AzTrials
AzTrials

Macular DegenerationPhase 4NCT00324116

Evaluation Of Safety And Efficacy Of 0.3 Mg/Eye Macugen In Patients With Small Age-Related Macular Degeneration Lesions

A Phase 4 study testing pegaptanib sodium (Macugen) in people with Macular Degeneration, run by Pfizer at 34 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the efficacy, based on the best-corrected visual acuity (using the ETDRS chart), of a 0.3 mg/eye pegaptanib sodium intravitreous injection given every 6 weeks for 54 weeks in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration and evidence of recent onset, subfoveal and/or juxtafoveal choroidal… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Macular Degeneration
What is being tested?
pegaptanib sodium (Macugen)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
81 participants
Where
34 sitesFrance
Study dates
Jul 2006to Aug 2008
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical and angiographic evidence of juxtafoveal or subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD with a total lesion size of less than 2 MPS disc areas
  • Best-corrected visual acuity in the study eye greater than 54 letters (ETDRS)
  • Women must be using 2 forms of effective contraception
  • Adequate hematological, renal and liver functions

Who cannot join

  • Any atrophy or fibrosis; any retinal hemorrhage measuring more than 1 disc area
  • Any extrafoveal choroidal neovascularization
  • Any intraocular surgery or thermal laser to the study eye within 3 months of enrollment
  • Previous or concomitant therapy for AMD including PDT with verteporfin (Visudyne) or subfoveal/non-foveal thermal laser therapy, transpupillary thermotherapy, external beam radiation, submacular surgery.
  • Presence of other causes of choroidal neovascularization, including pathological myopia, the ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, angioid streaks, choroidal rupture and multifocal choroiditis

Trial locations and contacts

34 sites in 1 country.

34 sites in 1 country

France34 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Angers, Cedex 09, 49933

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Bayonne, 64100

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Belfort, 90016

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Besançon, Cedex, 25030

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Bordeaux, 33076

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Bordeaux, 33100

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Brest, 29200

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Créteil, Cedex, 94010

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Dijon, 21033

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    La Rochefoucauld, 16110

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    La Tronche, 38700

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Lille, 59800

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Limoges, 87042

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Lyon, Cedex 4, 69317

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Lyon, 69003

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Mâcon, Cedex, 71018

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Marseille, 13008

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Montpellier, 34000

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Montpellier, 34070

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Mulhouse, 68070

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Nancy, 54000

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Nantes, 44093

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Paris, 75006

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Paris, 75015

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Paris, 75557

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Paris, 75940

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Poitiers, Cedex, 86021

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Rives, 38140

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Rouen, 76000

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Saint-Herblain, 44819

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Strasbourg, 67000

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Strasbourg, 67091

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Toulouse, 31054

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Toulouse, 31200

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Open-Label Multi Center Trial Evaluating The Safety And Efficacy Of 0.3 Mg/Eye Pegaptanib Sodium (Macugen) Intravitreous Injection Given Every 6 Weeks For 54 Weeks In Patients With Small Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Lesions

To evaluate the efficacy, based on the best-corrected visual acuity (using the ETDRS chart), of a 0.3 mg/eye pegaptanib sodium intravitreous injection given every 6 weeks for 54 weeks in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration and evidence of recent onset, subfoveal and/or juxtafoveal choroidal neovascularization.

Being tested
pegaptanib sodium (Macugen)
Medical subject headings
Macular Degeneration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • pegaptanib sodium (Macugen)Drug

    Also called MACUGEN

    0.3 MG/eye pegaptanib IB sodium by intravitreous injection given every 6 weeks for 54 weeks.

Study groups in NCT00324116
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ActiveExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: pegaptanib sodium (Macugen)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Responders for Visual Acuity Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)

    Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0. Responders defined as subjects having lost from baseline less than 15 letters of the best-corrected visual acuity; includes subjects with visual acuity gain.

    Measured: Baseline, 54 Weeks

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity

    Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0. Change: mean score at observation minus mean score at baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 54 weeks

  2. Number of Subjects Gaining Vision

    Subjects gaining vision: gain from baseline of more than 15 letters of visual acuity. Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0.

    Measured: 54 weeks or at early termination

  3. Number of Subjects Maintaining Vision

    Subjects maintaining vision: gain from baseline of more than 0 letters of visual acuity. Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0.

    Measured: 54 weeks or at early termination

  4. Number of Subjects With Severe Visual Loss

    Subjects with severe visual loss: loss from baseline of >= 30 letters of visual acuity. Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0.

    Measured: 54 weeks or at early termination

  5. Number of Subjects With a Distance Visual Acuity of > 20/200 at Baseline and Progressing to (<= 20/200)

    Subjects with improving scores are those with > 20/200 at Baseline and progressing to =< 20/200 at Week 54.

    Subjects with no change are those with > 20/200 at Baseline and remaining at > 20/200 at Week 54.

    Measured: 54 weeks

  6. Change in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).

    Patient reported vision-related functioning and quality of life as measured using the 25 item NEI-VFQ 25. Change = Mean score at 54 weeks - mean score at baseline. A positive change represents an increase in function/health from Baseline. Items grouped as the following - Composite: mean score items 1-25; General Health: item 1; General Vision: item 2; Ocular Pain:4,19; Near Vision:5,6,7; Distance Vision:8,9,14; Social Functioning:11,13; Mental Health Activities:3,21,22,25; Role Difficulties:17,18; Dependency:20,23,24; Driving:15c,16, 16a; Color Vision: 12; Peripheral Vision: 10.

    Measured: Baseline, 54 weeks or at early termination

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 May 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2006
  3. Primary completionAug 2008
  4. Study completionAug 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
81 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00324116
Sponsor's protocol ID
A5751016
Status last verified
Mar 2010
First submitted
8 May 2006
Last updated
23 Mar 2010
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing pegaptanib sodium (Macugen) in people with Macular Degeneration, run by Pfizer at 34 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 34 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Oct 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Responders for Visual Acuity Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) (time frame: Baseline, 54 Weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in