Bone MetastasesPhase 3NCT00321464
A Study Comparing Denosumab vs. Zoledronic Acid for the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer Subjects.
A Phase 3 study testing Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in people with Bone Metastases, run by Amgen.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if denosumab is non-inferior to zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in subjects with advanced breast cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bone Metastases
- What is being tested?
- Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,049 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2006to 4 Apr 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults with histologically or cytologically confirmed breast adenocarcinoma
- radiographic evidence of at least one bone mets
- Easter Cooperative Oncology Group status of 0, 1 or 2;
- adequate organ function
Who cannot join
- Current or prior IV bisphosphonate administration
- current or prior oral bisphosphonates for bone mets
- life expectancy of less than 6 months
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study of Denosumab Compared With Zoledronic Acid (Zometa®) in the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Subjects With Advanced Breast Cancer
The purpose of this study is to determine if denosumab is non-inferior to zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in subjects with advanced breast cancer.
- Conditions
- Bone Metastases
- Being tested
- Denosumab, Zoledronic Acid
- Keywords
- Fractures, Compressions, Bisphosphonates, Bone metastases, Breast cancer, Skeletal, Radiation, Surgery to Bone
- Medical subject headings
- Fractures, Bone, Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DenosumabBiological
Q4W 120 mg denosumab SC injection and 4 mg zoledronic acid (Zometa) placebo IV over a minimum of 15 minutes
Zoledronic AcidDrug
Also called Zometa
Q4W 4 mg zoledronic acid IV over minimum 15 minutes and 120 mg denosumab placebo SC
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| zoledronic acid | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Zoledronic Acid |
| denosumab | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: Denosumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to First On-Study Skeletal Related Event (SRE) (Non-inferiority)
Time to first on-study skeletal-related event (SRE) using a non-inferiority analysis. The median time to first skeletal-related event could not be estimated in one treatment arm, so the subject incidence is presented.
Measured: Up to 34 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Time to First On-Study Skeletal-Related Event (Superiority)
Time to first on-study skeletal-related event (SRE) using a superiority analysis. The median time to first skeletal-related event could not be estimated in one treatment arm, so the subject incidence is presented.
Measured: Up to 34 months
Time to First and Subsequent On-Study Skeletal-Related Event
Time to first and subsequent on-study skeletal-related event (SRE) using a multiple event analysis. To be considered a subsequent SRE, the event must occur at least 21 days after the previous SRE. This outcome measure utilizes multiple event times, was analyzed based on a proportional mean model, and is therefore more appropriately summarized by the cumulative number of events.
Measured: Up to 34 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 May 2006 (estimated)
- Study start1 Apr 2006
- Primary completion20 Jul 2009
- Study completion4 Apr 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bone MetastasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AmgenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 2,049 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Daiichi Sankyo
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MD, Study director, Amgen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00321464
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20050136
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 2 May 2006
- Last updated
- 8 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Cleeland CS, Body JJ, Stopeck A, von Moos R, Fallowfield L, Mathias SD, Patrick DL, Clemons M, Tonkin K, Masuda N, Lipton A, de Boer R, Salvagni S, Oliveira CT, Qian Y, Jiang Q, Dansey R, Braun A, Chung K. Pain outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer and bone metastases: results from a randomized, double-blind study of denosumab and zoledronic acid. Cancer. 2013 Feb 15;119(4):832-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27789. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
PubMed 22951813Martin M, Bell R, Bourgeois H, Brufsky A, Diel I, Eniu A, Fallowfield L, Fujiwara Y, Jassem J, Paterson AH, Ritchie D, Steger GG, Stopeck A, Vogel C, Fan M, Jiang Q, Chung K, Dansey R, Braun A. Bone-related complications and quality of life in advanced breast cancer: results from a randomized phase III trial of denosumab versus zoledronic acid. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Sep 1;18(17):4841-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3310. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
PubMed 22893628Stopeck AT, Lipton A, Body JJ, Steger GG, Tonkin K, de Boer RH, Lichinitser M, Fujiwara Y, Yardley DA, Viniegra M, Fan M, Jiang Q, Dansey R, Jun S, Braun A. Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 10;28(35):5132-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.7101. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
PubMed 21060033Stopeck AT, Fizazi K, Body JJ, Brown JE, Carducci M, Diel I, Fujiwara Y, Martin M, Paterson A, Tonkin K, Shore N, Sieber P, Kueppers F, Karsh L, Yardley D, Wang H, Maniar T, Arellano J, Braun A. Safety of long-term denosumab therapy: results from the open label extension phase of two phase 3 studies in patients with metastatic breast and prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jan;24(1):447-455. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2904-5. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
PubMed 26335402Body JJ, Bone HG, de Boer RH, Stopeck A, Van Poznak C, Damiao R, Fizazi K, Henry DH, Ibrahim T, Lipton A, Saad F, Shore N, Takano T, Shaywitz AJ, Wang H, Bracco OL, Braun A, Kostenuik PJ. Hypocalcaemia in patients with metastatic bone disease treated with denosumab. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(13):1812-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
PubMed 26093811Diel IJ, Body JJ, Stopeck AT, Vadhan-Raj S, Spencer A, Steger G, von Moos R, Goldwasser F, Feng A, Braun A. The role of denosumab in the prevention of hypercalcaemia of malignancy in cancer patients with metastatic bone disease. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Jul;51(11):1467-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 May 11.
PubMed 25976743von Moos R, Body JJ, Egerdie B, Stopeck A, Brown JE, Damyanov D, Fallowfield LJ, Marx G, Cleeland CS, Patrick DL, Palazzo FG, Qian Y, Braun A, Chung K. Pain and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced solid tumours and bone metastases: integrated results from three randomized, double-blind studies of denosumab and zoledronic acid. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Dec;21(12):3497-507. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1932-2. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
PubMed 23975226Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, Henry DH, Brown JE, Yardley DA, Richardson GE, Siena S, Maroto P, Clemens M, Bilynskyy B, Charu V, Beuzeboc P, Rader M, Viniegra M, Saad F, Ke C, Braun A, Jun S. Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
PubMed 22975218
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study of Denosumab Compared With Zoledronic Acid (Zometa®) in the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Subjects With Advanced Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00321464
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20050136
- Conditions
- Bone Metastases
- Keywords
- Fractures, Compressions, Bisphosphonates, Bone metastases, Breast cancer, Skeletal, Radiation, Surgery to Bone
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,049 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmgenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Daiichi Sankyo
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2006 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jul 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Apr 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 May 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Mar 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine if denosumab is non-inferior to zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in subjects with advanced breast cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| zoledronic acid | Active comparator | Drug: Zoledronic Acid |
| denosumab | Experimental | Biological: Denosumab |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adults with histologically or cytologically confirmed breast adenocarcinoma
- radiographic evidence of at least one bone mets
- Easter Cooperative Oncology Group status of 0, 1 or 2;
- adequate organ function
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Current or prior IV bisphosphonate administration
- current or prior oral bisphosphonates for bone mets
- life expectancy of less than 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DenosumabQ4W 120 mg denosumab SC injection and 4 mg zoledronic acid (Zometa) placebo IV over a minimum of 15 minutes | Biological | denosumab |
| Zoledronic AcidAlso: ZometaQ4W 4 mg zoledronic acid IV over minimum 15 minutes and 120 mg denosumab placebo SC | Drug | zoledronic acid |
Primary outcome
Time to First On-Study Skeletal Related Event (SRE) (Non-inferiority)
Time frame: Up to 34 months
Time to first on-study skeletal-related event (SRE) using a non-inferiority analysis. The median time to first skeletal-related event could not be estimated in one treatment arm, so the subject incidence is presented.
2 secondary outcomes
Time to First On-Study Skeletal-Related Event (Superiority)
Time frame: Up to 34 months
Time to First and Subsequent On-Study Skeletal-Related Event
Time frame: Up to 34 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Nov 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 22951813Cleeland CS, Body JJ, Stopeck A, von Moos R, Fallowfield L, Mathias SD, Patrick DL, Clemons M, Tonkin K, Masuda N, Lipton A, de Boer R, Salvagni S, Oliveira CT, Qian Y, Jiang Q, Dansey R, Braun A, Chung K. Pain outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer and bone metastases: results from a randomized, double-blind study of denosumab and zoledronic acid. Cancer. 2013 Feb 15;119(4):832-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27789. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
- Background: PubMed 22893628Martin M, Bell R, Bourgeois H, Brufsky A, Diel I, Eniu A, Fallowfield L, Fujiwara Y, Jassem J, Paterson AH, Ritchie D, Steger GG, Stopeck A, Vogel C, Fan M, Jiang Q, Chung K, Dansey R, Braun A. Bone-related complications and quality of life in advanced breast cancer: results from a randomized phase III trial of denosumab versus zoledronic acid. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Sep 1;18(17):4841-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3310. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
- Background: PubMed 21060033Stopeck AT, Lipton A, Body JJ, Steger GG, Tonkin K, de Boer RH, Lichinitser M, Fujiwara Y, Yardley DA, Viniegra M, Fan M, Jiang Q, Dansey R, Jun S, Braun A. Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 10;28(35):5132-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.7101. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26335402Stopeck AT, Fizazi K, Body JJ, Brown JE, Carducci M, Diel I, Fujiwara Y, Martin M, Paterson A, Tonkin K, Shore N, Sieber P, Kueppers F, Karsh L, Yardley D, Wang H, Maniar T, Arellano J, Braun A. Safety of long-term denosumab therapy: results from the open label extension phase of two phase 3 studies in patients with metastatic breast and prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jan;24(1):447-455. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2904-5. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26093811Body JJ, Bone HG, de Boer RH, Stopeck A, Van Poznak C, Damiao R, Fizazi K, Henry DH, Ibrahim T, Lipton A, Saad F, Shore N, Takano T, Shaywitz AJ, Wang H, Bracco OL, Braun A, Kostenuik PJ. Hypocalcaemia in patients with metastatic bone disease treated with denosumab. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(13):1812-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25976743Diel IJ, Body JJ, Stopeck AT, Vadhan-Raj S, Spencer A, Steger G, von Moos R, Goldwasser F, Feng A, Braun A. The role of denosumab in the prevention of hypercalcaemia of malignancy in cancer patients with metastatic bone disease. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Jul;51(11):1467-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 May 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23975226von Moos R, Body JJ, Egerdie B, Stopeck A, Brown JE, Damyanov D, Fallowfield LJ, Marx G, Cleeland CS, Patrick DL, Palazzo FG, Qian Y, Braun A, Chung K. Pain and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced solid tumours and bone metastases: integrated results from three randomized, double-blind studies of denosumab and zoledronic acid. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Dec;21(12):3497-507. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1932-2. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22975218Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, Henry DH, Brown JE, Yardley DA, Richardson GE, Siena S, Maroto P, Clemens M, Bilynskyy B, Charu V, Beuzeboc P, Rader M, Viniegra M, Saad F, Ke C, Braun A, Jun S. Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
- AmgenTrials clinical trials websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Bone Metastases
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
ALT-100 Monoclonal Antibody (mAb) in Bone-Predominant Metastatic Androgen Pathway Modulation Resistant (APMR) Prostate Cancer -- The ALTAR-100 Trial
Prostate Cancer Metastatic to Bone
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
REducing Systemic Inflammation With LOw-dose Colchicine to ImproVE Cardiovascular Calcification in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Pilot Randomized Open-Label Trial
Chronic Kidney Disease Mineral and Bone Disorder, Cognitive Function
RecruitingObservational study
Change in Fat Fraction Quantification Before and After Treatment in Bone Metastases
Neoplasm Metastasis / Bone and Bones
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Randomized Study Comparing Two Dosing Schedules for Hypofractionated Image-Guided Radiation Therapy
Melanoma, Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Iscador® P (Mistletoe) Immunotherapy for Recurrent Resectable Osteogenic Sarcoma
Osteogenic Sarcoma Recurrent
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MD study director
Amgen
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in people with Bone Metastases, run by Amgen.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Mar 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to First On-Study Skeletal Related Event (SRE) (Non-inferiority) (time frame: Up to 34 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00321464, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2022.