AzTrials
AzTrials

MenorrhagiaNCT00323999

Hysteroscopic Monopolar and Bipolar Resection

A study testing Hysteroscopic resection of fibroids, polyps and endometrium. in people with Menorrhagia and Fibroid, run by Ullevaal University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate bipolar equipment versus monopolar, and to see if there is any differences between the two types of bipolar equipment espescially regading both safety and effect. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Menorrhagia, Fibroid, Polyps
What is being tested?
Hysteroscopic resection of fibroids, polyps and endometrium.
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
Not given
Where
1 siteNorway
Study dates
Dec 2004to Dec 2007
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Inclusion Criteria:-Pre-or perimenopausal women with a bleeding disorder with or without fibroids or polyps -

Exclusion Criteria:-Postmenopausal patient. Infertility. Additional condition requiring treatment detected during examination. Malignancy or atypical hyperplasia detected by histological examination.

-

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Anette Berg, MD contact

+4795219282

anette.berg@uus.no

Olav Istre, MD., PhD. contact

+4741302221

oistre@c2i.net

Norway1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Gynaecological department Ullevaal University Hospital

    Oslo

    Recruiting

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: A Randomised Trial to Compare the Differences Between Monopolar Surgery (Loop Resection) With Glycine 1,5% and Bipolar Surgery With Saline (Olympus,Versapoint) on Hysteroscopic Surgery.

The aim of the study is to evaluate bipolar equipment versus monopolar, and to see if there is any differences between the two types of bipolar equipment espescially regading both safety and effect.

Read the detailed description
  • Trial design: A prospective randomised study with three arms, one arm with monopolar surgery and two different arms with bipolar surgery. Its a one center study.
  • Trial population: Pre-or perimenopausal women reffered to our clinic with bleeding disorders and were we plan to do endometrial resection. Patients with a bleeding disorder due to fibroids type 0 and 1 will be included and patients with polyps were endometrial resection is planned at the same time will also be included.
  • Preoperative selection: The fibroids will be mapped using transvaginal ultrasound according to the classification ESGE. Type 0 and 1 fibroids will be included. Diameter of the fibroid must not extend 4cm. The endometrium size double layer will be recorded. Uterine size anetrior /posterior diameter, longitudinal diameter (cavity; top fundal to isthmus) will be measured. Were polyps are included these will be measured; length and width. Higham score (PBAC), Se-hgb, Ferritin, FSH and Oestradiol will be documented at all visits. Menstrual pain will be documented due to a VAS-scale.
  • Treatment regimen:Randomisation in blocs of 20 between monopolar and two types of bipolar surgery.
  • Surgical Technique: The cervical canal will be dilated to Hegar 10 or 11 and a rigid resectoscope Ch. 26 is passed to the uterine cavity. Glycine 1,5% or Saline (Baxter) is infused to irrigate the uterine cavity (Iglesias technique) Automatic pressure cuff maintains an infusion pressure of 100mm Hg and suction 10-15mmHg is applied to the outflow tube in order to achieve a sufficient flow.Fibroids type 0 and 1 are resected in total if possible or flush to the plane of the uterine wall. The tissue chips are removed at intervals by currette and forceps. The operation will be performed by experienced surgeons.
  • Primary response variables: Safety is our primary response variable. Fluid absorption and lowering of Se-Sodium will be analysed. These parameters are the only objective parameters which can tell us about safety. Nausea will be reorded on a VAS-scale.
  • Secondary resonse variables: Operating time, tissue removed, easisness of operation, levels of vaginal bleeding measured by the methosd of Hgham(PBAC)before and at follow up.

After 6 month and one year we will look at secondary intervention like repeated resection or hysterectomy.

Being tested
Hysteroscopic resection of fibroids, polyps and endometrium.
Keywords
Hysteroscopic resection, Menorrhagia, fibroids, polyps
Medical subject headings
Menorrhagia, Leiomyoma, Polyps

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hysteroscopic resection of fibroids, polyps and endometrium.Procedure or surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 May 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2004
  3. Study completionDec 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00323999
Sponsor's protocol ID
AB170262
Status last verified
May 2006
First submitted
9 May 2006
Last updated
10 May 2006
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Hysteroscopic resection of fibroids, polyps and endometrium. in people with Menorrhagia and Fibroid, run by Ullevaal University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Anette Berg, MD (+4795219282, anette.berg@uus.no), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2006.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in