Atrial FlutterPhase 4NCT00326001
Isthmus Ablation With Gold Electrode for Treatment of Atrial Flutter (AURUM 8)
A Phase 4 study testing Gold tip catheter and Platinum-iridium tip catheter in people with Atrial Flutter, run by Biotronik SE & Co. KG at 28 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the advantage of using a gold alloy tip electrode over a platinum/iridium alloy tip electrode in ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus in patients with atrial flutter. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Flutter
- What is being tested?
- Gold tip catheter and Platinum-iridium tip catheter
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 463 participants
- Where
- 28 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2004to Mar 2008
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At least one electrocardiogram (ECG)-documented (can be older than 3 months), symptomatic, typical atrial flutter episode with either negative, sawtooth-shaped P-waves in leads II, III, and augmented voltage foot (aVF), or positive P-waves in leads II, III, and aVF
- At least one persistent, typical atrial flutter episode of over 2 hours that has been documented in the history in the patient file and/or ECG
- Signed informed consent form
Who cannot join
- Patient has recently undergone isthmus ablation
- Acute coronary syndrome or myocardial infarction within the last 3 months
- Acute reversible causes for atrial flutter (e.g. acute myocarditis)
- Severe cardiac valvular defects
- Tricuspid valve replacement
- Atrial septum defect
Show all 22Show fewer
- Cardiovascular surgery scheduled within the next 6 months
- Unstable medication in the last 7 days before study inclusion
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV
- Women who are breastfeeding
- Pregnancy
- Abuse of drugs or alcohol
- Patient is unable to participate in follow-up examinations
- The patient has only partial legal competence
- Participation in another clinical study
- The ablation procedure presents an above average risk to the patient as compared to the normal patient group (must be noted by the physician on the appropriate form).
- Right atrial thrombus
- Late Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient included by accident
- Premature termination of the ablation procedure
- Atrial flutter not dependent on the posterior isthmus
- No conduction at the posterior isthmus before ablation
Trial locations and contacts
28 sites in 3 countries.
28 sites in 3 countries
Germany24 sites
Universitätsklinik der RWTH Aachen
Aachen, 52074
Kerckhoff Klinik
Bad Nauheim, 61231
Charité Campus Mitte, Medizinische Fakultät der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin
Berlin, 10117
Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban
Berlin, 10967
Universitätsklinikum Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin
Berlin, 12200
Universitätsklinikum Charité, Campus Buch Franz-Volhard-Klinik
Berlin, 13125
Universitätsklinikum Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum
Berlin, 13353
Berufsgenossenschaftliche Kliniken, Bergmannsheil Universitätsklinik
Bochum, 44789
Medizinische Einrichtungen der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Bonn, 53105
Elektrophysiologische Praxis am Zentralkrankenhaus Links Der Weser
Bremen, 28277
Herzzentrum Duisburg
Duisburg, 47137
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, 40217
Georg-August-Universität, Universitätsklinikum Göttingen
Göttingen, 37099
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246
Allgemeines Krankenhaus Altona
Hamburg, 22763
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, 30625
Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes
Homburg/Saar, 66421
St. Vincentius Krankenhaus/St. Marien Krankenhaus - Abteilung für Innere Medizin III
Karlsruhe, 76137
Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH
Leipzig, 04289
Universitätsklinikum Mainz
Mainz, 55131
Städtisches Krankenhaus München-Bogenhausen
München, 81925
Universitätsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, 89070
Klinikum der Stadt Villingen-Schwenningen GmbH
Villingen-Schwenningen, 78050
Medizinische Universitätsklinik Würzburg
Würzburg, 97080
Hungary3 sites
Semmelweis Medical University - Department of Cardiology
Budapest, 1122
The Debrecen University of Medicine, Center of Medicine and Health Care Sciences, Clinical Department of Cardiology
Debrecen, 4032
The University of Pecs
Pécs, 7624
About this study
Official title: AURUM 8 - Ablation of the Cavotricuspid Isthmus in Patients With Atrial Flutter Using an 8 mm Gold Alloy Tip Electrode
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the advantage of using a gold alloy tip electrode over a platinum/iridium alloy tip electrode in ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus in patients with atrial flutter.
Read the detailed description
Transvenous catheter ablation has become the therapy of choice for patients with recurring, isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter. Achieving bidirectional conduction block in the cavotricuspid isthmus is decisive for both acute and long-term therapy success and essentially depends on the selected ablation method and the lesion size. By using an 8 mm tip electrode instead of a conventional 4 mm electrode, deeper lesions can be made, thus significantly reducing the required number of energy applications for achieving a bidirectional conduction block. Experimental studies have proven that using an ablation electrode made of gold alloy allows the creation of deeper lesions than with conventional platinum-iridium electrodes. Due to the greater heat conductivity of the gold alloy as opposed to platinum-iridium, the cooling of the ablation electrode is improved and more electric energy can be transmitted to the tissue at identical temperatures.
The combination of both technologies in the form of an 8 mm-long gold electrode anticipates that the lesion depth required for an isthmus block can be achieved more quickly in comparison to the platinum-iridium electrode.
- Conditions
- Atrial Flutter
- Being tested
- Gold tip catheter, Platinum-iridium tip catheter
- Keywords
- Transvenous Catheter Ablation, Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation, Atrial flutter, Catheter Ablation
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Flutter
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Gold tip catheterDevice
Radiofrquency ablation using gold tip catheter
Platinum-iridium tip catheterDevice
Radiofrequency ablation using platinum-iridium tip catheter
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Gold tip catheter | Experimental | Gold tip catheter Receives: Device: Gold tip catheter |
| Platinum-iridium tip catheter | Active comparator | Platinum-iridium tip catheter Receives: Device: Platinum-iridium tip catheter |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Duration of Energy Application
Cumulative amount of time current is flowing through the catheter tip. The current (in the radiofrequency range) is applied to ablate the cavotricuspid isthmus in the right atrium.
Measured: ablation procedure
Secondary outcomes (3)
Ablation Success With the First Catheter
Delivery of radiofrequency current was repeated until a cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) conduction block was detected. The final bidirectional CTI block test (well documented in the literature) was performed 20 minutes after the last radiofrequency current delivery to assess ablation success (Y/N).
Positive final bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus condution block test means "ablation successful".
Negative final bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus condution block test means "ablation unsuccessful"; ablation should be continued until success or terminated and classified as unsuccess.
Measured: ablation procedure
Number of Patients With Long-term Treatment Success
No recurrence of atrial flutter after ablation
Measured: 6 months after ablation
Number of Patients With Charred Catheter Tips
Char or coagulum formation on the catheter tip
Measured: ablation procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 May 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2004
- Primary completionMar 2008
- Study completionMar 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial FlutterStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 463 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Biotronik SE & Co. KG
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Thorsten Lewalter, Assoc. Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Medizinische Klinik and Poliklinik II, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00326001
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EP016
- Status last verified
- Aug 2009
- First submitted
- 12 May 2006
- Last updated
- 18 Feb 2010
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Lewalter T, Bitzen A, Wurtz S, Blum R, Schlodder K, Yang A, Lickfett L, Schwab JO, Schrickel JW, Tiemann K, Linhart M, Zima E, Merkely B, Luderitz B. Gold-tip electrodes--a new "deep lesion" technology for catheter ablation? In vitro comparison of a gold alloy versus platinum-iridium tip electrode ablation catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Jul;16(7):770-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.40832.x.
PubMed 16050836Berjano EJ. Gold-tip electrodes--a new 'deep lesion' technology for catheter ablation? In vitro comparison of gold alloy versus platinum-iridium tip electrode ablation catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Dec;16(12):1395-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.280_2.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 16403084Lickfett L, Mittmann-Braun E, Weiss C, Spencker S, Jung W, Haverkamp W, Willems S, Deneke T, Kautzner J, Wiedemann M, Siebels J, Pitschner HF, Hoffmann E, Hindricks G, Zabel M, Vester E, Schwacke H, Leyen JV, Mewis C, Bauer W, Lewalter T. Differences in clinical and echocardiographic parameters between paroxysmal and persistent atrial flutter in the AURUM 8 study: targets for prevention of persistent arrhythmia? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 Feb;36(2):194-202. doi: 10.1111/pace.12051.
PubMed 23379836Lewalter T, Weiss C, Spencker S, Jung W, Haverkamp W, Willems S, Deneke T, Kautzner J, Wiedemann M, Siebels J, Pitschner HF, Hoffmann E, Hindricks G, Zabel M, Vester E, Schwacke H, Mittmann-Braun E, Lickfett L, Hoffmeister S, Proff J, Mewis C, Bauer W; AURUM 8 Study Investigators. Gold vs. platinum-iridium tip catheter for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation: the AURUM 8 study. Europace. 2011 Jan;13(1):102-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq339. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
PubMed 20876601
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Feb 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- AURUM 8 - Ablation of the Cavotricuspid Isthmus in Patients With Atrial Flutter Using an 8 mm Gold Alloy Tip Electrode
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00326001
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EP016
- Conditions
- Atrial Flutter
- Keywords
- Transvenous Catheter Ablation, Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation, Atrial flutter, Catheter Ablation
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 463 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Biotronik SE & Co. KGIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2004
- Primary completion
- Mar 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 May 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 4 Feb 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the advantage of using a gold alloy tip electrode over a platinum/iridium alloy tip electrode in ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus in patients with atrial flutter.
Detailed description
Transvenous catheter ablation has become the therapy of choice for patients with recurring, isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter. Achieving bidirectional conduction block in the cavotricuspid isthmus is decisive for both acute and long-term therapy success and essentially depends on the selected ablation method and the lesion size. By using an 8 mm tip electrode instead of a conventional 4 mm electrode, deeper lesions can be made, thus significantly reducing the required number of energy applications for achieving a bidirectional conduction block. Experimental studies have proven that using an ablation electrode made of gold alloy allows the creation of deeper lesions than with conventional platinum-iridium electrodes. Due to the greater heat conductivity of the gold alloy as opposed to platinum-iridium, the cooling of the ablation electrode is improved and more electric energy can be transmitted to the tissue at identical temperatures.
The combination of both technologies in the form of an 8 mm-long gold electrode anticipates that the lesion depth required for an isthmus block can be achieved more quickly in comparison to the platinum-iridium electrode.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Gold tip catheter | Experimental | Device: Gold tip catheterGold tip catheter |
| Platinum-iridium tip catheter | Active comparator | Device: Platinum-iridium tip catheterPlatinum-iridium tip catheter |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- At least one electrocardiogram (ECG)-documented (can be older than 3 months), symptomatic, typical atrial flutter episode with either negative, sawtooth-shaped P-waves in leads II, III, and augmented voltage foot (aVF), or positive P-waves in leads II, III, and aVF
- At least one persistent, typical atrial flutter episode of over 2 hours that has been documented in the history in the patient file and/or ECG
- Signed informed consent form
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Patient has recently undergone isthmus ablation
- Acute coronary syndrome or myocardial infarction within the last 3 months
- Acute reversible causes for atrial flutter (e.g. acute myocarditis)
- Severe cardiac valvular defects
- Tricuspid valve replacement
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gold tip catheterRadiofrquency ablation using gold tip catheter | Device | Gold tip catheter |
| Platinum-iridium tip catheterRadiofrequency ablation using platinum-iridium tip catheter | Device | Platinum-iridium tip catheter |
Primary outcome
Duration of Energy Application
Time frame: ablation procedure
Cumulative amount of time current is flowing through the catheter tip. The current (in the radiofrequency range) is applied to ablate the cavotricuspid isthmus in the right atrium.
3 secondary outcomes
Ablation Success With the First Catheter
Time frame: ablation procedure
Number of Patients With Long-term Treatment Success
Time frame: 6 months after ablation
Number of Patients With Charred Catheter Tips
Time frame: ablation procedure
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Feb 2010.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 16050836Lewalter T, Bitzen A, Wurtz S, Blum R, Schlodder K, Yang A, Lickfett L, Schwab JO, Schrickel JW, Tiemann K, Linhart M, Zima E, Merkely B, Luderitz B. Gold-tip electrodes--a new "deep lesion" technology for catheter ablation? In vitro comparison of a gold alloy versus platinum-iridium tip electrode ablation catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Jul;16(7):770-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.40832.x.
- Background: PubMed 16403084Berjano EJ. Gold-tip electrodes--a new 'deep lesion' technology for catheter ablation? In vitro comparison of gold alloy versus platinum-iridium tip electrode ablation catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Dec;16(12):1395-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.280_2.x. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23379836Lickfett L, Mittmann-Braun E, Weiss C, Spencker S, Jung W, Haverkamp W, Willems S, Deneke T, Kautzner J, Wiedemann M, Siebels J, Pitschner HF, Hoffmann E, Hindricks G, Zabel M, Vester E, Schwacke H, Leyen JV, Mewis C, Bauer W, Lewalter T. Differences in clinical and echocardiographic parameters between paroxysmal and persistent atrial flutter in the AURUM 8 study: targets for prevention of persistent arrhythmia? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 Feb;36(2):194-202. doi: 10.1111/pace.12051.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20876601Lewalter T, Weiss C, Spencker S, Jung W, Haverkamp W, Willems S, Deneke T, Kautzner J, Wiedemann M, Siebels J, Pitschner HF, Hoffmann E, Hindricks G, Zabel M, Vester E, Schwacke H, Mittmann-Braun E, Lickfett L, Hoffmeister S, Proff J, Mewis C, Bauer W; AURUM 8 Study Investigators. Gold vs. platinum-iridium tip catheter for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation: the AURUM 8 study. Europace. 2011 Jan;13(1):102-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq339. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
Related trials for Atrial Flutter
Recruiting
Anatomical Navigation for Guided Electrophysiology in AFL and AFib
Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter
Recruiting
Feasibility Study on the VERAFEYE Imaging and Navigation System for Guided Catheter Ablation Procedures
Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter
Active, not recruiting
Repeat Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, Including Mitral Isthmus Catheter Ablation, With the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
Pericardiotomy in Cardiac Surgery
Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter
Recruiting
Atrial Flutter Ablation in the iCMR
Atrial Flutter Typical
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thorsten Lewalter, Assoc. Prof. Dr. principal investigator
Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Medizinische Klinik and Poliklinik II, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
28 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Gold tip catheter and Platinum-iridium tip catheter in people with Atrial Flutter, run by Biotronik SE & Co. KG at 28 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 28 sites in Germany, Hungary, Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Feb 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Duration of Energy Application (time frame: ablation procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00326001, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2010; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.