Coronary DiseasePhase 3NCT00322569
A Randomized, Multi-Center Study of the Pimecrolimus-Eluting and Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent Systems (GENESIS)
A Phase 3 study testing Corio™ Pimecrolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System, SymBio™ Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System and Costar ™ Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in people with Coronary Disease, run by Cordis US Corp. at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
To demonstrate non-inferiority in 6-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss of the pimecrolimus-eluting coronary stent (Corio) compared to the CoStar coronary stent control arm and the dual pimecrolimus/paclitaxel-eluting (Symbio) coronary stent compared to the CoStar coronary stent control arm for the treatment… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Disease
- What is being tested?
- Corio™ Pimecrolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System, SymBio™ Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System and Costar ™ Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 246 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Jul 2006to May 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- General Inclusion Criteria
- Eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Documented stable or unstable angina pectoris
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥25%
- Acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).
- Target lesion < 25 mm in length with RVD of ≥2.5 mm to ≤3.5 mm with visually estimated stenosis of ≥50% and < 100% .
Show all 10Show fewer
- Target vessel had not undergone prior revascularization within the preceding 6 months.
- Target lesion must have been a minimum of 10 mm distance from any previously treated segment of the target vessel
- Patient understood the study requirements and the treatment procedures and provided written Informed Consent, approved by the local Ethics Committee.
- Willing to comply with all specified follow-up evaluations.
Who cannot join
- General Exclusion Criteria
- Known sensitivity to pimecrolimus, paclitaxel, the polymer (PLGA) or cobalt chromium.
- Planned treatment with any other PCI device in the target vessel(s).
- MI within 72 hours prior to the index procedure
- The patient is in cardiogenic shock.
- Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) within the past 6 months.
Show all 31Show fewer
- Acute or chronic renal dysfunction
- Contraindication to ASA or to clopidogrel.
- Thrombocytopenia
- Active gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within the past 3 months.
- Any prior true anaphylactiod reaction to contrast agents
- Patient is currently taking colchicine, chronic systemic steroid therapy or systemic immunosuppressant therapy, or or had been treated with paclitaxel (systemic) within 12 months of the index procedure.
- Patient was currently, or was on long term intermittent therapy with topical pimecrolimus
- Female of childbearing potential.
- Life expectancy of less than 24 months due to other medical conditions.
- Co-morbid condition(s)
- Currently participating in another investigational drug or device study
- General Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:
- Left main coronary artery disease (stenosis >50%), whether protected or unprotected.
- Target lesion was ostial in location (within 3.0 mm of vessel origin).
- Target lesion and/or target vessel proximal to the target lesion was severely calcified by visual estimation.
- Target lesion involved a bifurcation with a diseased (>50% stenotic) branch vessel >2.0 mm in diameter that required intervention.
- Target lesion was totally occluded Thrombolysis In MI (TIMI flow 0) or TIMI flow ≤1.
- Angiographic presence of probable or definite thrombus.
- Target vessel would have been pre-treated with an unapproved device, directional or rotational coronary atherectomy, laser, cutting balloon or transluminal extraction catheter immediately prior to stent placement.
- Prior coronary intervention using brachytherapy to any segment of the target vessel.
- The target vessel had prior drug-eluting stent placement to vessel segment (or branch) proximal to intended target lesion site within preceding 6 months.
- Angiographic restenosis of any segment of the target vessel that had undergone prior percutaneous coronary intervention.
- Angiographic evidence of atherosclerotic disease with >50% diameter stenosis (by visual estimate) proximal or distal to the target lesion (applies to the major epicardial portion of the target vessel and contiguous vessel segment if the target lesion was located in a branch vessel).
- Prior surgical revascularization of the target vessel with patent graft (saphenous vein graft or arterial conduit).
- Target lesion lied within 10mm of prior surgical anastomosis site.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Southampton University Hospital
Southampton, SO16 YD
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Multi-Center Study of the Pimecrolimus-Eluting (Corio™) and Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System (SymBio™) in Patients With De Novo Lesions of the Native Coronary Arteries
To demonstrate non-inferiority in 6-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss of the pimecrolimus-eluting coronary stent (Corio) compared to the CoStar coronary stent control arm and the dual pimecrolimus/paclitaxel-eluting (Symbio) coronary stent compared to the CoStar coronary stent control arm for the treatment of single de novo lesions <25 mm in length in native coronary arteries 2.5 - 3.5 mm in diameter.
Read the detailed description
This study is designed to evaluate 6 month in-stent late lumen loss of the 1) Corio™ pimecrolimus-eluting coronary stent system and the 2) SymBio™ dual pimecrolimus/paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent system compared to the CoStar™ Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System control arm.
- Conditions
- Coronary Disease
- Being tested
- Corio™ Pimecrolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System, SymBio™ Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System, Costar ™ Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System
- Keywords
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), Drug eluting stent (DES)
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Corio™ Pimecrolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent SystemDevice
Drug-eluting stent
SymBio™ Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent SystemDevice
Drug-eluting stent
Costar ™ Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent SystemDevice
Drug-eluting Stent
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Corio™ Pimecrolimus-Eluting Cobalt Chromium Coronary Stent System Receives: Device: Corio™ Pimecrolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System |
| 2 | Experimental | SymBio™ Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System Receives: Device: SymBio™ Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System |
| Control Arm | Active comparator | Costar ™ Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System Receives: Device: Costar ™ Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary angiographic late loss in the stent as measured by Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA)
Measured: 6 months post-procedure
Secondary outcomes (12)
MACE (composite of non-cardiac death, new Qw/nonQw MI, and TVR) as described below
Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) defined as an adjudicated composite of death that cannot be clearly attributed to a non-cardiac event or non-intervention vessel, new myocardial infarction (Q-wave or non-Q-wave) that cannot be clearly attributed to a non-intervention vessel and clinically driven target vessel revascularization (TVR)
Measured: 30 days and 6 months
Primary Device Success defined as attainment of <50% in-stent residual stenosis of the target lesion using only the assigned device in the absence of device malfunction and device-related complication.
Measured: 30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
Lesion Success defined as attainment of <50% residual stenosis of the target lesion using the assigned study device or any percutaneous method.
Measured: 30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
Procedure Success defined as attainment of final lesion success in the absence of in-hospital MACE.
Measured: 30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
Angiographic in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis (≥50% diameter stenosis).
Measured: 30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
In-stent and in-segment MLD
Measured: 6 months post-procedure
In-segment angiographic late loss
Measured: 6 months post-procedure
Clinically driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Measured: 6 months post-procedure
Percent volume obstruction of the stent by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in the IVUS cohort.
Measured: 6 months post-procedure
Incidence of late acquired incomplete stent to vessel apposition (stent malapposition) by IVUS in the IVUS cohort.
Measured: 6 months post-procedure
Incidence of reported MACE
Measured: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure
Comparison of the pimecrolimus-eluting stent to the pimecrolimus/paclitaxel-eluting stent for primary and secondary endpoints.
Measured: 30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 May 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2006
- Primary completionOct 2007
- Study completionMay 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 246 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cordis US Corp.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Conor Medsystems
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nicholas Curzen, M.D., Principal investigator, Southampton University HospitalStefan Verheye, M.D., Principal investigator, AZ Middelheim Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00322569
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CP-01
- Status last verified
- Mar 2013
- First submitted
- 4 May 2006
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Verheye S, Agostoni P, Dawkins KD, Dens J, Rutsch W, Carrie D, Schofer J, Lotan C, Dubois CL, Cohen SA, Fitzgerald PJ, Lansky AJ. The GENESIS (Randomized, Multicenter Study of the Pimecrolimus-Eluting and Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in Patients with De Novo Lesions of the Native Coronary Arteries) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Mar;2(3):205-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.12.011.
PubMed 19463427
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Multi-Center Study of the Pimecrolimus-Eluting (Corio™) and Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System (SymBio™) in Patients With De Novo Lesions of the Native Coronary Arteries
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00322569
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CP-01
- Conditions
- Coronary Disease
- Keywords
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), Drug eluting stent (DES)
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 246 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cordis US Corp.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Conor Medsystems
- Study start
- Jul 2006
- Primary completion
- Oct 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 May 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To demonstrate non-inferiority in 6-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss of the pimecrolimus-eluting coronary stent (Corio) compared to the CoStar coronary stent control arm and the dual pimecrolimus/paclitaxel-eluting (Symbio) coronary stent compared to the CoStar coronary stent control arm for the treatment of single de novo lesions <25 mm in length in native coronary arteries 2.5 - 3.5 mm in diameter.
Detailed description
This study is designed to evaluate 6 month in-stent late lumen loss of the 1) Corio™ pimecrolimus-eluting coronary stent system and the 2) SymBio™ dual pimecrolimus/paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent system compared to the CoStar™ Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System control arm.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Device: Corio™ Pimecrolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent SystemCorio™ Pimecrolimus-Eluting Cobalt Chromium Coronary Stent System |
| 2 | Experimental | Device: SymBio™ Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent SystemSymBio™ Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System |
| Control Arm | Active comparator | Device: Costar ™ Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent SystemCostar ™ Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- General Inclusion Criteria
- Eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Documented stable or unstable angina pectoris
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥25%
- Acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).
Key exclusion criteria (31 listed)
- General Exclusion Criteria
- Known sensitivity to pimecrolimus, paclitaxel, the polymer (PLGA) or cobalt chromium.
- Planned treatment with any other PCI device in the target vessel(s).
- MI within 72 hours prior to the index procedure
- The patient is in cardiogenic shock.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Corio™ Pimecrolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent SystemDrug-eluting stent | Device | 1 |
| SymBio™ Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent SystemDrug-eluting stent | Device | 2 |
| Costar ™ Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent SystemDrug-eluting Stent | Device | Control Arm |
Primary outcome
Primary angiographic late loss in the stent as measured by Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA)
Time frame: 6 months post-procedure
12 secondary outcomes
MACE (composite of non-cardiac death, new Qw/nonQw MI, and TVR) as described below
Time frame: 30 days and 6 months
Primary Device Success defined as attainment of <50% in-stent residual stenosis of the target lesion using only the assigned device in the absence of device malfunction and device-related complication.
Time frame: 30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
Lesion Success defined as attainment of <50% residual stenosis of the target lesion using the assigned study device or any percutaneous method.
Time frame: 30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
Procedure Success defined as attainment of final lesion success in the absence of in-hospital MACE.
Time frame: 30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
Angiographic in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis (≥50% diameter stenosis).
Time frame: 30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
In-stent and in-segment MLD
Time frame: 6 months post-procedure
In-segment angiographic late loss
Time frame: 6 months post-procedure
Clinically driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Time frame: 6 months post-procedure
Percent volume obstruction of the stent by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in the IVUS cohort.
Time frame: 6 months post-procedure
Incidence of late acquired incomplete stent to vessel apposition (stent malapposition) by IVUS in the IVUS cohort.
Time frame: 6 months post-procedure
Incidence of reported MACE
Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure
Comparison of the pimecrolimus-eluting stent to the pimecrolimus/paclitaxel-eluting stent for primary and secondary endpoints.
Time frame: 30 days and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2013.
- Results publication: PubMed 19463427Verheye S, Agostoni P, Dawkins KD, Dens J, Rutsch W, Carrie D, Schofer J, Lotan C, Dubois CL, Cohen SA, Fitzgerald PJ, Lansky AJ. The GENESIS (Randomized, Multicenter Study of the Pimecrolimus-Eluting and Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in Patients with De Novo Lesions of the Native Coronary Arteries) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Mar;2(3):205-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.12.011.
Related trials for Coronary Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nicholas Curzen, M.D. principal investigator
Southampton University Hospital
Stefan Verheye, M.D. principal investigator
AZ Middelheim Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Corio™ Pimecrolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System, SymBio™ Pimecrolimus/Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System and Costar ™ Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in people with Coronary Disease, run by Cordis US Corp. at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 31 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary angiographic late loss in the stent as measured by Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) (time frame: 6 months post-procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00322569, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2013.