured: From the start of study drug administration to 1 hour before the expected time of extubation.
Ease of patient management on the basis of a questionnaire to physicians and nurses
Measured: Conducted to the greatest possible extent, at ICU discharge or at 36 hours after the start of drug administration, whichever is earlier (in Part II only).
Assessment of interactions between dexmedetomidine and propofol or fentanyl
Measured: After propofol or fentanyl administration (Pre-dose and Post dose [5 and 10 minutes])
Patient self-evaluation of experiences during their stay in the ICU
Measured: Conducted to the greatest possible extent, at ICU discharge or at 36 hours after the start of drug administration, whichever is earlier (in Part II only).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Apr 2006 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2005
- Primary completionAug 2006
- Study completionAug 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Conscious SedationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospira, now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Maruishi Pharmaceutical
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Misa Kawai, Study director, Hospira, now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00318955
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DEX-401
- Status last verified
- Jun 2015
- First submitted
- 18 Apr 2006
- Last updated
- 20 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Aitkenhead AR. Analgesia and sedation in intensive care. Br J Anaesth. 1989 Aug;63(2):196-206. doi: 10.1093/bja/63.2.196. No abstract available.
PubMed 2669909Minoru Kaneshiro. Analgesic and Sedatin during mechanical ventilation, ICU and CCU 14:14643-648,1990
Syu Matsukawa, et.al.Sedation during ventilation control, ICU and CCU 14:603-608,1990
Megumu Tagami et.al. Post-operative analgesic and sedation control,
Greenblatt DJ, Divoll M, Abernethy DR, Ochs HR, Shader RI. Clinical pharmacokinetics of the newer benzodiazepines. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1983 May-Jun;8(3):233-52. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198308030-00003.
PubMed 6133664Hidekazu Yukioka, et.al. Current status of analgesic and sedation control in ICU. Japan ICU Treatment Association's Magazine 1:13-19, 1994
Masayoshi Hyodo et.al. Anesthetic Science, 10th edition, Kinpodo, ppl 213-219
Ikuto Yoshiya. Section 4; Pharmacology for Anesthesia, Introduction to Anesthesiology, 7th edition, Nagai Shoten,pp439-447, 1993
Ikuto Yoshiya: Sedation and Analgesia for Intensive Care Patients. Anesthesia 21(2):2-6, 333-337, 2000
Costas Katsanoulas. Concluding Remarks: Redefining Intensive Care Unit Sedation, International Congress and Symposium Series 221, 83-88
Mantz,J., Singer,M. Importance of Patient Orientation and Rousability as Components of Intensive Care Unit Sedation, International Congress and Symposium Series 221, 23-29
Hewitt PB. Subjective follow-up of patients from a surgical intensive therapy ward. Br Med J. 1970 Dec 12;4(5736):669-73. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5736.669.
PubMed 4098972
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Post-Marketing, Open-Label, Randomized, Comparative Study Comparing the Usefulness of Dexmedetomidine at the Time of Extubation and Post Extubation Period to Other Sedative Management in Post-Operative Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00318955
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DEX-401
- Conditions
- Conscious Sedation
- Keywords
- Dexmedetomidine, Sedation, Extubation, Phase 4
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospira, now a wholly owned subsidiary of PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Maruishi Pharmaceutical
- Study start
- Nov 2005
- Primary completion
- Aug 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Apr 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine at the time of extubation and after extubation, in patients requiring postoperative sedation in the ICU.
Detailed description
The study is to conduct as a phase IV post-marketing clinical study in accordance with the approval condition of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride in Japan. The study will compare the use of dexmedetomidine in patient management at the time of extubation with other sedative/ analgesic management, Comparison is made in the use of dexmedetomidine in patient management between a group in which management is performed with dexmedetomidine and a group in which standard management is performed with propofol in patients requiring postoperative sedation in the ICU The usefulness of dexmedetomidine during postextubation period is also evaluated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dexmedetomidine group | Experimental | Drug: Dexmedetomidine |
| Propofol group | Active comparator | Drug: Propofol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patient or legally acceptable representative (if acceptable by Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee) has signed and dated the Informed Consent after the study has been fully explained.
- Patient is male or female; at least 20 years of age.
- Patient who is in condition of American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I to III Class preoperatively
- Patient is orally intubated and anticipated to require sedation for mechanical ventilation for a minimum period of 4 hours following open-heart surgery, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), or major vascular surgery
- If patient is female with child bearing potential, she is to be non-pregnant, and not lactating
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Patient with serious disturbance of the central nervous system (disturbance of consciousness).
- Patient has undergone or requires intracranial surgery during current hospitalization
- Patient requires muscle relaxant drugs after admission to the ICU (except when an endotracheal tube is reinserted).
- Patient requires epidural or intrathecal administration of analgesia/anesthesia after surgery and during their ICU stay.
- Patients for whom propofol or opioids are contraindicated.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dexmedetomidine | Drug | Dexmedetomidine group |
| Propofol | Drug | Propofol group |
Primary outcome
Percentage of patients who maintained a Richmond Agitation-Sedation score =0, -1, -2
Time frame: Continuously from 1 hour before extubation or end of propofol infusion before extubation, whichever is later, to 1 hour after extubation
11 secondary outcomes
Variations in vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate) in patients
Time frame: From 10 minutes before extubation to 10 minutes after extubation
Percentage of patients who required analgesia and received supplemental fentanyl before and after extubation
Time frame: From 7 days prior to surgery to the start of surgery, and from the end of surgery to 48 hrs after the start of infusion
Percentage of patients with a total score of 3 on the Behavioral Pain Scale just before extubation
Time frame: 10±2 minutes before extubation, 2±1 minutes after extubation
Percentage of patients who required supplemental sedation after extubation
Time frame: After extubation to 24 hours after the start of study drug infusion.
Percentage of patients who require post-extubation analgesia and who received supplemental fentanyl after extubation
Time frame: After extubation to 24 hours after the start of study drug infusion.
Amount of supplemental fentanyl required after extubation
Time frame: After extubation to 24 hours after the start of study drug infusion.
Ratio of time with a Richmond Agitation-Sedation score ≥+1
Time frame: From 1 hour before extubation or the end of propofol infusion before extubation, whichever was later, to 1 hour after extubation
Distribution of Richmond Agitation-Sedation score most frequently recorded while intubated
Time frame: From the start of study drug administration to 1 hour before the expected time of extubation.
Ease of patient management on the basis of a questionnaire to physicians and nurses
Time frame: Conducted to the greatest possible extent, at ICU discharge or at 36 hours after the start of drug administration, whichever is earlier (in Part II only).
Assessment of interactions between dexmedetomidine and propofol or fentanyl
Time frame: After propofol or fentanyl administration (Pre-dose and Post dose [5 and 10 minutes])
Patient self-evaluation of experiences during their stay in the ICU
Time frame: Conducted to the greatest possible extent, at ICU discharge or at 36 hours after the start of drug administration, whichever is earlier (in Part II only).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Mar 2017.
- Background: PubMed 2669909Aitkenhead AR. Analgesia and sedation in intensive care. Br J Anaesth. 1989 Aug;63(2):196-206. doi: 10.1093/bja/63.2.196. No abstract available.
- BackgroundMinoru Kaneshiro. Analgesic and Sedatin during mechanical ventilation, ICU and CCU 14:14643-648,1990
- BackgroundSyu Matsukawa, et.al.Sedation during ventilation control, ICU and CCU 14:603-608,1990
- BackgroundMegumu Tagami et.al. Post-operative analgesic and sedation control,
- Background: PubMed 6133664Greenblatt DJ, Divoll M, Abernethy DR, Ochs HR, Shader RI. Clinical pharmacokinetics of the newer benzodiazepines. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1983 May-Jun;8(3):233-52. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198308030-00003.
- BackgroundHidekazu Yukioka, et.al. Current status of analgesic and sedation control in ICU. Japan ICU Treatment Association's Magazine 1:13-19, 1994
- BackgroundMasayoshi Hyodo et.al. Anesthetic Science, 10th edition, Kinpodo, ppl 213-219
- BackgroundIkuto Yoshiya. Section 4; Pharmacology for Anesthesia, Introduction to Anesthesiology, 7th edition, Nagai Shoten,pp439-447, 1993
- BackgroundIkuto Yoshiya: Sedation and Analgesia for Intensive Care Patients. Anesthesia 21(2):2-6, 333-337, 2000
- BackgroundCostas Katsanoulas. Concluding Remarks: Redefining Intensive Care Unit Sedation, International Congress and Symposium Series 221, 83-88
- BackgroundMantz,J., Singer,M. Importance of Patient Orientation and Rousability as Components of Intensive Care Unit Sedation, International Congress and Symposium Series 221, 23-29
- Background: PubMed 4098972Hewitt PB. Subjective follow-up of patients from a surgical intensive therapy ward. Br Med J. 1970 Dec 12;4(5736):669-73. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5736.669.
Related trials for Conscious Sedation
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion Versus Dexmedetomidine for Sedation During Chronic Subdural Hematoma Surgery Under Local Anesthesia
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Active, not recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia in Pulsed-Field Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation (Paroxysmal)
Recruiting
Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Pulsed Field Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
Minimal Sedation Versus Standard Continuous Sedation After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury
Recruiting
Restoration of Consciousness With Ultrasonic Deep Brain Stimulation During Anesthetic Sedation
Mental Function
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Misa Kawai study director
Hospira, now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Dexmedetomidine and Propofol in people with Conscious Sedation, run by Hospira, now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer at 13 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of patients who maintained a Richmond Agitation-Sedation score =0, -1, -2 (time frame: Continuously from 1 hour before extubation or end of propofol infusion before extubation, whichever is later, to 1 hour after extubation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00318955, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2017.