Macular DegenerationPhase 4NCT00324116
Evaluation Of Safety And Efficacy Of 0.3 Mg/Eye Macugen In Patients With Small Age-Related Macular Degeneration Lesions
A Phase 4 study testing pegaptanib sodium (Macugen) in people with Macular Degeneration, run by Pfizer at 34 sites in France.
Trial summary
To evaluate the efficacy, based on the best-corrected visual acuity (using the ETDRS chart), of a 0.3 mg/eye pegaptanib sodium intravitreous injection given every 6 weeks for 54 weeks in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration and evidence of recent onset, subfoveal and/or juxtafoveal choroidal… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Macular Degeneration
- What is being tested?
- pegaptanib sodium (Macugen)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 81 participants
- Where
- 34 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Jul 2006to Aug 2008
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical and angiographic evidence of juxtafoveal or subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD with a total lesion size of less than 2 MPS disc areas
- Best-corrected visual acuity in the study eye greater than 54 letters (ETDRS)
- Women must be using 2 forms of effective contraception
- Adequate hematological, renal and liver functions
Who cannot join
- Any atrophy or fibrosis; any retinal hemorrhage measuring more than 1 disc area
- Any extrafoveal choroidal neovascularization
- Any intraocular surgery or thermal laser to the study eye within 3 months of enrollment
- Previous or concomitant therapy for AMD including PDT with verteporfin (Visudyne) or subfoveal/non-foveal thermal laser therapy, transpupillary thermotherapy, external beam radiation, submacular surgery.
- Presence of other causes of choroidal neovascularization, including pathological myopia, the ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, angioid streaks, choroidal rupture and multifocal choroiditis
Trial locations and contacts
34 sites in 1 country.
34 sites in 1 country
France34 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Angers, Cedex 09, 49933
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bayonne, 64100
Pfizer Investigational Site
Belfort, 90016
Pfizer Investigational Site
Besançon, Cedex, 25030
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bordeaux, 33076
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bordeaux, 33100
Pfizer Investigational Site
Brest, 29200
Pfizer Investigational Site
Créteil, Cedex, 94010
Pfizer Investigational Site
Dijon, 21033
Pfizer Investigational Site
La Rochefoucauld, 16110
Pfizer Investigational Site
La Tronche, 38700
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lille, 59800
Pfizer Investigational Site
Limoges, 87042
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lyon, Cedex 4, 69317
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lyon, 69003
Pfizer Investigational Site
Mâcon, Cedex, 71018
Pfizer Investigational Site
Marseille, 13008
Pfizer Investigational Site
Montpellier, 34000
Pfizer Investigational Site
Montpellier, 34070
Pfizer Investigational Site
Mulhouse, 68070
Pfizer Investigational Site
Nancy, 54000
Pfizer Investigational Site
Nantes, 44093
Pfizer Investigational Site
Paris, 75006
Pfizer Investigational Site
Paris, 75015
Pfizer Investigational Site
Paris, 75557
Pfizer Investigational Site
Paris, 75940
Pfizer Investigational Site
Poitiers, Cedex, 86021
Pfizer Investigational Site
Rives, 38140
Pfizer Investigational Site
Rouen, 76000
Pfizer Investigational Site
Saint-Herblain, 44819
Pfizer Investigational Site
Strasbourg, 67000
Pfizer Investigational Site
Strasbourg, 67091
Pfizer Investigational Site
Toulouse, 31054
Pfizer Investigational Site
Toulouse, 31200
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Open-Label Multi Center Trial Evaluating The Safety And Efficacy Of 0.3 Mg/Eye Pegaptanib Sodium (Macugen) Intravitreous Injection Given Every 6 Weeks For 54 Weeks In Patients With Small Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Lesions
To evaluate the efficacy, based on the best-corrected visual acuity (using the ETDRS chart), of a 0.3 mg/eye pegaptanib sodium intravitreous injection given every 6 weeks for 54 weeks in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration and evidence of recent onset, subfoveal and/or juxtafoveal choroidal neovascularization.
- Conditions
- Macular Degeneration
- Being tested
- pegaptanib sodium (Macugen)
- Medical subject headings
- Macular Degeneration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
pegaptanib sodium (Macugen)Drug
Also called MACUGEN
0.3 MG/eye pegaptanib IB sodium by intravitreous injection given every 6 weeks for 54 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: pegaptanib sodium (Macugen) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Responders for Visual Acuity Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)
Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0. Responders defined as subjects having lost from baseline less than 15 letters of the best-corrected visual acuity; includes subjects with visual acuity gain.
Measured: Baseline, 54 Weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity
Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0. Change: mean score at observation minus mean score at baseline.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 54 weeks
Number of Subjects Gaining Vision
Subjects gaining vision: gain from baseline of more than 15 letters of visual acuity. Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0.
Measured: 54 weeks or at early termination
Number of Subjects Maintaining Vision
Subjects maintaining vision: gain from baseline of more than 0 letters of visual acuity. Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0.
Measured: 54 weeks or at early termination
Number of Subjects With Severe Visual Loss
Subjects with severe visual loss: loss from baseline of >= 30 letters of visual acuity. Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0.
Measured: 54 weeks or at early termination
Number of Subjects With a Distance Visual Acuity of > 20/200 at Baseline and Progressing to (<= 20/200)
Subjects with improving scores are those with > 20/200 at Baseline and progressing to =< 20/200 at Week 54.
Subjects with no change are those with > 20/200 at Baseline and remaining at > 20/200 at Week 54.
Measured: 54 weeks
Change in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).
Patient reported vision-related functioning and quality of life as measured using the 25 item NEI-VFQ 25. Change = Mean score at 54 weeks - mean score at baseline. A positive change represents an increase in function/health from Baseline. Items grouped as the following - Composite: mean score items 1-25; General Health: item 1; General Vision: item 2; Ocular Pain:4,19; Near Vision:5,6,7; Distance Vision:8,9,14; Social Functioning:11,13; Mental Health Activities:3,21,22,25; Role Difficulties:17,18; Dependency:20,23,24; Driving:15c,16, 16a; Color Vision: 12; Peripheral Vision: 10.
Measured: Baseline, 54 weeks or at early termination
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 May 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2006
- Primary completionAug 2008
- Study completionAug 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Macular DegenerationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- ITEC GROUP 3
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00324116
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A5751016
- Status last verified
- Mar 2010
- First submitted
- 8 May 2006
- Last updated
- 23 Mar 2010
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Mar 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Open-Label Multi Center Trial Evaluating The Safety And Efficacy Of 0.3 Mg/Eye Pegaptanib Sodium (Macugen) Intravitreous Injection Given Every 6 Weeks For 54 Weeks In Patients With Small Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Lesions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00324116
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A5751016
- Conditions
- Macular Degeneration
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- ITEC GROUP 3
- Study start
- Jul 2006
- Primary completion
- Aug 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 May 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 2 Oct 2009
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate the efficacy, based on the best-corrected visual acuity (using the ETDRS chart), of a 0.3 mg/eye pegaptanib sodium intravitreous injection given every 6 weeks for 54 weeks in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration and evidence of recent onset, subfoveal and/or juxtafoveal choroidal neovascularization.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active | Experimental | Drug: pegaptanib sodium (Macugen) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Clinical and angiographic evidence of juxtafoveal or subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD with a total lesion size of less than 2 MPS disc areas
- Best-corrected visual acuity in the study eye greater than 54 letters (ETDRS)
- Women must be using 2 forms of effective contraception
- Adequate hematological, renal and liver functions
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Any atrophy or fibrosis; any retinal hemorrhage measuring more than 1 disc area
- Any extrafoveal choroidal neovascularization
- Any intraocular surgery or thermal laser to the study eye within 3 months of enrollment
- Previous or concomitant therapy for AMD including PDT with verteporfin (Visudyne) or subfoveal/non-foveal thermal laser therapy, transpupillary thermotherapy, external beam radiation, submacular surgery.
- Presence of other causes of choroidal neovascularization, including pathological myopia, the ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, angioid streaks, choroidal rupture and multifocal choroiditis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| pegaptanib sodium (Macugen)Also: MACUGEN0.3 MG/eye pegaptanib IB sodium by intravitreous injection given every 6 weeks for 54 weeks. | Drug | Active |
Primary outcome
Number of Responders for Visual Acuity Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)
Time frame: Baseline, 54 Weeks
Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0. Responders defined as subjects having lost from baseline less than 15 letters of the best-corrected visual acuity; includes subjects with visual acuity gain.
6 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 54 weeks
Number of Subjects Gaining Vision
Time frame: 54 weeks or at early termination
Number of Subjects Maintaining Vision
Time frame: 54 weeks or at early termination
Number of Subjects With Severe Visual Loss
Time frame: 54 weeks or at early termination
Number of Subjects With a Distance Visual Acuity of > 20/200 at Baseline and Progressing to (<= 20/200)
Time frame: 54 weeks
Change in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).
Time frame: Baseline, 54 weeks or at early termination
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Mar 2010.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of 36-Week Refill Exchanges of Port Delivery System (PDS) With Ranibizumab in nAMD
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingObservational study
Pivotal Trial of an Automated AI-based System for Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Late Age-related Macular Degeneration
Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Retinal Pigment Epithelium Safety Study For Patients In B4711001
Age Related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingObservational study
National Ophthalmic Genotyping and Phenotyping Network (eyeGENE (Registered Trademark)), Stage 3 - Expansion of DNA and Data Repositories for Rare Inherited Ophthalmic Diseases
Inherited Ophthalmic Diseases, Hypopigmentation Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
34 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing pegaptanib sodium (Macugen) in people with Macular Degeneration, run by Pfizer at 34 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 34 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Oct 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Responders for Visual Acuity Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) (time frame: Baseline, 54 Weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2010.