Joint PainPhase 3NCT00325845
Synvisc Injections for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain
A Phase 3 study testing Synvisc viscosupplementation in people with Joint Pain, run by Sheltering Arms Physical Rehabilitation Hospitals at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The objective of this investigation is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of viscosupplementation in treating symptomatic lumbar facet joint arthropathy. The intended use of the device (Synvisc) is to alleviate pain and improve function in patients with painful lumbar facet joint arthrosis by intra-articular… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Joint Pain
- What is being tested?
- Synvisc viscosupplementation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2006to May 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Ongoing axial lumbar pain, greater than any lower limb pain if present, for > 3 months duration.
- No improvement despite 6-8 weeks of physical therapy (PT), oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), relative rest, and activity modification.
- Radiographic evidence of facet joint arthrosis on advanced imaging studies defined as joint capsule hypertrophy, osteophyte formation, joint space narrowing, irregularity of joint contours, subchondral sclerosis, and synovial cyst formation.
- Age 30 years or older.
- Positive double, local comparative anesthetic diagnostic block injections at one unilateral or bilateral joint(s).
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy.
- Active or remote history of spinal malignancy.
- Active infection.
- Blood dyscrasias/coagulopathy.
- Unwillingness to follow through with follow up evaluations.
- Negative response to all diagnostic facet joint injections.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Application for/currently receiving worker's compensation.
- Allergy to avian products.
- Allergy to prior viscosupplementation products.
- Prior viscosupplementation of lumbar facet joints.
- Improper intra-articular needle placement at time of Synvisc injection.
- Painful bilateral or multi-level facet joint arthropathy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Sheltering Arms Spine and Sport Center; St. Mary's Hospital
Richmond, Virginia, 23226
Michael J DePalma, MD
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Intra-Articular Synvisc Injections as Treatment of Painful Lumbar Facet Joint Arthrosis
The objective of this investigation is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of viscosupplementation in treating symptomatic lumbar facet joint arthropathy. The intended use of the device (Synvisc) is to alleviate pain and improve function in patients with painful lumbar facet joint arthrosis by intra-articular injection into the involved joint.
Read the detailed description
Patients will enter the study once the putatively painful joint or joints have been confirmed by single blind, double local-comparative anesthetic blockade. The joint(s) suspected by historical features and physical examination will be injected under fluoroscopic guidance with contrast-enhancement confirming intra-articular placement. The initial injectate will be 1cc of 2% xylocaine. Single diagnostic lumbar facet joint injections carry a false positive rate of 38%. In order to maximize the specificity of the diagnostic injections a second 1cc injection of a longer-acting local anesthetic, 0.5% marcaine, will be performed on all patients reporting clinically significant pain reduction (> 75% VAS reduction from pre-injection baseline) within 10-15 minutes after the xylocaine injection. This second diagnostic injection will be completed upon return of the patient's pain back to baseline (no sooner than 3 days after the initial diagnostic injection). A true positive response will be defined as > 50% VAS reduction after the second injection. Patients will then undergo 2 IA Synvisc injections into the painful facet joint(s). An initial IA injection of 1.0cc (or a volume, not to exceed 1.0cc, accepted by the joint upon reaching a capsular endpoint) of Synvisc (1cc, 10mg/ml) will be injected into the painful joint(s) 7 days after the second diagnostic injection after the baseline pain has returned. A 2nd injection will then be performed 10 days after the initial injection. A 3rd injection may be offered to patients not satisfied with the results obtained with the first 2 Synvisc injections. A 2.0cc vial of Synvisc per patient will be shipped including other trial materials to the investigator for implementation. A fluid dispenser connector will allow direct dispensation of 1.0cc of Synvisc from the pre-packaged 2.0cc unmarked vial. Outcome measurement tools will include Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, SF-36, lumbar spine range of motion (ROM), sitting and walking tolerance, analgesic usage, and patient satisfaction. Data will be collected at baseline, at 7-10 days after the second Synvisc injection, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 month follow up (after the final Synvisc injection) visits. For example, patient X will undergo an initial 2 Synvisc injections and then be evaluated in the office 7 days later. If the patient experiences significant benefit, no other injections will be pursued. However, if a therapeutic benefit is achieved but is not satisfactory to the patient, a 3rd Synvisc injection will be performed within 3 days. A side effect and complications questionnaire will be completed by each patient within 30 minutes, 24 hours, and 72 hours after each injection (including diagnostic injections).
- Conditions
- Joint Pain
- Being tested
- Synvisc viscosupplementation
- Keywords
- Investigational, Therapeutic, Efficacy, Safety, Outcomes, Lumbar facet joint arthrosis, Lumbar facet joint arthropathy
- Medical subject headings
- Arthralgia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Synvisc viscosupplementationProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for baseline pain (best, worst, average) and pain while walking
Oswestry Disability Questionnaire
Short Form 36-Item (SF-36)
Standing/walking tolerance (defined as time patient can sit for before pain level reaches baseline or distance walked before pain reaches baseline)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Analgesic usage
Lumbar range of motion
Patient satisfaction
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 May 2006 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2006
- Study completionMay 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Joint PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sheltering Arms Physical Rehabilitation Hospitals
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Genzyme, a Sanofi Company, Virginia Commonwealth University
- Investigators
- Michael J DePalma, MD, Principal investigator, Sheltering Arms Physical Rehabilitation Hospitals; Virginia Commonwealth University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00325845
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- G050253
- Status last verified
- Sep 2006
- First submitted
- 12 May 2006
- Last updated
- 13 Sep 2006
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Sep 2006. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of Intra-Articular Synvisc Injections as Treatment of Painful Lumbar Facet Joint Arthrosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00325845
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- G050253
- Conditions
- Joint Pain
- Keywords
- Investigational, Therapeutic, Efficacy, Safety, Outcomes, Lumbar facet joint arthrosis, Lumbar facet joint arthropathy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 15 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Sheltering Arms Physical Rehabilitation HospitalsUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Genzyme, a Sanofi Company, Virginia Commonwealth University
- Study start
- May 2006
- Study completion
- May 2008
- First posted
- 15 May 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this investigation is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of viscosupplementation in treating symptomatic lumbar facet joint arthropathy. The intended use of the device (Synvisc) is to alleviate pain and improve function in patients with painful lumbar facet joint arthrosis by intra-articular injection into the involved joint.
Detailed description
Patients will enter the study once the putatively painful joint or joints have been confirmed by single blind, double local-comparative anesthetic blockade. The joint(s) suspected by historical features and physical examination will be injected under fluoroscopic guidance with contrast-enhancement confirming intra-articular placement. The initial injectate will be 1cc of 2% xylocaine. Single diagnostic lumbar facet joint injections carry a false positive rate of 38%. In order to maximize the specificity of the diagnostic injections a second 1cc injection of a longer-acting local anesthetic, 0.5% marcaine, will be performed on all patients reporting clinically significant pain reduction (> 75% VAS reduction from pre-injection baseline) within 10-15 minutes after the xylocaine injection. This second diagnostic injection will be completed upon return of the patient's pain back to baseline (no sooner than 3 days after the initial diagnostic injection). A true positive response will be defined as > 50% VAS reduction after the second injection. Patients will then undergo 2 IA Synvisc injections into the painful facet joint(s). An initial IA injection of 1.0cc (or a volume, not to exceed 1.0cc, accepted by the joint upon reaching a capsular endpoint) of Synvisc (1cc, 10mg/ml) will be injected into the painful joint(s) 7 days after the second diagnostic injection after the baseline pain has returned. A 2nd injection will then be performed 10 days after the initial injection. A 3rd injection may be offered to patients not satisfied with the results obtained with the first 2 Synvisc injections. A 2.0cc vial of Synvisc per patient will be shipped including other trial materials to the investigator for implementation. A fluid dispenser connector will allow direct dispensation of 1.0cc of Synvisc from the pre-packaged 2.0cc unmarked vial. Outcome measurement tools will include Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, SF-36, lumbar spine range of motion (ROM), sitting and walking tolerance, analgesic usage, and patient satisfaction. Data will be collected at baseline, at 7-10 days after the second Synvisc injection, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 month follow up (after the final Synvisc injection) visits. For example, patient X will undergo an initial 2 Synvisc injections and then be evaluated in the office 7 days later. If the patient experiences significant benefit, no other injections will be pursued. However, if a therapeutic benefit is achieved but is not satisfactory to the patient, a 3rd Synvisc injection will be performed within 3 days. A side effect and complications questionnaire will be completed by each patient within 30 minutes, 24 hours, and 72 hours after each injection (including diagnostic injections).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Ongoing axial lumbar pain, greater than any lower limb pain if present, for > 3 months duration.
- No improvement despite 6-8 weeks of physical therapy (PT), oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), relative rest, and activity modification.
- Radiographic evidence of facet joint arthrosis on advanced imaging studies defined as joint capsule hypertrophy, osteophyte formation, joint space narrowing, irregularity of joint contours, subchondral sclerosis, and synovial cyst formation.
- Age 30 years or older.
- Positive double, local comparative anesthetic diagnostic block injections at one unilateral or bilateral joint(s).
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Pregnancy.
- Active or remote history of spinal malignancy.
- Active infection.
- Blood dyscrasias/coagulopathy.
- Unwillingness to follow through with follow up evaluations.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Synvisc viscosupplementation | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for baseline pain (best, worst, average) and pain while walking
Oswestry Disability Questionnaire
Short Form 36-Item (SF-36)
Standing/walking tolerance (defined as time patient can sit for before pain level reaches baseline or distance walked before pain reaches baseline)
3 secondary outcomes
Analgesic usage
Lumbar range of motion
Patient satisfaction
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Sep 2006.
Related trials for Joint Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Cervicothoracic Mobilization in Patients With Supraspinatus Tendinitis
Rotator Cuff Tendonitis
Recruiting
Effects of Telerehabilitation Versus Supervised Rehabilitation Protocol on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Recovery in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.
Patello Femoral Pain Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
Geriatric Oncology Assessment and Coping Skills Training for Older Women on Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy
Breast Cancer, Hormone Receptor Positive, Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgia
Recruiting
Hybrid mHealth and Telerehabilitation vs Conventional Physiotherapy for Subacromial Pain Syndrome
Subacromial Pain Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy of Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain Management in Hip Arthroscopy
Femoracetabular Impingement, Hip Arthroscopy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael J DePalma, MD principal investigator
Sheltering Arms Physical Rehabilitation Hospitals; Virginia Commonwealth University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Synvisc viscosupplementation in people with Joint Pain, run by Sheltering Arms Physical Rehabilitation Hospitals at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Michael J DePalma, MD (804-723-3244, depalmamj8@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for baseline pain (best, worst, average) and pain while walking. The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2006.